Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
726
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
726 results for “model evaluation”
The NUIST Earth System Model (NESM) version 3: Description and preliminary evaluation
<p>The model code and necessary data: NESMv3_gmd.tar.gz.</p> <p>The model manual :Using NESM v3 model.pdf</p> <p>The reference: Reference.tar.gz</p>
Figure 6. One chromosome from the population and the five chromosomes existing in the evaluation partition.-Genetic Algorithms Principles Towards Hidden Markov Model
<p>For example comparing the<br> chromosome given in Figure 6 with the first chromosome in the evaluation partition, the<br> difference between the relation Med-Med and Med-High as a pair is 0.0 and the difference<br> between the relation High-High and High-Med as a pair is 0.1. Similarly the difference between<br> the relation Med-Cold and Med-Hot as a pair is 0.1 and the difference between the relation<br> High-Cold and High-Hot as a pair is 0.2. We sum all these differences to get the value of<br> compare(i,j), the sum value is 0+0.1+0.1+0.2 = 0.4. Using the same approach we compute the<br> compare function with the other four chromosomes and we get values 0.4, 0.5,0.4 and 0.6. Now<br> we sum the five values 0.4 + 0.4 + 0.5+ 0.4 +0.6 = 2.3. The fitness value is then 1/ 2.3 = 0.434.<br> The highest is the fitness value, the better is the performance of the chromosome.</p>
Train and Evaluation Code, Road Classification Models and Test set of the paper "Insights into the Effects of Image Overlap and Image Size on Semantic Segmentation Models Trained for Road Surface Area Extraction from Aerial Orthophotography"
<p>This repository contains the Python scripts built for training and evaluation of the implementation, together with the test data and the resulting road segmentation models corresponding to the paper "Insights into the Effects of Image Overlap and Image Size on Semantic Segmentation Models Trained for Road Surface Area Extraction from Aerial Orthophotography". The scripts make use of the Tensorflow with Keras framework and their additional required dependencies.</p> <p>The training and validation set is based on the binary SROADEX dataset (<a href="../records/6482346">https://zenodo.org/records/6482346</a>) that was re-split into tiles that feature the image resolutions (256 x 256, 512 x 512, and 1024 x 1024 pixels) and image overlaps (0% and 12.5%) considered in this study. The data have been generated using scripts developed in Python using Open Source libraries (GDAL/OGR and MapScript) for rasterization of vector cartography that represents the axes of the different types of roads (urban, interurban and rural). This binary road data contains information from 16 full orthoimages (28.5 km * 18.5 km) with spatial resolution of 0.5 m/pixel from the insular and peninsular Spanish territory. Due to the size on disk of approximately 492 gigabytes, this training and validation data is only available upon request from the corresponding author. The test set has been generated from a novel area from Palencia (Spain) and features 18 million pixels labelled with the positive "Road" class. The test sets are provided in the repository for each resolution (with no overlap), so that additional DL models can be evaluated on the same data and compared with the results achieved in this study.</p> <p>The structure of the information shared in this repository is as follows:<br>The scripts have been grouped by tile resolution (256, 512 and 1024). First, the test set and the evaluation script can be found. For each tile resolution, there are two subfolders (corresponding to the "no overlap" and "12.5% overlap"). In each case, the Python scripts for training the models in the three repetitions are shared, and the trained models (H5 format) are shared in compressed form. Finally, for each resolution we also share the testing dataset which consists of two folders.</p> <p>The material is distributed under a CC-BY 4.0 license.</p>
CausalBench A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
<p>CausalBench is a comprehensive benchmark dataset designed to evaluate the causal reasoning capabilities of large language models. The primary uses of this dataset include, but are not limited to:</p> <p>- Testing the performance of large language models on causal reasoning tasks</p> <p>- Serving as a benchmark dataset for causal reasoning research</p> <p>- Improving and developing new causal reasoning algorithms and models</p>
