Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
115
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
115 results for “Controversy”
FIGURE 7. Drosera spirocalyx. A in Elucidating the controversial Drosera montana complex (Droseraceae): a taxonomic revision
FIGURE 7. Drosera spirocalyx. A, habitat, forming a circular clump of rosettes, at the locus classicus. B, a flowering specimen. C, an open flower seen from below, highlighting the sepals. D, detail of a sterile rosette. E, side view of a flower bud, showing the contorted, overlapping sepals with obtuse apex, forming a pyramidal projection where adjacent sepals fuse. All by P.M. Gonella.
FIGURE 2 in Elucidating the controversial Drosera montana complex (Droseraceae): a taxonomic revision
FIGURE 2. Distribution map of D. montana in Bolivia (departments: BNI = Beni, CHQ = Chuquisaca, CBB = Cochabamba, LPZ = La Paz, ORU = Oruro, PND = Pando, PSI = Potosi, SCZ = Santa Cruz, TJA = Tarija).
FIGURE 6. Drosera spirocalyx. A, habit. B, C in Elucidating the controversial Drosera montana complex (Droseraceae): a taxonomic revision
FIGURE 6. Drosera spirocalyx. A, habit. B, C, detail of the indumentum at the base (B) and apex (C) of the scape. D, leaf, abaxial surface. E, leaf, adaxial surface. F, stipule. G, calyx showing actual shape of sepals. H, calyx showing the spirally contorted overlap of the sepals. J, petal. K, gynoecium and one stamen seen from above. L, seed. Based on the holotype. Drawn by P.M. Gonella.
FIGURE 11. Drosera tomentosa. A, habit. B, C, stipule. D–G in Elucidating the controversial Drosera montana complex (Droseraceae): a taxonomic revision
FIGURE 11. Drosera tomentosa. A, habit. B, C, stipule. D–G, leaf, abaxial surface (E, F), adaxial surface (D, G). H, J, side view of the calyx. K, L, petal. M, gynoecium and one stamen seen from above. N–P, seed. A, B, F, H, L, M correspond to D. tomentosa var. glabrata. C–E, G, J, O, P correspond to D. tomentosa var. tomentosa. A, F based on Gonella et al. 365; B on Gonella et al. 434; C, G on Gonella et al. 47; H on Gonella et al. 141; J on Ganev 3531; D, E on Rivadavia & Ganev 482; K–M on photographs of living plants; N on Rivadavia 435; O on Gonella et al. 475; P on Gonella et al. 492. Drawn by P.M. Gonella.
FIGURE 13. Drosera tomentosa. A in Elucidating the controversial Drosera montana complex (Droseraceae): a taxonomic revision
FIGURE 13. Drosera tomentosa. A, habitat, dense population growing in sandy soil of seepage at the Parque Nacional das Sempre-vivas, Minas Gerais. B, detail of the apex of the inflorescence. C–E, rosettes with emerging inflorescences, showing the variation in eglandular indumentum of the scape. F–G, flowers. A–C and G represent D. tomentosa var. tomentosa; D–F represent D. tomentosa var. glabrata. All by P.M. Gonella.
FIGURE 12 in Elucidating the controversial Drosera montana complex (Droseraceae): a taxonomic revision
FIGURE 12. Drosera tomentosa. Indumentum of the scape at the base (1), middle (2), and apex (3). A, B, D. tomentosa var. glabrata. C, D, D. tomentosa var. tomentosa. A based on Gonella et al. 141; B based on Gonella et al. 125; C based on Gonella et al. 427; D based on Ganev 3531. Drawn by P.M. Gonella.
FIGURE 5 in Elucidating the controversial Drosera montana complex (Droseraceae): a taxonomic revision
FIGURE 5. Distribution map of D. spirocalyx (squares) and D. tentaculata (circles) in eastern Brazil.
