Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 5 in Molecular phylogeny, analysis of character evolution, and submersible collections enable a new classification of a diverse group of gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Nes subgroup), including nine new species and four new genera

Figure 5. Bayesian phylogeny from MrBayes analysis of the Gobiosomatini. Tip labels follow classification recognized prior to this study. Red bars indicate new classification from this study (Table 2). Support values at nodes are Bayesian posterior probabilities. The "?" for Chriolepis cf. fisheri refers to the incertae sedis status of this species (see "Remarks" section for Chriolepis). Species from the eastern Pacific are denoted with "(P)".

Figure 30. Varicus cephalocellatus papillae pattern, drawn from paratype USNM 426788 in Molecular phylogeny, analysis of character evolution, and submersible collections enable a new classification of a diverse group of gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Nes subgroup), including nine new species and four new genera

Figure 30. Varicus cephalocellatus papillae pattern, drawn from paratype USNM 426788. Illustration by J.L. Van Tassell. Note that two paratypes USNM 427227 have papillae rows 5i and 5s separated by the space of 1 or two papillae.

Figure 11 in Molecular phylogeny, analysis of character evolution, and submersible collections enable a new classification of a diverse group of gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Nes subgroup), including nine new species and four new genera

Figure 11. Pinnichthys aimoriensis in preservation. (A) holotype, 22.4 mm SL, CIUFES 2414; (B) paratype, 16.4 mm SL, AMNH 265021. Photos by J.L. Van Tassell.

Figure 18 in Molecular phylogeny, analysis of character evolution, and submersible collections enable a new classification of a diverse group of gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Nes subgroup), including nine new species and four new genera

Figure 18. Psilotris laetarii holotype, preserved, 23.6 mm SL, AMNH 261272. Photo by J.L. Van Tassell.

Figure 10 in Molecular phylogeny, analysis of character evolution, and submersible collections enable a new classification of a diverse group of gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Nes subgroup), including nine new species and four new genera

Figure 10. Pinnichthys aimoriensis holotype, prior to preservation, 22.4 mm SL, CIUFES 2414. Photo by Hudson Pinheiro.

Figure 27 in Molecular phylogeny, analysis of character evolution, and submersible collections enable a new classification of a diverse group of gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Nes subgroup), including nine new species and four new genera

Figure 27. Varicus cephalocellatus, illustration of holotype, 28.2 mm SL, USNM 427232, based on notes of live coloration, by R.G. Gilmore.

Figure 21 in Molecular phylogeny, analysis of character evolution, and submersible collections enable a new classification of a diverse group of gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Nes subgroup), including nine new species and four new genera

Figure 21. Psilotris laurae holotype, preserved, 26.8 mm SL, USNM 426779. Photo by J.L. Van Tassell.

Figure 8 in Molecular phylogeny, analysis of character evolution, and submersible collections enable a new classification of a diverse group of gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Nes subgroup), including nine new species and four new genera

Figure 8. Ancestral character estimation for (A) branched versus unbranched 5th pelvic ray and (B) presence/absence of a well-developed membrane connecting the innermost pelvic rays. Pies at nodes represent posterior probabilities for ancestor's character state. Species from the eastern Pacific are denoted with "(P)".

Figure 26 in Molecular phylogeny, analysis of character evolution, and submersible collections enable a new classification of a diverse group of gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Nes subgroup), including nine new species and four new genera

Figure 26. Varicus adamsi papillae pattern, composite from type series. Illustration by J.L. Van Tassell.

Figure 14. Pinnichthys saurimimica, holotype. 55.5 in Molecular phylogeny, analysis of character evolution, and submersible collections enable a new classification of a diverse group of gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Nes subgroup), including nine new species and four new genera

Figure 14. Pinnichthys saurimimica, holotype. 55.5 mm SL, USNM 427228, in situ at 282 m, Bahamas, photo by R.G. Gilmore, from the Johnson Sea Link II submersible.

