Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
484
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
484 results for “southern South America”
Figure 15 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 15. Transverse sections of the skulls of two anuran taxa through the region of the optic foramina. A, Rhinophrynus dorsalis (KU 186799). B, Xenopus muelleri (KU 196041). Numbers before the colon indicate the character and numbers after the colon indicate the character state. Bone is shown in black and cartilage is shown in grey. Not to scale.
Figure 4 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 4. Reconstruction of the skull of Llankibatrachus truebae in dorsal view, based primarily on specimens BAR 2469– 10 and 2367–1. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 6 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 6. Llankibatrachus truebae. Young postmetamorphic specimens. Photographs of (A) BAR 3080–10 and (B) BAR 2467–10. Scale bars = 5 mm
Figure 19 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 19. Premaxillae in frontal view and anterior ends of maxillae in two anuran taxa. A, Pelobates syriacus (KU, 146856). B, Xenopus laevis (KU 195934). Numbers before the colon indicate the character and numbers after the colon indicate the character state. Not to scale.
Figure 3 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 3. Partial reconstruction of the skeleton of an adult Llankibatrachus truebae in dorsal view. Based on several specimens (e.g. BAR 2367–1, 2469–10, 2479–10, BAR -1). Scale bar = 3 mm.
Figure 2 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 2. Photograph of Llankibatrachus truebae (Holotype, BAR 2469–10) representing a nearly complete, articulated cranial and postcranial skeleton. The specimen is mostly preserved as a dorsal impression, although the ventral surface of several sectioned bones still in situ is also evident. Note the body outline preserved in this specimen. Scale bar = 3 mm.
Figure 14 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 14. Nasals and sphenethmoid of two anuran taxa in dorsal view. A, Shelania pascuali (CBPA 12213). B, Xenopus laevis (KU 69842). Numbers before the colon indicate the character and numbers after the colon indicate the character state. Not to scale.
Figure 11. Nieuwkoop & Faber Stage 57 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 11. Nieuwkoop & Faber Stage 57/58 tadpole of Llankibatrachus truebae in ventral view. The irregular, stippled area in the posterior half of the head denotes calcium deposits. Stippling in the left leg (right side of the figure) shows ossification of the femur, tibia, and fibula. Scale bar = 3 mm.
Figure 1 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 1. Map of north-western Patagonia showing location of the two fossiliferous sites near the northern margin of the Nahuel Huapi Lake, from which Llankibatrachus truebae was recovered.
Figure 5 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 5. Skull and pectoral girdle of Llankibatrachus truebae in ventral view (BAR 2720–10). Bones are shown in stippling; dashed lines indicate broken bones. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 8 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 8. Ventral view of the left humerus. A, Llankibatrachus truebae (BAR 2367–1, partially reconstructed). B, Xenopus muelleri (MCZ 1631). 'Xenopus' romeri (DNPM 572, right humerus reversed). Not to scale.
Figure 17 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 17. Dorsal views of the skulls of three anuran taxa. A, Discoglossus sardus (KU 129239). B, Saltenia ibanezi redrawn from Báez (1981: fig. 2). C, Xenopus muelleri (KU 196043). Numbers before the colon indicate the character and numbers after the colon indicate the character state. Spaces between bones are shown in black, cartilage is shown in grey, and bone is shown in white; the pterygoids are stippled. Not to scale.
Figure 26 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 26. Mandibles and hyoid apparatuses of two anuran taxa in ventral view. A, Pipa parva (USNM 115771). B, Silurana tropicalis (KU 195667). Numbers before the colon indicate the character and numbers after the colon indicate the character state. Cartilage is shown in grey, bone is shown in white, and combined grey and stippling denotes calcification. Not to scale.
Figure 23 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 23. Scapulae of two anuran taxa in ventral view. A, Pipa carvalhoi (MCZ 97277). B, Xenopus laevis (KU 69842). Numbers before the colon indicate the character and numbers after the colon indicate the character state. Not to scale.
Figure 22. Vertebrae I–IV in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution
Figure 22. Vertebrae I–IV of two anuran taxa in dorsal view. A, Xenopus wittei (KU 195673). B, Rhinophrynus dorsalis (KU 69084). Numbers before the colon indicate the character and numbers after the colon indicate the character state. Spaces between bones are shown in black, cartilage is shown in grey, and bone is shown in white. Not to scale.
