Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE. Distribution of Dicorynia. Physical map of the Amazonian region with all analyzed specimens of Dicorynia. A large amount of point overlays leading to reduced number of visible points is due to the large percentage of materials being old collections that rely only on the name of the municipality or similar. Source: NASA with modifications. Note that almost all specimens are contained in areas with less than 200 m high and the high elevations of the Guiana shield may represent a form of isolation between the two species. in A Taxonomic Revision of the Amazonian Genus Dicorynia (Fabaceae: Dialioideae)

FIGURE. Distribution of Dicorynia. Physical map of the Amazonian region with all analyzed specimens of Dicorynia. A large amount of point overlays leading to reduced number of visible points is due to the large percentage of materials being old collections that rely only on the name of the municipality or similar. Source: NASA with modifications. Note that almost all specimens are contained in areas with less than 200 m high and the high elevations of the Guiana shield may represent a form of isolation between the two species.

FIGURE. Dicorynia paraensis Benth. A-B, H-N in A Taxonomic Revision of the Amazonian Genus Dicorynia (Fabaceae: Dialioideae)

FIGURE. Dicorynia paraensis Benth. A-B, H-N: Dicorynia paraensis var. uaupensis; C-G: Dicorynia paraensis var. macrophylla. A. Tree in floodable beach; B. Trunk; C. Tree in flooded "igapó" forest with trunk's base under water; D. Branch with leaves; E. Abaxial face of the leaf; F. Detail of branch with axillary and terminal buds; G. Terminal bud with a lateral axillary bud. H. Branch with leaves; I. Detail of the branch with common red stripes; J. Inflorescence; K. Flower; L. Branches bearing fruits; M. Fruit; N. Morphological variation in fruits and seeds of a single specimen. Photos by: A-I, L-N: Marcus Falcão & Lorena Tierno: Falcão, M.J. 90; 91; J-K: Vidal Mansano: Mansano, V.F. 117. Scale bar: A: 2m; B–C, I: 20cm; D–E: 10cm; H, L: 8cm; F–G, K, M-N: 1cm; J: 3cm.

FIGURE. Dicorynia guianensis Amshoff. A–B in A Taxonomic Revision of the Amazonian Genus Dicorynia (Fabaceae: Dialioideae)

FIGURE. Dicorynia guianensis Amshoff. A–B. Branches with leaves and inflorescences; C. Abaxial face of the leaflet; D. Inflorescence; E. Flowers (flower in anthesis on left and a senescent flower on the right with only the sepals and the gynoecium); F. Detail of the stamens and gynoecium (the polysporangy is externally noticeable in the anther of the longer stamen); G. Gynoecium in senescent flower; H. Young fruit; I. Mature fruit. Photos by: A–H: Hervé Galliffet; I: MNHN Virtual Herbarium. Scale bar. A–B: 4cm; C, E, I: 1cm; D: 5cm; F: 2mm; G–H: 1mm.

FIGURE. Dicorynia paraensis Benth. A in A Taxonomic Revision of the Amazonian Genus Dicorynia (Fabaceae: Dialioideae)

FIGURE. Dicorynia paraensis Benth. A. Tree; B–D. Dicorynia paraensis var. uaupensis; B. Branch with leaves; C. Petiolule and base of the leaflet; D. Axillary bud; E–G. Dicorynia paraensis var. paraensis; E. Branch with leaf and inflorescence; F. Petiolule and base of the leaflet; G. Axillary bud; H. Terminal bud with axillary lateral bud; I. Cymose subunit of the inflorescence with flower buds and some lateral bracts; J. Flower; K. Anther of the shorter stamen, dorsal view; L. Anther of the longer stamen, lateral view; M. Anther of the shorter stamen, frontal view; N–O. Apex of the anthers of the shorter and longer stamens with the two open pores; P–Q. Cross sections of the anthers of the longer and shorter stamens showing 4 and 11 sporangia; R. Longitudinal section of the flower showing the gynoecium displaced to its abaxial region and with three ovules, note the reduced hypanthium forming a cavity between carpel and sepal; S. Style and stigma; T–V. Morphological variation of the fruits; W. Common galled fruit; X. Seed. A, B, H, T: M.J. Falcão 91; C–D: R. Spruce 2772; E, I: A. Ducke s.n. RB35072; F: R. Spruce 1918; G: A. Ducke s.n. RB24185; J: V.F. Mansano 117; K–M: D. Cardoso 3440; N–S: H.C. Lima 3297; U, X: H.C. Lima 3197; V–W: O.C. Nascimento 216. Drawn by M. Falcão. Scale bar. A: 2m; B, E: 2cm; C–D, F–G, R: 2mm; H–J: 5mm; K–M, P–Q: 1mm; N–O, S: 0.5mm; T–X: 1cm.