Evaluation datasets and results of the paper "A Framework for Measuring the Quality of Business Process Simulation Models"
<p>Datasets and files used in the evaluation of the publication entitled "A Framework for Measuring the Quality of Business Process Simulation Models", where:</p> <ul> <li><strong><em>BPS-models/</em></strong>: folder containing the BPS models used in the evaluation (the BPS models discovered by ServiceMiner are not included due to privacy reasons). <ul> <li>The BPS models discovered by SIMOD are composed of <em>i)</em> a BPMN file with the process model structure, and <em>ii)</em> a JSON file with the parameters of the simulation. These files correspond to the format of Prosimos simulation engine (<a href="https://prosimos.cloud.ut.ee/">https://prosimos.cloud.ut.ee/</a>).</li> <li>The BPS models of the Loan Application and Procure to Pay processes are composed of a BPMN file with both the process model structure and parameters, corresponding to the format of the BIMP simulator used in APROMORE (<a href="https://apromore.com/">https://apromore.com/</a>).</li> </ul> </li> <li><em><strong>measures/</strong></em>: folder containing the distance values of each measure reported in the paper.</li> <li><em><strong>original-event-logs/</strong></em>: folder containing the (train and test) event logs used in the evaluation.</li> <li><em><strong>simulated-logs/</strong></em>: folder containing the simulated logs evaluated in the paper (synthetic, SIMOD, and ServiceMiner).</li> <li><em><strong>ComputeLogDistance.py</strong></em>: script to compute the distance measures proposed in the paper.</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>To evaluate the distance measures of a set of simulated event logs in the folder <em>simulated_logs/</em> against the test log <em>test_event_log.csv.gz</em>, run:<br><em> python ComputeLogDistance.py -cfld test_event_log.csv.gz simulated_logs/</em></p> <p>*The flag <em>-cfld</em> is optional, due to the high computational complexity of the CFLD measure.</p> <p><strong>WARNING</strong>: set the column names of each log accordingly (where <em>log_1_ids</em> are the IDs of the test log, and <em>log_2_ids</em> the IDs of the simulated logs). Examples:</p> <pre><code># Column IDs for the (train/test) real-life logs, and the SIMOD simulated logs. EventLogIDs( case='case_id', activity='activity', start_time='start_time', end_time='end_time', resource='resource' ) # Column IDs for the Loan Application and Procure to Pay simulated logs. EventLogIDs( case='case_id', activity='activity', start_time='Start_Time', end_time='End_Time', resource='resource' ) # Column IDs for the ServiceMiner simulated logs. EventLogIDs( case='case_id', activity='Activity', start_time='start_time', end_time='end_time', resource='Resource' )</code></pre> <p> </p>
Data from: Integrating genomic data and simulations to evaluate alternative species distribution models and improve predictions of glacial refugia and future responses to climate change
<p>Climate change poses a threat to biodiversity, and it is unclear whether species can adapt to or tolerate new conditions, or migrate to areas with suitable habitats. Reconstructions of range shifts that occurred in response to environmental changes since the last glacial maximum from species distribution models (SDMs) can provide useful data to inform conservation efforts. However, different SDM algorithms and climate reconstructions often produce contrasting patterns, and validation methods typically focus on accuracy in recreating current distributions, limiting their relevance for assessing predictions to the past or future. We modeled historically suitable habitat for the threatened North American tree green ash (<em>Fraxinus pennsylvanica</em>) using 24 SDMs built using two climate models, three calibration regions, and four modeling algorithms. We evaluated the SDMs using contemporary data with spatial block cross-validation and compared the relative support for alternative models using a novel integrative method based on coupled demographic-genetic simulations. We simulated genomic datasets using habitat suitability of each of the 24 SDMs in a spatially-explicit model. Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) was then used to evaluate the support for alternative SDMs through comparisons to an empirical population genomic dataset. Models had very similar performance when assessed with contemporary occurrences using spatial cross-validation, but ABC model selection analyses consistently supported SDMs based on the CCSM climate model, an intermediate calibration extent, and the generalized linear modeling algorithm. Finally, we projected the future range of green ash under four climate change scenarios. Future projections using the SDMs selected via ABC suggest only minor shifts in suitable habitat for this species, while some of those that were rejected predicted dramatic changes. Our results highlight the different inferences that may result from the application of alternative distribution modeling algorithms and provide a novel approach for selecting among a set of competing SDMs with independent data.</p>
