Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
156
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
156 results for “distribution sites”
Fig. 3 in Bats of Alpi Marittime Nature Park (North West Italy) and Site of Community Importance IT1160056: distribution and status
Fig. 3 - Trend of hibernating individuals (counted from 15th December to 15th February) for each observed bat species in the Grotte del Bandito caves and in neighbouring bunkers and tunnels (Roaschia). / Trend del numero d'individui in ibernazione (contati nel periodo compreso tra il 15 dicembre e il 15 febbraio) delle differenti specie di chirotteri osservate nelle Grotte del Bandito e nei vicini bunker e gallerie (Roaschia).
Fig. 2 in Bats of Alpi Marittime Nature Park (North West Italy) and Site of Community Importance IT1160056: distribution and status
Fig. 2 - Percentage frequency of 1 km grid cells size in which every species was reported. / Frequenza percentuale del numero di griglie chilometriche in cui sono state segnalate le differenti specie.
Рис. 4. Карта-схема мест встреч пятнистого оΛеня в Нижнем Приамурье в 1979–2021 гг. КваΑраты — места фоторегистрации: 1 — верховья рр. Обор и Àурмин; 2, 3 — Анюйский национаΛьный парк; круги — места встреч по Λитературным и опросным Αанным: 1 — окрестности с. Кутузовка (место первой регистрации в 1979 г.); 2 — верховья р. СиΑима; 3 — устье р. Нижняя Буге; 4 — бассейн р. Мухен; 5–8 — Анюйский национаΛьный парк (соответственно, р. Пихца, урочище Сира, окрестности с. Арсеньево, устье р. СоΛоми); 9 — среΑнее течение р. СоΛоми; 10 — 76 км трассы ΔиΑога — Ванино; 11 — бассейн р. Кия; 12 — бассейн р. ХойΑур; 13 — бассейн р. Нюра Fig. 4. A schematic map of sika deer sightings in the Lower Amur Region in 1979-2021. Squares designate sites of photo recording: 1 — upper reaches of the rivers Obor and Durmin; 2, 3 — Anyui National Park; circles designate sightings sites according to the literature and the survey data: 1 — vicinity of the village Kutuzovka (the place of the first registration in 1979); 2 — upper reaches of the river Sidima; 3 — the mouth of the river Lower Buge; 4 — the Mukhen River basin; 5-8 —Anyui National Park (respectively, the Pikhtsa River, the Sira tract, the vicinity of the village Arsenyevo, the mouth of the Solomi River); 9 — the middle course of the Solomi River; 10 — 76 km of the Lidoga-Vanino Highway; 11 — the Kiya River basin; 12 — the Khoydur River basin; 13 — the Nyura River basin in New data on the distribution of sika deer Cervus nippon Temminck, 1838 in the Lower Amur Region
Рис. 4. Карта-схема мест встреч пятнистого оΛеня в Нижнем Приамурье в 1979–2021 гг. КваΑраты — места фоторегистрации: 1 — верховья рр. Обор и Àурмин; 2, 3 — Анюйский национаΛьный парк; круги — места встреч по Λитературным и опросным Αанным: 1 — окрестности с. Кутузовка (место первой регистрации в 1979 г.); 2 — верховья р. СиΑима; 3 — устье р. Нижняя Буге; 4 — бассейн р. Мухен; 5–8 — Анюйский национаΛьный парк (соответственно, р. Пихца, урочище Сира, окрестности с. Арсеньево, устье р. СоΛоми); 9 — среΑнее течение р. СоΛоми; 10 — 76 км трассы ΔиΑога — Ванино; 11 — бассейн р. Кия; 12 — бассейн р. ХойΑур; 13 — бассейн р. Нюра Fig. 4. A schematic map of sika deer sightings in the Lower Amur Region in 1979-2021. Squares designate sites of photo recording: 1 — upper reaches of the rivers Obor and Durmin; 2, 3 — Anyui National Park; circles designate sightings sites according to the literature and the survey data: 1 — vicinity of the village Kutuzovka (the place of the first registration in 1979); 2 — upper reaches of the river Sidima; 3 — the mouth of the river Lower Buge; 4 — the Mukhen River basin; 5-8 —Anyui National Park (respectively, the Pikhtsa River, the Sira tract, the vicinity of the village Arsenyevo, the mouth of the Solomi River); 9 — the middle course of the Solomi River; 10 — 76 km of the Lidoga-Vanino Highway; 11 — the Kiya River basin; 12 — the Khoydur River basin; 13 — the Nyura River basin