FIGURE. Dicorynia guianensis Amshoff. A in A Taxonomic Revision of the Amazonian Genus Dicorynia (Fabaceae: Dialioideae)

FIGURE. Dicorynia guianensis Amshoff. A. Base of the trunk with buttresses; B. Branch with leaves and an inflorescence; C. Abaxial face of the leaflet; D. Petiolule and base of the leaflet; E. Terminal bud with lateral axillary bud; F. Axillary bud enveloped by stipules; G. Cymose subunit of the inflorescence with three flower buds, the two outermost sepals covering the bud; H. Flower; I. Flower without petals and stamens, showing the three external sepals and also the two internal sepals that are, in general, hidden by the petals; J. One of the adaxial sepals above the scars of the removed petals and stamens; K. longer stamen, side view; L, shorter stamen, dorsal view; M–N. Cross sections of the anthers of the longer and shorter stamens, showing 8 and 11 sporangia; O. senescent flower with gynoecium; P. Detail of style and stigma; Q. Fruit; R. Seed. A: J.Y. Goret s.n.; B, C, G–J, O: M.F. Prevost 2946 and H. Galliffet s.n.; D–F: G. Stahel s.n. RB756216; K–N, P: F. Billiet 4375; Q: S. Mori 15430; E: Gentry 63030. Drawn by M. Falcão. Scale bar. A: 25cm; B: 2.5cm; C, Q: 2cm; D–E, H–J: 3mm; F, K–O: 1mm; G, R: 5mm; P: 0.5mm.

FIG. 4 in Towards Navigating the Minotaur's Labyrinth: Cryptic Diversity and Taxonomic Revision within the Speciose Genus Hipposideros (Hipposideridae)

FIG. 4. Morphological comparisons of the frontal sacs and noseleaves in A — Macronycteris commersonii (FMNH 213588, ♀), Madagascar, Province d'Antsiranana, Réserve Spéciale d'Ankarana [now Parc National], near Andrafiabe Cave, 31 October 2010; B — M. gigas (FMNH 128212, ♀), Senegal, Casmance, Diabane, 12 km SW of Adeane, 15 January 1983; C — M. vittatus (FMNH 192800, ♀, sequenced for Cyt-b), Tanzania, Pemba Island, Kaskazini Region, Micheweni District, Kilijini Village, 3 August 2006; and D — Doryrhina cyclops (FMNH 164973), Uganda, Masindi District, Budongo Forest, 25 June 1998. The form of M. cryptovalorona is similar to M. commersonii and no comparative specimen material was available for M. thomensis. Drawing by Velizar Simeonovski

FIG. 3 in Towards Navigating the Minotaur's Labyrinth: Cryptic Diversity and Taxonomic Revision within the Speciose Genus Hipposideros (Hipposideridae)

FIG. 3. Time tree resulting from MCMCTREE analysis in PAML using the MrBayes topology shown in Fig. 1. The analysis was constrained using two calibrations, one applied to the root and a fossil calibration applied to the split between Rhinonicteris and Cloeotis (see Materials and Methods for details). Numbers at nodes are divergence time estimates in millions of years. 95% confidence intervals for each node are denoted by grey bars. See Table 1 for definitions of acronyms

FIG. 2 in Towards Navigating the Minotaur's Labyrinth: Cryptic Diversity and Taxonomic Revision within the Speciose Genus Hipposideros (Hipposideridae)

FIG. 2. Resulting MrBayes tree from Bayesian analysis of the Cyt-b dataset under a GTR+G model of sequence evolution. The analysis was rooted using Doryrhina cyclops (not shown). Support values for both the ML and BA analysis are shown, with posterior probabilities converted to percentages. Clades referring to the commersonii species groups identified in Rakotoarivelo et al. (2015) are highlighted. Samples sequenced as part of this study, including a re-sequenced sample of H. vittatus FMNH 192857 from Pemba, are highlighted in bold. See Table 1 for definitions of acronyms. Where sampling sites are known for Malagasy samples, the site is given followed by the code MG to indicate Madagascar

FIG. 1 in Towards Navigating the Minotaur's Labyrinth: Cryptic Diversity and Taxonomic Revision within the Speciose Genus Hipposideros (Hipposideridae)

FIG. 1. Phylogenetic tree inferred from Bayesian analysis in MrBayes from the ca. 3 kb nuclear intron dataset under a fully partitioned model. At each node nodal support is shown as bootstrap support from the RAxML analysis and posterior probabilities from the Bayesian analysis converted to percentages. Black squares denote highly supported nodes with bootstrap values of 100 for the ML analysis and a posterior probability of 1. Filled circles denote African species and open circles denote Asian taxa. '-' indicates that the relationship was not recovered in the ML analysis. See Systematic Summary for full description of the newly elevated genera Macronycteris and Doryrhina. See Table 1 for definitions of acronyms

Figure 86. Shaanxinus mingchihensis Lin, 2019. A, male left spinnerets. B, female spinnerets. Scale bar 0.1 in Evolution of nuptial-gift-related male prosomal structures: taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of the genus Oedothorax (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae)

Figure 86. Shaanxinus mingchihensis Lin, 2019. A, male left spinnerets. B, female spinnerets. Scale bar 0.1 mm.

