Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
7,169
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
7,169 results for “30”
Set of N integers between -30 and 30 with sum and cubic sum up to zero for 4<N<13
<p><strong>Anomalies</strong></p> <p>Solutions obtained with the python package: <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5526558">anomalies</a> based on the method to find anomaly free solutions of the standard model extended with an Abelian Dark Symmetry with <em>N</em> right-handed singlet chiral fields described in <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.13729">arXiv:1905.13729</a> [PRL]:</p> <p><strong>Data scheme</strong></p> <ul> <li>'l': integer lists → input to obtain the 'solution' by using the <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5526558">anomalies</a> package</li> <li>'k': integer lists → input to obtain the 'solution' by using hte <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5526558">anomalies</a> package</li> <li>'solution': list → of integers, <span class="math-tex">\(\large z_i\)</span><sub> </sub>which satisfy <span class="math-tex">\(\large\displaystyle{ \sum_{i=1}^N z_i=0}\)</span> and <span class="math-tex">\(\large\displaystyle{ \sum_{i=1}^N z_i^3=0}\)</span> .</li> <li>'n': integer → number of integers in 'solution', <em>N</em>.</li> </ul> <pre> <strong>USAGE</strong></pre> <pre><code class="language-python">#Example of JSON file usage in Python with pandas (see also json module) >>> import pandas as pd >>> df=pd.read_json('solutions.json.gz') >>> df[:2] l k solution gcd n 0 [1, 2] [0, -3] [1, 5, -7, -8, 9] 1 5 1 [-2, -1] [0, -1] [2, 4, -7, -9, 10] 1 5</code></pre> <p><strong>Data:</strong><br> 2 296 615 solutions with <span class="math-tex">\(\large 5\le N\le 12\)</span> integers until `|32|` [JSON]</p>
Global mangrove soil carbon data set at 30 m resolution for year 2020 (0-100 cm)
<p>Global soil organic carbon stocks in mangrove forests at 30 m resolution, and predicted for 2020 using spatiotemporal ensemble machine learning. Soil organic carbon stock (t/ha) was derived using predictions of soil organic carbon content and bulk density (BD) to 1 m soil depth, which were then aggregated to calculate soil organic carbon stocks.</p> <p>The "mangroves_tiles_SOC_predictions_2020.zip" file contains predictions of SOC content, Bulk Density (BD) and aggregated SOC stocks (t/ha) for 0—100 cm depth interval. Example of a tile:</p> <ul> <li>089E_21N (89E to 90E, 21N to 22N): <ul> <li>sol_db.od_mangroves.typology_m_30m_s0..100cm_2020_global_v0.1.tif = predicted BD aggregated to 0—100 cm;</li> <li>sol_soc.wpct_mangroves.typology_m_30m_s0..0cm_2020_global_v1.1.tif = predicted SOC content (%) at 0 cm depth (surface soil);</li> <li>sol_soc.wpct_mangroves.typology_m_30m_s0..100cm_2020_global_v1.1.tif = predicted SOC content (%) for 0—100 cm;</li> <li>sol_soc.tha_mangroves.typology_m_30m_s0..100cm_2020_global_v0.1.tif = predicted SOC stocks in t/ha (mean value);</li> <li>sol_soc.tha_mangroves.typology_l.std_30m_s0..100cm_2020_global_v0.1.tif = predicted SOC stocks in t/ha lower 95% probability prediction interval;</li> <li>sol_soc.tha_mangroves.typology_u.std_30m_s0..100cm_2020_global_v0.1.tif = predicted SOC stocks in t/ha upper 95% probability prediction interval;</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>Example of a tile:</p> <ul> <li>class : RasterLayer</li> <li>dimensions : 4004, 4004, 16032016 (nrow, ncol, ncell)</li> <li>resolution : 0.00025, 0.00025 (x, y)</li> <li>extent : 88.9995, 90.0005, 20.9995, 22.0005 (xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax)</li> <li>crs : +proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs</li> <li>source : sol_db.od_mangroves.typology_m_30m_s0..0cm_2002_global_v0.1.tif</li> </ul> <p>To load global mosaics <strong><strong>Soil Carbon t/ha Maps (0—100cm)</strong></strong> as COGs directly into QGIS or similar, best use:</p> <ul> <li> <p><a href="https://s3.eu-central-1.wasabisys.com/openlandmap/mangroves/sol/soc.tha_tnc.mangroves.typology_m_30m_b0..100cm_2019_2020_go_epsg.4326_v1.2.tif">https://s3.eu-central-1.wasabisys.com/openlandmap/mangroves/sol/soc.tha_tnc.mangroves.typology_m_30m_b0..100cm_2019_2020_go_epsg.4326_v1.2.tif</a></p> </li> <li> <p><a href="https://s3.eu-central-1.wasabisys.com/openlandmap/mangroves/sol/soc.tha_tnc.mangroves.typology_l.std_30m_b0..100cm_2019_2020_go_epsg.4326_v1.2.tif">https://s3.eu-central-1.wasabisys.com/openlandmap/mangroves/sol/soc.tha_tnc.mangroves.typology_l.std_30m_b0..100cm_2019_2020_go_epsg.4326_v1.2.tif</a></p> </li> <li> <p><a href="https://s3.eu-central-1.wasabisys.com/openlandmap/mangroves/sol/soc.tha_tnc.mangroves.typology_u.std_30m_b0..100cm_2019_2020_go_epsg.4326_v1.2.tif">https://s3.eu-central-1.wasabisys.com/openlandmap/mangroves/sol/soc.tha_tnc.mangroves.typology_u.std_30m_b0..100cm_2019_2020_go_epsg.4326_v1.2.tif</a></p> </li> </ul>
Predicted soil organic carbon stock at 30 m in t/ha for 0-100 cm depth global / update of the map of mangrove forest soil carbon
<p>This is the 2nd update of maps produced by <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabe1c">Sanderman et al (2018)</a>. The improvements to the <a href="https://opengeohub.github.io/spatial-prediction-eml/spatiotemporal-prediction-of-soil-organic-carbon.html">3D spatial predictions</a> include:</p> <ul> <li> <p>new updated global mangrove coverage map (contact Thomas Worthington),</p> </li> <li> <p>spatiotemporal predictions to account for differences in spectral reflectance at the time of field work,</p> </li> <li> <p>additional SOC points <a href="https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41558-018-0162-5/MediaObjects/41558_2018_162_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx">published in Rovai et al. (2018)</a> used in model training (see gpkg file).</p> </li> </ul> <p>To open map in QGIS or similar, drag and drop the *.tif files. You can than add also the gpkg file contain the training points.</p> <p>Production steps (ensemble predictions using SuperLearner) are explained in detail at: </p> <ul> <li>R code: <a href="https://github.com/whrc/Mangrove-Soil-Carbon/">https://github.com/whrc/Mangrove-Soil-Carbon/</a> (see "R_code/GMW_mangroves_SOC_30m.R")</li> <li>Tutorial: <a href="https://envirometrix.github.io/PredictiveSoilMapping/soilmapping-using-mla.html#ensemble-predictions-using-superlearner-package">"Predictive Soil Mapping with R"</a></li> </ul> <p>Produced for the purpose of Mangrove Restoration Potential Map funded by The Nature Conservancy and IUCN. Contact TNC: Emily Landis <<a href="mailto:elandis@TNC.ORG">elandis@TNC.ORG</a>>. Contact IUCN / University of Cambridge: Thomas Worthington <<a href="mailto:taw52@cam.ac.uk">taw52@cam.ac.uk</a>>.</p> <ul> <li>The mangrove restoration potential map is available at: <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fmaps.oceanwealth.org%2Fmangrove-restoration%2F">http://maps.oceanwealth.org/mangrove-restoration/</a></li> </ul>
Groundwater well pressure, temperature, conductance, salinity and oxygen measurements for GCE-LTER study hammock HN_i_1 from 30-Oct-2008 to 03-Dec-2013
Groundwater pressure, temperature and other parameters (e.g. conductance, salinity, oxygen and pH) were measured using various instruments installed in PVC wells at the GCE-LTER HN_i_1 holocene study hammock from 30-Oct-2008 to 03-Dec-2013. Observations were logged continuously at 15 minute intervals, and accumulated data were downloaded from loggers using manufacturer-provided communications software semi-monthly, then imported into MATLAB for post-processing, quality control and documention. Raw, unvented pressure readings were corrected for atmospheric pressure and sensor height from the bottom of the well to generate corrected pressure readings. Separate data tables are provided for each combination of instrument and well due to differences in parameters measured and post-processing steps, but all tables include detailed information on location and well characteristics to support integration and analysis. These data were collected as part of the Georgia Coastal Ecosystems LTER Intensive Hammock Characterization and Hammock Groundwater Modeling projects, and will be used for groundwater modeling studies at two marsh hammocks on Sapelo Island, Georgia.
