Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

121

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

121 results for “Molecular systematics and phylogenetics”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1. A. Phylogenetic relationships derived from 18 in Systematic ambiguity in the well-established model system insect Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae): sister species S. soror revealed by molecular evidence

FIGURE 1. A. Phylogenetic relationships derived from 18'002 Bayesian trees based on combined COI, 12S rDNA, 16S rDNA, and ITS2 sequences as established between 21 Scathophagidae species. The tree is a 50% majority rule consensus tree; values of posterior probabilities over 50% are indicated above branches (branches with probabilities less than 50% are collapsed). Scathophaga soror is evidenced in bold. B. Excerpt from a gene tree (Neighbour Joining, Kimura 2 parameters, COI gene) illustrating the sister group relationship between the monophyletic S. stercoraria and S. soror clades. Bootstrap values (for 1000 pseudo-replicates) are indicated above branches.

opennotspecifiedApr 2010View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 3 in A molecular phylogenetic appraisal of the systematics of the Aglaopheniidae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa, Leptothecata) from the north-east Atlantic and west Mediterranean

Figure 3. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of the dataset containing all the 16S Aglaopheniidae sequences used in this study. Note that the part of the phylogenetic tree with all the branches of the Aglaophenia pluma complex is represented in a separate figure – Figure 5. Numbers near the nodes indicate the values of bootstrap (left) and posterior probabilities (right) in percentages. Values less than 70% are replaced by <; if equal to 100%, an asterisk is used instead. Values of bootstrap and posterior probabilities are omitted if both were less than 70% for the same node. The branch length indicator represents 0.1 substitutions per site.

opennotspecifiedFeb 2012View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 5 in A molecular phylogenetic appraisal of the systematics of the Aglaopheniidae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa, Leptothecata) from the north-east Atlantic and west Mediterranean

Figure 5. Part of the phylogenetic tree of Figure 3 with all the branches of the Aglaophenia pluma complex represented. Numbers near the nodes indicate the values of bootstrap (left) and posterior probabilities (right) in percentages. Values less than 70% are replaced by <; if equal to 100%, an asterisk is used instead. Values of bootstrap and posterior probabilities are omitted if both were less than 70% for the same node. The branch length indicator represents 0.1 substitutions per site.

opennotspecifiedFeb 2012View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 4 in A molecular phylogenetic appraisal of the systematics of the Aglaopheniidae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa, Leptothecata) from the north-east Atlantic and west Mediterranean

Figure 4. Hydrothecae of Aglaophenia species revealed as distinct by genetic data: A, Aglaophenia sp. 1 from deep waters of the Azores; B, Aglaophenia sp. 2 from coastal waters of Madeira. Scale bars = 0.1 mm. Credits: C. J. Moura.

opennotspecifiedFeb 2012View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 2 in A molecular phylogenetic appraisal of the systematics of the Aglaopheniidae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa, Leptothecata) from the north-east Atlantic and west Mediterranean

Figure 2. Map of the north-east Atlantic and west Mediterranean with representation of the sites with Aglaopheniidae haplotypes sampled specifically for this study.

opennotspecifiedFeb 2012View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in A molecular phylogenetic appraisal of the systematics of the Aglaopheniidae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa, Leptothecata) from the north-east Atlantic and west Mediterranean

Figure 1. Examples of Aglaopheniidae colonies: A, Gymnangium montagui off Berlengas – west Portugal; B, Macrorhynchia philippina off Madeira island; C, undetermined Aglaophenia species off Madeira. Credits: C. J. Moura.

opennotspecifiedFeb 2012View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 4 in First record of the African-Indian centipede genus Digitipes Attems, 1930 (Scolopendromorpha: Otostigminae) from Myanmar, and the systematic position of a new species based on molecular phylogenetics

FIGURE 4. Maximum likelihood consensus tree based on combined COI and 16S sequences. Numbers at nodes are bootstrap support in maximum likelihood (ML) and posterior probabilities in Bayesian inference (BI). Black circles refer to nodes supported from both ML and BI; grey circle refers to a node supported only by ML.

opennotspecifiedDec 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 3 in First record of the African-Indian centipede genus Digitipes Attems, 1930 (Scolopendromorpha: Otostigminae) from Myanmar, and the systematic position of a new species based on molecular phylogenetics

