Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
126
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
126 results for “morphological disparity”
Fig. 9 in New fossil data and phylogenetic inferences shed light on the morphological disparity of Mesozoic Sinoalidae (Hemiptera, Cicadomorpha)
Fig. 9 Reconstruction of head and thorax of representatives within Sinoalidae: a Stictocercopis wuhuaensis Fu et Huang, 2018; b Sinoala parallelivena Wang et Szwedo, 2012; c Fangyuania xiai Chen, Szwedo et Wang, 2018; d Mesodorus orientalis gen. et sp. nov.
Fig. 7 in New fossil data and phylogenetic inferences shed light on the morphological disparity of Mesozoic Sinoalidae (Hemiptera, Cicadomorpha)
Fig. 7 Abdomen of Mesodorus orientalis gen. et sp. nov.: a dorsal view; b ventral view; c enlargement of apical process of anal tube. Scale bars = 0.5 mm (a, b) or = 0.1 mm (c)
Fig. 4 in New fossil data and phylogenetic inferences shed light on the morphological disparity of Mesozoic Sinoalidae (Hemiptera, Cicadomorpha)
Fig. 4 Photographs of holotype of Mesodorus orientalis gen. et sp. nov.: a dorsal view; b ventral view. Scale bar = 1 mm
Fig. 2 in New fossil data and phylogenetic inferences shed light on the morphological disparity of Mesozoic Sinoalidae (Hemiptera, Cicadomorpha)
Fig. 2 Overall view of the entire amber piece containing the holotype of Mesodorus orientalis gen. et sp. nov.
Fig. 3 in New fossil data and phylogenetic inferences shed light on the morphological disparity of Mesozoic Sinoalidae (Hemiptera, Cicadomorpha)
Fig. 3 Line drawing of wings of holotype of Mesodorus orientalis gen. et sp. nov.: a tegmen; b hindwing
Fig. 3 in Inferring the accumulation of morphological disparity in epiphyllous liverworts
Fig. 3 Exploring morphospace occupation using the scatter-plot of the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on 12 morphological characters with component 1 plotted to x-axis and component 2 plotted to y-axis. Symbols and colors indicate different clades shown in Fig. 1: orange square AA, green circle AB, purple circle B, brown hexagon C, blue square D, red circle E, yellow circle F, black circle Cololejeunea angustiflora+C. magnilobula, light blue circles C. chinii+C. shimizui, green hexagon C. ceratilobula+ C. madothecoides+ C. raduliloba. Grey area Morphospace occupied by epiphytic/ epiphyllous species
Fig. 2 in Inferring the accumulation of morphological disparity in epiphyllous liverworts
Fig. 2 Scatter-plot contrasting genotypic variation plotted as patristic distance to the x-axis versus phenotypic variation plotted as morphological characters distance to the y-axis based on the 12 traits studied. The patristic distances were calculated using the combined pDNA+nrDNA dataset. Results are shown for four analyses. Morphological disparity is
Fig. 1 in Inferring the accumulation of morphological disparity in epiphyllous liverworts
Fig. 1 Majority consensus tree obtained from the results of Bayesian inference of phylogeny using the combined dataset with a partition of plastid (pDNA) and nuclear (nDNA) DNA. The consensus tree is generated based on the trees recovered in 9,000,000 generations that were assembled from the results of MrBayes analyses with the exclusions of the burn-in phase determined as 1,000,000 generations. Posterior values
Figure 4. Comparative metriorhynchid cranial morphology. A in The evolution of Metriorhynchoidea (mesoeucrocodylia, thalattosuchia): an integrated approach using geometric morphometrics, analysis of disparity, and biomechanics
Figure 4. Comparative metriorhynchid cranial morphology. A, Eoneustes gaudryi comb. nov., holotype, NHM R.3353. B, Geosaurus araucanensis, holotype, MLP 72-IV-7-1. C, Cricosaurus suevicus, lectotype, SMNS 9808. D, Enaliosuchus schroederi, holotype, MMGLV#. E, Suchodus durobrivensis, referred specimen, NHM R.2618. F, Metriorhynchus superciliosus, referred specimen, MNHN 1908-6. G, Geosaurus giganteus, referred specimen, NHM 37020. H, Dakosaurus maximus, neotype, SMNS 8203. Scale bars: 20 mm. We thank N. Knötschke for photograph (D), and P. Hurst and P.M. Barrett for photograph (G).
Figure 11 in Morphological disparity in a hyperdiverse mammal clade: a new morphotype and tribe of Neotropical cricetids
Figure 11. Selected cranial details in Rhagomys rufescens (all based on MZUFV-CM 3706): A, laterodorsal view of the left temporal region showing the alisphenoid strut (as); B, lateral view of the anterior part of the cranium to show the broad zygomatic plate (note also the staggered incisor profile highlighted by an arrow); C, left zygomatic plate ventrally viewed to put in evidence the thick posterior border (pb) transversally oriented and the point (marked with an arrow) where the shaft twist; D, lateroventral view of the occipital region showing a large foramen magnum (fm), the left mastoid capsule (mc) and the ventral appearance of a prominent petrosal (pe).
Figure 9 in Morphological disparity in a hyperdiverse mammal clade: a new morphotype and tribe of Neotropical cricetids
Figure 9. Selected soft anatomical traits of Rhagomys: A, dorsal view of the tongue in R. septentrionalis (MEPN 12715); B, caecal portion of the intestine in R. rufescens (MZUFV-CM 3706); C, soft palate in R. septentrionalis (MECN 6172); D, external (left) and internal (right) view of the stomach in R. rufescens (MZUFV-CM 3706); E, frontal view of the rhinarium in R. rufescens (right panel; MZUSP 33890) and R. septentrionalis (left panel; MECN 6172). Abbreviations: a, alanasi; ce, caecum; co, colon; cv, circumvallate papilla; d, diastemal ridge; es, esophagus; i, interdental ridge; il, ileum; n, nasal pad; p, basal fold; ph, philtrum; py, pylorous.