Experimentally manipulated biota over a 30-40d period in two streams with distinctly different macrobiotic assemblages
Here we test the hypothesis that differences in macrobiotic assemblages can lead to differences in the quantity and quality of organic matter in benthic depositional environments among streams in montane Puerto Rico. We experimentally manipulated biota over a 30-40d period in two streams with distinctly different macrobiotic assemblages: one characterized by high densities of omnivorous shrimps (Decapoda: Atyidae and Xiphocarididae) and no predaceous fishes. To incorporate the natural hydrologic regime and to avoid confounding artifacts associated with cage enclosure/exclosure (e.g., high sedimentation), we used electricity as a mechanism for experimental exclusion, in situ. In each stream, shrimps and/or fishes were excluded from specific areas of rock substrata in four pools using electric "fences" attached to solar-powered fence chargers. In the stream lacking predaceous fishes (Sonadora), the unelectrified control treatment was almost exclusively dominated by high densities of omnivorous shrimps that constantly ingested fine particulate material from rock surfaces. Consequently, the control had significantly lower levels of inorganic sediments, organic material, carbon and nitrogen than the exclusion treatment, as well as less variability in these parameters. Tenfold more organic material (as ash-free dry mass, AFDM) and fivefold more nitrogen accrued in shrimp exclosures (10.6 g AFDM/m2, 0.2 g N/m2) than in controls (1.1 g AFDM/m2, 0.04 g N/m2). By reducing th quantity of fine particulate organic material and associated nitrogen in benthic environments, omnivorous shrimps potentially affect the the supply of this important resource to other trophic levels. The small amount of fine particulate organic matter (FPOM) that remained in control treatments (composed of sparse algal cells0 was of higher quality than that in shrimp exclosures. This is evidenced by the significantly lower carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio (an indicator of food quality, with relatively low C
Wood to Soil 0-10 cm data and Wood to Soil 10-20 cm data to detect the imprint of decaying logs (30-80 cm diameter) from two hurricane cohorts (Hugo, 1989, and Georges, 1998)
Many trees fell during Hurricanes Hugo (1989) and Georges (1998) in Puerto Rico. A debris removal experiment suggested that coarse woody hurricane debris slowed canopy recovery by fueling microbial nitrogen immobilization. We analyzed C, N, microbial biomass C and root length in paired soil samples taken under versus 20-50 cm away from large trunks of two species felled by Hugo and Georges three times during wet and dry seasons during the two years after Georges. Data on soil P and other nutrients have not yet been analyzed. Soil microbial biomass, C and N were higher under than near logs of both age cohorts. Frass from wood boring beetles may induce the early effects. Root length was greater under logs at 0-10 cm depth during the dry season, and away from logs in the wet season, but varied independently of microbial biomass. Thus decaying wood can provide resources exploited by tree roots. Percent soil C and N were significantly higher under than near logs in both the 0-10 and 10-20 cm samples. Microbial biomass C varied significantly among seasons at 0-10 cm depth but differences between positions (under vs away) were only suggestive. Surface soil on the upslope side of the logs had significantly more N and microbial biomass, likely from accumulation of leaf litter above the logs on steep slopes. This study shows that C and N accumulate significantly more in soil under than near decaying logs, even in logs that had only decayed for 7 months, and thus contributes to soil heterogeneity. Tree roots track and exploit resource and nutrient hotspots as they change locations between seasons, so the soil heterogeneity in soil fertility is important for forest productivity. Soil phosphorus (P) availability is most often the most limiting nutrient in wet tropical forests. Total soil P was measured by complete digestion in samples from the upper 10 cm; Olsen extractable P (available) was also measured. Total soil P concentrations were significantly greater under than away fr
Reference Windfarm database CNk2 30
<p>Dataset for TotalControl reference windfarm database simulation of a conventionally neutral boundary layer flow with 30 degree inflow wind direction angle (Casename CNk2 30)</p> <p>Included Python files for loading and visualizing the data. Use the plot_*.py files.</p> <p>Further information, including description of the case and dataset can be found in the deliverable report at: </p> <p><a href="https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/727680/results">https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/727680/results</a></p> <p>"Database for reference wind farms part 2: windfarm simulations"</p>
Reference Windfarm database CNk4 30
<p>Dataset for TotalControl reference windfarm database simulation of a conventionally neutral boundary layer flow with 30 degree inflow wind direction angle (Casename CNk4 30)</p> <p>Included Python files for loading and visualizing the data. Use the plot_*.py files.</p> <p>Further information, including description of the case and dataset can be found in the deliverable report at: </p> <p><a href="https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/727680/results">https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/727680/results</a></p> <p>"Database for reference wind farms part 2: windfarm simulations"</p>
Reference Windfarm database PDk 30
<p>Dataset for TotalControl reference windfarm database simulation of a pressure-driven high Reynolds number boundary layer flow with 30 degree inflow wind direction angle (Casename PDk 30)</p> <p>Included Python files for loading and visualizing the data. Use the plot_*.py files.</p> <p>Further information, including description of the case and dataset can be found in the deliverable report at: </p> <p><a href="https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/727680/results">https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/727680/results</a></p> <p>"Database for reference wind farms part 2: windfarm simulations"</p>
GLC_FCS30: Global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery
<p>A novel global 30-m land-cover product with a fine classification system for the year 2015 (GLC_FCS30-2015). The product was produced by combining time-series of Landsat imagery and high-quality training data from the GSPECLib (Global Spatial Temporal Spectra Library) on the Google Earth Engine computing platform. First, the global training data from the GSPECLib were developed by applying a series of rigorous filters to the MCD43A4 NBAR and CCI_LC land-cover products. Secondly, a local adaptive random forest model was built for each 5°×5° geographical tile by using the multi-temporal Landsat spectral and textures features of the corresponding training data, and the GLC_FCS30-2015 land-cover product containing 30 land-cover types was generated for each tile.</p>
Películas en top 30 de varios géneros de filmaffinity
<p>El dataset contiene diversa información obtenida de la página de filmaffinity (propietaria en todo caso de la información) de las películas que formas el top 30 de varios géneros cinematográficos.</p> <p>El objetivo final de este dataset es dar respuesta a la práctica 1 de la asignatura Tipología y ciclo de vida de los datos, impartida dentro del Máster en Ciencia de Datos de la UOC.</p>
FUI Water Color product of inland waters in China at 30-m in 2015
<p>The first 30-meters FUI water color product of China. The product was developed using time-series Landsat 8 imagery and FUI water color retrieval method. Taking into account the huge amount of computational and storage space required for the national-scale water color mapping, the high-performance Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud-based platform was introduced to support the computation. First, a cloud-free composite in China for the summer of 2015 was generated using time-series Landsat-8 imagery and the Best-Available-Pixel (BAP) compositing algorithm. Then, the first 30-merters FUI water color product of China was developed using the generated BAP composite and the Google Earth Engine computing platform. The first 30-meters FUI water color product can promote the understanding of the water color of water bodies in China, and provide very important information for preserving and restoring inland water quality.</p> <p>The details of the product is described in "<a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/59060333-b9fc-45ad-b381-3b05a866de6c/FUI_WaterColor_2015China_Readme_V1.1.docx?versionId=44bb5bbb-407f-4dc8-b183-fa1a3843488f">FUI_WaterColor_2015China_Readme_V1.1.docx</a>".</p>
