Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

1,667

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

1,667 results for “susceptibility”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo40/100

IODP Expedition 374 Magnetic susceptibility (whole round)

<p>Magnetic susceptibility was measured on whole-round sections (and rarely section halves) on the Whole-Round Multisensor Logger (WRMSL) and/or Special Task Multisensor Logger (STMSL) using a Bartington MS2 meter and a 90 mm or 80 mm MS2C loop. As volume of the sample is not controlled for this experiment, susceptibility units are recorded in instrument units and are not volume-corrected.</p>

opencc-zeroAug 2019View details →
zenodo40/100

IODP Expedition 374 Magnetic susceptibility (point or contact system)

<p>Magnetic susceptibility was measured on section halves on the Section Half Multisensor Logger (SHMSL) using a Bartington MS2 meter and either a MS2E or MS2K probe. Because all JRSO cores meet minimum size requirements for these two probes, MSPOINT data are corrected for volume and recorded in SI susceptibility units (x10<sup>-5</sup>).</p>

opencc-zeroAug 2019View details →
zenodo40/100

Event-based landslide susceptibility models (Styrian Basin, Austria)

<p><strong>Landslide susceptibility models</strong></p> <p>Landslide susceptibility modes are based on rainfall-triggered landslide events in the Styrian basin, Austria, in 2009 and 2014. Landslide susceptibility models are generalized additive models (GAM). <em>Note: Information on the exact location of landslides has been obscured.</em></p> <p><br> <strong>Uncertainty</strong></p> <p>Posterior simulations of the coefficients using a simple Metropolis Hastings sampler and a Gaussian approximation are available for GAM-Spatial and GAM-SM.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <table> <caption><strong>Overview of landslide susceptibility models</strong></caption> <thead> <tr> <th scope="col"><strong>GAM</strong></th> <th scope="col"><strong>Variables</strong></th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>GAM-Co</td> <td>land surface variables, meteorological variables, geology, LULC</td> </tr> <tr> <td>GAM-SM</td> <td>GAM-Co, soil moisture</td> </tr> <tr> <td>GAM-SM+TC</td> <td>GAM-SM, five-day rainfall &gt; 80 mm top-coded</td> </tr> <tr> <td>GAM-Spatial</td> <td>GAM-SM+TC, Gaussian process smoother</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2022View details →
dryad40/100

Microbiomes associated with avian malaria survival differ between susceptible Hawaiian honeycreepers and sympatric malaria-resistant introduced birds

<p>Of the estimated 55 Hawaiian honeycreepers (subfamily Carduelinae) only 17 species remain, 9 of which the International Union for Conservation of Nature considers endangered. Among the most pressing threats to honeycreeper survival is avian malaria, caused by the introduced blood parasite <em>Plasmodium relictum</em>, which is increasing in distribution in Hawai`i as a result of climate change. Preventing further honeycreeper decline will require innovative conservation strategies that confront malaria from multiple angles. Research on mammals revealed strong connections between gut microbiome composition and malaria susceptibility, illuminating a potential novel approach to malaria control through the manipulation of gut microbiota. </p> <p><span>One honeycreeper species, Hawai`i `amakihi (<em>Chlorodrepanis virens</em>), persists in some areas of high malaria prevalence, indicating they have acquired some level of immunity. To investigate if avian host-specific microbes may be associated with malaria survival, we characterized cloacal microbiomes and malaria infection for 174 `amakihi and 172 malaria-resistant warbling white-eyes (<em>Zosterops japonicus</em>) from Hawai`i Island using 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding and qPCR. Neither microbial alpha nor beta diversity covaried with infection, but 149 microbes showed positive associations with malaria survivors. Among these were <em>Escherichia</em> and <em>Lactobacillus</em> spp., which appear to mitigate malaria severity in mammalian hosts, revealing promising candidates for future probiotic research for augmenting malaria immunity in sensitive endangered species.</span></p>

opencc-zeroJun 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

IODP Expedition 352 Magnetic susceptibility (point or contact system)

<p>Magnetic susceptibility was measured on section halves on the Section Half Multisensor Logger (SHMSL) using a Bartington MS2 meter and either a MS2E or MS2K probe. Because all JRSO cores meet minimum size requirements for these two probes, MSPOINT data are corrected for volume and recorded in SI susceptibility units (x10<sup>-5</sup>).</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

IODP Expedition 352 Magnetic susceptibility (whole round)

<p>Magnetic susceptibility was measured on whole-round sections (and rarely section halves) on the Whole-Round Multisensor Logger (WRMSL) and/or Special Task Multisensor Logger (STMSL) using a Bartington MS2 meter and a 90 mm or 80 mm MS2C loop. As volume of the sample is not controlled for this experiment, susceptibility units are recorded in instrument units and are not volume-corrected.</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Paleomagnetic directions, anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS), and anisotropy of anhysteretic remanent magnetization (AARM) from IODP Sites U1507 and U1511 (Exp. 371, Tasman Sea).

