Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
99
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
99 results for “parasitic lice”
FIGURE 6 in <strong>An annotated checklist of parasitic lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) from the Galápagos Islands</strong>
FIGURE 6. Myrsidea nesomimi borealis Palma & Price, 2010. A: male. B: female (Host: Nesomimus parvulus).
Figure 3 in Comparative phylogeography between parasitic sucking lice and their host the Namaqua rock mouse, Micaelamys namaquensis (Rodentia: Muridae)
Figure 3. NuDNA haplotype networks for: A, M. namaquensis; B, H. patersoni; C, P. praomydis. Haplotype colours correspond to the colours of the different localities from where the samples were collected in (D).
Figure 2 in Comparative phylogeography between parasitic sucking lice and their host the Namaqua rock mouse, Micaelamys namaquensis (Rodentia: Muridae)
Figure 2. MtDNA haplotype networks for: A, M. namaquensis; B, H. patersoni; C, P. praomydis. Haplogroups that could not be connected with 95% confidence are identified by shapes/circles. The average percentage COI sequence divergence between the different haplotypes and the number of mutational steps between haplogroups are indicated. The geography of haplogroups are indicated in (D), where black, red and blue circles indicate the haplogroups of M. namaquensis, H. patersoni and P. praomydis separately. Colours of sampling localities correspond to the colours used in the haplotype networks (A–C).
Figure 1. Sampling localities where the host M. namaquensis and lice H in Comparative phylogeography between parasitic sucking lice and their host the Namaqua rock mouse, Micaelamys namaquensis (Rodentia: Muridae)
Figure 1. Sampling localities where the host M. namaquensis and lice H. patersoni (red) and/or P. praomydis (blue) were recorded: De Doorns (DD), Loeriesfontein (LF), Goegap (GP), Elandskuil (EK), Rusplaas (RS), Bloemfontein (BF), Rooipoort (RP), Postmasburg (PB), Tswalu (TS), Dinokeng (DK), Marken (MA), Alldays (AD) and Mogalakwena (MO). Numbers indicate the percentage prevalence of H. patersoni and P. praomydis at each locality.
Figure 4 in Comparative phylogeography between parasitic sucking lice and their host the Namaqua rock mouse, Micaelamys namaquensis (Rodentia: Muridae)
Figure 4. Phylogenetic reconciliation of H. patersoni and M. namaquensis retrieved from JANE after the five types of evolutionary events (legend) was tested for. The locality abbreviations refer to the localities in Figure 1 and CSW refers to the central/south-western haplogroup.
Figure 2. Hoplopleura altaiensis n in Sucking Lice (Phthiraptera: Anoplura) Parasitizing Mongolian Rodents With The Description Of A New Species Of Hoplopleura From Mountain Voles (Alticola Spp.)
Figure 2. Hoplopleura altaiensis n. sp., male and female. (A) Paratergal plates of male; (B) paratergal plates of female; (C) male genitalia; (D) female genitalia and posterior, ventral abdomen. The dashed lines show the shape of the subgenital plate for slide-mounted specimens following DNA extraction or clearing in potassium hydroxide.
Figure 1. Hoplopleura altaiensis n in Sucking Lice (Phthiraptera: Anoplura) Parasitizing Mongolian Rodents With The Description Of A New Species Of Hoplopleura From Mountain Voles (Alticola Spp.)
Figure 1. Hoplopleura altaiensis n. sp., male. (A) Scanning electron micrograph showing dorsal features; (B) scanning electron micrograph showing ventral features.
Data from: Integrating phylogenomic and population genomic patterns in avian lice provides a more complete picture of parasite evolution
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Phylogenomics using target-restricted assembly resolves intra-generic relationships of parasitic lice (Phthiraptera: Columbicola)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Psocodea Phylogenomic dataset from: Phylogenomics of parasitic and non-parasitic lice (Insecta: Psocodea): combining sequence data and Exploring compositional bias solutions in Next Generation Datasets
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Biogeography and host-related factors trumps parasite life-history: limited congruence among the genetic structures of specific ectoparasitic lice and their rodent hosts
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Size matters for lice on birds: coevolutionary allometry of host and parasite body size
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Fig. 3 in Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken
Fig. 3. Geographical distribution of four species of menoponid chewing lice parasitizing wild and domestic chicken (Gallus spp.). Each circle is divided into four sectors, representing the four louse species: upper left = Menacanthus cornutus (Schömmer, 1913); upper right = Menacanthus stramineus (Nitzsch, 1818); lower left = Menacanthus pallidulus (Neumann, 1912); lower right = Menopon gallinae (Linnaeus, 1758). Black sectors indicate that this louse species is known from this country, whereas hollow sectors indicate that we have found no published records of this species in this country. The presence of the four species of chewing lice in a country is based on the reports summarized in Table 1. Note that the menoponid species Amyrsidea powelli (Bedford, 1920) appears to be established on chicken in Nigeria (Fabiyi 1986, 1996), and that Menacanthus longiscleritus Naz & Rizvi, 2016, has been described from chicken in Pakistan. These are not shown on the map.