Supplementary Data for "Development of a General Calibration Model and Long-Term Performance Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Pollutant Gas Monitoring" (abridged version)
<p>This is a supplementary data set associated with the publication "Development of a General Calibration Model and Long-Term Performance Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Pollutant Gas Monitoring" from the Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies, submitted to Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. This is an abbreviated version which does not include the calibrated models; these models must be re-generated by running the codes contained with the data set.</p> <p> </p>
A Layer-averaged Nonhydrostatic Dynamical Framework on an Unstructured Mesh for Global and Regional Atmospheric Modeling: Model Description, Baseline Evaluation and Sensitivity Exploration
<p>Selected model output data for supporting this paper.</p> <p>List of Files:</p> <p>2dtracer.tar.gz: correlated tracer test</p> <p>rh3d.tar.gz: 3D Rossby-Haurwitz Wave</p> <p>modon.tar.gz: Colliding Modons</p> <p>jwss.tar.gz: Jablonowski-Williamson Baroclinic Steady State</p> <p>jwbw_1d.tar.gz: 1D data output from Jablonowski-Williamson Baroclinic Wave</p> <p>jwbw_2d.tar.gz: 2D data output from Jablonowski-Williamson Baroclinic Wave</p> <p>dcmip31.tar.gz: DCMIP3-1 nonhydrostatic gravity wave</p> <p>Klemp15.tar.gz: Nonhydrostatic Mountain Waves in Klemp et al. 2015</p> <p>held-suarez.tar.gz: Held-Suarez dry climate (post-processed data for plotting, the raw daily data are too large to upload)</p> <p>jwbwvr.tar.gz: Variable-Resolution modeling of the Jablonowski-Williamson Baroclinic Wave</p> <p> </p> <p>see https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3544795 for a companion work</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Zhang, Y., J. Li, R. Yu, S. Zhang, Z. Liu, J. Huang, and Y. Zhou, 2019: A Layer-Averaged Nonhydrostatic Dynamical Framework on an Unstructured Mesh for Global and Regional Atmospheric Modeling: Model Description, Baseline Evaluation, and Sensitivity Exploration. <em>Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems</em>, <strong>11,</strong> 1685-1714.</p>
Critical droplet properties for particles containing 6 pollenkitts evaluated with 4 Köhler models for the study "Cloud condensation nuclei activity of six pollenkitts and the influence of their surface activity" by Prisle et al. (2019)
<p>Critical droplet supersaturation and surface tension, calculated with 3 thermodynamic Köhler models presented in Prisle et al., <em>Surfactants in cloud droplet activation: mixed organic-inorganic particles</em>, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10, 5663-5683, doi:10.5194/acp-10-5663-2010, and with the model presented in Prisle et al., <em>A simple representation of surface active organic aerosol in cloud droplet formation</em>, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11, 4073-4083, doi: 10.5194/acp-11-4073-2011, for particles of varying size comprising 6 pollenkitts and mixtures with ammonium sulfate.</p>
Wikidata's linked data for cultural heritage digital resources: an evaluation based on the Europeana Data Model
<p>Wikidata is an open data source with many potential applications. Our study aims to evaluate the usability of Wikidata as a linked data source for acquiring richer descriptions of digital objects within the context of Europeana, a data aggregator from the cultural heritage domain. Specifically, we aim to crawl and convert Wikidata using the standard approaches and operations developed for the (Semantic) Web of Data, i.e. using technologies like linked data consumption and RDF(S)/OWL ontology expression and reasoning. We also seek to re-use existing “semantic” specifications, such as conversions to and from generic data models like Schema.org and SKOS. We have developed an experimental set-up and accompanying software to test the feasibility of this approach. We conclude that Wikidata’s linked data is able to express an interesting level of semantics for cultural heritage, but quality can still be improved and a human operator still must assist linked data applications to interpret Wikidata’s RDF.</p>
