Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
794
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
794 results for “publishing”
Data for article entitled 'Anti-hiatus tendencies in Spanish: Rate of occurrence and phonetic identification'', published in Linguistics
<p>see the article</p>
How do conservationists choose where to publish?
<p>Accompanying data for:</p> <p>Natalie Yoh, Mukhlish Jamal Musa Holle, Jasmin Willis, Lauren F. Rudd, Iain M. Fraser, Diogo Veríssimo. (2023). How do conservationists choose where to publish? Conservation Letters. In Review. </p>
Data for "Exploring the influences of cybernetic and dynamic controls on flexibility and performance" published by BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
<p>Appendices </p>
Data for article entitled 'Prediction in SVO and SOV languages: Processing and typological considerations', published in Linguistics
<p>see the publication for the description of the data and analysis</p>
MtDNA genomes from Ranis individuals aligned with previously published ancient & modern humans
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Beyond the print - virtual paleontology in science publishing, outreach and education
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Do urology journals enforce trial registration? A cross-sectional study of published trials
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Trends in authorship demographics for manuscripts published in Endocrine journals: A 70-year analysis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Multiple approaches converge on three biological subtypes of meningioma and extract new insights from published studies [RNA-Seq]
GEO Series GSE189672. Homo sapiens. 110 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
Gene expression studies of WT1 mutant Wilms tumor cell lines in the frame work of published kidney development data reveals their early kidney stem cell origin
GEO Series GSE220082. Homo sapiens. 34 samples. Type: Expression profiling by array; Third-party reanalysis.
Multiple approaches converge on three biological subtypes of meningioma and extract new insights from published studies [Methylation array]
GEO Series GSE189521. Homo sapiens. 110 samples. Type: Methylation profiling by genome tiling array.
Publishers allowing AAM ('postprint') posting to repositories without embargo
<p>This file contains information about publishers which allow the posting of author-accepted manuscripts ('postprint') accepted for publication in their subscription-based journals to open access repositories (e.g. the author's university repository) without any embargo.</p> <p>This file is a snapshot (downloaded 2020-01-25) of the live version available here: <a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n9NO5KZr3s7SXySq6y50_l-7X8Dax7mExSHQhMfvZEc/edit">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n9NO5KZr3s7SXySq6y50_l-7X8Dax7mExSHQhMfvZEc/edit</a></p> <p>Please see the live version via the link above for the most up-to-date version.</p> <p>This spreadsheet is shared under a cc-zero licence: https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/cc0/</p> <p>Please contact Stuart Taylor about any additions, deletions or corrections - stuart.taylor@royalsociety.org , these will be added to the live version available via the link above.</p>
Wikidata Dump Articles published in Nature
<p> RDF dump of wikidata produced with <a href="https://tools.wmflabs.org/wdumps/">wdumps</a>. </p> <p> <br> <a href="https://tools.wmflabs.org/wdumps/dump/147">View on wdumper</a> </p> <p> <b>entity count</b>: 0, <b>statement count</b>: 0, <b>triple count</b>: 0 </p>
Figure 28 in Revision of the Oriental genera of Agathidinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with an emphasis on Thailand and interactive keys to genera published in three different formats
Figure 28. Gyrochus sp. a lateral habitus b forewing
Figure 23 in Revision of the Oriental genera of Agathidinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with an emphasis on Thailand and interactive keys to genera published in three different formats
Figure 23. Coccygidium sp. a lateral habitus b forewing
Records published through GBIF with "Serido" or "Seridó" present in the locality field
<p>Records published through GBIF with the word "Serido" or "Seridó" present in the locality field. Junco do Seridó is a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipalities_of_Brazil">municipality</a> in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Para%C3%ADba">Paraíba</a> state in the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_Region,_Brazil">Northeast Region</a> of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazil">Brazil</a>.</p>
Figure 5 from: Menzel F, Gammelmo Ø, Olsen KM, Köhler A (2020) The Black Fungus Gnats (Diptera, Sciaridae) of Norway – Part I: species records published until December 2019, with an updated checklist. ZooKeys 957: 17-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.957.46528
Figure 5 Number of publications on Norwegian sciarid fauna per decade between 1730 and 2020.
Data for 'Reassessing the third person pronominal "copula" in spoken Israeli Hebrew', published in Linguistics 58.6
<p>The table contains the data used for the article on 'Reassessing the third person pronominal “copula” in spoken Israeli Hebrew', published in Linguistics 58.6; cf. the publication for details.</p>
Data from: Comparison of methodological quality of positive versus negative comparative studies published in Indian medical journals: a systematic review
Objectives: Published negative studies should have the same rigour of methodological quality as studies with positive findings. However, the methodological quality of negative versus positive studies is not known. The objective was to assess the reported methodological quality of positive versus negative studies published in Indian medical journals. Design: A systematic review (SR) was performed of all comparative studies published in Indian medical journals with a clinical science focus and impact factor >1 between 2011 and 2013. The methodological quality of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies. The results were considered positive if the primary outcome was statistically significant and negative otherwise. When the primary outcome was not specified, we used data on the first outcome reported in the history followed by the results section. Differences in various methodological quality domains between positive versus negative studies were assessed by Fisher's exact test. Results: Seven journals with 259 comparative studies were included in this SR. 24% (63/259) were RCTs, 24% (63/259) cohort studies, and 49% (128/259) case–control studies. 53% (137/259) of studies explicitly reported the primary outcome. Five studies did not report sufficient data to enable us to determine if results were positive or negative. Statistical significance was determined by p value in 78.3% (199/254), CI in 2.8% (7/254), both p value and CI in 11.8% (30/254), and only descriptive in 6.3% (16/254) of studies. The overall methodological quality was poor and no statistically significant differences between reporting of methodological quality were detected between studies with positive versus negative findings. Conclusions: There was no difference in the reported methodological quality of positive versus negative studies. However, the uneven reporting of positive versus negative studies (72% vs 28%) indicates a publication bias in Indian medical journals with an impact factor of >1.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.