Figs 7–8 in Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken
Figs 7–8. Gallancyra dentata (Sugimoto, 1934) gen. et comb. nov. ex Gallus gallus (Linnaeus, 1758) (NHMUK010682393). 7. Male subgenital plate and terminal end of abdomen, ventral view. 8. Female subgenital plate and terminal end of abdomen, ventral view. Abbreviations: vms = vulval marginal setae; vss = vulval submarginal setae.
Fig. 1 in Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken
Fig. 1. Geographical distribution of three species of ischnoceran chewing lice parasitizing wild and domestic chicken (Gallus spp). Each circle is divided into three sectors, representing the three louse species: upper left = Goniodes gigas (Taschenberg, 1879); upper right = Goniodes dissimilis Denny, 1842; lower = Goniocotes gallinae (De Geer, 1778). Black sectors indicate that this louse species is known from this country, whereas hollow sectors indicate that we have found no published records of this species in this country. Presence of the three species of chewing lice in a country is based on the reports summarized in Table 1.
Figs 5–6 in Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken
Figs 5–6. Gallancyra dentata (Sugimoto, 1934) gen. et comb. nov. ex Gallus gallus (Linnaeus, 1758) (NHMUK010682393). 5. Habitus, ♂, dorsal and ventral view. 6. Habitus, ♀, dorsal and ventral views. Legs II and III distorted in all examined males, here illustrated approximately, and rotated compared to how they are in the slide specimen.
Fig. 4 in Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken
Fig. 4. Geographical distribution of the known records of Gallancyra dentata (Sugimoto, 1934), based on the reports cited in Table 1. Black circles indicate countries where G. dentata has been reported at in at least one survey, including the present report. Hollow circles indicate countries for which surveys of domestic chicken have been published, but G. dentata has not been found. In addition to the areas indicated on the map, Emerson (1956) reported G. dentata from "various islands in the Central Pacific Area", but gave no detail.
Fig. 14 in Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken
Fig. 14. Gallancyra dentata (Sugimoto, 1934) gen. et comb. nov. ex Gallus gallus (Linnaeus, 1758) (NHMUK010682393). Male legs I–III, dorsal and ventral views. Legs II and III distorted in all examined males, and here illustrated approximately; note that marginal and near-marginal setae (marked with small black circles) are illustrated on both dorsal and ventral side, as their exact placement is difficult to establish due to the distortion of the legs. Some setae on tibiae II–III appear hyaline in examined specimens, and have here been illustrated as hollow.
Data from: Mitochondrial genome fragmentation unites the parasitic lice of eutherian mammals
Organelle genome fragmentation has been found in a wide range of eukaryotic lineages; however, its use in phylogenetic reconstruction has not been demonstrated. We explored the use of mitochondrial (mt) genome fragmentation in resolving the controversial suborder-level phylogeny of parasitic lice (order Phthiraptera). There are ~5,000 species of parasitic lice in four suborders (Amblycera, Ischnocera, Rhyncophthirina and Anoplura), which infest mammals and birds. The phylogenetic relationships among these suborders are unresolved despite decades of studies. We sequenced the mt genomes of eight species of parasitic lice and compared them with 17 other species of parasitic lice sequenced previously. We found that the typical single-chromosome mt genome is retained in the lice of birds but fragmented into many minichromosomes in the lice of eutherian mammals. The shared derived feature of mt genome fragmentation unites the eutherian mammal lice of Ischnocera (family Trichodectidae) with Anoplura and Rhyncophthirina to the exclusion of the bird lice of Ischnocera (family Philopteridae). This novel clade is also supported by phylogenetic analysis of mt genome and cox1 gene sequences. Our results demonstrate, for the first time, that organelle genome fragmentation is informative for resolving controversial high-level phylogenies.
FIGURE 11 in <strong>An annotated checklist of parasitic lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) from the Galápagos Islands</strong>
FIGURE 11. Perineus oblongus Kéler, 1957. A: male. B: female (Host: Phoebastria irrorata).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.