Global Pasture Watch - Annual grassland class and extent maps at 30-m spatial resolution (2000—2024)
<h2><strong>Sub-dataset: Dominant grassland class, 2018-2020</strong></h2> <h2>Description</h2> <p>Global annual grassland class and extent for 2000—2024 produced by <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04139-6">Parente et al. (2024)</a> within the scope of the <a href="https://landcarbonlab.org/data/global-grassland-and-livestock-monitoring/">Global Pasture Watch initiative</a>. The mapped grassland extent includes any land cover type, which contains at least <strong>30% of dry or wet low vegetation</strong>, dominated by grasses and forbs (less than 3 meters) and a:</p> <ul> <li>maximum of 50% tree canopy cover (greater than 5 meters),</li> <li>maximum of 70% of other woody vegetation (scrubs and open shrubland), and</li> <li>maximum of 50% active cropland cover in mosaic landscapes of cropland & other vegetation.</li> </ul> <p>The grassland extent is classified into two classes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Cultivated grassland</strong>: Areas where grasses and other forage plants have been intentionally planted and managed, as well as areas of native grassland-type vegetation where they clearly exhibit active and 'heavy' management for specific human-directed uses, such as directed grazing of livestock.</li> <li><strong>Natural/semi-natural grassland</strong>: Relatively undisturbed native grasslands/short-height vegetation, such as steppes and tundra, as well as areas that have experienced varying degrees of human activity in the past, which may contain a mix of native and introduced species due to historical land use and natural processes. In general, they exhibit natural-looking patterns of varied vegetation and clearly ordered hydrological relationships throughout the landscape.</li> <li><strong>Open shrubland (v2-beta): </strong>Land on which the vegetation is dominated by low-growing woody plants, characterized by a sparse distribution of shrubs and dominated by woody perennials. Typically covers 50—75% of the area, with significant open ground (with or without herbaceous understory) between them, where shrub canopies are less than 10 meters in diameter, and tree cover is below 10%, meaning they do not form a continuous or semi-continuous canopy.</li> </ul> <p>The dataset is organized in 69 global mosaics (25 years for each time series) in COG (Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF) format, WGS84 Coordinate Systems (EPSG:4326) and pixel size equal to 0.00025 degrees, including:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of cultivated grassland (values range from 0–100),</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of natural/semi-natural grassland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of open shrubland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Dominant</strong> class (0-other land cover, 1-cultivated grassland and 2-natural/semi-natural grassland, 3-open shrubland).</li> </ul> <p>All raster files are in unsigned <code>8-bit integer format</code> and use <code>255</code> as no-data value (pixels ignored by prediction), following an specific naming convention:</p> <ol> <li>Project name: Global Pasture Watch (<code>gpw</code>)</li> <li>Class name: cultivated grassland (<code>cultiv.grassland</code>), natural/semi-natural grassland (<code>nat.semi.grassland</code>), open shrubland (<code>open.shrubland</code>) and dominant grassland (<code>grassland</code>)</li> <li>Procedure combination: Random Forest (<code>rf</code>), median filter (med.filt) and balanced threshold (<code>bthr</code>).</li> <li>Variable type: probability (<code>p</code>) and factor class (<code>c</code>)</li> <li>Spatial resolution: 30m</li> <li>Begin of time reference: date of first Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20240101</code>)</li> <li>End of time reference: date of last Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20241231</code>)</li> <li>Spatial extent: global (<code>go</code>)</li> <li>Coordinate system: World Geodetic System 1984, used in GPS (<code>epsg.4326</code>)</li> <li>Version: v2</li> </ol> <h3>Related resources</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Maps of dominant grassland:</strong><br><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15646181">2000-2002</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644486"> 2003-2005</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644623"> 2006-2008</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647042"> 2009-2011</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647681"> 2012-2014</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648306"> 2015-2017</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648551"> 2018-2020</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648751"> 2021-2023</a> <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15649332">2024</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of cultivated grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of natural/semi-natural grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li> <div><strong>Grassland reference samples based on VHR imagery (2000–2024):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15631655">GeoPackage files</a></div> </li> <li><strong>Global machine learning models (Random Forest):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952806">Parquet and joblib python files</a></li> <li><strong>Reference sampling design derived by FSCV:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11391517">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Harmonized reference samples based on existing LULC dataset:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13951976">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Source code for reproducibility:<br></strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952867">GitHub release</a><strong><br></strong></li> <li><strong>Mapping feedback tool:</strong><br><a href="https://geo-wiki.org">GeoWiki</a></li> <li><strong>Data catalogues:</strong><br><a href="https://stac.openlandmap.org/gpw_ggc-30m/collection.json?.language=en">OpenLandMap STAC</a> <a href="https://global-pasture-watch.projects.earthengine.app/view/ggc-30m">Google Earth Engine</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>For questions of bugs/inconsistencies related to the dataset raise a GitHub issue in <a href="https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch">https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch</a></p>
Global Pasture Watch - Annual grassland class and extent maps at 30-m spatial resolution (2000—2024)
<h2><strong>Sub-dataset: Dominant grassland class, 2021-2023</strong></h2> <h2>Description</h2> <p>Global annual grassland class and extent for 2000—2024 produced by <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04139-6">Parente et al. (2024)</a> within the scope of the <a href="https://landcarbonlab.org/data/global-grassland-and-livestock-monitoring/">Global Pasture Watch initiative</a>. The mapped grassland extent includes any land cover type, which contains at least <strong>30% of dry or wet low vegetation</strong>, dominated by grasses and forbs (less than 3 meters) and a:</p> <ul> <li>maximum of 50% tree canopy cover (greater than 5 meters),</li> <li>maximum of 70% of other woody vegetation (scrubs and open shrubland), and</li> <li>maximum of 50% active cropland cover in mosaic landscapes of cropland & other vegetation.</li> </ul> <p>The grassland extent is classified into two classes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Cultivated grassland</strong>: Areas where grasses and other forage plants have been intentionally planted and managed, as well as areas of native grassland-type vegetation where they clearly exhibit active and 'heavy' management for specific human-directed uses, such as directed grazing of livestock.</li> <li><strong>Natural/semi-natural grassland</strong>: Relatively undisturbed native grasslands/short-height vegetation, such as steppes and tundra, as well as areas that have experienced varying degrees of human activity in the past, which may contain a mix of native and introduced species due to historical land use and natural processes. In general, they exhibit natural-looking patterns of varied vegetation and clearly ordered hydrological relationships throughout the landscape.</li> <li><strong>Open shrubland (v2-beta): </strong>Land on which the vegetation is dominated by low-growing woody plants, characterized by a sparse distribution of shrubs and dominated by woody perennials. Typically covers 50—75% of the area, with significant open ground (with or without herbaceous understory) between them, where shrub canopies are less than 10 meters in diameter, and tree cover is below 10%, meaning they do not form a continuous or semi-continuous canopy.