Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 11 in In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia

Fig. 11. Micro-CT images of the skeletons of caryophylliid coral Ceratotrochus (Edwardsotrochus) duodecimcostatus (Goldfuss, 1826) with domichnia Maeandropolydora elegans Bromley and D'Alessandro, 1983, INGUJ265P150 (A) and Maeandropolydora sulcans Voigt, 1965, INGUJ265P152 (B) from the El Melah stream section, the upper part of the Argiles de Sidi Barka Formation (upper Pliocene) of Tunisia; surface view (A1, B1), surface view with indication of bioerosion structures (A2, B2), partial transparency (A3, B3), and without corallum (A4, B4).

Fig. 9 in In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia

Fig. 9. Snapshots from micro-CT images of Caulostrepsis in the skeleton of caryophylliid coral Ceratotrochus (Edwardsotrochus) duodecimcostatus Goldfuss, 1826) (INGUJ265P153), from the El Melah stream section, the upper part of the Argiles de Sidi Barka Formation (upper Pliocene) of Tunisia. A. The surface with indications of bioerosion traces, with partial transparency, and without corallum, A1–A4, respectively; Ct, Caulostrepsis taeniola Clarke, 1908; Me, Maeandropolydora elegans Bromley and D'Alessandro, 1983. B. View from the other side, B1–B4, respectively; Ca, Caulostrepsis avipes Bromley and D'Alessandro, 1983.

Fig. 12. Pinaceocladichnus onubensis Mayoral, 1988 in In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia

Fig. 12. Pinaceocladichnus onubensis Mayoral, 1988, (a domichnion produced by ctenostome bryozoans) and associated trace fossils in the skeleton of caryophylliid coral Ceratotrochus (Edwardsotrochus) duodecimcostatus (Goldfuss, 1826), from the El Melah stream section, the upper part of the Argiles de Sidi Barka Formation (upper Pliocene) of Tunisia. A. INGUJ265P152, different places of the same corallum (A1, A2). B. INGUJ265P154, also Maeandropolydora elegans Bromley and D'Alessandro, 1983 (Me). C. INGUJ265P151, C1, C2 different places of the same corallum, also Caulostrepsis cretacea (Voigt, 1971) (Cc).

Fig. 10. Maeandropolydora elegans Bromley and D in In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia

Fig. 10. Maeandropolydora elegans Bromley and D'Alessandro, 1983, a dominichnion produced by polychates, in the skeleton of caryophylliid coral Ceratotrochus (Edwardsotrochus) duodecimcostatus (Goldfuss, 1826), from the El Melah stream section, the upper part of the Argiles de Sidi Barka Formation (upper Pliocene) of Tunisia. A. INGUJ265P171. B. INGUJ265P155. C. INGUJ265P159. D. INGUJ265P163.

Fig. 8. Caulostrepsis, a in In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia

Fig. 8. Caulostrepsis, a domichnion produced by polychates, in the skeleton of caryophylliid coral Ceratotrochus (Edwardsotrochus) duodecimcostatus Goldfuss, 1826), from the El Melah stream section, the upper part of the Argiles de Sidi Barka Formation (upper Pliocene) of Tunisia. A. Caulostrepsis cretacea (Voigt, 1971), INGUJ265P156. B. Caulostrepsis taeniola Clarke, 1908 and Pinaceocladichnus onubensis Mayoral, 1988 (Pn), INGUJ265P154. C. Caulostrepsis avipes Bromley and D'Alessandro, 1983, INGUJ265P176. D. A cluster of Caulostrepsis taeniola Clarke, 1908, INGUJ265P162. E–G. Caulostrepsis penicillus isp. nov. E. INGUJ265P158 holotype (a), and paratype (b). F. INGUJ265P174 paratype. G. INGUJ265P172, partial views (G1, G2).

Fig. 7 in In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia

Fig. 7. Benthic foraminifera from upper Pliocene deposits in a tributary valley of the El Melah stream, north-east of Hammamet town, Tunisia. A. Uvigerina peregrina Cushman, 1923, (FSTDG22H2, sample H2). B. Melonis affinis (Reuss, 1851) (FSTDG22H11, sample H1), side (B1) and apertural (B2) views. C. Nonion commune (d'Orbigny, 1846) (FSTDG22H10, sample H10). D. Textularia conica d'Orbigny, 1839b, (FSTDG22H12, sample H1). E. Elphidium crispum (Linnaeus, 1758) (FSTDG22H25, sample H25). F. Ammonia beccarii (Linnaeus, 1758) (FSTDG22H201, sample H20). G. Neoconorbina terquemi (Rzehak, 1888) (FSTDG22H21, sample H21). H. Uvigerina mediterranean Hofker, 1932, (FSTDG22H17, sample H17). I. Bolivina dilatata Reuss, 1850, (FSTDG22H22, sample H2). J. Amphycoryna scalaris (Batsch, 1791) (FSTDG22H1, sample H17). K. Planulina ariminensis d'Orbigny, 1826, (FSTDG22H24, sample H2). L. Bulimina costata d'Orbigny, 1852, (FSTDG22H9, sample H9). M. Spiroloculina sp. (FSTDG22H72, sample H7). N. Bolivina punctata d'Orbigny, 1839c, (FSTDG22H241, sample H24).

Fig. 6 in In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia

Fig. 6. Planktonic foraminifera foraminifera from upper Pliocene deposits in a tributary valley of the El Melah stream, north-east of Hammamet town, Tunisia. A. Globigerina bulloides d'Orbigny, 1826, (FSTDG22H31, sample H3). B. Globigerinoides ruber (d'Orbigny, 1839b) (FSTDG22H21, sample H2). C. Globigerinoides extremus Bolli and Bermudez, 1965, FSTDG22H71, sample H7). D. Orbulina universa (d'Orbigny, 1839a) FSTDG22H181, sample H18). E. Globorotalia crassaformis (Galloway and Wissler, 1927) (FSTDG22H30, sample H30). F. Globorotalia puncticulata (Deshayes, 1832) (FSTDG22H17, sample H17).

