Find research datasets worth reusing

Project Gullstrand - European Project for the Determination of Average Biometric Values of Human Eyes

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01173614. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

A Prospective Study to Collect Images in Patients Treated With Iodine-131 as Part of a European Research Project in Radiation Protection.

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03986437. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

The European Collaborative Project on Inflammation and Vascular Wall Remodeling in Atherosclerosis - Intravascular Ultrasound Study

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01789411. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.

Infant and Child European Cryoablation Project ICECaP

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03721783. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

European Childhood Obesity Project: Early Programming by Infant Nutrition?

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00338689. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 5. Publications: 22.

European Project on Nutrition in Elderly People

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01754012. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 5. Publications: 15.

publicJul 2020View details →

dryad32/100

Data from: Projected impacts of warming seas on commercially fished species at a biogeographic boundary of the European continental shelf

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2020View details →

Increasing of Renewables Hosting Capacity in Czech Republic in Terms of European Project InterFlex

dataset for scientific paper

dryad28/100

Data from: Contrasting the roles of section length and instream habitat enhancement for river restoration success: a field study on 20 European restoration projects

1. Restoration of river hydromorphology often has limited detected effects on river biota. One frequently discussed reason is that the restored river length is insufficient to allow populations to develop and give the room for geomorphologic processes to occur. 2. We investigated ten pairs of restored river sections of which one was a large project involving a long, intensively restored river section and one represented a smaller restoration effort. The restoration effect was quantified by comparing each restored river section to an upstream non-restored section. We sampled the following response variables: habitat composition in the river and its floodplain, three aquatic organism groups (aquatic macrophytes, benthic invertebrates and fish), two floodplain-inhabiting organism groups (floodplain vegetation, ground beetles), as well as food web composition and land–water interactions reflected by stable isotopes. 3. For each response variable, we compared the difference in dissimilarity of the restored and nearby non-restored section between the larger and the smaller restoration projects. In a second step, we regrouped the pairs and compared restored sections with large changes in substrate composition to those with small changes. 4. When comparing all restored to all non-restored sections, ground beetles were most strongly responding to restoration, followed by fish, floodplain vegetation, benthic invertebrates and aquatic macrophytes. Aquatic habitats and stable isotope signatures responded less strongly. 5. When grouping the restored sections by project size, there was no difference in the response to restoration between the projects targeting long and short river sections with regard to any of the measured response variables except nitrogen isotopic composition. In contrast, when grouping the restored sections by substrate composition, the responses of fish, benthic invertebrates, aquatic macrophytes, floodplain vegetation and nitrogen isotopic composition were greater in sections with larger changes in substrate composition as compared to those with smaller changes. 6. Synthesis and applications. The effects of hydromorphological restoration measures on aquatic and floodplain biota strongly depend on the creation of habitat for aquatic organisms, which were limited or not present prior to restoration. These positive effects on habitats are not necessarily related to the restored river length. Therefore, we recommend a focus on habitat enhancement in river restoration projects.

opencc-zeroDec 2014View details →

opencc-zeroMay 2016View details →

Supplementary material 3 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

List of tested and analyzed data sharing tools (non-exhaustive)

opencc-zeroMay 2016View details →

Supplementary material 2 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Definitions and concepts in the context of the main paper.