</li> </ul> <p>The dataset is organized in 69 global mosaics (25 years for each time series) in COG (Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF) format, WGS84 Coordinate Systems (EPSG:4326) and pixel size equal to 0.00025 degrees, including:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of cultivated grassland (values range from 0–100),</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of natural/semi-natural grassland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of open shrubland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Dominant</strong> class (0-other land cover, 1-cultivated grassland and 2-natural/semi-natural grassland, 3-open shrubland).</li> </ul> <p>All raster files are in unsigned <code>8-bit integer format</code> and use <code>255</code> as no-data value (pixels ignored by prediction), following an specific naming convention:</p> <ol> <li>Project name: Global Pasture Watch (<code>gpw</code>)</li> <li>Class name: cultivated grassland (<code>cultiv.grassland</code>), natural/semi-natural grassland (<code>nat.semi.grassland</code>), open shrubland (<code>open.shrubland</code>) and dominant grassland (<code>grassland</code>)</li> <li>Procedure combination: Random Forest (<code>rf</code>), median filter (med.filt) and balanced threshold (<code>bthr</code>).</li> <li>Variable type: probability (<code>p</code>) and factor class (<code>c</code>)</li> <li>Spatial resolution: 30m</li> <li>Begin of time reference: date of first Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20240101</code>)</li> <li>End of time reference: date of last Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20241231</code>)</li> <li>Spatial extent: global (<code>go</code>)</li> <li>Coordinate system: World Geodetic System 1984, used in GPS (<code>epsg.4326</code>)</li> <li>Version: v2</li> </ol> <h3>Related resources</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Maps of dominant grassland:</strong><br><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15646181">2000-2002</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644486"> 2003-2005</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644623"> 2006-2008</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647042"> 2009-2011</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647681"> 2012-2014</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648306"> 2015-2017</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648551"> 2018-2020</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648751"> 2021-2023</a> <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15649332">2024</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of cultivated grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of natural/semi-natural grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li> <div><strong>Grassland reference samples based on VHR imagery (2000–2024):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15631655">GeoPackage files</a></div> </li> <li><strong>Global machine learning models (Random Forest):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952806">Parquet and joblib python files</a></li> <li><strong>Reference sampling design derived by FSCV:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11391517">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Harmonized reference samples based on existing LULC dataset:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13951976">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Source code for reproducibility:<br></strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952867">GitHub release</a><strong><br></strong></li> <li><strong>Mapping feedback tool:</strong><br><a href="https://geo-wiki.org">GeoWiki</a></li> <li><strong>Data catalogues:</strong><br><a href="https://stac.openlandmap.org/gpw_ggc-30m/collection.json?.language=en">OpenLandMap STAC</a> <a href="https://global-pasture-watch.projects.earthengine.app/view/ggc-30m">Google Earth Engine</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>For questions of bugs/inconsistencies related to the dataset raise a GitHub issue in <a href="https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch">https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch</a></p>
Global Pasture Watch - Annual grassland class and extent maps at 30-m spatial resolution (2000—2024)
<h2><strong>Sub-dataset: Dominant grassland class, 2015-2017</strong></h2> <h2>Description</h2> <p>Global annual grassland class and extent for 2000—2024 produced by <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04139-6">Parente et al. (2024)</a> within the scope of the <a href="https://landcarbonlab.org/data/global-grassland-and-livestock-monitoring/">Global Pasture Watch initiative</a>. The mapped grassland extent includes any land cover type, which contains at least <strong>30% of dry or wet low vegetation</strong>, dominated by grasses and forbs (less than 3 meters) and a:</p> <ul> <li>maximum of 50% tree canopy cover (greater than 5 meters),</li> <li>maximum of 70% of other woody vegetation (scrubs and open shrubland), and</li> <li>maximum of 50% active cropland cover in mosaic landscapes of cropland & other vegetation.</li> </ul> <p>The grassland extent is classified into two classes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Cultivated grassland</strong>: Areas where grasses and other forage plants have been intentionally planted and managed, as well as areas of native grassland-type vegetation where they clearly exhibit active and 'heavy' management for specific human-directed uses, such as directed grazing of livestock.</li> <li><strong>Natural/semi-natural grassland</strong>: Relatively undisturbed native grasslands/short-height vegetation, such as steppes and tundra, as well as areas that have experienced varying degrees of human activity in the past, which may contain a mix of native and introduced species due to historical land use and natural processes. In general, they exhibit natural-looking patterns of varied vegetation and clearly ordered hydrological relationships throughout the landscape.</li> <li><strong>Open shrubland (v2-beta): </strong>Land on which the vegetation is dominated by low-growing woody plants, characterized by a sparse distribution of shrubs and dominated by woody perennials. Typically covers 50—75% of the area, with significant open ground (with or without herbaceous understory) between them, where shrub canopies are less than 10 meters in diameter, and tree cover is below 10%, meaning they do not form a continuous or semi-continuous canopy.</li> </ul> <p>The dataset is organized in 69 global mosaics (25 years for each time series) in COG (Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF) format, WGS84 Coordinate Systems (EPSG:4326) and pixel size equal to 0.00025 degrees, including:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of cultivated grassland (values range from 0–100),</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of natural/semi-natural grassland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of open shrubland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Dominant</strong> class (0-other land cover, 1-cultivated grassland and 2-natural/semi-natural grassland, 3-open shrubland).</li> </ul> <p>All raster files are in unsigned <code>8-bit integer format</code> and use <code>255</code> as no-data value (pixels ignored by prediction), following an specific naming convention:</p> <ol> <li>Project name: Global Pasture Watch (<code>gpw</code>)</li> <li>Class name: cultivated grassland (<code>cultiv.grassland</code>), natural/semi-natural grassland (<code>nat.semi.grassland</code>), open shrubland (<code>open.shrubland</code>) and dominant grassland (<code>grassland</code>)</li> <li>Procedure combination: Random Forest (<code>rf</code>), median filter (med.filt) and balanced threshold (<code>bthr</code>).