Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 5 in The effect of grazing by geese, goats, and fallow deer on soil mites (Acari)

Figure 5. Percentage ratio of adult and juvenile oribatids at goose pasture and corresponding meadow. Oribatida: A_ col – Achipteria coleoptrata, E_occ – Eupelops occultus, L_sim – Liebstadia similis, M_pul – Metabelba pulverosa, P_pel – Platynothrus peltifer, P_pun – Punctoribates punctum, S_lae – Scheloribates laevigatus, S_imm – Sellnickochthonius immaculatus, T_vel – Tectocepheus velatus, T_nov – Trichoribates novus.

Figure 3 in The effect of grazing by geese, goats, and fallow deer on soil mites (Acari)

Figure 3. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) for most abundant oribatid species with A> 0.5. Soil components and plant community, eigenvalues for axis 1 ʎ = 0.53 (72.0%), for axis 2 ʎ = 0.14 (19.2%), permutation test of first axis F = 0.7, p = 0.376. GM – goose meadow, GP – goose pasture, GoM – goat meadow, GoP – goat pasture, FM – fallow deer meadow, FP – fallow deer pasture, A_col – Achipteria coleoptrata, E_occ – Eupelops occultus, L_sim – Liebstadia similis, M_pul – Metabelba pulverosa, P_pel – Platynothrus peltifer, P_pun – Punctoribates punctum, S_lae – Scheloribates laevigatus, S_imm – Sellnickochthonius immaculatus, T_vel – Tectocepheus velatus, T_nov – Trichoribates novus.

Figure 1 in The effect of grazing by geese, goats, and fallow deer on soil mites (Acari)

Figure 1. Location of the study plots. Go – goat pasture and meadow, G – goose pasture and meadow, F – fallow deer pasture and meadow.

Figure 7 in The effect of grazing by geese, goats, and fallow deer on soil mites (Acari)

Figure 7. Percentage ratio of adult and juvenile oribatids at fallow deer pasture and corresponding meadow. Oribatida: A_col – Achipteria coleoptrata, E_occ – Eupelops occultus, L_sim – Liebstadia similis, M_pul – Metabelba pulverosa, P_pel – Platynothrus peltifer, P_pun – Punctoribates punctum, S_lae – Scheloribates laevigatus, S_imm – Sellnickochthonius immaculatus, T_vel – Tectocepheus velatus, T_nov – Trichoribates novus.

Figure 5 in Peculiarities of seasonal dynamics of net primary production and its microzooplankton grazing in the coastal waters of the Black Sea (Sevastopol region)

Figure 5. Seasonal dynamics of parameters: a – relative biomass of diatoms (1) and weighted average volume of phytoplankton cells (2), b – relative biomass of dinoflagellates (1) and coccolithophores (2), c – molar ratios N/P (1) and Si/N (2), d – net phytoplankton growth rate (1) and ratio g/µ (2) in station 2.

Figure 4 in Peculiarities of seasonal dynamics of net primary production and its microzooplankton grazing in the coastal waters of the Black Sea (Sevastopol region)

Figure 4. Seasonal dynamics of parameters: a – intensity of solar radiation (1) and water temperature (2), b – nitrates (1) and ammonium (2), c – silicates (1) and phosphates (2), c – net primary production (1) and chlorophyll a concentration (2) in station 2.

Figure 3 in Peculiarities of seasonal dynamics of net primary production and its microzooplankton grazing in the coastal waters of the Black Sea (Sevastopol region)

Figure 3. Seasonal dynamics of parameters: a – relative biomass of diatoms (1) and weighted average volume of phytoplankton cells (2), b – relative biomass of dinoflagellates (1) and coccolithophores (2), c – molar ratios N/P (1) and Si/N (2), d – net phytoplankton growth rate (1) and ratio g/µ (2) in station 1.

Figure 2 in Peculiarities of seasonal dynamics of net primary production and its microzooplankton grazing in the coastal waters of the Black Sea (Sevastopol region)

Figure 2. Seasonal dynamics of parameters: a – intensity of solar radiation (1) and water temperature (2), b – nitrates (1) and ammonium (2), c – silicates (1) and phosphates (2), c – net primary production (1) and chlorophyll a concentration (2) in station 1.

Fig. 5 in Value of forest remnants for montane amphibians on the livestock grazed Mount Mbam, Cameroon

Fig. 5. Non-metric dimensional scaling plot of amphibian community structure divided by land use type on Mount Mbam based on visual encounter surveys with equal effort for each land use. The PERMANOVA p-value is shown in the top right corner.

