Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
216
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
216 results for “systematic literature review”
Background material for systematic review of literature on ICT acceptance among community dwelling elderly
<p>This is a zip file containing RIS files and PDF files that provide detailed background information about the study.</p>
Supplementary material for "Patient portal adoption rates: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis"
<p>The attached file contains the searches used to review the literature and identify papers evaluating usage, usability and influence on decision making of patient portals (Supplementary Table 1).</p> <p>Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3 contains references and individual studies characteristics of included studies.</p>
Supplementary material for "Patient portal adoption rates: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis"
<p>The attached file contains the searches used to review the literature and identify papers evaluating usage, usability and influence on decision making of patient portals (Supplementary Table 1).</p> <p>Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3 contains references and individual study characteristics of included studies.</p>
Requirement prioritization in Software Engineering: a systematic literature review update
<div> <div> <div> </div> </div> </div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <p>A data extraction form was developed to collect all relevant information from the identified studies and organize the selection process in this updated systematic literature review. The main information included in this form comprises the protocol, an identifier (ID) for each study, bibliographic references, and answers to the research questions.</p> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div>
Replication package - Potential Effectiveness and Efficiency Issues in Usability Evaluation within Digital Health: A Systematic Literature Review
<p>1. File: <strong>Maqbool_SLR_2023_JSS_Inclusion_610.xlsm.</strong></p> <p>There are two sheets in file. A. <strong>Final_Selected_papers</strong>, (sheet) aims to provide a comprehensive list of articles (n=610) selected for our SLR, whose process and data items specified and detailed in the article. </p> <p>B. <strong>Rejected_After_Full_Review</strong>, (sheet) aims to provide a comprehensive list of articles (n=153) rejected for our SLR based on inclusion or exclusion criteria after full article review process, whose process and data items specified and detailed in the article. </p> <p>2. File: <strong>Maqbool_SLR_2023_JSS_Data_Extraction_Form.pdf</strong></p> <p>This file aims to provide a comprehensive data extraction form, whose process and data items specified and detailed in the article. The form was used to elicit data relevant to answer the postulated research questions. This form served as the foundation for the additional information presented in the final paper.</p> <p>3. File: <strong>Bilal_SLR_JSS_Primary_Studies_References.pdf</strong></p> <p>This file contains the primary selected studies (n=610) for the systematic literature review. The systematic review aims to explore and analyse research literature related to usability evaluation methods and their effectiveness and efficiency in the context of digital health applications. This file will help to identity reference of the primary selected study that is cited in the paper using a prefix (S, e.g. S137). This file can be used for peer review, ensuring the reliability and correctness of findings.</p> <p>4. File: <strong>SLR_Analysis_updated_2023.nvp</strong></p> <p>The data extracted from each article was recorded in a worksheet (Excel) and then coded in NVivo 12/14 to categorise (classify) and compare extracted facets. Each data item's category and related paper id are coded in the given Excel file. Papers were not included in the NVivo project due to copyright concerns. Relevant papers can be tracked using the provided spreadsheet file (see Paper ID cell).<br>The file(s) are cleaned as much as reasonable and other raw data is removed. This file does not include the matrix tables or codes, which were produced and analysed run-time during the analysis phase. Although the given package allows for re-generation.</p> <p>-------- UPDATE: --------</p> <p>5. File: <strong>SLR_Analysis_updated_2023_for_MAC.nvpx</strong></p> <p>This is an extra copy of NVivo project, created for the MAC user.</p> <p> </p> <p>This replication package is produced and published here. Research conducted by Karlstad University researchers. We publish data sets to improve coverage and accessibility. For more info or concerns, contact us.</p> <p> </p> <p>Linked paper published at: Maqbool, Bilal, and Sebastian Herold. "Potential effectiveness and efficiency issues in usability evaluation within digital health: A systematic literature review." <em>Journal of Systems and Software</em> (2023): 111881.</p> <p>DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111881">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111881</a><br> </p> <p>This work was funded, in parts, by Region Värmland through the DHINO project, Sweden (Grant: RUN/220266) and Vinnova through the DigitalWell Arena (DWA) project, Sweden (Grant: 2018-03025).</p>
