Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
972
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
972 results for “morphological barcode”
FIGURE 16 in Morphological description and DNA barcoding of Ceratophysella gracilimucronata sp. nov. (Collembola: Hypogastruridae) from China, with a key to species of the C. armata group of the Sino-Japanese Region
FIGURE 16. Molecular phylogeny tree based on mtDNA COI gene.
FIGURE 15 in Morphological description and DNA barcoding of Ceratophysella gracilimucronata sp. nov. (Collembola: Hypogastruridae) from China, with a key to species of the C. armata group of the Sino-Japanese Region
FIGURE 15. Furca of C. gracilimucronata sp. nov.
FIGURE 12 in Morphological description and DNA barcoding of Ceratophysella gracilimucronata sp. nov. (Collembola: Hypogastruridae) from China, with a key to species of the C. armata group of the Sino-Japanese Region
FIGURE 12. Chaetotaxy of head of C. gracilimucronata sp. nov.
FIGURE 14 in Morphological description and DNA barcoding of Ceratophysella gracilimucronata sp. nov. (Collembola: Hypogastruridae) from China, with a key to species of the C. armata group of the Sino-Japanese Region
FIGURE 14. Chaetotaxy of Abd. I–V of C. gracilimucronata sp. nov.
FIGURE 13 in Morphological description and DNA barcoding of Ceratophysella gracilimucronata sp. nov. (Collembola: Hypogastruridae) from China, with a key to species of the C. armata group of the Sino-Japanese Region
FIGURE 13. Chaetotaxy of Th. I–III of C. gracilimucronata sp. nov.
TABLE 1 in Morphological description of a new species of Capnia (Plecoptera: Capniidae) with DNA barcoding of genus members from the Russian Far East
<p><b>TABLE 1.</b> List of taxa, isolate numbers, sex, locations and GenBank accessions.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Species</th><th>Isolate</th><th>Sex</th><th>Country</th><th>Coordinates</th><th>Accession number</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Capnia khingana</i></th><td>TVA62</td><td>Male</td><td>Russia: Amurskaya Oblast, Amur River Basin, Eracta River</td><td>49.09285 N 130.591083 E</td><td>OL343052</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. khingana</i></th><td>TVA95</td><td>Male</td><td>Russia: Amurskaya Oblast, Amur River Basin, Eracta River</td><td>49.09285 N 130.591083 E</td><td>OL343053</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. khingana</i></th><td>TVA160</td><td>Female</td><td>Russia: Khabarovskiy Kray, Amur River Basin, Khankuka stream</td><td>50.757554 N 137.413548 E</td><td>OL343054</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. yavorskayae</i> <b>sp. nov.</b></th><td>TVA163</td><td>Female</td><td>Russia: Khabarovskiy Kray, Amur River Basin, Khankuka Stream</td><td>50.756951 N 137.412730 E</td><td>OL343055</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. yavorskayae</i> <b>sp. nov.</b></th><td>TVA184</td><td>Female</td><td>Russia: Khabarovskiy Kray, Amur River Basin, Khankuka Stream</td><td>50.768183 N 137.421572 E</td><td>OL343062</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. nigra</i></th><td>TVA166</td><td>Male</td><td>Russia: Khabarovskiy Kray, Amur River Basin, Gorin River</td><td>50.890137 N 137.457746 E</td><td>OL343056</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. nearctica</i></th><td>TVA167</td><td>Male</td><td>Russia: Magadan Oblast, Ola River</td><td>59.576183 N 151.270017 E</td><td>OL343057</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. bargusinica</i></th><td>TVA168</td><td>Female</td><td>Russia: Magadan Oblast, Ola River Basin, Donyshko River</td><td>60.385667 N 151.475 E</td><td>OL343058</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. kurnakovi</i></th><td>TVA170</td><td>Female</td><td>Russia: Magadan Oblast, Ola River</td><td>59.576183 N 151.270017 E</td><td>OL343059</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. rara</i></th><td>TVA171</td><td>Female</td><td>Russia: Magadan Oblast, Ola River</td><td>59.576183 N 151.270017 E</td><td>OL343060</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. rara</i></th><td>TVA172</td><td>Male</td><td>Russia: Magadan Oblast, Ola River</td><td>59.576183 N 151.270017 E</td><td>OL343061</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. aligera</i></th><td>TVA186</td><td>Male</td><td>Russia: Khabarovskiy Kray, Amur River Basin, Gorin River</td><td>50.929194 N 137.754936 E</td><td>OL343063</td></tr></tbody></table>
Fig. 2 in COI mtDNA barcoding and morphology for the description of a new species of ricinuleid of the genus Pseudocellus (Arachnida: Ricinulei: Ricinoididae) from El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico
Fig. 2. Maximum Likelihood gene tree (highest log: -3134.13), constructed with COI barcode sequences of Pseudocellus Platnick, 1980. Colors of the branches indicate species; same colors are in the bars, which represent the different species delimitation methods used for their validation. Red branches + red circle indicate the new species described herein. Numbers below the bars represent the number of species recovered under each species delimitation method (not considering the outgroup: Ricinoides feae (Hansen, 1921)): 1: morphology (M). 2: GMYC. 3: ABGD with recursive partitions (RP). 4: ABGD with initial partitions (IP). 5: bPTP with IB. 6: bPTP with ML. 7: ASAP. Numbers on the branches are Bootstrap support values (>50% significant).