FIGURE 3. Drawings depicting variation in some morphological characters; A. Cephalic plate and T1 (Holotype). B. Forcipular segment (Holotype). C. Tooth-plate with five teeth on right side (Paratype; CUMZ 00234). D. Articles 1–3 of telopodite of second maxilla (Paratype; CUMZ 00241). E. Tergites 9–11 (Holotype). F. Sternite 10 (Paratype; CUMZ 00240). G. Coxopleural pore area (Holotype). H. Sternite of ultimate leg-bearing segment with ultimate legs (Holotype; ventral view). I. Left ultimate leg (Paratype; CUMZ 00234).

opennotspecifiedDec 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 2 in First record of the African-Indian centipede genus Digitipes Attems, 1930 (Scolopendromorpha: Otostigminae) from Myanmar, and the systematic position of a new species based on molecular phylogenetics

FIGURE 2. Morphological characters of Digitipes kalewaensis n. sp.; A. Forcipular coxosternite (Paratype; CUMZ 00234). B- C. Tergites and sternites 9–11 (Paratype; CUMZ 00241). D. Antenna, cephalic plate and T1 (Holotype). E-G. Spiracles 3, 5 and 8, respectively (Holotype). H, J. Ultimate legs (Paratypes; CUMZ 00234-00235). I. Projection on femur of ultimate leg in male (Holotype). K. Pore-field of coxopleuron (left and right; Paratype; CUMZ 00235). L-M. Ventral and dorsal view of ultimate leg-bearing segment (Paratype; CUMZ 00234).

opennotspecifiedDec 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1 in First record of the African-Indian centipede genus Digitipes Attems, 1930 (Scolopendromorpha: Otostigminae) from Myanmar, and the systematic position of a new species based on molecular phylogenetics

FIGURE 1. Collecting area of Digitipes kalewaensis n. sp.; A. Location of collection area in Myanmar. B. Collecting locality (expanded magnification). C. Habitat type.

opennotspecifiedDec 2015View details →
dryad32/100

Unveiling the evolutionary history of a puzzling antlion genus Gatzara Navás (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae: Dendroleontinae) based on systematic revision, molecular phylogenetics, and biogeographic inference

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2022View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Phylogenetic systematics of Cochlospermaceae (Malvales) based on molecular and morphological evidence

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2018View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Combined molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Orthoptera (Arthropoda, Insecta) and implications for their higher systematics

A phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear rDNA sequences from species of all the superfamilies of the insect order Orthoptera (grasshoppers, crickets and relatives) confirmed that although mitochondrial sequences provided good resolution of the youngest superfamilies, nuclear rDNA sequences were necessary to separate the basal groups. To try to reconcile these data sets into a single fully resolved orthopteran phylogeny, we adopted consensus and combined data strategies. The consensus analysis produced a partially resolved tree, lacking several well-supported features of the individual analyses. However, this lack of resolution was explained by an examination of resampled data sets that identified the likely source of error as the relatively short length of the individual mitochondrial data partitions. In a subsequent comparison in which the mitochondrial sequences were initially combined, we observed less conflict. We then used two approaches to examine the validity of combining all of the data in a single analysis; comparative analysis of trees recovered from resampled data sets and the application of a randomization test. The results did not point to significant levels of heterogeneity in phylogenetic signal between the mitochondrial and nuclear data sets, and we therefore proceeded with a combined analysis. Reconstructing phylogenies under the minimum evolution and maximum likelihood optimality criteria, we examined monophyly of the major orthopteran groups using nonparametric and parametric bootstrap analysis and Kishino-Hasegawa tests. Our analysis suggests that phylogeny reconstruction under the ML criteria is the most discriminating approach for the combined sequences. The results indicate that the caeliferan Pneumoroidea and Pamphagoidea (as previously suggested) are polyphyletic. The Acridoidea is redefined to include all pamphagoid families other than the Pyrgomorphidae, which we propose should be accorded superfamily status.

opencc-zeroDec 2008View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 28 in Molecular phylogenetics, systematics and host-plant associations of the Bruchidius albosparsus (Fåhraeus) species group (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae) with the description of four new species

FIGURE 28. Color variation in Bruchidius grandemaculatus adults (a, b—males; c, d—females).

opennotspecifiedDec 2015View details →
zenodo28/100

Fig. 5 in Molecular phylogenetics and systematics of two enteric helminth parasites (Baylisascaris laevis and Diandrya vancouverensis) in the Vancouver Island marmot (Marmota vancouverensis)