FIGURE 4. Drosera montana. A in Elucidating the controversial Drosera montana complex (Droseraceae): a taxonomic revision
FIGURE 4. Drosera montana. A, habitat, in white clayey soil (blackened after a recent fire), at Chapada dos Veadeiros, Goiás (centralwestern morphotype). B, habitat, in red clayey soil at São Gonçalo do Rio Preto, Minas Gerais (type morphotype). C, habit of the centralwestern morphotype, at Brasília, Distrito Federal. D, habit of the typical morphotype, with young flower scape densely glandular-pilose, at the Itatiaia National Park, Rio de Janeiro. E, detail of the base of the scape of the southern morphotype, presenting a dense indumentum of white eglandular trichomes at the base, near Curitiba, Paraná. F, flower, at the Serra do Quiriri, Santa Catarina. G, flower, cultivated specimen from the Chapada dos Veadeiros, Goiás. A, E by F. Rivadavia; B, D by P.M. Gonella; C by Henrique Moreira; F, G by Carlos Rohrbacher.
FIGURE 3. Drosera montana. A, habit. B, C in Elucidating the controversial Drosera montana complex (Droseraceae): a taxonomic revision
FIGURE 3. Drosera montana. A, habit. B, C, detail of the indumentum of the base (B) and apex (C) of the scape. D, E, stipule. F–J, leaf, abaxial surface (F, J) and adaxial surface (G, H). K, side view of the calyx. L, sepal. M, N, petal. O, stamen. P, gynoecium. Q, R, seed. A-C, E, J, K based on Gonella et al. 361; D, H based on Rivadavia & Batista 2630; F, G based on Gonella et al. 94; L based on Rivadavia 432; M–P based on photographs of living material; Q based on Rivadavia & Mullins 543; R based on Rivadavia 639. Drawn by P.M. Gonella.
Population genetics informs the management of a controversial Australian waterbird
<p>Widespread degradation across Australia's inland wetland network has contributed to severe declines for many waterbird species. In contrast, breeding colonies of the Australian white ibis (<em>Threskiornis molucca)</em> have increased in urbanised areas along the coast, but the level of dispersal and gene flow between inland and coastal areas remain unknown. This study uses single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to ascertain the variables influencing genetic connectivity among several inland and urban colonies of white ibis across south-eastern Australia between 2015 and 2018. The contemporary effective population size was estimated, and this value was used in simulations to evaluate the impact of various management scenarios on future genetic diversity. We found no significant differences in allele frequencies between localities, or robust evidence of site fidelity, therefore suggesting widespread dispersal and gene flow between inland and urban colonies. Furthermore, effective sizes were large enough to maintain genetic diversity into the future under various realistic management scenarios. However, the lack of genetic partitioning found suggests that urban management of the ibis should not be undertaken in isolation of the conservation requirements of inland colonies.</p>
FIGURE 51 in First cladistic analysis of Toxotarsinae (Diptera: Calliphoridae), with insights on the evolution of the group and on the transformation series of some historically controversial characters
FIGURE 51. Cladistic analysis of Toxotarsinae. Single most parsimonious tree recovered with TNT in the equal weighting analysis, with characters and character states mapped to each branch. Black dots represent non-ambiguous synapomorphies and white dots represent non-ambiguous homoplasies, with character numbers given above the branches and state numbers for the respective characters given below the branches.
FIGURE 50 in First cladistic analysis of Toxotarsinae (Diptera: Calliphoridae), with insights on the evolution of the group and on the transformation series of some historically controversial characters
FIGURE 50. Cladistic analysis of Toxotarsinae. Single most parsimonious tree recovered with TNT in the equal weighting analysis. Tree length = 102; CI=0.57; RI=0.71. Values above the branches indicate bootstrap (BS, left) and jackknife (JK, right) supports. Values below the branches indicate the absolute Bremer (BR, left) and relative fit difference (RFD, right) supports for each branch. * = node not recovered in bootstrap consensus tree.
FIGURES 42–49. Male terminalia. 42–44 in First cladistic analysis of Toxotarsinae (Diptera: Calliphoridae), with insights on the evolution of the group and on the transformation series of some historically controversial characters
FIGURES 42–49. Male terminalia. 42–44. Cerci and surstyli in posterior view (arrow showing dorsal region). 42. Sarconesia roraima. 43. S. chlorogaster. 44. S. magellanica. 45–47. Cercus and surstylus in lateral view. 45. S. roraima. 46. S. magellanica. 47. S. chlorogaster. 48–49. Pre- and postgonite (dotted area highlighting less sclerotized portion at apex of postgonite). 48. S. roraima. 49. S. dichroa (arrow showing seta on anterior margin of postgonite). Scale bars: 0.5 mm. Abbreviations: cer—cercus, sur—surstylus, prg—pregonite, pog—postgonite.