</li> <li>Variable type: probability (<code>p</code>) and factor class (<code>c</code>)</li> <li>Spatial resolution: 30m</li> <li>Begin of time reference: date of first Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20240101</code>)</li> <li>End of time reference: date of last Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20241231</code>)</li> <li>Spatial extent: global (<code>go</code>)</li> <li>Coordinate system: World Geodetic System 1984, used in GPS (<code>epsg.4326</code>)</li> <li>Version: v2</li> </ol> <h3>Related resources</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Maps of dominant grassland:</strong><br><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15646181">2000-2002</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644486"> 2003-2005</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644623"> 2006-2008</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647042"> 2009-2011</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647681"> 2012-2014</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648306"> 2015-2017</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648551"> 2018-2020</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648751"> 2021-2023</a> <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15649332">2024</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of cultivated grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of natural/semi-natural grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li> <div><strong>Grassland reference samples based on VHR imagery (2000–2024):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15631655">GeoPackage files</a></div> </li> <li><strong>Global machine learning models (Random Forest):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952806">Parquet and joblib python files</a></li> <li><strong>Reference sampling design derived by FSCV:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11391517">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Harmonized reference samples based on existing LULC dataset:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13951976">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Source code for reproducibility:<br></strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952867">GitHub release</a><strong><br></strong></li> <li><strong>Mapping feedback tool:</strong><br><a href="https://geo-wiki.org">GeoWiki</a></li> <li><strong>Data catalogues:</strong><br><a href="https://stac.openlandmap.org/gpw_ggc-30m/collection.json?.language=en">OpenLandMap STAC</a> <a href="https://global-pasture-watch.projects.earthengine.app/view/ggc-30m">Google Earth Engine</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>For questions of bugs/inconsistencies related to the dataset raise a GitHub issue in <a href="https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch">https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch</a></p>
Global Pasture Watch - Annual grassland class and extent maps at 30-m spatial resolution (2000—2024)
<h2><strong>Sub-dataset: Dominant grassland class, 2009-2011</strong></h2> <h2>Description</h2> <p>Global annual grassland class and extent for 2000—2024 produced by <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04139-6">Parente et al. (2024)</a> within the scope of the <a href="https://landcarbonlab.org/data/global-grassland-and-livestock-monitoring/">Global Pasture Watch initiative</a>. The mapped grassland extent includes any land cover type, which contains at least <strong>30% of dry or wet low vegetation</strong>, dominated by grasses and forbs (less than 3 meters) and a:</p> <ul> <li>maximum of 50% tree canopy cover (greater than 5 meters),</li> <li>maximum of 70% of other woody vegetation (scrubs and open shrubland), and</li> <li>maximum of 50% active cropland cover in mosaic landscapes of cropland & other vegetation.</li> </ul> <p>The grassland extent is classified into two classes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Cultivated grassland</strong>: Areas where grasses and other forage plants have been intentionally planted and managed, as well as areas of native grassland-type vegetation where they clearly exhibit active and 'heavy' management for specific human-directed uses, such as directed grazing of livestock.</li> <li><strong>Natural/semi-natural grassland</strong>: Relatively undisturbed native grasslands/short-height vegetation, such as steppes and tundra, as well as areas that have experienced varying degrees of human activity in the past, which may contain a mix of native and introduced species due to historical land use and natural processes. In general, they exhibit natural-looking patterns of varied vegetation and clearly ordered hydrological relationships throughout the landscape.</li> <li><strong>Open shrubland (v2-beta): </strong>Land on which the vegetation is dominated by low-growing woody plants, characterized by a sparse distribution of shrubs and dominated by woody perennials. Typically covers 50—75% of the area, with significant open ground (with or without herbaceous understory) between them, where shrub canopies are less than 10 meters in diameter, and tree cover is below 10%, meaning they do not form a continuous or semi-continuous canopy.</li> </ul> <p>The dataset is organized in 69 global mosaics (25 years for each time series) in COG (Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF) format, WGS84 Coordinate Systems (EPSG:4326) and pixel size equal to 0.00025 degrees, including:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of cultivated grassland (values range from 0–100),</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of natural/semi-natural grassland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of open shrubland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Dominant</strong> class (0-other land cover, 1-cultivated grassland and 2-natural/semi-natural grassland, 3-open shrubland).</li> </ul> <p>All raster files are in unsigned <code>8-bit integer format</code> and use <code>255</code> as no-data value (pixels ignored by prediction), following an specific naming convention:</p> <ol> <li>Project name: Global Pasture Watch (<code>gpw</code>)</li> <li>Class name: cultivated grassland (<code>cultiv.grassland</code>), natural/semi-natural grassland (<code>nat.semi.grassland</code>), open shrubland (<code>open.shrubland</code>) and dominant grassland (<code>grassland</code>)</li> <li>Procedure combination: Random Forest (<code>rf</code>), median filter (med.filt) and balanced threshold (<code>bthr</code>).</li> <li>Variable type: probability (<code>p</code>) and factor class (<code>c</code>)</li> <li>Spatial resolution: 30m</li> <li>Begin of time reference: date of first Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20240101</code>)</li> <li>End of time reference: date of last Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20241231</code>)</li> <li>Spatial extent: global (<code>go</code>)</li> <li>Coordinate system: World Geodetic System 1984, used in GPS (<code>epsg.4326</code>)</li> <li>Version: v2</li> </ol> <h3>Related resources</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Maps of dominant grassland:</strong><br><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15646181">2000-2002</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644486"> 2003-2005</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644623"> 2006-2008</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647042"> 2009-2011</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647681"> 2012-2014</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648306"> 2015-2017</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648551"> 2018-2020</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648751"> 2021-2023</a> <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15649332">2024</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of cultivated grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of natural/semi-natural grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li> <div><strong>Grassland reference samples based on VHR imagery (2000–2024):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15631655">GeoPackage files</a></div> </li> <li><strong>Global machine learning models (Random Forest):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952806">Parquet and joblib python files</a></li> <li><strong>Reference sampling design derived by FSCV:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11391517">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Harmonized reference samples based on existing LULC dataset:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13951976">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Source code for reproducibility:<br></strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952867">GitHub release</a><strong><br></strong></li> <li><strong>Mapping feedback tool:</strong><br><a href="https://geo-wiki.org">GeoWiki</a></li> <li><strong>Data catalogues:</strong><br><a href="https://stac.openlandmap.org/gpw_ggc-30m/collection.json?.language=en">OpenLandMap STAC</a> <a href="https://global-pasture-watch.projects.earthengine.app/view/ggc-30m">Google Earth Engine</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>For questions of bugs/inconsistencies related to the dataset raise a GitHub issue in <a href="https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch">https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch</a></p>
