Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure5 in Habitat-Based Breeding Strategies of Female Hoplobatrachus occipitalis (Anura: Dicroglossidae) from Daloa Department, Midwest of Côte d'Ivoire

Figure5. Egg diameter frequency distribution of female Hoplobatrachus occipitalis from Fatiga and Zaliohouan in Daloa Department.

Fig 5 in Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping

Fig 5. Phylogenetic tree based on a portion of the COI barcoding segment showing the relationships of selected non-target moth specimens (g54xxx) isolated from fall armyworm pheromone traps relative to selected GenBank sequences. GenBank sequences are indicated by species name followed by accession number. Fall armyworm R-strain and fall armyworm C-strain are consensus sequences for the 2 fall armyworm host strains.

Figure4 in Habitat-Based Breeding Strategies of Female Hoplobatrachus occipitalis (Anura: Dicroglossidae) from Daloa Department, Midwest of Côte d'Ivoire

Figure4. Spatial variability in gonado-somatic index of female Hoplobatrachus occipitalis from Fatiga and Zaliohouan in Daloa Department

Figure3 in Habitat-Based Breeding Strategies of Female Hoplobatrachus occipitalis (Anura: Dicroglossidae) from Daloa Department, Midwest of Côte d'Ivoire

Figure3. Spatial variability in size (SVL) of female Hoplobatrachus occipitalis from Fatiga and Zaliohouan in Daloa Department

Figure8 in Habitat-Based Breeding Strategies of Female Hoplobatrachus occipitalis (Anura: Dicroglossidae) from Daloa Department, Midwest of Côte d'Ivoire

Figure8. Regression between female size (SVL) and egg diameter in Hoplobatrachus occipitalis from Fatiga and Zaliohouan in Daloa Department

Fig 3 in Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping

Fig 3. Field screening of home-made trap design (Jar2 and Jar4) in comparison to Unitrap model using pheromone lures (all combined) over 2 maize cropping systems (maize monoculture and maize-cowpea intercrops) during the second planting season. The traps were installed on 30 Sep 2019 during the second maize growing season, and the moth collection period covered Oct to Dec. The data denotes average numbers per trap type for overall 3-d intervals moth collections with standard errors.

Fig 2 in Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping

Fig 2. Preliminary field test of pheromone traps using the 2-component fall armyworm pheromone PSU lure during the first maize growing season: comparison between home-made Jar2 trap and Unitrap model (A) (average number per trap type for overall weekly moth collections; error bars represent standard error and different lowercase letters denote statistical difference), and fluctuation in moth trap catch of the Unitrap-2-component lure combination (B) (moth collections were done every 3 d).

Fig 4 in Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping

Fig 4. Moth trap catch of 3 pheromone lures over 2 cropping systems (maize monoculture and maize-cowpea intercrops) using Unitraps. The traps were installed on 30 Sep 2019 during the second maize growing season and allowed to collect moths Oct to Dec 2019. The 4-component lure type (4C) contained Z9-14:Ac (78.3%), (Z)-11-hexadecenyl acetate (Z11-16:Ac) (3.6%), Z7-12:Ac (11.2%), and (Z)-9-dodecenyl acetate (Z9-12:Ac) (7.0%); whereas the 3-component lure type (3C) was composed of Z9-14:Ac (66.1%), Z11-16:Ac (4.7%), and Z7-12:Ac (29.3%); and the 2-component lure type (2C) of Z9-14:Ac (90.5%) and Z7-12:Ac (9.5%). The data represents average numbers for overall 3-d intervals moth collections.

Fig 1 in Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping

Fig 1. Traps used in study: commercially available Unitrap (A); home-made Jar2 trap constructed from 2 L plastic jar (B). The Jar2 trap was designed by G.T. TepaYotto and J.K. Winsou.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2019View details →

Fig. 3 in Use of baits for the evaluation of underground termites (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae) in different habitats of the southern Amazon region

Fig. 3. Queen of Heterotermes tenuis (center circle) in early stage of egg production (circle on lef), and colony formation inside the cardboard bait in southern Amazonia.

Fig 4 in Spatiotemporal distribution of stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in peach orchards and surrounding habitat

Fig 4. Interpolated maps of Euschistus tristigmus adult distributions in peach orchards and surrounding habitat early season (wk 1), mid-season (wk 8), and late season (wk 12) in 2002 and 2003.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2019View details →

Fig. 2 in Use of baits for the evaluation of underground termites (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae) in different habitats of the southern Amazon region

Fig. 2. Predominant termites in this study in southern Amazonia: (A) Nasutitermes sp. soldier; (B) Heterotermes tenuis soldier.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in Use of baits for the evaluation of underground termites (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae) in different habitats of the southern Amazon region

Fig. 1. Spatial arrangement of Termitrap® baits within plots for subterranean termite survey in different environments in southern Amazonia.

Fig. 2 in Spatiotemporal distribution of stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in peach orchards and surrounding habitat

Fig. 2. Seasonal capture of Euschistus servus and Euschistus tristigmus in pheromone-baited traps; (A) mean number of E. servus and E. tristigmus per pheromonebaited trap in peach and non-crop habitat over time in 2002; (B) mean number of E. servus and E. tristigmus per pheromone-baited trap in peach and surrounding habitat over time in 2003.

Fig 3 in Spatiotemporal distribution of stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in peach orchards and surrounding habitat

Fig 3. Interpolated maps of Euschistus servus adult distributions in peach orchards and surrounding non-crop habitat early season (wk 1), mid-season (wk 8), and late season (wk 12) in 2002 and 2003.

Fig. 1 in Spatiotemporal distribution of stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in peach orchards and surrounding habitat

Fig. 1. Spatiotemporal distribution patterns of Euschistus servus and Euschistus tristigmus: (A) number of traps in which E. servus and E. tristigmus were present in peach and surrounding habitat; (B) number of traps in which stink bugs were present over the season in peach and surrounding habitat.

Fig 4 in First record of Raorchestes longchuanensis Yang and Li, 1978 (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from northeastern Bangladesh suggests wide habitat tolerance

Fig 4. Advertisement call of Raorchestes longchuanensis at ambient air temperature 27.4 °C. (A) A call consists of five call groups, numbers on the top indicate pulse numbers in the respective call group. (B) Spectrogram of the call. (C) First call group with four pulses. (D) A pulse of the 5th call group.

Fig 3 in First record of Raorchestes longchuanensis Yang and Li, 1978 (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from northeastern Bangladesh suggests wide habitat tolerance

Fig 3. Color variation in Raorchestes longchuanensis. (A) Pale brown dorsum with faint ")(" mark; (B) Dark brown dorsum with prominent ")(" mark; (C) Dark chocolate color dorsum without mid-dorsal line; (D) Dark chocolate color dorsal side with narrow yellow mid-dorsal line.

Fig 2 in First record of Raorchestes longchuanensis Yang and Li, 1978 (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from northeastern Bangladesh suggests wide habitat tolerance

Fig 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA genes, showing the identity of the specimens as Raorchestes longchuanensis. The red box shows the specimens from the present study.

Fig 1 in First record of Raorchestes longchuanensis Yang and Li, 1978 (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from northeastern Bangladesh suggests wide habitat tolerance

Fig 1. External features of Raorchestes longchuanensis. (A) Calling position of an adult male individual where transparent gular sack is prominent; (B) Ventral aspect of hand with rounded, disked fingertips; (C) Ventral aspect of foot with rounded disked, reddish toe tips.