TERENO-preAlpine observatory and ScaleX 2016 campaign data set associated with HESS paper "High-resolution fully-coupled atmospheric–hydrological modeling: a cross-compartment regional water and energy cycle evaluation"
<p>netCDF Dataset, that holds processed hourly station observations for the period 2016-06-01 to 2016-10-31.</p> <p>dimensions:<br> time = 3672 ;<br> stations = 6 ;<br> name_strlen = 6 ;<br> depth = 3 ;<br> height = 201 ;<br> variables:<br> double time(time) ;<br> time:standard_name = "time" ;<br> time:long_name = "time of measurement" ;<br> time:units = "hours since 2016-06-01 00:00:00" ;<br> time:timezone = "UTC" ;<br> time:calendar = "proleptic_gregorian" ;<br> double lat(stations) ;<br> lat:standard_name = "latitude" ;<br> lat:long_name = "station_latitude" ;<br> lat:units = "degrees_north" ;<br> double lon(stations) ;<br> lon:standard_name = "longitude" ;<br> lon:long_name = "station_longitude" ;<br> lon:units = "degrees_east" ;<br> double elev(stations) ;<br> elev:standard_name = "altitude" ;<br> elev:long_name = "station_altitude" ;<br> elev:units = "m ASL" ;<br> double height(height) ;<br> height:standard_name = "altitude" ;<br> height:long_name = "station_altitude" ;<br> height:units = "m ASL" ;<br> double depth(depth) ;<br> depth:standard_name = "soil_depth" ;<br> depth:long_name = "soil sensor depth" ;<br> depth:units = "cm" ;<br> char station_name(name_strlen, stations) ;<br> station_name:long_name = "station_name" ;<br> station_name:cf_role = "timeseries_id" ;<br> double T(time, stations) ;<br> T:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> T:standard_name = "temperature" ;<br> T:long_name = "2m air temperature" ;<br> T:units = "degree_Celsius" ;<br> T:source = "TERENO-preAlpine" ;<br> double Q(time, stations) ;<br> Q:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> Q:standard_name = "mixing_ratio" ;<br> Q:long_name = "2m mixing ratio" ;<br> Q:units = "g kg-1" ;<br> Q:source = "TERENO-preAlpine" ;<br> double ET_i(time, stations) ;<br> ET_i:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> ET_i:standard_name = "evapotranspiration_intensive" ;<br> ET_i:long_name = "lysimeter evapotranspiration intensive management" ;<br> ET_i:units = "g kg-1 h-1" ;<br> ET_i:source = "TERENO-preAlpine" ;<br> double ET_e(time, stations) ;<br> ET_e:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> ET_e:standard_name = "evapotranspiration_extensive" ;<br> ET_e:long_name = "lysimeter evapotranspiration extensive management" ;<br> ET_e:units = "g kg-1 h-1" ;<br> ET_e:source = "TERENO-preAlpine" ;<br> double LvE_cor(time, stations) ;<br> LvE_cor:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> LvE_cor:standard_name = "latent_heat_flux" ;<br> LvE_cor:long_name = "energy balance corrected flux tower latent heat flux" ;<br> LvE_cor:units = "W m-2" ;<br> LvE_cor:source = "TERENO-preAlpine" ;<br> double HTs_cor(time, stations) ;<br> HTs_cor:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> HTs_cor:standard_name = "sensible_heat_flux" ;<br> HTs_cor:long_name = "energy balance corrected flux tower sensible heat flux" ;<br> HTs_cor:units = "W m-2" ;<br> HTs_cor:source = "TERENO-preAlpine" ;<br> double GHF(time, stations) ;<br> GHF:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> GHF:standard_name = "ground_heat_flux" ;<br> GHF:long_name = "flux tower ground heat flux" ;<br> GHF:units = "W m-2" ;<br> GHF:positive = "up" ;<br> GHF:source = "TERENO-preAlpine" ;<br> double SW(time, stations) ;<br> SW:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> SW:standard_name = "short_wave_radiation" ;<br> SW:long_name = "downward short wave radiation" ;<br> SW:units = "W m-2" ;<br> SW:source = "TERENO-preAlpine" ;<br> double LW(time, stations) ;<br> LW:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> LW:standard_name = "long_wave_radiation" ;<br> LW:long_name = "downward long wave radiation" ;<br> LW:units = "W m-2" ;<br> LW:source = "TERENO-preAlpine" ;<br> double VWC_25(time, depth) ;<br> VWC_25:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> VWC_25:standard_name = "volumetric_water_content" ;<br> VWC_25:long_name = "DE-Fen SoilNet volumetric water content first quartile" ;<br> VWC_25:units = "vol. %" ;<br> VWC_25:source = "TERENO-preAlpine" ;<br> double VWC_50(time, depth) ;<br> VWC_50:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> VWC_50:standard_name = "volumetric_water_content" ;<br> VWC_50:long_name = "DE-Fen SoilNet volumetric water content second quartile" ;<br> VWC_50:units = "vol. %" ;<br> VWC_50:source = "TERENO-preAlpine" ;<br> double VWC_75(time, depth) ;<br> VWC_75:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> VWC_75:standard_name = "volumetric_water_content" ;<br> VWC_75:long_name = "DE-Fen SoilNet volumetric water content third quartile" ;<br> VWC_75:units = "vol. %" ;<br> VWC_75:source = "TERENO-preAlpine" ;<br> double T_prof(time, height) ;<br> T_prof:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> T_prof:standard_name = "temperature_profile" ;<br> T_prof:long_name = "DE-Fen HATPRO spline interpolated temperature profile" ;<br> T_prof:units = "K" ;<br> T_prof:source = "scaleX campaign 2016" ;<br> double A_prof(time, height) ;<br> A_prof:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> A_prof:standard_name = "humidity_profile" ;<br> A_prof:long_name = "DE-Fen HATPRO spline interpolated absolute humidity profile" ;<br> A_prof:units = "kg m-3" ;<br> A_prof:source = "scaleX campaign 2016" ;<br> double PRW(time) ;<br> PRW:_FillValue = -9999. ;<br> PRW:standard_name = "precipitable_water" ;<br> PRW:long_name = "DE-Fen HATPRO column precipitable water" ;<br> PRW:units = "kg m-2" ;<br> PRW:source = "scaleX campaign 2016" ;</p> <p>// global attributes:<br> :history = "2019-09-12: File created." ;<br> :institution = "Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) - Campus Alpin, Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research" ;<br> :Contact_person = "Benjamin Fersch (benjamin.fersch@kit.edu)" ;<br> :Author = "Benjamin Fersch (benjamin.fersch@kit.edu)" ;<br> :source = "https://www.tereno.net, https://scalex.imk-ifu.kit.edu" ;<br> :Conventions = "CF-1.6" ;<br> :License = "Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 4.0 International" ;</p> <p> </p>
Evaluation data used in "An innovative STEM outreach model (OH-Kids) to foster the next generation of geoscientists, engineers, and technologists"
<p>This repository contains all data of the evaluation questionnaire used to assess modifications in pupils’ perceptions of same water resources concepts and science and scientist resulting from the application of OH-Kids outreach model in six Mexican primary schools (n=344 pupils).</p>
Results and figures from "Evaluating the robustness of the ARIO model for a local disaster: 2021 Flooding in Germany"
<p>These files and notebook allow reproducing the figures from "Evaluating the robustness of the ARIO model for a local disaster: 2021 Flooding in Germany".</p> <p>The main result file is a pandas DataFrame saved in parquet format under "results/general-plot_df.parquet".</p> <p>Two notebooks allow post-processing these results and plot the figures.</p> <p>Reproduction of the raw results can be achieved with the Snakemake pipeline, available here: https://github.com/spjuhel/BoARIO-Sensitivity</p> <p> </p>
Evaluating mesoscale model predictions of diurnal speedup events in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area of California
<p>This dataset contains input files for the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model related to the manuscript "Evaluating mesoscale model predictions of diurnal speedup events in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area of California," to be submitted to the <em>Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology</em> by Arthur, et al. Included are:</p> <ul> <li><strong>namelist.wps</strong>: used by the WRF preprocessing system (WPS) to configure the model domain and initial/boundary conditions</li> <li><strong>Vtable.HRRR</strong>: used by WPS to process data from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model for WRF initial/boundary conditions</li> <li><strong>namelist.input.mynn</strong>: used to run the MYNN PBL simulation</li> <li><strong>namelist.input.3dpbl</strong>: used to run the 3D PBL simulation</li> <li><strong>windturbines.txt</strong>: used to define the location and type of wind turbines included in the simulations</li> <li><strong>wind-turbine-*.tbl</strong>: used to define the parameters of each turbine type (see Table 1 in Arthur et al.) <ul> <li><strong>1</strong>: NREL 1.7MW, H=80m, D=103m</li> <li><strong>2</strong>: NREL 2.3MW, H=80m, D=107m</li> <li><strong>3</strong>: NREL 2.3MW, H=80m, D=116m</li> <li><strong>4</strong>: Vestas V47 0.66MW, H=60m, D=47m</li> <li><strong>5</strong>: Bonus B54 1.0MW, H=55m, D=54m</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>This work was prepared by LLNL under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.</p>