Global Pasture Watch - Annual grassland class and extent maps at 30-m spatial resolution (2000—2024)
<h2><strong>Sub-dataset: Dominant grassland class, 2012-2014</strong></h2> <h2>Description</h2> <p>Global annual grassland class and extent for 2000—2024 produced by <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04139-6">Parente et al. (2024)</a> within the scope of the <a href="https://landcarbonlab.org/data/global-grassland-and-livestock-monitoring/">Global Pasture Watch initiative</a>. The mapped grassland extent includes any land cover type, which contains at least <strong>30% of dry or wet low vegetation</strong>, dominated by grasses and forbs (less than 3 meters) and a:</p> <ul> <li>maximum of 50% tree canopy cover (greater than 5 meters),</li> <li>maximum of 70% of other woody vegetation (scrubs and open shrubland), and</li> <li>maximum of 50% active cropland cover in mosaic landscapes of cropland & other vegetation.</li> </ul> <p>The grassland extent is classified into two classes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Cultivated grassland</strong>: Areas where grasses and other forage plants have been intentionally planted and managed, as well as areas of native grassland-type vegetation where they clearly exhibit active and 'heavy' management for specific human-directed uses, such as directed grazing of livestock.</li> <li><strong>Natural/semi-natural grassland</strong>: Relatively undisturbed native grasslands/short-height vegetation, such as steppes and tundra, as well as areas that have experienced varying degrees of human activity in the past, which may contain a mix of native and introduced species due to historical land use and natural processes. In general, they exhibit natural-looking patterns of varied vegetation and clearly ordered hydrological relationships throughout the landscape.</li> <li><strong>Open shrubland (v2-beta): </strong>Land on which the vegetation is dominated by low-growing woody plants, characterized by a sparse distribution of shrubs and dominated by woody perennials. Typically covers 50—75% of the area, with significant open ground (with or without herbaceous understory) between them, where shrub canopies are less than 10 meters in diameter, and tree cover is below 10%, meaning they do not form a continuous or semi-continuous canopy.</li> </ul> <p>The dataset is organized in 69 global mosaics (25 years for each time series) in COG (Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF) format, WGS84 Coordinate Systems (EPSG:4326) and pixel size equal to 0.00025 degrees, including:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of cultivated grassland (values range from 0–100),</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of natural/semi-natural grassland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of open shrubland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Dominant</strong> class (0-other land cover, 1-cultivated grassland and 2-natural/semi-natural grassland, 3-open shrubland).</li> </ul> <p>All raster files are in unsigned <code>8-bit integer format</code> and use <code>255</code> as no-data value (pixels ignored by prediction), following an specific naming convention:</p> <ol> <li>Project name: Global Pasture Watch (<code>gpw</code>)</li> <li>Class name: cultivated grassland (<code>cultiv.grassland</code>), natural/semi-natural grassland (<code>nat.semi.grassland</code>), open shrubland (<code>open.shrubland</code>) and dominant grassland (<code>grassland</code>)</li> <li>Procedure combination: Random Forest (<code>rf</code>), median filter (med.filt) and balanced threshold (<code>bthr</code>).</li> <li>Variable type: probability (<code>p</code>) and factor class (<code>c</code>)</li> <li>Spatial resolution: 30m</li> <li>Begin of time reference: date of first Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20240101</code>)</li> <li>End of time reference: date of last Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20241231</code>)</li> <li>Spatial extent: global (<code>go</code>)</li> <li>Coordinate system: World Geodetic System 1984, used in GPS (<code>epsg.4326</code>)</li> <li>Version: v2</li> </ol> <h3>Related resources</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Maps of dominant grassland:</strong><br><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15646181">2000-2002</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644486"> 2003-2005</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644623"> 2006-2008</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647042"> 2009-2011</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647681"> 2012-2014</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648306"> 2015-2017</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648551"> 2018-2020</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648751"> 2021-2023</a> <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15649332">2024</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of cultivated grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of natural/semi-natural grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li> <div><strong>Grassland reference samples based on VHR imagery (2000–2024):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15631655">GeoPackage files</a></div> </li> <li><strong>Global machine learning models (Random Forest):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952806">Parquet and joblib python files</a></li> <li><strong>Reference sampling design derived by FSCV:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11391517">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Harmonized reference samples based on existing LULC dataset:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13951976">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Source code for reproducibility:<br></strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952867">GitHub release</a><strong><br></strong></li> <li><strong>Mapping feedback tool:</strong><br><a href="https://geo-wiki.org">GeoWiki</a></li> <li><strong>Data catalogues:</strong><br><a href="https://stac.openlandmap.org/gpw_ggc-30m/collection.json?.language=en">OpenLandMap STAC</a> <a href="https://global-pasture-watch.projects.earthengine.app/view/ggc-30m">Google Earth Engine</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>For questions of bugs/inconsistencies related to the dataset raise a GitHub issue in <a href="https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch">https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch</a></p>
Global Pasture Watch - Annual grassland class and extent maps at 30-m spatial resolution (2000—2024)
<h2><strong>Sub-dataset: Dominant grassland class, 2006-2008</strong></h2> <h2>Description</h2> <p>Global annual grassland class and extent for 2000—2024 produced by <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04139-6">Parente et al. (2024)</a> within the scope of the <a href="https://landcarbonlab.org/data/global-grassland-and-livestock-monitoring/">Global Pasture Watch initiative</a>. The mapped grassland extent includes any land cover type, which contains at least <strong>30% of dry or wet low vegetation</strong>, dominated by grasses and forbs (less than 3 meters) and a:</p> <ul> <li>maximum of 50% tree canopy cover (greater than 5 meters),</li> <li>maximum of 70% of other woody vegetation (scrubs and open shrubland), and</li> <li>maximum of 50% active cropland cover in mosaic landscapes of cropland & other vegetation.</li> </ul> <p>The grassland extent is classified into two classes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Cultivated grassland</strong>: Areas where grasses and other forage plants have been intentionally planted and managed, as well as areas of native grassland-type vegetation where they clearly exhibit active and 'heavy' management for specific human-directed uses, such as directed grazing of livestock.</li> <li><strong>Natural/semi-natural grassland</strong>: Relatively undisturbed native grasslands/short-height vegetation, such as steppes and tundra, as well as areas that have experienced varying degrees of human activity in the past, which may contain a mix of native and introduced species due to historical land use and natural processes. In general, they exhibit natural-looking patterns of varied vegetation and clearly ordered hydrological relationships throughout the landscape.</li> <li><strong>Open shrubland (v2-beta): </strong>Land on which the vegetation is dominated by low-growing woody plants, characterized by a sparse distribution of shrubs and dominated by woody perennials. Typically covers 50—75% of the area, with significant open ground (with or without herbaceous understory) between them, where shrub canopies are less than 10 meters in diameter, and tree cover is below 10%, meaning they do not form a continuous or semi-continuous canopy.