Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 6 in The life cycle in late Paleozoic eryopid temnospondyls: developmental variation, plasticity and phylogeny

Figure 6. Cranial morphology in eryopid temnospondyls, exemplified by reconstructed skull dorsal views. (a) Actinodon frossardi (after Werneburg, 1997), (b) Osteophorus roemeri (after Meyer, 1860), (c) Glaukerpeton avinoffi (after Werneburg and Berman, 2012), (d) Onchiodon labyrinthicus (after Boy, 1990), (e) Onchiodon thuringiensis (after Werneburg, 2008), (f) Clamorosaurus nocturnus (after Gubin, 1983, and photographs courteously provided by Ralf Werneburg), (g) Eryops sp. from the Moran Formation (MCZ 1914), (h) Eryops anatinus (AMNH 4310), (i) Eryops megacephalus (MCZ 1129). Darker shading figures depressions on the dorsal side of the skull roof.

Figure 7 in The life cycle in late Paleozoic eryopid temnospondyls: developmental variation, plasticity and phylogeny

Figure 7. Morphospace occupation of eryopiform skulls, showing differences in ontogenetic change and morphometric variance between Onchiodon labyrinthicus and Sclerocephalus spp. and adult skulls of other eryopids. (a) PC1–PC2 axes, (b) areas occupied by immature Onchiodon and Sclerocephalus compared, (c) close-up of (a) with focus on variation in O. labyrinthicus, and (d) PC1 plotted against size.

Figure 2 in The life cycle in late Paleozoic eryopid temnospondyls: developmental variation, plasticity and phylogeny

Figure 2. Larger juveniles of Onchiodon labyrinthicus Geinitz. (a) LFUG 13570, (b) LFUG 13501, (c) MMG SaP 356, (d) LFUG 13391, (e) LFUG 13398, (f) LFUG 13609, (g) LFUG 13047. Darker shading figures depressions on the dorsal side of the skull roof. Scale equals 10 mm.

Figure 4 in The life cycle in late Paleozoic eryopid temnospondyls: developmental variation, plasticity and phylogeny

Figure 4. Reconstruction of skulls in dorsal view Onchiodon labyrinthicus Geinitz. (a) MMG SaP 237, (b) LFUG 13343, (c) LFUG 13405, (d) MMG SaP 356, (e) LFUG 13391, (f) LFUG 13570, (g) LFUG 13501, (h) LFUG 13292. Darker shading figures depressions on dorsal side of skull roof. Scale equals 10 mm.

Figure 5 in The life cycle in late Paleozoic eryopid temnospondyls: developmental variation, plasticity and phylogeny

Figure 5. Palate of Onchiodon labyrinthicus Geinitz, in ventral view. (a) LFUG 13394, (b) LFUG 13514. Darker grey is the inner side of the skull roof. Scale equals 10 mm.

Figure 3 in The life cycle in late Paleozoic eryopid temnospondyls: developmental variation, plasticity and phylogeny

Figure 3. Ontogeny of the dermal ornament in Onchiodon labyrinthicus Geinitz. (a) LFUG 13343, (b) MMG SaP 390, (c) MMG SaP 356, (d) MMG SaP 361, (e) LFUG 13395, (f) LFUG 13391, (g) LFUG 13570, (h) LFUG 13292.

Figs 35.–38 in Phylogeny of the genus Paramyiolia Shiraki (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetini) with descriptions of five Chinese species

Figs 35.–38. Female postabdomen of Paramyiolia yunnana. (35) Postadbomen in ventral view; (36) Aculeus in lateral view; (37) Oviscape and eversible membrane in ventral and dorsal view; (38) Spermatheca. This figure is shown in color in a supplementary document online as Suppl. Figs. 35–38 in Florida Entomologist 98(1) (March 2015) at http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse.

Figs. 25–29 in Phylogeny of the genus Paramyiolia Shiraki (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetini) with descriptions of five Chinese species

Figs. 25–29. Epandrial complexes of Chinese Paramyiolia in caudal and lateral views (all from holotypes). (25) P. atra; (26) P. atrifasciata; (27) P. melanogaster; (28) P. nigrihumera; (29) P. yunnana. This figure is shown in color in a supplementary document online as Suppl. Figs. 25–29 in Florida Entomologist 98(1) (March 2015) at http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse.

Figs. 9–18 in Phylogeny of the genus Paramyiolia Shiraki (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetini) with descriptions of five Chinese species

Figs. 9–18. Chinese Paramyiolia species in lateral and dorsal views (all male holotype specimens). (9, 10) P. atra; (11, 12) P. atrifasciata; (13, 14) P. melanogaster; (15, 16) P. nigrihumera; (17, 18) P. yunnana. This figure is shown in color in a supplementary document online as Suppl. Figs. 9–18 in Florida Entomologist 98(1) (March 2015) at http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse.

Figs. 19–24 in Phylogeny of the genus Paramyiolia Shiraki (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetini) with descriptions of five Chinese species

Figs. 19–24. Heads of Chinese Paramyiolia in fronto-lateral view. (19) P. atra, holotype male; (20) P. atrifasciata, holotype male; (21) P. melanogaster, holotype male; (22) P. nigrihumera, holotype male; (23) P. yunnana, holotype male; (24) P. yunnana, paratype female (size and position of missing anterior frontal setae marked in dotted lines based on a Japanese P. cornuta female – Ito, 1985). This figure is shown in color in a supplementary document online as Suppl. Figs. 19–24 in Florida Entomologist 98(1) (March 2015) at http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse.