Рис. 1. Карта-схема пунктов сборов Gynaephora (rossii) в Якутии: 1 — о-в КотеΛьный; 2 — о-в СтоΛбовой; 3 — о-в МаΛый Αяховский; 4 — о-в БоΛьшой Αяховский; 5 — п-ов Быковский в устье Αены; 6 — СеΛΛяхская губа, р. СеΛях, низовья Яны; 7 — КоΛымская протока, низовья ИнΔигирки; 8 — озеро ХомоΛох, бассейн р. БёрёΛёх, низовья ИнΔигирки; 9 — о-в Крестовский; 10 — о-в ЧетырехстоΛбовой; 11 — устье р. Энюмчувеем, южное побережье Восточно-Сибирского моря; 12 — хребет СунтарХаята; 13 — р. ÀжеΛинΔа в системе Станового хребта (точками обозначены ранее опубΛикованные точки, треугоΛьниками — новые местообитания) Fig. 1. Chart of Gynaephora (rossii) collection sites in Yakutia: 1 — Kotelny island; 2 — Stolbovoy island; 3 — Maly Lyakhovsky island; 4 — Bolshoi Lyakhovsky island; 5 — Bykovsky peninsula at the mouth of the Lena river; 6 — Sellakhskaya bay, Selyakh river, lower reaches of the Yana river; 7 — Kolymskaya channel, lower reaches of the Indigirka river; 8 — Lake Homolokh, Berelekh river basin, lower reaches of the Indigirka river; 9 — Krestovsky island; 10 — Chetyrekhstolbovoy island; 11 — the mouth of the Enyumchuveem river, southern coast of the East Siberian sea; 12 — Suntar-Khayata ridge; 13 — Gelinda river in the Stanovoy ridge system (dots indicate previously published localities, triangles indicate new localities) in New data on the distribution of the Gynaephora (rossii) species group in Northern Yakutia
Рис. 1. Карта-схема пунктов сборов Gynaephora (rossii) в Якутии: 1 — о-в КотеΛьный; 2 — о-в СтоΛбовой; 3 — о-в МаΛый Αяховский; 4 — о-в БоΛьшой Αяховский; 5 — п-ов Быковский в устье Αены; 6 — СеΛΛяхская губа, р. СеΛях, низовья Яны; 7 — КоΛымская протока, низовья ИнΔигирки; 8 — озеро ХомоΛох, бассейн р. БёрёΛёх, низовья ИнΔигирки; 9 — о-в Крестовский; 10 — о-в ЧетырехстоΛбовой; 11 — устье р. Энюмчувеем, южное побережье Восточно-Сибирского моря; 12 — хребет СунтарХаята; 13 — р. ÀжеΛинΔа в системе Станового хребта (точками обозначены ранее опубΛикованные точки, треугоΛьниками — новые местообитания) Fig. 1. Chart of Gynaephora (rossii) collection sites in Yakutia: 1 — Kotelny island; 2 — Stolbovoy island; 3 — Maly Lyakhovsky island; 4 — Bolshoi Lyakhovsky island; 5 — Bykovsky peninsula at the mouth of the Lena river; 6 — Sellakhskaya bay, Selyakh river, lower reaches of the Yana river; 7 — Kolymskaya channel, lower reaches of the Indigirka river; 8 — Lake Homolokh, Berelekh river basin, lower reaches of the Indigirka river; 9 — Krestovsky island; 10 — Chetyrekhstolbovoy island; 11 — the mouth of the Enyumchuveem river, southern coast of the East Siberian sea; 12 — Suntar-Khayata ridge; 13 — Gelinda river in the Stanovoy ridge system (dots indicate previously published localities, triangles indicate new localities)
COMMENTS.— Although not breeding in the Mediterranean, the species forages in Libyan waters (van Dijk et al. 2014). In addition to the single beached record, an individual was pulled from nearshore waters of the Tajura coast in 1996 and died in the rehabilitation facility of the Marine Biology Research Centre (MBRC) at Tajura, where it was subsequently taxidermied at the MBRC Museum (Hamza 2010). Capra's (1949) records were based on a report in "L'Idea Coloniale" for 2 May 1927 (Mongàr) and an unspecified specimen in the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Trieste (Sella). IUCN THREAT STATUS.— Vulnerable A2bd. MAP 3. Distribution of Dermochelys coriacea in Libya showing stranding site records. in Atlas of the Reptiles of Libya
COMMENTS.— Although not breeding in the Mediterranean, the species forages in Libyan waters (van Dijk et al. 2014). In addition to the single beached record, an individual was pulled from nearshore waters of the Tajura coast in 1996 and died in the rehabilitation facility of the Marine Biology Research Centre (MBRC) at Tajura, where it was subsequently taxidermied at the MBRC Museum (Hamza 2010). Capra's (1949) records were based on a report in "L'Idea Coloniale" for 2 May 1927 (Mongàr) and an unspecified specimen in the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Trieste (Sella). IUCN THREAT STATUS.— Vulnerable A2bd. MAP 3. Distribution of Dermochelys coriacea in Libya showing stranding site records.