Figure 6 in Morphological disparity in a hyperdiverse mammal clade: a new morphotype and tribe of Neotropical cricetids
Figure 6. Unique tubercular hypsodonty in Rhagomys exemplified by R. septentrionalis (MECN 6172): right upper (A, C) and lower (B, D) molar series viewed from behind (A, B) and the labial side (C, D). The pictures are three-dimensional reconstructions based on micro-CT data.
Figure 4 in Morphological disparity in a hyperdiverse mammal clade: a new morphotype and tribe of Neotropical cricetids
Figure 4. Mandible morphology of Rhagomys: A, external view of the left hemimandible of R. longilingua (FMNH 170687): note the chin process (c) and the straight inner border (b); B, external view of the left hemimandible of R. septentrionalis (MECN 6172); C, medial view of the left hemimandible of R. septentrionalis (MECN 6172); D, dorsolateral view of the retromolar fossa in the left hemimandible of R. septentrionalis (MECN 6172); E, lingual dorsolateral view of the retromolar fossa in the left hemimandible of R. rufescens (MZUFV-CM 3706): note the elevated bony ridge (mi) forming the caudad close of the fossa. Except for A and E the pictures are three-dimensional reconstructions based on micro-CT data.
Figure 8 in Morphological disparity in a hyperdiverse mammal clade: a new morphotype and tribe of Neotropical cricetids
Figure 8. Topological comparison of the left first molar of A, Rhagomys (R. rufescens; MZUFV-CM 3706); B, Thomasomys (T. aureus; CNP 6471); C, Wilfredomys (W. oenax; CNP 2378) and the left second molar of D, Delomys (D. sublineatus; UFSC711).
Figure 3 in Morphological disparity in a hyperdiverse mammal clade: a new morphotype and tribe of Neotropical cricetids
Figure 3. Selected anatomical traits and regions in the cranium of Rhagomys: A, lateral left view of the cranium of R. septentrionalis (MEPN 10898): note the position of the mastoid (mc) well above the basal plane (indicated by the yellow horizontal line); B, lateral view of the left otic region of R. rufescens (MZUFV-CM 3706); C, ventral view of basicranial region of R. septentrionalis (MECN 6172); D, dorsal view (roofing bones of braincase removed) of basicranial region of R. septentrionalis (MEPN 10898); E, cross-section of the cranium of R. septentrionalis (MEPN 10898) at the frontal sinuses plane. Abbreviations: bs, basisphenoid; bo, basioccipital; f, fontanelle; fo, foramen ovale; m, foramen magnum; etI, ethmoturbinal I; etII, ethmoturbinal II; etIII, ethmoturbinal III; ft1, frontoturbinal 1; ft2, frontoturbinal 2; it, interturbinal; ls, lamina semicircularis; ps, presphenoid. Except for B the pictures are three-dimensional reconstructions based on micro-CT data.
Figure 7 in Morphological disparity in a hyperdiverse mammal clade: a new morphotype and tribe of Neotropical cricetids
Figure 7. ICAMER system applied on the right first upper (upper row) and lower (lower row) molar of Rhagomys rufescens (MZUFV-CM 3706). Schematic cuspal units employed differential colours to highlight component structures (arms and projections). Abbreviations: upper molar: alb, anterolabial conule; alg, anterolingual conule; am, anterior mure; anf, anteromedian flexus; ant, anteroloph; hyf, hypoflexus; hyp, hypocone; mef, metaflexus; met, metacone; mm, median mure; msf, mesoflexus; msp, mesoloph; paf, paraflexus; pal, paraloph; par, paracone; pof, posteroflexus; pol, posteroloph; prf, protoflexus; pro, protocone. Lower molar: amd, anterior murid; cg, anterolabial cingulum; enfd, entoflexid; ent, entoconid; entl, entolophid; hyfd, hypoflexid; lgd, anterolingual conulid; med, metaconid; mefd, metaflexid; metl, metalophid; mmd, median murid; msd, mesolophid; msfd, mesoflexid; pod, posterolophid; pofd, posteroflexid; prd, protoconid.
Figure 5 in Morphological disparity in a hyperdiverse mammal clade: a new morphotype and tribe of Neotropical cricetids
Figure 5. Incisor external appearance and morphology of Rhagomys: A, labial view of the left lower incisor of R. septentrionalis (MECN 6172): note the thick band of enamel (e) compared to dentine (d); B, ventral view of the left lower incisor of R. septentrionalis (MECN 6172): note the tenues groove (g); C, frontal view of both upper incisors of R. rufescens (MZUFV-CM 3706): note the inverted v shape of the cutting edge (broken line) and the flattened anterior faces medially inclined (arrows); D–F, ventral view of the left lower incisor of R. rufescens (MZUFV-CM 3706): note the textured surface. A and B are three-dimensional reconstructions based on micro-CT data.
Data from: The influence of climatic variability on morphological integration, evolutionary rates, and disparity in the Carnivora
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Increasing morphological disparity and decreasing optimality for jaw speed and strength during the radiation of jawed vertebrates
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Patterns of cranial ontogeny in lacertid lizards: morphological and allometric disparity
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.