Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,025
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,025 results for “R&D”
Figure 7 from: Short G, Smith R, Motomura H, Harasti D, Hamilton H (2018) Hippocampus japapigu, a new species of pygmy seahorse from Japan, with a redescription of H. pontohi (Teleostei, Syngnathidae). ZooKeys 779: 27-49. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.779.24799
Figure 7 Comparison of live specimens of AHippocampusjapapigu photographed off Hachijo-jima Island, Japan (Richard Smith), and its most similar congener BHippocampuspontohi photographed off Tomia Island, southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia (Richard Smith). Note the differences in the anterodorsal area of the trunk in H.japapigu vs. H.pontohi: single vs. double pair of bilaterally paired wing-like protrusions behind the head, raised dorsal ridge vs. laterodorsal flat surface, and large and prominent vs. small eighth lateral trunk ridge spine. Abbreviations: SP-WP, single pair of bilaterally paired wing-like protrusions; DP-WP, double pair of bilaterally paired wing-like protrusions; DR, raised dorsal ridge; FS, flat dorsal surface; P-8LTR, prominent eighth lateral trunk ridge spine; S-8LTR, small eighth lateral trunk ridge spine.
Figure 5 from: Assou D, Segniagbeto GH, Radji R, Akiti J, Pando F (2018) Monitoring data of marine turtles on the Togolese coast during 2012–2013. ZooKeys 779: 109-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.779.26967
Figure 5 Sea turtle species considered in the survey: aLepidochelysolivaceabCheloniamydascDermochelyscoriacea.
Figure 5 from: Espinasa L, Robinson J, Soares D, Hoese G, Toulkeridis T, Toomey III R (2018) Troglomorphic features of Astroblepus pholeter, a cavefish from Ecuador, and possible introgressive hybridization. Subterranean Biology 27: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.27.27098
Figure 5 Specimens collected in 1962 (A modified from Collette 1962) and 2011 (B Modified from Soares and Niemiller 2013) had proportionally longer pectoral fins and maxillary barbels than specimens observed in the field in 2015 (C). Images have been scaled to the same body size (blue arrow). Notice that length of appendages in C–D (red arrows) are progressively smaller than in B and A (red plus yellow and green arrows).
Figure 1 from: Espinasa L, Robinson J, Soares D, Hoese G, Toulkeridis T, Toomey III R (2018) Troglomorphic features of Astroblepus pholeter, a cavefish from Ecuador, and possible introgressive hybridization. Subterranean Biology 27: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.27.27098
Figure 1 Specimens collected in 1962 (holotype, and paratypes of A.pholeter from left to right) 2011, 2015 and 2018. Notice that there is a progressive reduction in the expression of troglomorphic features. After 2011 the skin was distinctly more pigmented and the barbels and fins were shorter. Eyes are also embedded under a thinner dermal layer of skin. In 2011 the population was highly variable.
Figure 3 from: Espinasa L, Robinson J, Soares D, Hoese G, Toulkeridis T, Toomey III R (2018) Troglomorphic features of Astroblepus pholeter, a cavefish from Ecuador, and possible introgressive hybridization. Subterranean Biology 27: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.27.27098
Figure 3 AChaetostomamicrops (Surface catfish) BAstroblepuspholeter (Cave catfish). Both species inhabit the same river drainage.
Figure 4 from: Espinasa L, Robinson J, Soares D, Hoese G, Toulkeridis T, Toomey III R (2018) Troglomorphic features of Astroblepus pholeter, a cavefish from Ecuador, and possible introgressive hybridization. Subterranean Biology 27: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.27.27098
Figure 4 Cross section of the eye from Astroblepuspholeter (A, E–G) and Chaetostomamicrops (B–D). Notice that the pigmented epithelium (G) and iris of A.pholeter (E) are black, implying that they are not albino. Furthermore, A.pholeter eye has retained its lens, optic nerve, and its retina has all the normal layers, as the surface fish eye.