Figure 6. Outlinks degree distribution for all web sites-Study of a Random Navigation on the Web Using Software Simulation
<p>Some of the most important aspects of the analysis is obtaining the parameters which can<br> give the main information about a web. In the simulation implementation information as: page,<br> number of inlinks, number of outlinks, value for Algorithmic Page Rank and Experimental Page<br> Rank will be processed for obtaining the results of the analysis. For the first part it was necessary to<br> use experimental values as: inlinks, outlinks and in and out frequencies.</p>
Figure 5 in Distribution patterns of ocellated eagle rays, Aetobatus ocellatus, along two sites in Moorea Island, French Polynesia
Figure 5. – Percentage of observations for the ten different behaviours according to the study site: swimming, foraging, chafing, cruising, escape, pre-mating, jumping, conspecific interaction, heterospecific interaction, come-close. See Table II for details on each behaviour.
Figure 2 in Distribution patterns of ocellated eagle rays, Aetobatus ocellatus, along two sites in Moorea Island, French Polynesia
Figure 2. – Multiple Correspondence Analysis factor map (2 first components, 34.5% and 19.4%, respectively) representing the relationship between the study sites (ClubMed/Mareto), ontogenetic stage of the eagle rays (male/female/juvenile), seasons (wet/dry), and the time of the day (am/pm).
Figure 1 in Distribution patterns of ocellated eagle rays, Aetobatus ocellatus, along two sites in Moorea Island, French Polynesia
Figure 1. – Map highlighting the two study sites on Moorea Island, French Polynesia: Mareto and ClubMed.
Figure 4 in Distribution patterns of ocellated eagle rays, Aetobatus ocellatus, along two sites in Moorea Island, French Polynesia
Figure 4. – Abundance (number of macroinvertebrate individuals) and biomass (grams) for the two study sites. The boxes represent the first and third quartiles, black lines are the medians (second quartiles), and whiskers cor- respond to the range (min-max) of the distributions. An asterisk indicates sta- tistically significant differences.
Figure 3 in Distribution patterns of ocellated eagle rays, Aetobatus ocellatus, along two sites in Moorea Island, French Polynesia
Figure 3. – Multiple Factor Analysis scatter plots (2 first components, 18% and 13%, respectively) representing the relationship between sex (male/ female/ juvenile), the site (ClubMed/Mareto) and the environmental factors: wave and wind direction (east/north/south/ west), wind speed (high/medium/low) and current strength (no/light/medium/ strong).
Fig. 3 in Assessing the distribution, roosting site characteristics, and population of Pteropus lylei in Thailand
Fig. 3. Roosting sites responded (total number: 34) according to responses from community-based questionnaire, and result of a field survey to validate survey data.
Fig. 2 in Assessing the distribution, roosting site characteristics, and population of Pteropus lylei in Thailand
Fig. 2. Pteropus lylei roosting sites and foraging zones; questionnaire respondents and bat hunting zones are marked in each sub-district.
