Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
423
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
423 results for “University students”
Adaptation and evolution of teaching method for university programming subject to the online learning environment - Student point gain dataset
<p>This dataset contains anonymized study results of students studying Operating Systems class at the Technical University of Košice in the span of school years 2015/2016 to 2020/2021.</p>
Lifestyle and sense of coherence: A comparative analysis among university students in different areas of knowledge
<p>Background: The concept of health has undergone profound changes. Lifestyle Medicine (LSM) consists of therapeutic approaches that focus on the prevention and treatment of diseases. It follows that the quality of life of university students directly affects their health and educational progress.</p> <p>Experimental Methodology: Socioeconomic, lifestyle (LS), and sense of coherence (SOC) questionnaires were administered to college students from three different areas. The results were analyzed for normality and homogeneity, followed by ANOVA variance analysis and Dunn and Tukey post hoc test for multiple comparisons. Spearman's correlation coefficient evaluated the correlation between lifestyle and sense of coherence; p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. </p> <p>Results: The correlation between LS and SOC was higher among males and higher among Medical and Human sciences students compared to Exact sciences. Medical students' scores were higher than Applied sciences and Human sciences students on the LS questionnaire. Exact science students' scores on the SOC questionnaire were higher than Human sciences students. In the LS areas related to alcohol intake, sleeping quality, and behavior, there were no differences between the areas. However, women scored better in the nutrition domain and alcohol intake. The SOC was also higher in men compared to women. </p> <p>Conclusion: The results obtained demonstrate in an unprecedented way in the literature that the correlation between the LS and SOC of college students varies according to gender and areas of knowledge, reflecting the importance of actions on improving students' quality of life and enabling better academic performance.</p>
Data base: case-based learning with or without Escape Room activities as an active learning approach for improving academic performance and satisfaction among university students of psychology of groups
<p>Data base Database that collects data on gender, age, grade at the beginning of the course, grades of the activity and satisfaction with the activity.</p> <p>An experimental study using randomisation of team work groups was developed. Some student groups developed CBL activities in combination with Escape Room activities, and other student groups developed CBL activities alone. The latter can be considered a control group.</p> <p>This innovative teaching project was performed by social work students at the University of Zaragoza (Spain). This degree comprises 240 ECTS credits spread out over four years. Specifically, this experimental study was created for "Social Work with Groups" , a compulsory subject taught during the second semester of the second academic year of the Social Work degree programme. It is divided into two parts: the first one is presented from a social psychology perspective, and it is made up of five course curriculum topics. The second one is taught from a social work/social services perspective, which focuses more on the specifics of the profession (four course curriculum topics). This experiment was conducted in February and March 2023, during the delivery of the social psychology part of the course. There are taught five course curriculum topics that fall within the domain of social psychology (psychology of groups). These topics are: 1) group meaning and types; 2) group growth processes, cohesion, conflict, obedience and group violence, group decision-making; 3) group structure: definition, status, roles, norms, group culture; 4) leadership and 5) group characteristics such as communication and empathy.</p> <p>The participants were students enrolled in the “Social Work with Groups” course at the University of Zaragoza (Spain) during the 2022-2023 academic year. The sample size was 111 students: 56 performed CBL activities with Escape Room activities, and 55 performed CBL activities without Escape Room activities.</p> <p>The variable outcome of this experimental study was academic performance, assessed by the grade obtained in the mark for CBL activities with a rating from 0 to 10, where the higher score indicated a better performance. This mark showed the number of correct concepts that were identified and extracted from the case. This score was translated to a categorical assessment going from <em>fail</em> (between 0 and 4.9), to <em>pass</em> (between 5.0 and 6.9), to <em>merit</em> (between 7.0 and 8.9), to <em>outstanding</em> (between 9.0 and 10).</p> <p><em>Secondary outcomes</em></p> <p>The secondary variables were: 1) quantitative and qualitative exam score (on the psychology of groups´ contents) 2) students´ satisfaction with the activity, and 3) time needed for performing the activities.</p> <p>The academic performance data were collected using the exam score for the subject (psychology of groups´ contents). This exam consisted of 40 multiple-choice questions with three response options, taking the chance factor into account (so marks were deducted for wrong answers). The quantitative rating of each academic score can range between 0 and 10, with a higher score denoting a higher percentage of correct answers. The categorical holistic assessment of achievement goes from <em>fail</em> (between 0 and 4.9), to <em>pass</em> (between 5.0 and 6.9), to <em>merit</em> (between 7.0 and 8.9), to <em>outstanding</em> (between 9.0 and 10).</p> <p>The data on students´ satisfaction with the activity performed were collected using a self-reporting questionnaire made up of seven statements on the course and teaching methodology used (Gómez-Poyato et al. 2020; Oliván-Blázquez et al. 2022; Olivan-Blázquez et al. 2019), which were answered on a Likert scale from 0 to 4, with 0 meaning <em>not at all</em> and 4 meaning <em>to a great extent</em>. The statements to be evaluated were as follows: the teaching methodology used has encouraged new knowledge acquisition; it has favoured deep learning; it has helped me to think more critically; it has helped me to apply theoretical content to practice; it has helped me to apply theoretical content to assessments; it has helped me to understand concepts better; I believe it is an appropriate teaching methodology. A free response section was also included so that students could express themselves openly.</p> <p>The data for the time used to carry out the activities were also collected, measured in minutes used for finishing the activities.</p> <p>Age, gender and university admittance mark data were also obtained in order to to determine if the student groups were in the same conditions regarding these values at the start of the analysis.</p>
Smartphone Application for University Students With Binge Drinking Behavior
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06084832. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Transdiagnostic Internet Intervention to Improve Mental Health Among University Students: Pilot Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05509660. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Impact of Whole-Body Vibration on Anthropometric Measurement and Body Composition in Overweight and Obese University Students
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06913231. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Fertility Awareness in University Students
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02607761. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
The Effect of Exercise on Anxiety and Cognition in Students at University
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04847128. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 8.
Reading; Through the Eyes of a University Student
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04318106. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 10.
Factors Linked to AI Literacy in University Students
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06689319. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Interventions for the Wellbeing of Students At the University of Helsinki
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06542029. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 17.
Promoting Health Knowledge Among University Students
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02717169. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Prescribing Laughter for Sleep and Wellbeing in UAE University Students
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04171245. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Aerobic and Tai Chi Exercise Among the Smoker University Students
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03851029. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 13.
Text Message and Competition-Based Interventions Among University Students
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06246812. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
Supporting University Students Transition Towards Sustainable and Healthy Dietary Behaviours: A Living Lab Approach.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06939231. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 7.
The Effects of Psycho-educational Training in Undergraduate Students at the University of Granada (Spain)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05598944. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 8.
Long Term Impact of Child Abuse in University Students
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06366126. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Levels of Daily Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in Maastricht University's Undergraduate First Year Students
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03513341. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
Intervention Program Among University Student to Promote Physical Activity and Reduce the Sedentary Time
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05019482. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 16.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.