Figure 2 from: Espinasa L, Robinson J, Soares D, Hoese G, Toulkeridis T, Toomey III R (2018) Troglomorphic features of Astroblepus pholeter, a cavefish from Ecuador, and possible introgressive hybridization. Subterranean Biology 27: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.27.27098
Figure 2 A–C Live specimens of cave AstroblepuspholeterD Two different surface Astroblepus sp. from the Apurimac drainage. Notice contrasting coloration between A and B both of which were collected in 2011. Pigmentation level variability within the cave population in 2011 spanned from pinkish-white white (A) to pigmented (B) at levels equivalent to some surface Astroblepus (D). Specimens collected in 2011 had longer fins (A) than those collected in 2015 (C). Notice as well that some surface Astroblepus (bottom one in D) can have small eyes of a size equivalent to cave specimens. A Modified from Haspel et al. (2012)B Modified from the Soares Lab web-page-photo C Specimen collected on 2015 D Modified from Schaefer et al. (2011).
Figure 3 from: Davolos D, De Matthaeis E, Latella L, Tarocco M, Özbek M, Vonk R (2018) On the molecular and morphological evolution of continental and insular Cryptorchestia species, with an additional description of C. garbinii (Talitridae). ZooKeys 783: 37-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.783.26179
Figure 3 Cryptorchestiagarbinii, male 12 mm, Lake Iznik. A antenna I B antenna 2 C upper lip D lower lip E left mandible F right mandible G maxilla I H maxilla II I maxilliped J gnathopod II J' gnathopod II, detail.
Figure 6 from: Davolos D, De Matthaeis E, Latella L, Tarocco M, Özbek M, Vonk R (2018) On the molecular and morphological evolution of continental and insular Cryptorchestia species, with an additional description of C. garbinii (Talitridae). ZooKeys 783: 37-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.783.26179
Figure 6 Cryptorchestiagarbinii, male 12 mm, Lake Iznik. A epimeral plates I and II B pleopod II C uropod I D uropod II E uropod III F telson G female 13 mm, Lake Iznik, telson.
Figure 2 from: Davolos D, De Matthaeis E, Latella L, Tarocco M, Özbek M, Vonk R (2018) On the molecular and morphological evolution of continental and insular Cryptorchestia species, with an additional description of C. garbinii (Talitridae). ZooKeys 783: 37-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.783.26179
Figure 2 Molecular phylogeny by Bayesian method obtained in a combined analysis using mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene region (363 bp), and H3 histone (H3) gene fragment (330 bp) sequences (a total of 693 positions in the final dataset) from Cryptorchestia and Orchestia species reported in Table 2. Platorchestiaplatensis was used in this study as an outgroup species. Marked in blue: Cryptorchestia species; marked in green: Orchestia species. Numbers at nodes correspond to Bayesian posterior probability (PP) support values; PP values greater than 0.5 are labelled. The GenBank accession numbers of the DNA sequences from the COI and the histone H3 genes used in this study are reported in Table 2.
Figure 1 from: Davolos D, De Matthaeis E, Latella L, Tarocco M, Özbek M, Vonk R (2018) On the molecular and morphological evolution of continental and insular Cryptorchestia species, with an additional description of C. garbinii (Talitridae). ZooKeys 783: 37-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.783.26179
Figure 1 Occurrence of Cryptorchestiagarbinii in the Marmara region of Turkey and the habitats (insets) where specimens were collected. The 15 mm male (inset) of C.garbinii was found in Lake Sapanca.
Figure 5 from: Davolos D, De Matthaeis E, Latella L, Tarocco M, Özbek M, Vonk R (2018) On the molecular and morphological evolution of continental and insular Cryptorchestia species, with an additional description of C. garbinii (Talitridae). ZooKeys 783: 37-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.783.26179
Figure 5 Cryptorchestiagarbinii, male 12 mm, Lake Iznik. A pereopod III B pereopod IV B' pereopod IV, detail dactylus C pereopod V D pereopod VI E pereopod VII E' pereopod VII, carpus, propodus, and dactylus.
