Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
139
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
139 results for “Delphi”
Protocol Lab for Online Trial Delphi and Question Effects
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03498677. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 7.
Delphi Consensus Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in OSA
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05055271. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Protocol of an International Delphi Process
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06936826. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Identifying Which Adverse Events Associated With Dry Needling Should be Included For Informed Consent: A Modified e-Delphi Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05300815. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Effects of the Use of Multi Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA) on Decision Quality in an Online Delphi
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03498365. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
Comparison of Multi-Round and Real-Time Delphi Survey Methods
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04471103. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy Delphi Consensus
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05373966. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 12.
A Modified Delphi for ECPR Post Resuscitation Care
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06552312. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Data from: Development of a simple, practice-based tool to assess quality of paediatric emergency care delivery in resource-limited settings: identifying critical actions via a Delphi study
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Atypical residency of short-beaked common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) to a shallow, urbanized embayment in south-eastern Australia
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Core outcome set for burn care research: Delphi survey data
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Adult experts’ perceptions of telemental health for youth: a Delphi study
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Atypical panmixia in a European dolphin species (Delphinus delphis); implications for the evolution of diversity across oceanic boundaries.
Despite the scarcity of geographical barriers in the ocean environment, delphinid cetaceans often exhibit marked patterns of population structure on a regional scale. The European coastline is a prime example, with species exhibiting population structure across well defined environmental boundaries. Here we undertake a comprehensive population genetic study on the European common dolphin (Delphinus delphis, based on 492 samples and 15 loci) and establish that this species shows exceptional panmixia across most of the study range. We found differentiation only between the eastern and western Mediterranean, consistent with earlier studies, and here use Approximate Bayesian Computations to explore different scenarios to explain the observed pattern. Our results suggest that a recent population bottleneck likely contributed significantly to the differentiation of the Eastern Mediterranean population (in Greek waters). This interpretation is consistent with independent census data which suggests a sharp population decline in the recent past. The implication is that an unperturbed population may currently show panmixia across the full study range. This exception to the more typical pattern of population structure seen for other regional dolphin species (and for common dolphin populations elsewhere in the world) suggests particular ecological or life history traits distinct to this species in European waters.
Data from: Exploring health literacy competencies toward patient education program for Chinese-speaking healthcare professionals: a Delphi study
Objectives: To achieve consensus on a set of competencies in health literacy practice based on a literature review and expert consultation. Setting: Hospitals and community health centres in Taiwan. Method: A 2-stage modified Delphi study involving a literature review was conducted, followed by qualitative interviews and 3 rounds of email-based data collection over a 3-month period in 2011. Participants: 15 Chinese healthcare practitioners with more than 6 months' experience in patient education were interviewed to collect data on health literacy practice. 24 experts (12 academic scholars in health literacy and 12 professionals with training related to health literacy practice) were invited to participate in the Delphi process. Results: Qualitative data from the interviews were analysed and summarised to form 99 competency items for health literacy practice, which were categorised into 5 domains of health literacy practice including those pertaining to knowledge and skills. Consensus was reached on 92 of 99 competencies, using a modified Delphi technique. Conclusions: The 92 competencies in health literacy practice embraced core components of patient education in the Chinese healthcare profession.
Proposal for a physiotherapy assessment form for the evaluation of women patients with uro-gynecological disorders: A Delphi study
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Proposal for a physiotherapy assessment form for the evaluation of women patients with uro-gynecological disorders: A Delphi study
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Delphi_schisto Tropnet Geosentinel raw data file
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Factors Influencing Process Improvement in Chinese Multinational Corporations: A Delphi Method Study
<p>Delphi Round 1 Data</p>
Data from a three-phase Delphi study used to investigate Knowledge Infrastructure for Research Data in Norway, KIRDN_Data; PhD project
<p>A modified three-phase Delphi study was used to explore the knowledge infrastructure for research data in Norway. The study includes different stakeholders involved in research data sharing. A Delphi study is characterised by the use of an expert panel to elicit opinions on a shared reality from different perspectives. Data collection is performed in several rounds with the intention of reaching consensus or solving an issue. </p> <p>A group of 24 experts took part in the study. The group consisted of policy-makers, representatives of national service providers, and researchers and research support staff from four Norwegian universities. The participants were invited based on their involvement in the development of policies, infrastructure or data-related research support. The research support staff were recruited to include representatives from different research support services at the universities, including libraries, research offices and IT departments. While the researchers were selected from based on their receival of EU funding with requirements of data management plans.</p> <p>Data were collected in three phases. The first phase, the ‘exploration phase’, was conducted using open interviews lasting approximately one hour in January/February 2018. The purpose of this phase was to obtain an initial overview of the panel members opinions’ on issues regarding research data management.</p> <p>In the second phase, the ‘evaluation phase’, conducted in August/September 2018, participants answered a survey containing nine questions on topics such as data stewardship, DMPs, ethical aspects of data sharing and core functions in a research data infrastructure. The survey was designed to further explore issues and tensions uncovered in the first interviews. Several of the questions were formulated as statements that the participants were asked to agree or disagree upon. </p> <p>The third, ‘concluding phase’ was conducted using interviews in March/April 2019. These interviews lasted approximately 30 minutes and were based on results from the questionnaire as well as the first interview. Participants were asked whether they had thoughts on the preliminary findings of the study. </p> <p>Based on requests from some of the participants, the questions were sent to all participants prior to the data collection, in all three phases. The participants were also sent the transcripts from the interviews and were asked for permission to share the complete material or parts of the data material to which they contributed. </p>
FIGURE 5. Haplotype analysis for C in The Oracle of Delphi-a molecular phylogenetic approach to Greek Cordulegaster Leach in Brewster, 1815 (Odonata: Anisoptera: Cordulegastridae)
FIGURE 5. Haplotype analysis for C. heros (TCS-network made in PopART 1.7).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.