opencc-zeroMay 2016View details →

Supplementary material 1 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

List of selected tools.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →

European Projects funded under Data topics

The data provides the collection of information of projects funded in Europe by the European Commission on the topic of Data between 2013 and 2023. The data schema is as follows: {   "title": "Project title",   "type": "object",   "properties": {     "rcn": {       "type": "string"     },     "id": {       "type": "string"     },     "acronym": {       "type": "string"     },     "teaser": {       "type": "string"     },     "objective": {       "type": "string"     },     "name": {       "type": "string"     },     "totalCostEuro": {       "type": "number"     },     "euContributionEuro": {       "type": "number"     },     "startDate": {       "type": "string"     },     "endDate": {       "type": "string"     },     "ecSignatureDate": {       "type": "string"     },     "duration": {       "type": "string"     },     "status": {       "type": "string"     },     "doi": {       "type": "string"     },     "keywords": {       "type": "string"     },     "scienceFields": {       "type": "array",       "items": {         "type": "array",         "items": {           "type": "string"         }       }     },     "callForProposals": {       "type": "string"     },     "programmesUrl": {       "type": "array",       "items": {         "type": "string"       }     },     "topicURLs": {       "type": "array",       "items": {         "type": "string"       }     },     "participants": {       "type": "array",       "items": {         "type": "object",         "properties": {           "rcn": {             "type": "string"           },           "legalName": {             "type": "string"           },           "role": {             "type": "string"           },           "ecContribution": {             "type": "number"           },           "netEcContribution": {             "type": "number"           },           "totalCost": {             "type": "number"           },           "order": {             "type": "string"           },           "sme": {             "type": "string"           },           "address": {             "type": "object",             "properties": {               "street": {                 "type": "string"               },               "city": {                 "type": "string"               },               "postalCode": {                 "type": "string"               },               "country": {                 "type": "string"               },               "geolocation": {                 "type": "string"               },               "postBox": {                 "type": "string"               },               "url": {                 "type": "string"               }             },             "required": [               "street",               "city",               "postalCode",               "country",               "geolocation"             ]           },           "type": {             "type": "string"           }         },         "required": [           "rcn",           "legalName",           "role",           "ecContribution",           "netEcContribution",           "totalCost",           "order",           "sme",           "address",           "type"         ]       }     },     "projectDescriptionTitle": {       "type": "string"     },     "projectDescriptionText": {       "type": "string"     },     "foundedUnder": {       "type": "string"     },     "foundingScheme": {       "type": "string"     },     "image": {       "type": "string"     },     "url": {       "type": "string"     }   },   "required": [     "rcn",     "id",     "acronym",     "teaser",     "objective",     "name",     "totalCostEuro",     "euContributionEuro",     "startDate",     "endDate",     "ecSignatureDate",     "duration",     "status",     "doi",     "keywords",     "scienceFields",     "callForProposals",     "programmesUrl",     "topicURLs",     "participants",     "projectDescriptionTitle",     "projectDescriptionText",     "foundedUnder",     "foundingScheme",     "image",     "url"   ] }

restrictedcc-by-4.0Oct 2024View details →

Databases of MIS11 Western European sites - NEANDROOTS project (ANR-19-CE27-0011-01)

This folder contains all archaeolgical/technological databases developed in the frame of the NEANDROOTS project (ANR-19-CE27-0011-01), funded by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche and led by Marie-Hélène Moncel (Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle).  All databases refer to a list of 49 archaeological sites / levels, dated around MIS11 in Western Europe.  <ol> <li>Database with contextual iformation. </li> <li>Databases with basic technological information (cores, LCT, flakes, small tools and references)</li> <li>Short version of the database - presence/absence -.</li> <li>List of references</li> </ol>

Figure 8 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Figure 8 - The patchiness of survey coverage in Europe illustrated by the distribution map of Plantago lanceolata taken from GBIF in 2016. This species is one of the commonest and most widespread in Europe, it should occur in almost all areas of this map, but in fact the data traces out the borders of countries and area who have published data on GBIF.

Figure 9 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Figure 9 - Information flows between EU BON and LTER Europe, as envisaged on the 3rd EU BON Stakeholder Roundtable in Granada on 9-11 December 2015.

Figure 6 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Figure 6 - Individual Metacat instances can be connected to DataOne which replicates public files. Thus the data is still available if a single instance goes offline. https://search.dataone.org/#data/page/0

Figure 5 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Figure 5 - PPBio has installed a Metacat instance for their researchers to upload and make publicly available the results of work related to biodiversity in the Western Amazon. https://ppbiodata.inpa.gov.br/metacatui/

Figure 3 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Figure 3 - The implementation of Darwin Core Archive in Plazi to transfer treatment data. Observation data described with Darwin Core terms.