<p>We present here paleomagnetic and magnetic anisotropy data from International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Sites U1507 and U1511 (Expedition 371, Tasman Sea). Data consist of three tables that contain: (1) the characteristic remanent magnetization (ChRM) directions, before and after correction for inclination flattening of magnetic remanence, for both sites (Table S2); (2) the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) data from Site U1507 (Table S3); (3) the anisotropy of anhysteretic remanence (AARM) from Site U1507 (Table S4).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

IODP Expedition 351 Magnetic susceptibility (whole round)

<p>Magnetic susceptibility was measured on whole-round sections (and rarely section halves) on the Whole-Round Multisensor Logger (WRMSL) and/or Special Task Multisensor Logger (STMSL) using a Bartington MS2 meter and a 90 mm or 80 mm MS2C loop. As volume of the sample is not controlled for this experiment, susceptibility units are recorded in instrument units and are not volume-corrected.</p>

opencc-zeroAug 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

IODP Expedition 351 Magnetic susceptibility (point or contact system)

<p>Magnetic susceptibility was measured on section halves on the Section Half Multisensor Logger (SHMSL) using a Bartington MS2 meter and either a MS2E or MS2K probe. Because all JRSO cores meet minimum size requirements for these two probes, MSPOINT data are corrected for volume and recorded in SI susceptibility units (x10<sup>-5</sup>).</p>

opencc-zeroAug 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1 in Long-term exposure of Aedes aegypti to Bacillus thuringiensis svar. israelensis did not involve altered susceptibility to this microbial larvicide or to other control agents

Fig. 1 Resistance ratios (RR) betseen the lethal concentrations of Bti and its toxins (Cru11Aa, Cru4Ba), temephos (Tem) and diflubenzuron (Dif) for third-instar Ae. aegypti larvae from the RecBti strain compared to that of the reference strain. a RR at LC50. b RR at LC90

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2018View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 7 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes

Figure 7: Hemp plant dry weights (g) two hemp cultivars (Eletta Campana = fiber, Cherry Blossom x T1 = CBD) exposed to two RKN species, M. enterolobii and M. hapla. Factor levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey's HSD where P ≤ 0.05. PCBxT1 = Cherry Blossom x T1, PEC = Eletta (Trial 5).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 3 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes

Figure 3: Hemp plant dry weights (g) with a mixed population of root-knot species and 11 hemp cultivars; all plants were inoculated with 10,000 RKN eggs. Factor levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey's HSD with P ≤ 0.05 (Trial 2).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes

Figure 2: Hemp plant dry weights (g) for inoculated (+) and uninoculated (-) plants with a mixed population of root-knot species and six European hemp cultivars. Factor levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey's HSD with P ≤ 0.05 (Trial 1).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes

Figure 1: Root galls caused by RKN (M. javanica and M. incognita mixed population) on hemp roots (cv. Carmagnola Selezionata, left) compared to cucumber roots (cv. Dasher II, middle) (Trial 1) and cv. Cherry Blossom x T1 (right; Trial 2) (Photos J. Coburn).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 5 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes

Figure 5: Hemp plant dry weights (g) for two cannabigerol (CBG) hemp cultivars and a nematicide in naturally RKN-infested soil. P values (P ≤ 0.05) represent significant differences between cultivars by treatment (PG = Gold, PP= Panacea; NA = naturally infested soil, V = Velum, ST = steamed soil.). Velum was applied at 0.48 kg a.i./Ha. Factor levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey's HSD with P ≤ 0.05 (Trial 4).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 6 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes

Figure 6: Cannabis sativa (cv. Panacea) 60 days after planting in RKN-infested field soil. (Left) naturally infested soil, (middle) nematicide-treated (fluopyram) soil, (right) steamed soil (Photo J. Coburn).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes

Figure 4: Hemp plant dry weights (g) for RKN inoculated (+) and uninoculated (-) plants with two CBD and two Chinese fiber hemp cultivars. Factor levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey's HSD with P ≤ 0.05 (Trial 3).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 7 in Influence of Temperature on Susceptibility of Cvs. Tifguard and Georgia-06G Peanut to Meloidogyne arenaria

Figure 7: Number of Meloidogyne arenaria eggs per egg mass from roots of the peanut cultivars Tifguard (resistant) and Georgia-06G (susceptible) at 34°C at 40 days after inoculation. Different letters over bars indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.

opencc-by-4.0May 2018View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 6 in Influence of Temperature on Susceptibility of Cvs. Tifguard and Georgia-06G Peanut to Meloidogyne arenaria

Figure 6: Mature egg-laying females and necrotic lesions formed around Meloidogyne arenaria infection sites in Tifguard roots. A. Mature females at 35 days after inoculation (DAI) at 34°C; B. Egg-laying female at 40 DAI at 34°C (arrow points to egg mass); C. Arrow points to necrotic lesion at 5 DAI; D. Arrow points to necrotic lesion at 40 DAI.

opencc-by-4.0May 2018View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 3 in Influence of Temperature on Susceptibility of Cvs. Tifguard and Georgia-06G Peanut to Meloidogyne arenaria

Figure 3: Number of second-stage juveniles (J2) per gram of root system of the resistant cultivar Tifguard and the susceptible cultivar Georgia-06G 5 days after inoculation in Experiments 1 and 2. Different letters over bars from the same experiment indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.

opencc-by-4.0May 2018View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record