Figure 4 from: Davolos D, De Matthaeis E, Latella L, Tarocco M, Özbek M, Vonk R (2018) On the molecular and morphological evolution of continental and insular Cryptorchestia species, with an additional description of C. garbinii (Talitridae). ZooKeys 783: 37-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.783.26179
Figure 4 Cryptorchestiagarbinii, male 12 mm, Lake Iznik. A gnathopod I, outside left B gnathopod I, inside right C female 13 mm, Lake Iznik, gnathopod I D gnathopod II.
Figure 7 from: Davolos D, De Matthaeis E, Latella L, Tarocco M, Özbek M, Vonk R (2018) On the molecular and morphological evolution of continental and insular Cryptorchestia species, with an additional description of C. garbinii (Talitridae). ZooKeys 783: 37-54. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.783.26179
Figure 7 Cryptorchestiagarbinii, male 16 mm, Lake Iznik. A gnathopod II, palmar margin and dactylus B gnathopod I C maxilliped D pereopod IV, propodus and dactylus E uropod III F telson.
Supplementary material 2 from: Burkhard B, Maes J, Potschin-Young MB, Santos-Martín F, Geneletti D, Stoev P, Kopperoinen L, Adamescu CM, Adem Esmail B, Arany I, Arnell A, Balzan M, Barton DN, van Beukering P, Bicking S, Borges PAV, Borisova B, Braat L, M Brander LM, Bratanova-Doncheva S, Broekx S, Brown C, Cazacu C, Crossman N, Czúcz B, Daněk J, Groot R, Depellegrin D, Dimopoulos P, Elvinger N, Erhard M, Fagerholm N, Frélichová J, Grêt-Regamey A, Grudova M, Haines-Young R, Inghe O, Kallay TK, Kirin T, Klug H, Kokkoris IP, Konovska I, Kruse M, Kuzmova I, Lange M, Liekens I, Lotan A, Lowicki D, Luque S, Marta-Pedroso C, Mizgajski A, Mononen L, Mulder S, Müller F, Nedkov S, Nikolova M, Östergård H, Penev L, Pereira P, Pitkänen K, Plieninger T, Rabe S, Reichel S, Roche PK, Rusch G, Ruskule A, Sapundzhieva A, Sepp K, Sieber IM, Šmid Hribar M, Stašová S, Steinhoff-Knopp B, Stępniewska M, Teller A, Vackar D, van Weelden M, Veidemane K, Vejre H, Vihervaara P, Viinikka A, Villoslada M, Weibel B, Zulian G (2018) Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU - Lessons learned from the ESMERALDA approach of integration. One Ecosystem 3: e29153. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e29153
ESMERALDA Workshops overview
Supplementary material 1 from: Burkhard B, Maes J, Potschin-Young MB, Santos-Martín F, Geneletti D, Stoev P, Kopperoinen L, Adamescu CM, Adem Esmail B, Arany I, Arnell A, Balzan M, Barton DN, van Beukering P, Bicking S, Borges PAV, Borisova B, Braat L, M Brander LM, Bratanova-Doncheva S, Broekx S, Brown C, Cazacu C, Crossman N, Czúcz B, Daněk J, Groot R, Depellegrin D, Dimopoulos P, Elvinger N, Erhard M, Fagerholm N, Frélichová J, Grêt-Regamey A, Grudova M, Haines-Young R, Inghe O, Kallay TK, Kirin T, Klug H, Kokkoris IP, Konovska I, Kruse M, Kuzmova I, Lange M, Liekens I, Lotan A, Lowicki D, Luque S, Marta-Pedroso C, Mizgajski A, Mononen L, Mulder S, Müller F, Nedkov S, Nikolova M, Östergård H, Penev L, Pereira P, Pitkänen K, Plieninger T, Rabe S, Reichel S, Roche PK, Rusch G, Ruskule A, Sapundzhieva A, Sepp K, Sieber IM, Šmid Hribar M, Stašová S, Steinhoff-Knopp B, Stępniewska M, Teller A, Vackar D, van Weelden M, Veidemane K, Vejre H, Vihervaara P, Viinikka A, Villoslada M, Weibel B, Zulian G (2018) Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU - Lessons learned from the ESMERALDA approach of integration. One Ecosystem 3: e29153. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e29153
List of ESMERALDA poject partners
