Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 11 in New species of Paratya (Decapoda: Atyidae) from Australian inland waters - linking morphological characters with molecular lineages

Figure 11. Paratya spinosa sp. nov.: a, pereiopod 4; b, dactylus 4; c, pereiopod 5; d, dactylus 5; e, telson; f, telson terminal spines; g, pleopod 1 of female; h, pleopod 1 of male; i, endopod 1 of male. Scale lines 0.2 mm.

Figure 7 in New species of Paratya (Decapoda: Atyidae) from Australian inland waters - linking morphological characters with molecular lineages

Figure 7. Paratya walkeri sp. nov.: a, maxilliped 3; b, pereiopod 1; c, pereiopod 2; d, pereiopod 3; e, dactylus. Scale lines 0.2 mm.

Figure 6 in New species of Paratya (Decapoda: Atyidae) from Australian inland waters - linking morphological characters with molecular lineages

Figure 6. Paratya walkeri sp. nov.: a, head region and rostrum; b, antenna 1 peduncle and stylocerite; c, scaphocerite; d, left mandible; e, enlarged incisors; f, right mandible; g, enlarged incisors; h, maxilla 1; i, maxilla 2; j, maxilliped 1; k, maxilliped 2. Scale lines 0.2 mm.

Figure 2 in New species of Paratya (Decapoda: Atyidae) from Australian inland waters - linking morphological characters with molecular lineages

Figure 2. Neighbour-joining analysis of Paratya using Tamura-3-parameter, gamma distribution shape parameter of 0.81, homogenous pattern among lineages and 2000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates. Bootstrap values>72% displayed. Sequence data from Cook et al. (2006); Baker et al. (2004), Cook (2006), Hurwood et al. (2003), McCluskey (2007) and this study.

Figure 8 in New species of Paratya (Decapoda: Atyidae) from Australian inland waters - linking morphological characters with molecular lineages

Figure 8. Paratya walkeri sp. nov.: a, pereiopod 4; b, dactylus 4; c, pereiopod 5; d, dactylus 5; e, telson; f, telson terminal spines; g, pleopod 1 of female. Scale lines 0.2 mm.

Figure 1 in New species of Paratya (Decapoda: Atyidae) from Australian inland waters - linking morphological characters with molecular lineages

Figure 1. Maps: a, distribution of Paratya in Australia. Sources include data from Cook et al. (2006); Baker et al. (2004), Cook (2006), Hurwood et al. (2003), McCluskey (2007) and data from this study; b, distribution of Paratya specimens analysed in this study. Maps created in Cartographica.

Figure 5 in New species of Paratya (Decapoda: Atyidae) from Australian inland waters - linking morphological characters with molecular lineages

Figure 5. Paratya australiensis: a–e, P. australiensis Kemp; f–j, P. australiensis Shoalhaven morphotype; a, rostrum; b, left mandible incisors; c, right mandible incisors; d, first pereiopod; e, second pereiopod; f, rostrum; g, left mandible incisors; h, right mandible incisors; i, first pereiopod; j, second pereiopod. Scale lines 0.2 mm.

Figure 3 in New species of Paratya (Decapoda: Atyidae) from Australian inland waters - linking morphological characters with molecular lineages

Figure 3. Sub-tree of Paratya arrostra Riek, 1953, showing supported subclades. Themajority of material collected across a wide geographical area in this study grouped within a single clade (E), which is equivalent to Lineage 4B in Cook et al. (2006). Previous haplotypes from Cook et al. (2006) form the other sub-clades, but no specific geographical information is known for these sequences. Sub-clades A and B contain some specimens from this study.

Figure 4 in New species of Paratya (Decapoda: Atyidae) from Australian inland waters - linking morphological characters with molecular lineages

Figure 4. Sub-tree of Paratya tasmaniensis Riek, 1953, showing supported sub-clades. Sub-clade A predominantly has material from Tasmania but with a single specimen collected at Hamilton, Victoria. Sub-clade B contains specimens from the Glenelg River catchment, south-west Victoria through to the Hastings River in New South Wales. Sub-clade E contains sequences from Cook (2006) from the Strathbogie area, and sub-clades C and D are from Cook et al. (2006) and McCluskey (2007).

opencc-zeroJul 2024View details →

Linked collectors and determiners for: Review and phylogeny of Cyrtomenus Amyot & Serville (Hemiptera: Cydnidae: Cydninae) based on morphological characters.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Review and phylogeny of Cyrtomenus Amyot & Serville (Hemiptera: Cydnidae: Cydninae) based on morphological characters". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/035c358a-0715-41a2-a6c9-27ebad4ea273">https://bionomia.net/dataset/035c358a-0715-41a2-a6c9-27ebad4ea273</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/035c358a-0715-41a2-a6c9-27ebad4ea273">https://gbif.org/dataset/035c358a-0715-41a2-a6c9-27ebad4ea273</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