Systematic literature review of acoustic individual identification (AIID)
<p>Citations and characteristics of manuscripts considered relevant to acoustic individual identification (AIID). To be included in the review, at minimum a paper was required to: 1) Use recorded vocalizations, regardless of the method, and 2) attempt to differentiate individuals by vocal signature as an objective or as a step towards more advanced application of acoustic IID. Detailed methods are available in the "AIIDLiteratureReviewMethods.docx".</p>
Framing the cross-border commuting literature: a systematic review and bibliographic analysis
<p>The dataset consist of the 134 publications selected for the systematic literature review on cross-border commuting. </p>
T1.1 Systematic literature review dataset
<p>This document presents the T1.1 Systematic Literature Review Dataset, which was collected for the VERITY project, on the topic of ‘trust in science’, based on a total of <strong>83 articles which provide empirical results</strong> from various scientific disciplines (e.g., social and educational psychology, medicine, science education, science communication).<br>The methodology for the completion of the Systematic Literature Review was based on the <strong>PRISMA protocol</strong>, which provides an evidence-based minimum set of criteria for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.<br>To identify the most appropriate studies for our research questions, the eligibility of the articles to be included in the systematic literature review was determined by the <strong>following two main criteria</strong>:</p> <ol> <li>Only studies directly examining the correlation and causal relationship of various factors to the levels of public trust in science were considered.</li> <li>The factors correlated and affecting the public’s trust in science had to be investigated empirically, without any restrictions on the methodology. </li> </ol> <p>Moreover, to ensure the credibility, integrity, and feasibility of the literature review, three criteria were added: The surveys are based on participants aged at least 16 years old (research based on young children was excluded). The study is written in English. The study appears in a peer-reviewed journal as an article.</p> <p>The review began with a comprehensive search for articles in three electronic databases: <strong>Scopus, Web of Science and PsycInfo</strong>. The selection of Scopus and Web of Science was based on their widely recognized impact indices containing high-calibre scholarly literature published worldwide and across a wide range of scientific fields. PsycInfo was selected as the premier abstracting and indexing database covering the behavioural, social, and psychological sciences. The selected search strategy was based on the two core concepts of our main research question, namely, ‘trust’ and ‘science’.</p> <p>After careful consideration, the following query string was established utilizing Boolean operators (AND, OR): (trust* OR distrust* OR mistrust* ) AND ( scien* ) in TITLE</p>
Automatic User Story Generation: A Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review - Data Extraction
<p>This document presents the data extraction performed for the Systematic Literature Review in Automatic User Story Generation.</p>
Can Machine Learning Replace a Reviewer in the Selection of Studies for Systematic Literature Review Updates?
<p>Appendix of the M.Sc. dissertation "Can Machine Learning Replace a Reviewer in the Selection of Studies for Systematic Literature Review Updates".</p> <p>This appendix contains the files with the results obtained by the evaluation performed in our study. </p> <p>File used to answer RQ1:</p> <ul> <li><a href="../api/records/11019279/draft/files/RQ1-RF-predictions.csv/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">RQ1-RF-predictions.csv</a></li> <li><a href="../api/records/11021614/draft/files/RQ1-RQ3-best-configuration-RF.csv/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">RQ1-RQ3-best-configuration-RF.csv</a></li> </ul> <p>File used to answer RQ2:</p> <ul> <li><a href="../api/records/11019279/draft/files/RQ2-SVM-predictions.csv/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">RQ2-SVM-predictions.csv</a></li> <li><a href="../api/records/11021614/draft/files/RQ2-best-configuration-SVM.csv/content">RQ2-best-configuration-SVM.csv</a></li> </ul> <p>File used to answer RQ3:</p> <ul> <li><a href="../api/records/11019279/draft/files/RQ3-RF-normalized-predictions.csv/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">RQ3-RF-normalized-predictions.csv</a></li> <li><a href="../api/records/11021614/draft/files/RQ1-RQ3-best-configuration-RF.csv/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">RQ1-RQ3-best-configuration-RF.csv</a></li> </ul>