APPENDIX 1 in Paleoclimate estimates for the Paleogene-Neogene in southern South America using fossil leaves as proxies
<p>APPENDIX 1.— Supplementary material including the fossil specimens from the studied sites and the morphological character scores for CLAMP analysis</p><table><thead><tr><th><b>Lower Río Turbio Fm</b></th><th><b>LMA</b></th><th><b>LAA</b></th><th><b>Source</b></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th><i>Acrodiclidium flavianum</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Allophylus graciliformis</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Anacardites pichileufensis</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Annona</i> sp.</th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Casearia</i> sp.</th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Cissus pichileufensis</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Cinnamomum neogaea</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Cupania grosse-serrata</i></th><td>*</td><td>-</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Cupania latifolioides</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Cupania patagonica</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Cupania santacrucensis</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Drimys patagonica</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Drimys</i> sp.</th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Eucalyptus</i> sp.</th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Escallonia</i> sp.</th><td>*</td><td><b>–</b></td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Myrcia</i> sp.</th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Myricaceae</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Myrica hunzikerii</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Nectandra prolifica</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Nothofagus subferruginea</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Nothofagus variabilis</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Nothofagus serrulata</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Nothofagus elongata</i></th><td>*</td><td><b>–</b></td><td>Hünicken 1967</td></tr><tr><th><i>Ocotea menendezi</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Ocotea</i> sp.</th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Persea</i> sp.</th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Psidium liociardensis</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Qualea patagonica</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Schinopsis patagonica</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Styrax</i> sp.</th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Styrax glandulifera</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Tetracera</i> cf. <i>patagonica</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Zyziphus chubutensis</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Malvaceae</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Urticaceae</i></th><td>*</td><td><b>–</b></td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th>cf. <i>Pouterlabatia clark</i></th><td>*</td><td>*</td><td>Hünicken 1967; Vento & Prámparo 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Paullinia</i> sp.</th><td>*</td><td><b>–</b></td><td>Panti 2018</td></tr><tr><th><i>Banisteriophyllum</i></th><td>*</td><td><b>–</b></td><td>Panti 2018</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 4 in Paleoclimate estimates for the Paleogene-Neogene in southern South America using fossil leaves as proxies
<p>TABLE 4 — Estimated values for the climate variables in the lower Río Turbio Formation member from CLAMP analysis using the CLAMP3B SA and CLAMPSH90 data set.</p><table><thead><tr><th><b>CLAMP Climate parameters</b></th><th><b>Estimates</b></th><th><b>Error</b></th><th><b>Dataset</b></th><th><b>Estimates</b></th><th><b>Error</b></th><th><b>Data set</b></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>Mean annual temperature (°C)</th><td>12.7</td><td>2.1</td><td>CLAMP3BSA</td><td>12.2</td><td>4.83</td><td>CLAMPSH90</td></tr><tr><th>Warm month mean temperature (°C)</th><td>23.2</td><td>3.3</td><td>CLAMP3BSA</td><td>21.5</td><td>7.5</td><td>CLAMPSH90</td></tr><tr><th>Cold month mean temperature (°C)</th><td>3.4</td><td>3.8</td><td>CLAMP3BSA</td><td>4</td><td>4.6</td><td>CLAMPSH90</td></tr><tr><th>Mean Growing Season Precipitation (mm)</th><td>1741</td><td>42.6</td><td>CLAMP3BSA</td><td>1394</td><td>68</td><td>CLAMPSH90</td></tr><tr><th>3-Wettest Months Precipitation (mm)</th><td>784</td><td>19.8</td><td>CLAMP3BSA</td><td>460</td><td>35</td><td>CLAMPSH90</td></tr><tr><th>3-Driest Months Precipitation (mm)</th><td>334</td><td>15.3</td><td>CLAMP3BSA</td><td>160</td><td>22.8</td><td>CLAMPSH90</td></tr><tr><th>Length Growing Season</th><td>7.7</td><td>1.2</td><td>CLAMP3BSA</td><td>7.4</td><td>0.8</td><td>CLAMPSH90</td></tr></tbody></table>
Fig. 5 in Early steps in the radiation of notoungulate mammals in southern South America: A new henricosborniid from the Eocene of Patagonia
Fig. 5. Size comparison between members of Henricosborniidae and Orome deepi gen. et sp. nov.
Fig. 1 in A new genus and species of Heroini (Perciformes: Cichlidae) from the early Eocene of southern South America
Fig. 1. Map of the collecting area (arrow) at Alemanía in northwestern Argentina.
Data from: Genome-wide diversity in lowland and highland maize landraces from southern South America: Population genetics insights to assist conservation
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.