</li> </ul> <p>The dataset is organized in 69 global mosaics (25 years for each time series) in COG (Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF) format, WGS84 Coordinate Systems (EPSG:4326) and pixel size equal to 0.00025 degrees, including:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of cultivated grassland (values range from 0–100),</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of natural/semi-natural grassland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of open shrubland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Dominant</strong> class (0-other land cover, 1-cultivated grassland and 2-natural/semi-natural grassland, 3-open shrubland).</li> </ul> <p>All raster files are in unsigned <code>8-bit integer format</code> and use <code>255</code> as no-data value (pixels ignored by prediction), following an specific naming convention:</p> <ol> <li>Project name: Global Pasture Watch (<code>gpw</code>)</li> <li>Class name: cultivated grassland (<code>cultiv.grassland</code>), natural/semi-natural grassland (<code>nat.semi.grassland</code>), open shrubland (<code>open.shrubland</code>) and dominant grassland (<code>grassland</code>)</li> <li>Procedure combination: Random Forest (<code>rf</code>), median filter (med.filt) and balanced threshold (<code>bthr</code>).</li> <li>Variable type: probability (<code>p</code>) and factor class (<code>c</code>)</li> <li>Spatial resolution: 30m</li> <li>Begin of time reference: date of first Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20240101</code>)</li> <li>End of time reference: date of last Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20241231</code>)</li> <li>Spatial extent: global (<code>go</code>)</li> <li>Coordinate system: World Geodetic System 1984, used in GPS (<code>epsg.4326</code>)</li> <li>Version: v2</li> </ol> <h3>Related resources</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Maps of dominant grassland:</strong><br><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15646181">2000-2002</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644486"> 2003-2005</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644623"> 2006-2008</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647042"> 2009-2011</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647681"> 2012-2014</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648306"> 2015-2017</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648551"> 2018-2020</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648751"> 2021-2023</a> <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15649332">2024</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of cultivated grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of natural/semi-natural grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li> <div><strong>Grassland reference samples based on VHR imagery (2000–2024):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15631655">GeoPackage files</a></div> </li> <li><strong>Global machine learning models (Random Forest):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952806">Parquet and joblib python files</a></li> <li><strong>Reference sampling design derived by FSCV:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11391517">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Harmonized reference samples based on existing LULC dataset:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13951976">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Source code for reproducibility:<br></strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952867">GitHub release</a><strong><br></strong></li> <li><strong>Mapping feedback tool:</strong><br><a href="https://geo-wiki.org">GeoWiki</a></li> <li><strong>Data catalogues:</strong><br><a href="https://stac.openlandmap.org/gpw_ggc-30m/collection.json?.language=en">OpenLandMap STAC</a> <a href="https://global-pasture-watch.projects.earthengine.app/view/ggc-30m">Google Earth Engine</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>For questions of bugs/inconsistencies related to the dataset raise a GitHub issue in <a href="https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch">https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch</a></p>
Global Pasture Watch - Annual grassland class and extent maps at 30-m spatial resolution (2000—2024)
<h2><strong>Sub-dataset: Dominant grassland class, 2003-2005</strong></h2> <h2>Description</h2> <p>Global annual grassland class and extent for 2000—2024 produced by <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04139-6">Parente et al. (2024)</a> within the scope of the <a href="https://landcarbonlab.org/data/global-grassland-and-livestock-monitoring/">Global Pasture Watch initiative</a>. The mapped grassland extent includes any land cover type, which contains at least <strong>30% of dry or wet low vegetation</strong>, dominated by grasses and forbs (less than 3 meters) and a:</p> <ul> <li>maximum of 50% tree canopy cover (greater than 5 meters),</li> <li>maximum of 70% of other woody vegetation (scrubs and open shrubland), and</li> <li>maximum of 50% active cropland cover in mosaic landscapes of cropland & other vegetation.</li> </ul> <p>The grassland extent is classified into two classes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Cultivated grassland</strong>: Areas where grasses and other forage plants have been intentionally planted and managed, as well as areas of native grassland-type vegetation where they clearly exhibit active and 'heavy' management for specific human-directed uses, such as directed grazing of livestock.</li> <li><strong>Natural/semi-natural grassland</strong>: Relatively undisturbed native grasslands/short-height vegetation, such as steppes and tundra, as well as areas that have experienced varying degrees of human activity in the past, which may contain a mix of native and introduced species due to historical land use and natural processes. In general, they exhibit natural-looking patterns of varied vegetation and clearly ordered hydrological relationships throughout the landscape.</li> <li><strong>Open shrubland (v2-beta): </strong>Land on which the vegetation is dominated by low-growing woody plants, characterized by a sparse distribution of shrubs and dominated by woody perennials. Typically covers 50—75% of the area, with significant open ground (with or without herbaceous understory) between them, where shrub canopies are less than 10 meters in diameter, and tree cover is below 10%, meaning they do not form a continuous or semi-continuous canopy.</li> </ul> <p>The dataset is organized in 69 global mosaics (25 years for each time series) in COG (Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF) format, WGS84 Coordinate Systems (EPSG:4326) and pixel size equal to 0.00025 degrees, including:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of cultivated grassland (values range from 0–100),</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of natural/semi-natural grassland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of open shrubland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Dominant</strong> class (0-other land cover, 1-cultivated grassland and 2-natural/semi-natural grassland, 3-open shrubland).</li> </ul> <p>All raster files are in unsigned <code>8-bit integer format</code> and use <code>255</code> as no-data value (pixels ignored by prediction), following an specific naming convention:</p> <ol> <li>Project name: Global Pasture Watch (<code>gpw</code>)</li> <li>Class name: cultivated grassland (<code>cultiv.grassland</code>), natural/semi-natural grassland (<code>nat.semi.grassland</code>), open shrubland (<code>open.shrubland</code>) and dominant grassland (<code>grassland</code>)</li> <li>Procedure combination: Random Forest (<code>rf</code>), median filter (med.filt) and balanced threshold (<code>bthr</code>).