Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
599
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
599 results for “Volatile”
Fig. 5 in Behavioral responses of Aphis citricola (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and its natural enemy Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to non-host plant volatiles
Fig. 5. Differences in the number of Harmonia axyridis adults responding to French marigold (Tagetes patula) (A) and catbip (Nepeta cataria) (B) afer 60 min. T: Apple trees + aromatic plants; CK: apple trees. Aphids removed: aphids introduced for 2 h and then removed. The numbers of asterisks represent the level of significance: * significant (P <0.05); n.s. no significant difference.
Fig. 7 in Behavioral responses of Aphis citricola (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and its natural enemy Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to non-host plant volatiles
Fig. 7. Differences in the number Harmonia axyridis adults in response to 12.5 μL/L, 25 μL/L, and 50 μL/L D-limonene (A, B) and terpinolene (C, D) afer 60 min. A, C: No aphids;B, D: aphids present.The numbers of asterisks represent the level of significance:** highly significant (P <0.01);* significant (P <0.05);n.s. no significant difference.
Fig. 3 in Behavioral responses of Aphis citricola (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and its natural enemy Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to non-host plant volatiles
Fig. 3. Linear regression models showing the relationship in the ratio of Harmonia axyridis abundance to Aphis citricola abundance with sampling years. A: Catnip (Nepeta cataria) + French marigold (Tagetes patula), B: ageratum (Ageratum houstonianum) + French marigold, C: catnip + ageratum, and D: native vegetation.
Fig. 1 in Capture of Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in traps baited with torula yeast solution versus cucumber volatile plugs
Fig. 1. Captures of melon flies, Zeugodacus cucurbitae, in Multilure traps bait- ed with torula yeast borax solution or cucumber volatile plugs at low-capture sites (B, C, and E). Data were pooled among sites and over sampling weeks as described in the text. Bar heights represent means (± 1 SE) of 270 values (3 sites × 15 traps per trap type × 6 wk).
Fig. 2 in Capture of Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in traps baited with torula yeast solution versus cucumber volatile plugs
Fig. 2. Captures of melon flies, Zeugodacus cucurbitae, in Multilure traps bait- ed with torula yeast borax solution or cucumber volatile plugs over an 8 wk period at the intermediate-capture site (A). Points represent means (± 1 SE) of 15 traps per lure type.
Fig. 3 in Capture of Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in traps baited with torula yeast solution versus cucumber volatile plugs
Fig. 3. Captures of melon flies, Zeugodacus cucurbitae, in Multilure traps baited with torula yeast borax solution or cucumber volatile plugs over a 6 wk period at the high-capture site (D). Points represent means (± 1 SE) of 10 traps per lure type.
Geochemical evidence for high volatile fluxes from the mantle at the end of the Archean: Sample data
<p>This file describes the origin of samples and gives the original xenon data published in refs. 4, 5 and 8. The slopes of the fractionation lines are given in refs. 8 (Table S1), 5 (Tables 1 and S1) and 4 (Table S1). For the barite sample (Ref. 6, Table 1), Xe data were normalized to 132Xe since 130Xe could have been contributed by radioactivity products. In this case Δ129Xe was computed from 128Xe and 131,132Xe data. The Δ129Xe values were computed from the difference between the isotope fractionation slope (‰/u) and the 129Xe/130Xe values in deviation permil (‰) relative to the corresponding atmospheric isotope composition.</p>
Data for "Experimental investigation into the volatilities of highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOM)"
<p>The data used in the preparation of the manuscript "Experimental investigation into the volatilities of highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOM)". The data consists of the data in each of the figures, as well as the time series for measured ozone, alpha-pinene, NOx, NO, condensation sink, temperature, relative humidity, aerosol mass concentration for organics, sulfate and ammonium, as well as the high resolution fitted compounds and unit mass resolution sticks from the CI-APi-TOF.</p>
Fig. 2 in Preference of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for volatiles of Bt maize induced by multiple herbivory
Fig. 2. Predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus preference for volatile compounds in two-choice olfactometer tests, comparing: conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae (C + Tu); conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae and Spodoptera frugiperda (C + Tu + Sf); Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae (Bt + Tu); Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae and S. frugiperda (Bt + Tu + Sf). Numbers in bars represent individual predatory mites that choose the indicated odor. No significant p ≥ 0.05.
Fig. 5 in Preference of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for volatiles of Bt maize induced by multiple herbivory
Fig. 5. Projection to principal component analysis (PCA) based on the headspace composition of volatiles of conventional maize plants uninfested (C = o); conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae (C + Tu = •); Bt maize plants uninfested (Bt = Δ); and Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae (Bt + Tu = N), using the first two principal components (Dim) with explained variance in brackets.