Figure 83 in Evolution of nuptial-gift-related male prosomal structures: taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of the genus Oedothorax (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae)

Figure 83. Tmeticus tolli Kulczyński, 1908. A–C, male left palp. A, retrolateral view. B, embolic division, prolateral view. C, distal part of tibia. D, E, epigyne. D, dorsal view. E, external morphology. Scale bars 0.1 mm.

Figure 82 in Evolution of nuptial-gift-related male prosomal structures: taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of the genus Oedothorax (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae)

Figure 82. Nasoona crucifera (Thorell, 1895). A–D, male left palp. A, retrolateral view. B, tibia and patella, retrolateral view. C, retrolateral view, with copulatory bulb half-expanded. D, ventral view. E, male left spinnerets. F, female right spinnerets. Scale bars 0.1 mm.

Figure 85 in Evolution of nuptial-gift-related male prosomal structures: taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of the genus Oedothorax (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae)

Figure 85. Nasoona setifera (Tanasevitch, 1998). A–, male right palp, images flipped horizontally. A, retrolateral view. B, prolateral view. C, dorsal view. D, ventral view. E, male posterior median spinnerets and posterior lateral spinnerets, dorsal view. Scale bar 0.1 mm.

Figure 80 in Evolution of nuptial-gift-related male prosomal structures: taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of the genus Oedothorax (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae)

Figure 80. 'Oedothorax' stylus Tanasevitch, 2015. A–D, male right palp, images flipped horizontally. A, retrolateral view. B, prolateral view. C, dorsal view. D, ventral view. E, F, epigyne. E, ventrolateral view. F, external morphology. G, male posterior median spinnerets and posterior lateral spinnerets, dorsal view. H, female spinnerets. Scale bars 0.1 mm.

Figure 81 in Evolution of nuptial-gift-related male prosomal structures: taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of the genus Oedothorax (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae)

Figure 81. 'Oedothorax' uncus Tanasevitch, 2015. A–D, male right palp, images flipped horizontally. A, retrolateral view. B, prolateral view. C, dorsal view. D, ventral view. E, F, epigyne. E, ventral view. F, external morphology. G, H, male posterior median spinnerets and posterior lateral spinnerets. G, lateral view. H, dorsal view. I, female spinnerets. J, female posterior median spinnerets and posterior lateral spinnerets. Scale bars 0.1 mm.

Figure 79 in Evolution of nuptial-gift-related male prosomal structures: taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of the genus Oedothorax (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae)

Figure 79. 'Oedothorax' paracymbialis Tanasevitch, 2015. A–E, male right palp, images flipped horizontally. A, retrolateral view. B, prolateral view. C, dorsal view. D, ventral view. E, embolic division, prolateral view. F, male spinnerets. Scale bars 0.1 mm.

Figure 87 in Evolution of nuptial-gift-related male prosomal structures: taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of the genus Oedothorax (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae)

Figure 87. Female spinnerets of: A, Linyphia triangularis (Clerck, 1757); B, Stemonyphantes lineatus (Linnaeus, 1758). Scale bar 0.1 mm.

Figure 78 in Evolution of nuptial-gift-related male prosomal structures: taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of the genus Oedothorax (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae)

Figure 78. 'Oedothorax' nazareti Scharff, 1989. A–E, male left palp. A, retrolateral view. B, prolateral view. C, dorsal view. D, ventral view. E, apical view. F, G, epigyne. F, ventrolateral view. G, external morphology. H, male right spinnerets. I, female left spinnerets. Scale bar 0.1 mm.

Figure 77 in Evolution of nuptial-gift-related male prosomal structures: taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of the genus Oedothorax (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae)

Figure 77. 'Oedothorax' meghalaya Tanasevitch, 2015. A–D, male right palp, images flipped horizontally. A, retrolateral view. B, prolateral view. C, embolic division, prolateral view. D, suprategulum, retrolateral view. E, male spinnerets. Scale bars 0.1 mm.

Figure 76 in Evolution of nuptial-gift-related male prosomal structures: taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of the genus Oedothorax (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae)

Figure 76. 'Oedothorax' kodaikanal Tanasevitch, 2015. A–D, male right palp, images flipped horizontally. A, retrolateral view. B, prolateral view. C, dorsal view. D, embolic division, prolateral view. E, F, male left palp. E, apical view. F, embolic division, dorsal view. G, male posterior median spinnerets and posterior lateral spinnerets, dorsal view. H, male left spinnerets. Scale bars 0.1 mm.