Figs 27–31 in COI mtDNA barcoding and morphology for the description of a new species of ricinuleid of the genus Pseudocellus (Arachnida: Ricinulei: Ricinoididae) from El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico
Figs 27–31. Pseudocellus giribeti sp. nov. Paratype, ♀ (MCZ 80010). 27–28. Habitus, dorsal and ventral views. 29–31. Spermathecae, anterior, posterior and lateral views, respectively. Scale bars: 27–28 = 2 mm; 29–31 = 0.2 mm.
Figs 11–19 in COI mtDNA barcoding and morphology for the description of a new species of ricinuleid of the genus Pseudocellus (Arachnida: Ricinulei: Ricinoididae) from El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico
Figs 11–19. Pseudocellus giribeti sp. nov. Holotype, ♂ (MCZ 80010). 11. Cucullus, dorsal view. 12. Left chelicera, dorsal view. 13–14. Right tibia II, prolateral and proventral views. 15–16. Right metatarsus II, prolateral and proventral views. 17. Right femur II, prolateral view. 18. Detail of the movable and fixed claws of the right pedipalp, retrolateral view. 19. Right pedipalp tibia, retrolateral view. Scale bars: 11, 13–17, 19 = 0.5 mm; 12 = 0.2 mm; 18 = 0.1 mm.
Supplementary material 4 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S4. Vegetative and floral characters
Supplementary material 3 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S3. List of Ficus sequences retrieved from GenBank
Supplementary material 2 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S2. List of Ficus species collected from different parts of India
Figure 2 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure 2 Maximum Clade Credibility (MCC) tree from Bayesian analysis using two DNA barcode markers (ITS2+trnH-psbA) with posterior probabilities values in percentage that are shown at nodes.
Figure 1 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure 1 Typical morphology of Ficus benghalensis and Ficus krishnae. A1, A2Ficus benghalensis twig and figs (PC: Jana Venkata Sudhakar) B1, B2Ficus krishnae twig and figs (PC: Jana Venkata Sudhakar)
Supplementary material 7 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure S2. Multiple sequence alignment of trnH-psbA in Ficus krishnae and Ficus benghalensis
Figure 3 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure 3 Total evidence MCC tree from Bayesian analysis of the two DNA markers and morphology. The Posterior Probabilities values in percentage are shown at the nodes.
Supplementary material 6 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure S1. Multiple sequence alignment of ITS2 in Ficus krishnae and Ficus benghalensis
Supplementary material 1 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S1. The PCR reaction conditions for the barcoding loci
Supplementary material 5 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S5. The data matrix of vegetative and floral characters
Supplementary material 4 from: Krčmar S, Kučinić M, Pezzi M, Bruvo Mađarić B (2022) DNA barcoding of the horsefly fauna (Diptera, Tabanidae) of Croatia with notes on the morphology and taxonomy of selected species from Chrysopsinae and Tabaninae. ZooKeys 1087: 141-161. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1087.78707
Figure S2. NJ tree for the tribes Haematopotini and Heptatomini
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.