Figs. 3–8 in Phylogeny of the genus Paramyiolia Shiraki (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetini) with descriptions of five Chinese species

Figs. 3–8. Male thorax and abdominal patterns of the Paramyiolia cornuta species group in dorsal view. (3) P. atra; (4) P. atrifasciata; (5) P. melanogaster; (6) P. nigrihumera; (7) P. yunnana; (8) P. cornuta.

Figure 1 in The first molecular phylogeny of Buthidae (Scorpiones)

Figure 1: Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree of Old World and New World Buthidae inferred from a 296 bp fragment of the mitochondrial ribosome 16S region. The DNA substitution model was TVM + I + Γ; base frequencies: πA = 0.34, πT = 0.42, πC = 0.14, Rmatrix = (A-G = 11.50, A-C = 2.95, C-G ~ 0, A-T = 2.44, G-T = 1, C-T = 11.50), gamma shape parameter α = 0.67, and proportion of invariable sites = 0.28, respectively. The tree was rooted using the outgroup species Pseudochactas ovchinnikovi.

Figures 14-33 in The scorpion sternum: structure and phylogeny (Scorpiones: Orthosterni)

Figures 14-33: Internal view of scorpion sternum showing posterior process(es) for sternum types 1 (Figs. 14-19) and 2 (Figs. 20-33). Note, sternum is angled vertically in order to show profile of posterior process(es), therefore proportions are skewed (apex is closest to the horizontal plane). 14. Pseudochactas ovchinnikovi 15. Chaerilus variegatus 16. Apistobuthus pterygocercus 17. Mesobuthus caucasicus 18. Centruroides exilicauda 19. Rhopalurus junceus 20. Iurus dufoureius 21. Hadrurus concolor 22. Heterometrus longimanus 23. Diplocentrus ochoterenai 24. Opisthacanthus lepturus 25. Brachistosternus sp. 26. Megacormus gertschi 27. Euscorpius italicus 28. Chactas sp. 29. Brotheas granulatus 30. Vaejovis punctipalpi 31. Serradigitus subtilimanus 32. Smeringurus mesaensis 33. Superstitionia donensis.

Figure 3 in The scorpion sternum: structure and phylogeny (Scorpiones: Orthosterni)

Figure 3: Sternocoxal area of fossil (Lower and Upper Carboniferous, after Kjellesvig-Waering, 1986) and Recent scorpion genera (type 1 sterna), Pseudochactidae, Chaerilidae, Buthidae, and Microcharmidae. Gigantoscorpio willsi (Holosternina), Lower Mississippian (354-339 Ma), Watersonia airdriensis (Lobosternina), Lower Pennsylvanian (323-307 Ma), Palaeopisthacanthus schucherti (Orthosternina), Upper Pennsylvanian (307-290 Ma).

Figure 2 in The scorpion sternum: structure and phylogeny (Scorpiones: Orthosterni)

Figure 2: Fundamental sternum types illustrating special terminology (external view). Sternum type 1: Pseudochactas ovchinnikovi (left) and Mesobuthus caucasicus. Sternum type 2: Calchas nordmanni (left) and Cercophonius squama.

Figure 1 in The scorpion sternum: structure and phylogeny (Scorpiones: Orthosterni)

Figure 1: Methods of measurement of the sternocoxal area. CII-L = leg coxa II length, CIII-L = leg coxa III length, CIV-L = leg coxa IV length, L = sternum length, PW = sternum posterior width, AW = sternum apex width, AL = sternum apex lateral side length.

Figure 44 in The scorpion sternum: structure and phylogeny (Scorpiones: Orthosterni)

Figure 44: Charogram showing hypothesized evolution of the scorpion sternum for infraorder Orthosterni. Character derivations are depicted on the bottom of the branches (enclosed in rectangles) and subclades and taxa are shown on the top of branches or as terminal nodes. Type 1 sterna is considered plesiomorphic to all Recent scorpions being established for the palaeopisthacanthids; all type 1 sterna Recent taxa are depicted as "primitive" and type 2 sterna taxa, globally identified as those scorpions complying to Type C orthobothriotaxy, are considered "non-primitive". We suggest all buthoid scorpions exhibit some degree of horizontal compression, but in highly variable degrees. It is unknown whether the bothriurid genus Lisposoma shows vertical compression, so it is depicted separate from the bothriurids proper which exhibit vertical compression.

Figures 9-13 in The scorpion sternum: structure and phylogeny (Scorpiones: Orthosterni)

Figures 9-13: Sterna of Superstitioniidae. 9. Superstitionia donensis. 10. Alacran tartarus. 11. Typhlochactas mitchelli (after Sissom, 1988, Fig. 3, in part). 12. Sotanochactas elliotti (after Mitchell, 1971, Fig. 4, in part). 13. Typhlochactas granulosus (after Sissom, et al, 1998, Fig. 2, in part). Note, posterior edges of sterna in Figs. 12 & 13 are not necessarily complete due to overlaying genital operculum in original figures.

Figure 6 in The scorpion sternum: structure and phylogeny (Scorpiones: Orthosterni)

Figure 6: Sternocoxal area of Recent scorpion genera (type 2 sterna), Euscorpiidae, Chactidae, and two genera with unclear placement: Anuroctonus (now in Iuridae) and Belisarius (now in Troglotayosicidae).

Figure 8 in The scorpion sternum: structure and phylogeny (Scorpiones: Orthosterni)

Figure 8: Sternocoxal area of Recent scorpion genera (type 2 sterna), Iuridae and Superstitioniidae.