Text-fig. 10. The chronostratigraphic position of the sites of Erkertshofen 1, Erkertshofen 2 and Petersbuch 2 and the biochronology of some European Neogene bats in Central Europe (species distribution after Revilliod 1920, Zapfe 1950, Rachl 1983, Ziegler 1993, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003, Horáček 2001, Mörs 2002, Ginsburg and Mein 2012, Rosina and Rummel 2012, 2017, Rasser et al. 2013, Rosina et al. 2019). Miocene time scale after Steininger 1999, MN zones modified after Jones 1999, Rögl 1999. in The Early Miocene Bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia) From The Karstic Sites Of Erkertshofen And Petersbuch 2 (Southern Germany)
Text-fig. 10. The chronostratigraphic position of the sites of Erkertshofen 1, Erkertshofen 2 and Petersbuch 2 and the biochronology of some European Neogene bats in Central Europe (species distribution after Revilliod 1920, Zapfe 1950, Rachl 1983, Ziegler 1993, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003, Horáček 2001, Mörs 2002, Ginsburg and Mein 2012, Rosina and Rummel 2012, 2017, Rasser et al. 2013, Rosina et al. 2019). Miocene time scale after Steininger 1999, MN zones modified after Jones 1999, Rögl 1999.
Text-fig. 1. Distribution map for Quinquala obovata gen. et sp. nov. showing the Kisinger Lakes (KL) sites of the Tepee Trail Formation in Wyoming and Clarno Formation localities in Oregon – West Branch Creek (WBC) and White Cliffs (WC). in Winged Fruits Of Rutaceous Affinity From The Eocene Of Western North America
Text-fig. 1. Distribution map for Quinquala obovata gen. et sp. nov. showing the Kisinger Lakes (KL) sites of the Tepee Trail Formation in Wyoming and Clarno Formation localities in Oregon – West Branch Creek (WBC) and White Cliffs (WC).
Text-fig. 4. Known geographic distribution of Microtscoptini on a modern-day biome map (Arc-GIS feature TNC terrestrial ecoregions). 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole. 1–20, 30–32 – Steppe biomes, 21–29, 33 – xeric shrubland biomes. in Comments On The Age And Dispersal Of Microtoscoptini (Rodentia: Cricetidae)
Text-fig. 4. Known geographic distribution of Microtscoptini on a modern-day biome map (Arc-GIS feature TNC terrestrial ecoregions). 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole. 1–20, 30–32 – Steppe biomes, 21–29, 33 – xeric shrubland biomes.
Text-fig. 1. Known geographic distribution of Microtoscoptini. 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole. in Comments On The Age And Dispersal Of Microtoscoptini (Rodentia: Cricetidae)
Text-fig. 1. Known geographic distribution of Microtoscoptini. 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole.
Text-fig. 1. Palaeogeographical scheme (distribution of land and sea basins) in part of Eurasia at the beginning of the Late Cretaceous (modified from Spicer et al. 2008). The green leaf symbol indicates the site of the Arman Flora. Asterisks indicate the Okhotsk-Chukotka volcanogenic belt. Dashdotted line indicates the boundary between the Siberian- Canadian and Euro-Sinian palaeofloristic regions (modified from Vakhrameev 1991). in On The Likely Palaeoelevation Of The Turonian - Coniacian Arman Flora Site (North-Eastern Asia)
Text-fig. 1. Palaeogeographical scheme (distribution of land and sea basins) in part of Eurasia at the beginning of the Late Cretaceous (modified from Spicer et al. 2008). The green leaf symbol indicates the site of the Arman Flora. Asterisks indicate the Okhotsk-Chukotka volcanogenic belt. Dashdotted line indicates the boundary between the Siberian- Canadian and Euro-Sinian palaeofloristic regions (modified from Vakhrameev 1991).
Fig. 1 in Species distribution and assemblages of centipedes (Chilopoda) in open xeric sites of Saxony-Anhalt (Germany)
Fig. 1. Locations of study sites. Abbr.: xeric meadows (XM) – FW, Fscha, KK 1, AA, AT, Bi 1, CH 2, EP, SH, BH, Ha 5; mesoxeric meadows (SMM) – Bi 2, Zy, Ha 1, ha 2, ha 3, MTha, ZHei, SBe, SoTr 2, Rü 1, Rü 2, Rü 3, Kö 3, UF 2, UF 3, UF 4, NG, NBG, SBG, TT 1, TT 2; grasslands contaminated by heavy metal (HMG) – Eck 1, Eck 2, Wi, Wo; draw shrub heaths (DSH) – FK 2, FK 3, KB, CH 1, Ha 6, Kö 1, Kö 2, UF 1; advanced succession sites (ASS) – SoGZ 1, SoGO 3, SoGU 4, SoVW 5, Ha 4.
Using species distribution models and decision tools to direct surveys and identify potential translocation sites for a critically endangered species
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.