Model run with METROMS to evaluate open boundary conditions in CICE [idealized wind]
<p>Support for time-varying open boundary conditions (OBC) have been developed for sea ice in the Los Alamos Sea Ice Model (CICE) by Pedro Duarte (NPI, Norway). This dataset is a result of using the coupled ocean (ROMS) and sea ice (CICE) modelling framework METROMS (<a href="https://github.com/metno/metroms">https://github.com/metno/metroms</a>) in order to test the effects of the above mentioned boundary conditions. The specific application of METROMS that was used was MET Norway's main forecasting system for the Barents Sea; the Barents-2.5km model; details about the model can be found at <a href="https://ocean.met.no/models">https://ocean.met.no/models</a>.</p> <p>The model was initialized from the TOPAZ4 model (Sakov et al., 2012)<strong> </strong>and was run for the period 2019.09.01 - 2019.09.20, one time without OBC and one time with OBC enabled using input data from TOPAZ4<strong> </strong>at the boundaries. In both runs the model was set up realistically, but with the exception of idealized wind forcing. More specifically, the wind was blowing 10 m/s in the positive xi-direction until 2019-09.07 and then 10/m/s in the negative xi-direction for the rest of the simulation. The reasoning for this was to clearly demonstrate the effects of the OBC. Initially, the wind is blowing the ice away from the boundary and without using OBC for ice, it leaves open water in its path due to no information coming in through the boundary. With OBC enabled however, the simulation appear a lot more sensible with sea ice from TOPAZ4 coming in through the boundaries. When the wind switches to the opposite direction after 2019.09.07, on the case without OBC results in ice piling up at the boundary after some time. However, with OBC enabled, the ice exists the model domain.</p> <p> </p>
Model run with METROMS to evaluate open boundary conditions in CICE
<p>Support for time-varying open boundary conditions (OBC) have been developed for sea ice in the Los Alamos Sea Ice Model (CICE) by Pedro Duarte (NPI, Norway). This dataset is a result of using the coupled ocean (ROMS) and sea ice (CICE) modelling framework METROMS (<a href="https://github.com/metno/metroms">https://github.com/metno/metroms</a>) in order to test the effects of the above mentioned boundary conditions. The specific application of METROMS that was used was MET Norway's main forecasting system for the Barents Sea; the Barents-2.5km model; details about the model can be found at <a href="https://ocean.met.no/models">https://ocean.met.no/models</a>.</p> <p>The model was initialized from the TOPAZ4 model (Sakov et al., 2012)<strong> </strong>and was run for the period 2019.09.01 - 2019.10.03, one time without OBC and one time with OBC enabled using input data from TOPAZ4<strong> </strong>at the boundaries. This dataset can further be used to compare with satelite observations of sea ice concentration in order to help evaluate the impacts of the OBC's in CICE.</p>
A case study: evaluation of a single column model with advection to simulate fog/stratus during C-FOG experiment
<p>Those datasets are observed by C-FOG (<em>Toward Improving Coastal Fog Prediction</em>) campaign, which was organized as a field experiment combined with modelling and theoretical initiatives. The objective of C-FOG was to advance our understanding and ability to observe, simulate, and predict fog, with a particular focus on warm fog formation, development and dissipation over coastal environments.</p> <p>The uploaded observation data contains liquid water content, droplet number concentration, temperature, SST, wind, visibility, backscatter collected by ceilometer, and atmospheric profile. The details can be found in the dataset.</p> <p>Thanks for the intense observation by the C-FOG project, which collected valuable data for detailed fog research.</p>
Research project on field data collection for honey bee colony model evaluation - datasets