Fig. 1 in Preference of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for volatiles of Bt maize induced by multiple herbivory
Fig. 1. Predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus preference for volatile compounds in two-choice olfactometer tests, comparing: conventional maize plants uninfested (C); conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae (C + Tu); Bt maize plants uninfested (Bt); and Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae (Bt + Tu); Numbers in bars represent individual predatory mites that choose the indicated odor. No significant p ≥ 0.05.
Fig. 3 in Preference of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for volatiles of Bt maize induced by multiple herbivory
Fig. 3. Chromatograms of volatile compounds extracted from leaves of conventional maize plants uninfested (C); conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae (C + Tu); Bt maize plants uninfested (Bt); and Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae (Bt + Tu). The compounds observed in analysis were 1 = (E)-Hex-2-enal; 2 = heptanal; 3 = (E)-Oct-2-enal; 4 = α-pineno; 5 = β-cisocimeno; 6 = β-Ciclocitral; 7 = 1-metil-6-(3-metilbuta-1,3-dienil)-7-oxabiciclo[4,1,0]heptano; 8 = no identificated = C8; 9 = no identificated = C9; 10 = β-ionona; 11 = Ciclosativena; 12 = (E)-7-tetradecen-1-ol; 13 = no identificated = C13; 14 = Linolenic acid ethyl ester; 15 = no identificated = C15.
Fig. 4 in Preference of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for volatiles of Bt maize induced by multiple herbivory
Fig. 4. Chromatograms of volatile compounds extracted from leaves of conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae (C + Tu); conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae and Spodoptera frugiperda (C + Tu + Sf = +); Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae (Bt + Tu); Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae and S. frugiperda (Bt + Tu + Sf). The compounds observed in analysis were 1 = (E)-Hex-2-enal; 2 = heptanal; 3 = (E)-Oct-2-enal; 4 = ˛-pineno; 5 = ˇ-cisocimeno; 6 = ˇ-Ciclocitral; 7 = 1-metil-6- (3-metilbuta-1,3-dienil)-7-oxabiciclo[4,1,0]heptano; 8 = ˇ-ionona; 9 = no identificated = C9; 10 = (E)-7-tetradecen-1-ol; 11 = no identificated = C11; 12 = Linolenic acid ethyl ester; 13 = no identificated = C13.
Fig. 1 in Volatile compounds emitted by the stink bug Antiteuchus innocens (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)
Fig. 1. Typical gas chromatograms of volatile compounds released by disturbed females (A) and fifh instar nymphs (B), or produced by the dorsal gland of fifh instar nymphs (C). For an explanation of peak numbers see Tables 1 and 2.
Fig. 2 in A volatile semiochemical released by the fungus garden of leaf-cutting ants
Fig. 2. Olfactometer model used in the experiment of ant responses to healthy or unhealthy fungus in the Y-shaped choice system.
Fig. 4. A in A volatile semiochemical released by the fungus garden of leaf-cutting ants
Fig. 4. A: Mean percent area and standard deviation (confidence interval) of volatiles emited by the fungus; B: healthy fungus and fungus with cycloheximide for 7 d; C: healthy fungus and fungus with cycloheximide for 14 d.
Fig. 1. Fungus garden. A in A volatile semiochemical released by the fungus garden of leaf-cutting ants
Fig. 1. Fungus garden. A: Fungus healthy; B: fungus with incorporation of pellets with cycloheximide on d 7 of the experiment; and C: fungus on d 14 of the experiment.
Fig. 6 in A volatile semiochemical released by the fungus garden of leaf-cutting ants
Fig. 6. Means and confidence interval of disks transported containing healthy and unhealthy fungus extract into the colony.
Fig. 5 in A volatile semiochemical released by the fungus garden of leaf-cutting ants
Fig. 5. Percent and confidence interval of ant choice in the Y-shaped choice system. A: Chamber with healthy fungus and chamber without fungus; B: chamber with healthy fungus and chamber without healthy fungus; C: chamber containing fungus with cycloheximide for 7 d and chamber without fungus; D: chamber with healthy fungus and chamber containing fungus with cycloheximide for 7 d; E: chamber containing fungus with cycloheximide for 14 d and chamber without fungus; F: chamber with healthy fungus and chamber containing fungus with cycloheximide for 14 d.
Fig. 3 in A volatile semiochemical released by the fungus garden of leaf-cutting ants
Fig. 3. Volatiles emited by the fungus. A: Healthy fungus; B: fungus without cycloheximide for 7 d; C: fungus without cycloheximide for 14 d; D: fungus with cycloheximide for 7 d; E: fungus with cycloheximide for 14 d.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.