Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 6 in Does Bt maize cultivation affect the non-target insect community in the agro ecosystem?

Fig. 6. Estimated richness of insects in the whorl, ear and tassel of conventional (Conv.) and transgenic maize (Cry1Ab, Cry1F and combined Cry2Ab2 and Cry1A105 proteins) from Três Corações county, MG. Bars represent 95% confidence interval.

Fig. 3 in Does Bt maize cultivation affect the non-target insect community in the agro ecosystem?

Fig. 3. Estimated richness of insects in the whorl, ear and tassel of conventional (Conv.) and transgenic maize (Cry1Ab, Cry1F and combined Cry2Ab2 and Cry1A105 proteins) from Nazareno county, MG. Bars represent 95% confidence interval.

Fig. 1 in Does Bt maize cultivation affect the non-target insect community in the agro ecosystem?

Fig. 1. Abundance of different sizes of larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda in whorls of conventional and transgenic maize (Cry1Ab, Cry1F and combined Cry2Ab2 and Cry1A105 proteins) from cornfields of different counties in Minas Gerais. Bars represent a 95% confidence interval.

Fig. 5 in Does Bt maize cultivation affect the non-target insect community in the agro ecosystem?

Fig. 5. Estimated richness of insects in the whorl, ear and tassel of conventional (Conv.) and transgenic maize (Cry1Ab and Cry1F proteins) from Iraí de Minas Gerais county. Bars represent 95% confidence interval.

Fig. 14 in Does Bt maize cultivation affect the non-target insect community in the agro ecosystem?

Fig. 14. Estimated richness of secondary pests (S.P.) and natural enemies (N.E.) in tassels of conventional and transgenic maize for Cry1Ab, Cry1F and combined Cry2Ab2 and Cry1A105 proteins (A) and estimated richness in conventional maize and Bt maize (B), in different counties in Minas Gerais.Bars represent 95% confidence interval.

Fig. 13 in Does Bt maize cultivation affect the non-target insect community in the agro ecosystem?

Fig. 13. Estimated diversity of secondary pests (S.P.) and natural enemies (N.E.) in ears of conventional and transgenic maize for Cry1Ab, Cry1F and combined Cry2Ab2 and Cry1A105 proteins (A) and estimated diversity in conventional maize and Bt maize (B), in different counties in Minas Gerais. Bars represent 95% confidence interval.

opencc-by-4.0May 2015View details →

Fig. 3 in Characterization of sounds in maize produced by internally feeding insects: investigations to develop inexpensive devices for detection of Prostephanus truncatus (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in small-scale storage facilities in sub-Saharan Africa

Fig. 3. Effects of distance on detectability of larval sound impulses. Horizontal axis indicates the mean distance between the larval pouch and the sensor; vertical axis indicates the log10-transformed mean rate of impulses detected at that distance. Bars indicate the standard error of mean transformed rate.

opencc-by-4.0May 2015View details →

Fig. 1 in Characterization of sounds in maize produced by internally feeding insects: investigations to develop inexpensive devices for detection of Prostephanus truncatus (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in small-scale storage facilities in sub-Saharan Africa

Fig. 1. Spectral profiles of 4 distinctive types of larval sound impulses detected in cracked corn: HaNb, solid line; Ma, dashed line, Ha, dash-dot-dotted line, and La, dotted line. Horizontal axis indicates frequency in kHz and vertical axis indicates relative spectrum amplitude in dB.

opencc-by-4.0May 2015View details →

Fig. 2 in Characterization of sounds in maize produced by internally feeding insects: investigations to develop inexpensive devices for detection of Prostephanus truncatus (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in small-scale storage facilities in sub-Saharan Africa

Fig. 2. Oscillogram of sound impulses recorded 10 cm from pouch containing Sitophilus oryzae larvae. Examples of 3 types of larval sound impulse occur during the 1 s period, and one example each of type (Ha, La, and HaNb) is marked above the impulse. Horizontal axis indicates time in seconds and vertical axis indicates relative signal amplitude.

Fig. 3. Evolutionary analysis conducted through a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree between the cox1 in Detection of maize bushy stunt phytoplasma in leafoppers collected in native corn crops grown at high elevations in southeast Mexico

Fig. 3. Evolutionary analysis conducted through a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree between the cox1 mini-barcode sequences obtained for the red speckled nymphs and Idiodonus wickhami (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) (both marked with a circle) with reference sequences from GenBank. Bar 5 substitution in 100 positions.

Fig. 4. Evolutionary analysis conducted through a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree between the 16S in Detection of maize bushy stunt phytoplasma in leafoppers collected in native corn crops grown at high elevations in southeast Mexico

Fig. 4. Evolutionary analysis conducted through a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree between the 16S rRNA sequences amplified in this study from phytoplasma DNA, bar 1 substitution in 100 positions. Sequences in the grey square belong to the subgroup 16SrI-B. Sequences amplified from leafoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) Dalbulus elimatus marked with a circle and from Idiodonus wickhami marked with a square.

Fig. 7 in Detection of maize bushy stunt phytoplasma in leafoppers collected in native corn crops grown at high elevations in southeast Mexico

Fig. 7. Single nucleotide polymorphism of cpn60 UT sequences amplified from Dalbulus elimatus and Idiodonus wickhami compared with the 16SrI-B strains maize bushy stunt-Col (AB599712), maize bushy stunt-Pueb (KT444672), maize bushy stunt-Ver (KT444673), AVUT (AB599686), AY-27 (AB599688), and AY2192 (AB599687). (A) Similarities between the maize bushy stunt strains and the sequences obtained from the leafoppers. (B) Similarity between maize bushy stuntPueb and the phytoplasma detected associated with Idiodonus wickhami and similarity between maize bushy stunt-Col and maize bushy stunt-Ver with the phytoplasma associated with Dalbulus elimatus, based on SNP in cpn60 UT sequences.

Fig. 2 in Detection of maize bushy stunt phytoplasma in leafoppers collected in native corn crops grown at high elevations in southeast Mexico

Fig. 2. Idiodonus wickhami Ball. (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). (A) Dorsal view, (B) ventral view, (C) vertex, pronotum and scutellum, (D) Male genitalia, (E-G) I. wickhami nymphs.

Fig. 6. Electrophoresis agarose gel showing RFLP pattern comparison between the F2 in Detection of maize bushy stunt phytoplasma in leafoppers collected in native corn crops grown at high elevations in southeast Mexico

Fig. 6. Electrophoresis agarose gel showing RFLP pattern comparison between the F2nR2 sequences amplified from Dalbulus elimatus and Idiodonus wickhami digested with AluI, BstUI, HaeIII, HinfI, and Tsp509I. Molecular weight (MW) marker, 1 kb plus.

Fig. 1 in Detection of maize bushy stunt phytoplasma in leafoppers collected in native corn crops grown at high elevations in southeast Mexico

Fig. 1. Six of the 7 leafopper genera (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) detected in this study. Dorsal view of: (A) Dalbulus, (B) Macrosteles, (C) Amblysellus, (D) Graphocephala, (E) Erythridula, (F) Empoasca.

Fig. 3 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 3. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in barley. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 6 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 6. Number (SE) of S. zeamais male and female (n = 200) emergence when reared on the individual host grains: corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 5 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 5. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in brown rice. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 2 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 2. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in corn. Weevils were reared on corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, then presented with a choice of 4 host grains. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 1 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 1. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice. Weevils were reared on corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, then presented with a choice of 4 host grains. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.