</li> <li>Variable type: probability (<code>p</code>) and factor class (<code>c</code>)</li> <li>Spatial resolution: 30m</li> <li>Begin of time reference: date of first Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20240101</code>)</li> <li>End of time reference: date of last Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20241231</code>)</li> <li>Spatial extent: global (<code>go</code>)</li> <li>Coordinate system: World Geodetic System 1984, used in GPS (<code>epsg.4326</code>)</li> <li>Version: v2</li> </ol> <h3>Related resources</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Maps of dominant grassland:</strong><br><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15646181">2000-2002</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644486"> 2003-2005</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644623"> 2006-2008</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647042"> 2009-2011</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647681"> 2012-2014</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648306"> 2015-2017</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648551"> 2018-2020</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648751"> 2021-2023</a> <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15649332">2024</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of cultivated grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of natural/semi-natural grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li> <div><strong>Grassland reference samples based on VHR imagery (2000–2024):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15631655">GeoPackage files</a></div> </li> <li><strong>Global machine learning models (Random Forest):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952806">Parquet and joblib python files</a></li> <li><strong>Reference sampling design derived by FSCV:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11391517">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Harmonized reference samples based on existing LULC dataset:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13951976">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Source code for reproducibility:<br></strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952867">GitHub release</a><strong><br></strong></li> <li><strong>Mapping feedback tool:</strong><br><a href="https://geo-wiki.org">GeoWiki</a></li> <li><strong>Data catalogues:</strong><br><a href="https://stac.openlandmap.org/gpw_ggc-30m/collection.json?.language=en">OpenLandMap STAC</a> <a href="https://global-pasture-watch.projects.earthengine.app/view/ggc-30m">Google Earth Engine</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>For questions of bugs/inconsistencies related to the dataset raise a GitHub issue in <a href="https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch">https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch</a></p>
Global Pasture Watch - Annual grassland class and extent maps at 30-m spatial resolution (2000—2024)
<h2><strong>Sub-dataset: Dominant grassland class, 2000-2002</strong></h2> <h2>Description</h2> <p>Global annual grassland class and extent for 2000—2024 produced by <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04139-6">Parente et al. (2024)</a> within the scope of the <a href="https://landcarbonlab.org/data/global-grassland-and-livestock-monitoring/">Global Pasture Watch initiative</a>. The mapped grassland extent includes any land cover type, which contains at least <strong>30% of dry or wet low vegetation</strong>, dominated by grasses and forbs (less than 3 meters) and a:</p> <ul> <li>maximum of 50% tree canopy cover (greater than 5 meters),</li> <li>maximum of 70% of other woody vegetation (scrubs and open shrubland), and</li> <li>maximum of 50% active cropland cover in mosaic landscapes of cropland & other vegetation.</li> </ul> <p>The grassland extent is classified into two classes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Cultivated grassland</strong>: Areas where grasses and other forage plants have been intentionally planted and managed, as well as areas of native grassland-type vegetation where they clearly exhibit active and 'heavy' management for specific human-directed uses, such as directed grazing of livestock.</li> <li><strong>Natural/semi-natural grassland</strong>: Relatively undisturbed native grasslands/short-height vegetation, such as steppes and tundra, as well as areas that have experienced varying degrees of human activity in the past, which may contain a mix of native and introduced species due to historical land use and natural processes. In general, they exhibit natural-looking patterns of varied vegetation and clearly ordered hydrological relationships throughout the landscape.</li> <li><strong>Open shrubland (v2-beta): </strong>Land on which the vegetation is dominated by low-growing woody plants, characterized by a sparse distribution of shrubs and dominated by woody perennials. Typically covers 50—75% of the area, with significant open ground (with or without herbaceous understory) between them, where shrub canopies are less than 10 meters in diameter, and tree cover is below 10%, meaning they do not form a continuous or semi-continuous canopy.</li> </ul> <p>The dataset is organized in 69 global mosaics (25 years for each time series) in COG (Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF) format, WGS84 Coordinate Systems (EPSG:4326) and pixel size equal to 0.00025 degrees, including:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of cultivated grassland (values range from 0–100),</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of natural/semi-natural grassland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Probabilities</strong> of open shrubland (values range from 0–100), and</li> <li><strong>Dominant</strong> class (0-other land cover, 1-cultivated grassland and 2-natural/semi-natural grassland, 3-open shrubland).</li> </ul> <p>All raster files are in unsigned <code>8-bit integer format</code> and use <code>255</code> as no-data value (pixels ignored by prediction), following an specific naming convention:</p> <ol> <li>Project name: Global Pasture Watch (<code>gpw</code>)</li> <li>Class name: cultivated grassland (<code>cultiv.grassland</code>), natural/semi-natural grassland (<code>nat.semi.grassland</code>), open shrubland (<code>open.shrubland</code>) and dominant grassland (<code>grassland</code>)</li> <li>Procedure combination: Random Forest (<code>rf</code>), median filter (med.filt) and balanced threshold (<code>bthr</code>).</li> <li>Variable type: probability (<code>p</code>) and factor class (<code>c</code>)</li> <li>Spatial resolution: 30m</li> <li>Begin of time reference: date of first Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20240101</code>)</li> <li>End of time reference: date of last Landsat composite used by the modeling (<code>20241231</code>)</li> <li>Spatial extent: global (<code>go</code>)</li> <li>Coordinate system: World Geodetic System 1984, used in GPS (<code>epsg.4326</code>)</li> <li>Version: v2</li> </ol> <h3>Related resources</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Maps of dominant grassland:</strong><br><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15646181">2000-2002</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644486"> 2003-2005</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15644623"> 2006-2008</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647042"> 2009-2011</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15647681"> 2012-2014</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648306"> 2015-2017</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648551"> 2018-2020</a><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15648751"> 2021-2023</a> <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15649332">2024</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of cultivated grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li><strong>Probability maps of natural/semi-natural grassland:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13890401/files/ggc-30m.csv?download=1">2000-2024 (All URLs)</a></li> <li> <div><strong>Grassland reference samples based on VHR imagery (2000–2024):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15631655">GeoPackage files</a></div> </li> <li><strong>Global machine learning models (Random Forest):</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952806">Parquet and joblib python files</a></li> <li><strong>Reference sampling design derived by FSCV:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11391517">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Harmonized reference samples based on existing LULC dataset:</strong><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13951976">GeoPackage and raster files</a></li> <li><strong>Source code for reproducibility:<br></strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13952867">GitHub release</a><strong><br></strong></li> <li><strong>Mapping feedback tool:</strong><br><a href="https://geo-wiki.org">GeoWiki</a></li> <li><strong>Data catalogues:</strong><br><a href="https://stac.openlandmap.org/gpw_ggc-30m/collection.json?.language=en">OpenLandMap STAC</a> <a href="https://global-pasture-watch.projects.earthengine.app/view/ggc-30m">Google Earth Engine</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>For questions of bugs/inconsistencies related to the dataset raise a GitHub issue in <a href="https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch">https://github.com/wri/global-pasture-watch</a></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.