FIGURES 36–41 in First cladistic analysis of Toxotarsinae (Diptera: Calliphoridae), with insights on the evolution of the group and on the transformation series of some historically controversial characters
FIGURES 36–41. Ovipositor, ventral (left) and dorsal (right) views. 36. Calliphora nigribasis. 37. Sarconesia roraima. 38. S. dichroa. 39. N. chilensis. 40. S. chlorogaster. 41. Toxotarsus nigrocyaneus. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. Abbreviations: cer—cercus, epi—epiproct, hyp—hypoproct, st—sternite, tg—tergite.
FIGURES 31–33. Male abdominal sternites. 31. Sarconesia magellanica. 32. S. chlorogaster. 33 in First cladistic analysis of Toxotarsinae (Diptera: Calliphoridae), with insights on the evolution of the group and on the transformation series of some historically controversial characters
FIGURES 31–33. Male abdominal sternites. 31. Sarconesia magellanica. 32. S. chlorogaster. 33. Toxotarsus humeralis. Abbreviation: st—sternite.
FIGURES 27–28 in First cladistic analysis of Toxotarsinae (Diptera: Calliphoridae), with insights on the evolution of the group and on the transformation series of some historically controversial characters
FIGURES 27–28. Position of posterior region of lower calypter relative to body axis. 27. Divergent. 28. Not divergent.
FIGURES 10–18 in First cladistic analysis of Toxotarsinae (Diptera: Calliphoridae), with insights on the evolution of the group and on the transformation series of some historically controversial characters
FIGURES 10–18. Thoraces of Toxotarsinae showing position of setae on scutum and scutellum, dorsal view. 10. Sarconesia roraima. 11. S. magellanica. 12. N chilensis. 13. Sarconesia splendida. 14. S. versicolor. 15. S. dichroa. 16. S. chlorogaster. 17. Toxotarsus humeralis. 18. T. nigrocyaneus. Abbreviations: acr s—acrostichal setae, ap sctl s—apical scutellar setae, b sctl s—basal scutellar setae, dc s—dorsocentral setae, ds sctl s—discal scutellar setae, ial s—intra-alar setae, pal cal—postalar callus, pal s—postalar setae, pprn lb—postpronotal lobe, pprn s—postpronotal setae, presut sct—presutural scutum, psut sct— postsutural scutum, sctl—scutellum, spal s—supra-alar setae, trn sut—transverse suture.
FIGURES 1–6 in First cladistic analysis of Toxotarsinae (Diptera: Calliphoridae), with insights on the evolution of the group and on the transformation series of some historically controversial characters
FIGURES 1–6. Head characters of Toxotarsinae. 1–2. Parafacial setae. 1. Sarconesia chlorogaster. 2. S. magellanica. 3–4. Color of postgenal setae. 3. S. chlorogaster. 4. S. magellanica. 5–6. Apex of pedicel, highlighted by arrows. 5. Calliphora nigribasis. 6. S. chlorogaster. Abbreviations: gn—gena, pafc—parafacial setae, ped—pedicel, pgn—postgena.
FIGURES 25–26 in First cladistic analysis of Toxotarsinae (Diptera: Calliphoridae), with insights on the evolution of the group and on the transformation series of some historically controversial characters
FIGURES 25–26. Color of upper calypter rim, highlighted by arrows. 25. Pale (Sarconesia chlorogaster). 26. Dark (S. magellanica).
FIGURES 34–35. Female abdominal sternites. 34. Sarconesia roraima. 35. S in First cladistic analysis of Toxotarsinae (Diptera: Calliphoridae), with insights on the evolution of the group and on the transformation series of some historically controversial characters
FIGURES 34–35. Female abdominal sternites. 34. Sarconesia roraima. 35. S. magellanica. Abbreviation: st—sternite.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.