Fig. 5. Bayesian consensus tree from Diandrya, related genera, and outgroup alignments of cox1, ITS1, and concatenated sequences from GenBank and this study (D. vancouverensis). Branch labels represent Bayesian posterior probabilities. Branch lengths are scaled to expected number of substitutions per site. See also Table 2.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 34 in Systematic revision of the living species of Bullidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Cephalaspidea), with a molecular phylogenetic analysis

Figure 34. Gizzard plates of Bulla quoyii (A, B) and B. vernicosa (C, D). A, Auckland, New Zealand (BMNH 20030345; H = 27.1 mm). B, Albany, Western Australia (WAM S19095; H = 42.7 mm). C, Honolulu, Hawaii (BMNH 20030042; H = 31.0 mm). D, Dili, East Timor (BMNH 20040857; H = 25.0 mm). Scale bars: A, C, D = 2 mm; B = 1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2008View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 37 in Systematic revision of the living species of Bullidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Cephalaspidea), with a molecular phylogenetic analysis

Figure 37. Variability in the female glands of Bulla ampulla (A–C), B. orientalis (D, E), B. arabica sp. nov. (F, G), B. quoyii (H, I) and B. vernicosa (J, K). Dorsal views depicted in A, E, G, H, K and anterior ventral views in B–D, F, I, J. A, B, north of Cloates, Western Australia (WAM S.19144; H = 44.0 mm). C, Nha Trag, Vietnam (BMNH 20010449; H = 49.0 mm). D, E, Taolagnaro, Madagascar (BMNH 20030672/2; H = 27.8 mm). F, G, Ras al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates (BMNH 20060101; H = 42.2 mm). H, I, Auckland, New Zealand (BMNH 20030345; H = 29.6 mm). J, K, Lizard Island, Qld, Australia (WAM S.19142; H = 28.4 mm).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2008View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 28 in Systematic revision of the living species of Bullidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Cephalaspidea), with a molecular phylogenetic analysis

Figure 28. Involute spire and protoconch of Bulla ampulla (A, B), B. arabica sp. nov. (C), B. orientalis (D), B. peasiana (E), B. quoyii (F), and B. vernicosa (G, H). A, Kagoshima, Japan (BMNH 20060106; H = 37.0 mm). B, Noumea, New Caledonia (BMNH 20060548; H = 58.7 mm). C, Ras al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates (BMNH 20060102; H = 39.6 mm). D, Taolagnaro, Madagascar (BMNH 20030672/2; H = 27.8 mm). E, Hilo, Hawaii (BMNH 1910.09.28.118–120). F, Auckland, New Zealand (BMNH 20030345; H = 27.1 mm). G, Panglao, Philippines (MNHN, Paris; H = 27.7 mm). H, Dili, East Timor (BMNH 20040857; H = 25.0 mm). Scale bars: A, C–D, F = 200 Mm; B, E, G–H = 50 Mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2008View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 36 in Systematic revision of the living species of Bullidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Cephalaspidea), with a molecular phylogenetic analysis

Figure 36. Male genital system (with details of prostate and penial duct) of Bulla orientalis (A–C), B. quoyii (D, E), and B. vernicosa (F–H). A, B C, Okinawa, Japan (BMNH 20040859; H = 22.0 mm). D, Auckland, New Zealand (BMNH 20030345; H = 29.6 mm). E, Albany, Western Australia (WAM S19095; H = 43.7 mm). F, G, Panglao, Philippines (MNHN, Paris; H = 27.7 mm). H, Honolulu, Hawaii (BMNH 20030042; H = 31.0 mm).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2008View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 21 in Systematic revision of the living species of Bullidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Cephalaspidea), with a molecular phylogenetic analysis

Figure 21. Gizzard plates of Bulla mabillei (A, B), B. solida (C, D), B. gouldiana (E–G), and B. punctulata (H–J). A, B, Tenerife Island, Canary Islands (BMNH 20020457; H = 26.5, 20.4 mm). C, off Florida (HBOM 62–281; H = 34.9 mm). D, off Florida (HBOM 65-281; H = 40.0 mm). E, Baja California, Mexico (BMNH 20050366; H = 25.4 mm). F–G, Baja California, Mexico (CAS 067260; H = 40.6, 35.4 mm). H, Guanacaste, Costa Rica (INBio 03458490; H = 13.8 mm). I, Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos (CAS 067270; H = 16.5 mm). J, Puntarenas, Costa Rica (INBio 01482898; H = 19.6 mm). Scale bars: G–J = 1 mm; A–F = 2 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2008View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record