Fig. 4 in Value of forest remnants for montane amphibians on the livestock grazed Mount Mbam, Cameroon

Fig. 4. Montane endemic amphibian species observed in recent surveys of Mount Mbam, West-Region, Cameroon. a) Astylosternus rheophilus, b) Astylosternus montanus, c) Afrixalus aff. fulvovittatus, d) Hyperolius balfouri, e) Hyperolius igbettensis, f) Hyperolius nitidulus, g) Hyperolius concolor, h) Hyperolius cinnamomeoventris, i) Hyperolius tuberculatus, j) Leptopelis nordequatorialis, k) Leptopelis boulengeri, l) Phrynobatrachus steindachneri, m) Xenopus cf. eysoole, n) Hoplobatrachus occipitalis, and o) Sclerophrys maculata.

Fig. 2 in Value of forest remnants for montane amphibians on the livestock grazed Mount Mbam, Cameroon

Fig. 2. Montane habitats of amphibian species observed in recent surveys of Mount Mbam, West-Region, Cameroon: a) gallery forest during the rainy season; b): gallery forest during the dry season after a bushfire; c) savanna area transformed by overgrazing; and d): effects of bushfire started for pasture on the same site during the dry season.

Fig. 1 in Value of forest remnants for montane amphibians on the livestock grazed Mount Mbam, Cameroon

Fig. 1. Maps showing (top) the topography of the Bamenda Highlands, white circle showing Mount Mbam in the West Region of Cameroon; and (bottom) the layout of sample sites on Mount Mbam.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2017View details →

Fig. 3 in Short-term spider community monitoring after cattle removal in grazed grassland

Fig. 3. Richness based rarefaction curves for spiders sampled in ungrazed areas of APA Ibirapuitã, Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil, trough springs of 2011, 2012 and 2013. Adjacent lines indicates 95% confidence intervals.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2017View details →

Fig. 2 in Short-term spider community monitoring after cattle removal in grazed grassland

Fig. 2. Format used for exposal of pitfall traps in APA Ibirapuitã, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil during the campaign of 2011, 2012 and 2013. Red diamonds indicates the places of the traps. Traps were placed around 20 m from each other and least 10 m from the fence or border of each plot.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Short-term spider community monitoring after cattle removal in grazed grassland

Fig. 1. Extension of the Pampa Biome at Neotropical region. Red triangle indicates APA Ibirapuitã's localization, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Map from ANDRADE et al., 2015.

Figure 3 in Observations of a rapid decline in invasive macroalgal cover linked to green turtle grazing in a Hawaiian marine reserve

Figure 3. Mean hourly temperatures (°C) (a.), total rainfall (mm h-1) (b.), wind (km h−1) (c.), and PAR (µmol photons m−2) (d.) in 2015 (red triangle), 2016 (blue square), and 2017 (black circle). Data was obtained from Hawai'i Institute of Marine Biology Weather Station (http://www.pacioos.hawaii.edu/weather/obs-mokuoloe/).

Figure 1 in Observations of a rapid decline in invasive macroalgal cover linked to green turtle grazing in a Hawaiian marine reserve

Figure 1. Green turtle, Chelonia mydas, feeding on Gracilaria salicornia in the back lagoon of Moku o Lo'e, Kāneʻohe Bay, Oʻahu, Hawaiʻi in March 2017. Photo by KD Bahr.

Figure 2. Surveyed sites around Moku o in Observations of a rapid decline in invasive macroalgal cover linked to green turtle grazing in a Hawaiian marine reserve

Figure 2. Surveyed sites around Moku o Loʻe, Kāneʻohe Bay, Oʻahu, Hawaiʻi in April (left) and May (right) depicting proportion of substratum classified as coral (brown), rubble (grey), sand (yellow), or Gracilaria salicornia (green). Numbers within pie charts indicate number of turtles observed at each site during the survey. Red outlined pie charts denote areas with limited accessability (only during high tides) to Chelonia mydas.

Figure 5 in Observations of a rapid decline in invasive macroalgal cover linked to green turtle grazing in a Hawaiian marine reserve

Figure 5. Back lagoon of Moku o Loʻe, Kāneʻohe Bay, Oʻahu, Hawaiʻi adjacent to a fenced enclosure on 13 April 2017 (top) and same area 21 days later on 4 May 2017 (bottom). Photo by KD Bahr.