Figure 4 from: Seltmann K, Lafia S, Paul D, James S, Bloom D, Rios N, Ellis S, Farrell U, Utrup J, Yost M, Davis E, Emery R, Motz G, Kimmig J, Shirey V, Sandall E, Park D, Tyrrell C, Thackurdeen R, Collins M, O'Leary V, Prestridge H, Evelyn C, Nyberg B (2018) Georeferencing for Research Use (GRU): An integrated geospatial training paradigm for biocollections researchers and data providers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e32449. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e32449
Figure 4 Initial expertise (color of the bar) vs final confidence (y-axis) after the GRU workshop for participants responding to final survey. Example for how to interpret this graphic: the blue color bar at the top indicates that before the workshop roughly 50% of respondents said their knowledge of GEOLocate was "neither high nor low" but after the workshop these same respondents selected "much higher" for their knowledge of GEOLocate.
Figure 3 from: Seltmann K, Lafia S, Paul D, James S, Bloom D, Rios N, Ellis S, Farrell U, Utrup J, Yost M, Davis E, Emery R, Motz G, Kimmig J, Shirey V, Sandall E, Park D, Tyrrell C, Thackurdeen R, Collins M, O'Leary V, Prestridge H, Evelyn C, Nyberg B (2018) Georeferencing for Research Use (GRU): An integrated geospatial training paradigm for biocollections researchers and data providers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e32449. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e32449
Figure 3 An illustrative example of the two methods of uncertainty capture when georeferencing specimens. Method A, or polygon, creates a shape around the river (in blue). Method B, or point-radius, creates a circle of uncertainty around the origin. The illustration is based on output from GeoLocate software (Rios 2018) for both polygon and point-radius.
Figure 2 from: Seltmann K, Lafia S, Paul D, James S, Bloom D, Rios N, Ellis S, Farrell U, Utrup J, Yost M, Davis E, Emery R, Motz G, Kimmig J, Shirey V, Sandall E, Park D, Tyrrell C, Thackurdeen R, Collins M, O'Leary V, Prestridge H, Evelyn C, Nyberg B (2018) Georeferencing for Research Use (GRU): An integrated geospatial training paradigm for biocollections researchers and data providers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e32449. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e32449
Figure 2 This specimen record is an example from the University of California Collection Network Symbiota Portal. The large image is an edit of the record to include a medium size version of the image for easier viewing in this article. The portal software is open source and it is freely available for reuse through the Symbiota GitHub repository. The image is an example of a specimen record that includes an image of the specimen with label data. The image is contributed by the UCSB Invertebrate Zoology Collection at the Cheadle Center for Biodiversity and Ecological Restoration. The usage rights for the image is Creative Commons 0 (public domain).
Figure 1 from: Seltmann K, Lafia S, Paul D, James S, Bloom D, Rios N, Ellis S, Farrell U, Utrup J, Yost M, Davis E, Emery R, Motz G, Kimmig J, Shirey V, Sandall E, Park D, Tyrrell C, Thackurdeen R, Collins M, O'Leary V, Prestridge H, Evelyn C, Nyberg B (2018) Georeferencing for Research Use (GRU): An integrated geospatial training paradigm for biocollections researchers and data providers. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e32449. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e32449
Figure 1 Map created using SimpleMappr (Shorthouse 2010) that illustrates geolocated specimens for Genus=Cicindela in California as found on iDigBio.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.