Fig. 1 in Morphological characters and SNP markers suggest hybridization and introgression in sympatric populations of the pleurocarpous mosses Homalothecium lutescens and H. sericeum

Fig. 1 Measurements of branch leaf characteristics of Homalothecium spp. Leaf characters (L1-L18) are explained in Table 3

Fig. 4 in Morphological characters and SNP markers suggest hybridization and introgression in sympatric populations of the pleurocarpous mosses Homalothecium lutescens and H. sericeum

Fig. 4 Relationship between width and length of leaf lamina of Homalothecium leaf specimens (N = 240) collected from the allopatric populations of H. lutescens (N = 60) and H. sericeum (N = 59) and the

Fig. 6 in Morphological characters and SNP markers suggest hybridization and introgression in sympatric populations of the pleurocarpous mosses Homalothecium lutescens and H. sericeum

Fig. 6 The positions of putatively hybrid sporophytes from the sympatric populations of H. lutescens and H. sericeum superimposed in the PCA from Fig. 5, based on leaf morphology of the maternal gametophytes. The morphospace of leaves from allopatric populations of H. lutescens and H. sericeum are shown as encircled surfaces (blue circle = H. lutescens and yellow circle = H. sericeum). The red circle represents the morphospace of individuals from the sympatric populations. Each square represents a hybrid sporophyte specimen, collected on its

Fig. 5 in Morphological characters and SNP markers suggest hybridization and introgression in sympatric populations of the pleurocarpous mosses Homalothecium lutescens and H. sericeum

Fig. 5 Principal component analysis of 14 leaf characters from 240 specimens representing allopatric and sympatric populations of Homalothecium lutescens and H. sericeum. The first two axes (PC1 and PC2) representing together 36% of variation are shown. The colours and shapes of data points correspond to the population of the specimens. Leaf

Fig. 2 in Morphological characters and SNP markers suggest hybridization and introgression in sympatric populations of the pleurocarpous mosses Homalothecium lutescens and H. sericeum

Fig. 2 (a) Measurement of capsule orientation in relation to the seta in Homalothecium as the angle (in degrees) between the seta and spore capsule at the basis of the spore capsule. (b) Capsule inclinations of individuals from the allopatric populations fell into the black ranges of variation; in the sympatric populations individuals occurred with capsule inclinations ranging outside typical capsule inclinations of the pure species (red zone: 150°- 164°), indicating hybrid origin

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2018View details →

Fig. 1. Morphological characters used for the analysis. A–B. Head. C–D. Mandible. E–H. Apical maxillary palpomere. I–K in The world fauna of Synchroidae Lacordaire, 1859 (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea, Synchroidae)

Fig. 1. Morphological characters used for the analysis. A–B. Head. C–D. Mandible. E–H. Apical maxillary palpomere. I–K. Antenna.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2018View details →

Fig. 2. Morphological characters used for the analysis and key. A–D. Pronotum. E–F. Prosternal process. G–H. Mesoventral cavity. I. Elytral striae. J. Aedeagus. K in The world fauna of Synchroidae Lacordaire, 1859 (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea, Synchroidae)

Fig. 2. Morphological characters used for the analysis and key. A–D. Pronotum. E–F. Prosternal process. G–H. Mesoventral cavity. I. Elytral striae. J. Aedeagus. K. Ovipositor.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2014View details →

Figure 6. PCA scatter plot for the 2 canonical variates generated from the 7 morphometric characters from 5 in Morphological and biometrical comparisons of the baculum in the genus Nannospalax Palmer, 1903 (Rodentia: Spalacidae) from Turkey with consideration of its taxonomic importance

Figure 6. PCA scatter plot for the 2 canonical variates generated from the 7 morphometric characters from 5 species.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2008View details →

Text-fig. 1. D&E tree of Endress and Doyle (2009), from the combined morphological and molecular analysis of Doyle and Endress (2000), with modifications based on more recent data, showing the inferred evolution of the reticulum grading character (39). Boxes under names of taxa indicate their character state; shading of branches indicates their reconstructed state based on parsimony optimization with MacClade (Maddison and Maddison 2003). Nymph = Nymphaeales, Aust = Austrobaileyales, Chlor = Chloranthaceae, Piper = Piperales, Ca = Canellales, Magnol = Magnoliales. in Early Cretaceous Monocots: A Phylogenetic Evaluation

Text-fig. 1. D&E tree of Endress and Doyle (2009), from the combined morphological and molecular analysis of Doyle and Endress (2000), with modifications based on more recent data, showing the inferred evolution of the reticulum grading character (39). Boxes under names of taxa indicate their character state; shading of branches indicates their reconstructed state based on parsimony optimization with MacClade (Maddison and Maddison 2003). Nymph = Nymphaeales, Aust = Austrobaileyales, Chlor = Chloranthaceae, Piper = Piperales, Ca = Canellales, Magnol = Magnoliales.