Fig. 5 in In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia

Fig. 5. Structural features of the caryophylliid coral Ceratotrochus (Edwardsotrochus) duodecimcostatus (Goldfuss, 1826) coralla from upper Pliocene deposits in a tributary valley of the El Melah stream, north-east of Hammamet town, Tunisia. A. Virtual sections of INGUJ265P153 in lower (A1) and in more distal part (A2) of corallum. B. Thin-section 3/76 of INGUJ265P139 that shows nearly completely developed 5 cycles of septa. Positions of 10 S1 septa marked with black dots. C. Thin section 2/118 of INGUJ265P138, enlarged region of transversely sectioned corallum to show diverse pat- terns of mid-septal zone development (from zig-zag in S1, S2 septa to straight in S4 septa). D. Thin sections of INGUJ265P137, transverse (D1, thin section T1/8) and longitudinal (D2, thin section T1/9) sections to show some variability of septal cycle development (D1), and development of tabular dissepiments (D2). E. INGUJ265P188, distal (E1) and lateral (E2) views of specimen with major structural features indicated. F. Longitudinal thin section 5/29 of INGUJ265P136 with the boring Maeandropolydora sulcans Voigt, 1965. G. Virtual longitudinal section of INGUJ265P188 with the boring Maeandropolydora elegans Bromley and D'Alessandro, 1983.

Fig. 3 in In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia

Fig. 3. Lithological column of the Oued El Melah section with lithostratigraphic divisions, indications of samples, and field photographs of some fossiliferous levels.

Fig. 4 in In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia

Fig. 4. Exposures of the El Melah stream the section, upper part of the Argiles de Sidi Barka Formation (upper Pliocene) of Tunisia. A. Coral level III. General view (A1), close view of the sampling area (A2). B. The coral level II/coral level III boundary. C. Coral level II. General view (C1), close view of the sampling area (C2). D. General view of coral level I. Quadrangles indicate sampling areas.

Fig. 2 in In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia

Fig. 2. Lithostratigraphy and subdivision of the Neogene and Quaternary series of northern (A) and north-eastern Tunisia (B) (Burollet 1951; Colleuil 1976).

Fig. 1. A in In vivo and post-mortem bioerosion traces in solitary corals from the upper Pliocene deposits of Tunisia

Fig. 1. A. Location of the studied area in the north-eastern Tunisia and north Africa (inset). (Ben Ali and Gaaloul 2021). B. Detailed geological map of northern and north-eastern Tunisia (1:50000; National Mining Office of Tunisia) showing Pliocene marine deposits of the Hammamet area. S, study section.

opencc-zeroJun 2024View details →

Dataset: Vivos Therapeutics, Inc. (VVOS) Stock Performance

This dataset provides historical stock market performance data for specific companies. It enables users to analyze and understand the past trends and fluctuations in stock prices over time. This information can be utilized for various purposes such as investment analysis, financial research, and market trend forecasting.

Figure 7 in Phytotoxicity of plant extracts of Vismia japurensis cultivated in vivo and in vitro

Figure 7. Expansion of the 10.0 to 13.0 ppm region of hexanic extract 1H-NMR spectra (top to bottom): (a) Branch hexanic extract; (b) Leaf hexanic extract; (c) Hexanic extract from in vitro seedlings.

Figure 6 in Phytotoxicity of plant extracts of Vismia japurensis cultivated in vivo and in vitro

Figure 6. Expansion of the region from 5.0 to 5.5 and 6.0 to 8.0 ppm of the hexanic extracts 1H-NMR spectra (top to bottom): (a) Branch hexanic extract; (b) Leaf hexanic extract; (c) Hexanic extract from in vitro seedlings.

Figure 5. 1H in Phytotoxicity of plant extracts of Vismia japurensis cultivated in vivo and in vitro

Figure 5. 1H-RMN spectra for hexanic extracts (top to bottom): (a) Branch hexanic extract; (b) Leaf hexanic extract; (c) Hexanic extract from in vitro seedlings.

Figure 3 in Phytotoxicity of plant extracts of Vismia japurensis cultivated in vivo and in vitro

Figure 3. Growth of Lactuca sativa seedlings under the influence of dry and fresh Vismia japurensis leaves (sandwich tests). Significant results are followed by: **p <0.01; ***p <0.001; ****p <0.0001.

Figure 4 in Phytotoxicity of plant extracts of Vismia japurensis cultivated in vivo and in vitro

Figure 4. Seedlings of Lactuca sativa showing the influence of hexanic extracts: (A) L. sativa in contact to leaf hexanic extract and compared to control; (B) General view of L. sativa in contact with hexanic extract from in vitro seedlings and compared to control; (C) Several L. sativa plants in contact with hexanic extract from in vitro seedlings and compared to control; (D) One L. sativa plant in contact with hexanic extract from in vitro seedlings and compared to control; (E) Plant showed in (D) magnified view (2.5x).

Figure 2 in Phytotoxicity of plant extracts of Vismia japurensis cultivated in vivo and in vitro

Figure 2. Lactuca sativa seedling growth when in contact to different methanolic extracts. Significant results are followed by: ****p <0.0001.

Figure 1 in Phytotoxicity of plant extracts of Vismia japurensis cultivated in vivo and in vitro

Figure 1. Lactuca sativa seedling growth when in contact to different hexanic extracts. Significant results are followed by: ****p <0.0001.