Figure 15. Pinnichthys saurimimica holotype, 55.4 in Molecular phylogeny, analysis of character evolution, and submersible collections enable a new classification of a diverse group of gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae: Nes subgroup), including nine new species and four new genera

Figure 15. Pinnichthys saurimimica holotype, 55.4 mm SL, USNM 427228, preserved. Photo by J.L. Van Tassell.

FIGURE 3 in Using DNA barcoding to identify host-parasite interactions between cryptic species of goby (Coryphopterus: Gobiidae, Perciformes) and parasitic copepods (Pharodes tortugensis: Chondracanthidae, Cyclopoida)

FIGURE 3. Maximum likelihood tree derived from COI sequences of our copepod samples (labeled as P. tortugensis) plus voucher sequences from related copepods in the suborder Ergasilida (see Table 5 for a list). Sequences of copepods confamilial to P. tortugenis (Chondracanthidae) are labelled to species (and shaded blue in the online colour version), and members other taxa are labeled to family (and shaded pink in the colour online version). Support values for bipartitions are indicated, and divergence represented by dark blue scale bar = 3 %.

FIGURE 1 in Using DNA barcoding to identify host-parasite interactions between cryptic species of goby (Coryphopterus: Gobiidae, Perciformes) and parasitic copepods (Pharodes tortugensis: Chondracanthidae, Cyclopoida)

FIGURE 1. Maximum likelihood tree derived from COI sequences of our goby samples plus voucher sequences from all Coryphopterus species except C. punctipectophorus. Voucher sequences are identified by GenBank sequence ID. Sequences from several other goby species are included as outgroups (not all are identified in the figure; see Table 4 for a list). Support values for bipartitions are indicated, and divergence represented by scale bar = 6%.

FIGURE 2 in Using DNA barcoding to identify host-parasite interactions between cryptic species of goby (Coryphopterus: Gobiidae, Perciformes) and parasitic copepods (Pharodes tortugensis: Chondracanthidae, Cyclopoida)

FIGURE 2. Differences in body depth between goby species. A boxplot of body depth (as a % of body length in SL) for the three gobies, with sample sizes in parentheses. For the boxplot: box boundaries represent 25th and 75th percentiles respectively; line inside box indicates the median, lower and upper error lines indicate 10th and 90th percentiles respectively, and circles show data falling outside 10th and 90th percentiles.

FIGURE 4 in Callogobius falx, a new species of goby from southern Japan

FIGURE 4. Photograph of head of Callogobius falx (KAUM–I. 78359, 14.4 mm SL), showing variations insensory papillae rows 2 and 3.

FIGURE 2 in Callogobius falx, a new species of goby from southern Japan

FIGURE 2. Fresh (A) and preserved (B, C) paratype of Callogobius falx, KAUM–I. 78359, 14.4 mm SL,Yonaguni Island, Yaeyama Islands, Okinawa, Japan. (A, B): lateral view; (C): dorsal view.

FIGURE 1 in Callogobius falx, a new species of goby from southern Japan

FIGURE 1. Fresh (A) and preserved (B, C) holotype of Callogobius falx, OMNH-P 33597, 23.1 mm SL, Ishigaki Island, Yaeyama Islands, Okinawa, Japan. (A, B): lateral view; (C): dorsal view.

FIGURE 6 in Callogobius falx, a new species of goby from southern Japan

FIGURE 6. Distributional map of Callogobius falx. Red stars: records based on specimens examined in this study; red circles: records based on photographs.

FIGURE 5 in Callogobius falx, a new species of goby from southern Japan

FIGURE 5. Underwater photograph of Callogobius falx, Okinoerabu Island, Amami Islands, Kagoshima, Japan (specimen not collected). Photo by K. Uehara.

FIGURE 8 in Callogobius falx, a new species of goby from southern Japan

FIGURE 8. Photographs of heads of Callogobius plumatus, showing cephalic sensory system (holotype: left side; paratype: right side). Red and yellow labels indicate canal pores and papillae rows (in part), respectively (following Akihito & Meguro, 1977 and Delventhal & Mooi, 2013: fig. 5, table 2).