<p><strong>Description of the datasets</strong></p> <p>The file 00_MUSTB_field_data_model.docx contains the data model according to which the data collected in the context of the MUSTB field data collection were reported to EFSA. The current data model description includes some modifications with respect to the specifications published before the beginning of the project (EFSA, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.EN-1234). All the tables included in the data model are published here in csv format. The underlying schemas are also published in xsd format.</p> <p>Sites: General information about the sites where the data collection took place;</p> <p>Polygons: General information about the polygons where the botanical survey took place.</p> <p>Table I: Pesticide application, reporting data on experimental spraying events;</p> <p>Table II: Resource providing unit and landscape fitness, reporting data on abundance of flowering plants in polygons mostly within 1.5 km, but in some cases up to 3 km of the experimental colony;</p> <p>Table III: Master list of all hives included in the study;</p> <p>Table IV: Colony management, reporting the log of the beekeeper regarding input (if material was added to the hive: e.g. empty frames, chemicals for varroa treatment, sugar), output (if material was removed from the hive, e.g. honey combs, supers), queen loss, swarming, or clinical signs observed in the experimental hives;</p> <p>Table V: Hive inspection, reporting data on in-hive measurements in the experimental colonies. This table contained several types of data, including:</p> <ul> <li>Data on brood development and food provision (“cell utilization”) obtained from image analysis of combs;</li> <li>Data on forager activity obtained from automatic video recordings and image analysis by a bee counter;</li> <li>Data on hive weight obtained from automatic logging by a hive scale;</li> <li>Data on adult bee strength, obtained by weight assessment of combs with and without adult bees (“bees per comb data”);</li> </ul> <p>Table VI: SSD2, reporting data on results of laboratory analyses of pollen, pesticide residues and parasites/pathogens. These four types of laboratory analyses involved different methods, and were reported according to different standards. Therefore, a number of the fields in the technical specifications for the SSD2 table (EFSA, 2017) were not applicable for records reporting results of some analyses, in particular palynological, parasite and pathogen analyses. These fields were left empty;</p> <p>Table VII: Colony observation, reporting observations of honey bee waggle dances from observation hives. Orientation denotes the angle of the waggling phase relative to the vertical axis on the comb. Direction denotes the actual direction in the landscape, as calculated from the orientation of the waggle dance.</p> <p>In all the csv files, columns with the suffix "_desc" have been included, where relevant, to include the name corresponding to the EFSA controlled terminology used in the previous column (e.g. resUnit contains EFSA term codes while resUnit_desc contains the term names).</p> <p><strong>Data storage</strong></p> <p>All data collected during the project was stored in a relational database. The database was developed in .NET Entity Framework Core, ran on a PostgreSQL, and was hosted by Amazon Web Service during the whole duration of the project development. Data could be imported or entered manually in the database through a web form. Administrators could create new users and administrators, new sites, and new colonies, i.e., administrators were allowed to enter or change data of all tables. Users were allowed to enter data, and could view, retrieve, and modify their own data of all tables, except for Table III (description of experimental colonies). Administrators could view and retrieve all data. Data was retrieved in CSV and XML formats, and were structured to secure a smooth transmission of data to the Data Collection Framework of EFSA. Furthermore, data flow from the field data collection to the development of ApisRAM was secured by direct communication between the field and modelling teams.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Version 2</strong> contains the UTM coordinates in tables Sites, Polygons and Resource providing unit.</p>
Fig. 4 in Modeling energy flow in a large Neotropical reservoir: a tool do evaluate fishing and stability
Fig. 4. Simulated Total catch (solid line) and catch values observed (triangles). Simulations performed on ITAIPU-2 model, under constant fishing effort (values were close to 1998). Simulations made in Ecopath with Ecosim (Subroutine: Run Ecossim, module: Results).
Fig. 1 in Modeling energy flow in a large Neotropical reservoir: a tool do evaluate fishing and stability
Fig. 1. Itaipu Reservoir, its tributaries and the upper Paraná River Floodplain upstream (spawning areas for the reservoir migratory fish species).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.