The effect of wheelchair users on the egress time of pedestrian crowds: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
<p>This dataset provides supplementary input data for a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, examining the effects of mobility-impaired individuals, specifically wheelchair users, on pedestrian egress times. It includes the following variables:</p> <ul> <li><strong>short_trial_name</strong>: A unique identifier for each trial.</li> <li><strong>independent variables</strong>: Factors such as the number of attendees, bottleneck width, and mobility profiles (e.g., individuals with or without wheelchair usage).</li> <li><strong>left_shifted_time</strong>: Standardized start time for egress, adjusted for comparability across trials.</li> <li><strong>lower_left_no_of_people</strong>: The number of individuals who passed through the bottleneck at the standardized start time.</li> <li><strong>right_shifted_time</strong>: Standardized end time for egress.</li> <li><strong>right_left_no_of_people</strong>: The number of individuals who passed through the bottleneck by the standardized end time.</li> </ul>
Quality Evaluation Models or Frameworks for Open Source Software: A Systematic Literature Review (Matching articles with categories)
<p>This document includes which primary study falls into which category with respect to the RQs in the following study: “Quality Evaluation Models or Frameworks for Open Source Software: A Systematic Literature Review”</p>
Quality Evaluation Models or Frameworks for Open Source Software: A Systematic Literature Review (Matching articles with categories)
<p>This document includes which primary study falls into which category with respect to the RQs in the following study: “Quality Evaluation Models or Frameworks for Open Source Software: A Systematic Literature Review”</p>
Quality Evaluation Models or Frameworks for Open Source Software: A Systematic Literature Review (Matching articles with categories)
<p>This document includes which primary study falls into which category with respect to the RQs in the following study: “Quality Evaluation Models or Frameworks for Open Source Software: A Systematic Literature Review”</p>
Code repository that supports the research presented in the paper "The gender gap in higher STEM studies: a Systematic Literature Review"
<p>Resources for the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) carries out as part of PhD thesis about the gender gap in STEM studies in higher education by Sonia Verdugo-Castro and supervised by Alicia García-Holgado and Mª Cruz Sánchez Gómez.</p> <p>The SLR covers papers in WoS and Scopus from 2015 to 2021.</p> <p>All the papers retrieved and the different steps in the SLR selection process are contained and documented in:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ldml-Mg-oguX9gXayllojBRtZ1kjdD4WRSqYwf1yZ0o/edit?usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ldml-Mg-oguX9gXayllojBRtZ1kjdD4WRSqYwf1yZ0o/edit?usp=sharing</a></li> </ul>
Database of Systematic review of the literature. Planning of ICT in educational centers
<pre>These documents include a database of RSL articles developed on strategic planning in the integration of ICT in educational centers.</pre>
Supplementary material for "Language and User Requirements for Business Process Simulation - A Systematic Literature Review"
<p>This is ment as a supplementary material for the Publication "Language and User Requirements for Business Process Simulation - A Systematic Literature Review". It contains all sources that were used for the creation of the requirements broken down for each one.</p>
Supplementary Material for Requirements documentation containing natural language: A Systematic Tertiary Literature Review
<p>Context: Requirements documentation in natural language has diverse artifacts, but few studies address their suitability to types<br>of requirements or ease of communication.</p> <p>Methods: We conducted a systematic tertiary literature review (STLR) and identified 22 relevant review papers that address natural language artifacts used by practitioners to document software requirements. We also investigated which types of requirements are addressed by artifacts and if there are guidelines for each.</p> <p>Results: A variety of artifacts used for this purpose were identified, of which the most referenced in the literature were diagrams,<br>use cases, conceptual models, user stories, and prototypes. The analysis highlighted that artifacts are applied differently to functional and non-functional requirements. In general, diagrams, use cases, scenarios, and prototypes can be used for both types of requirements, depending on the content (usability, security, etc.). However, user stories and derived artifacts are more recommended for functional requirements and have limitations for non-functional requirements.</p> <p>Conclusion: Furthermore, the study explored different guidelines, structures, and formats used in documentation artifacts, reflecting the diversity in requirements documentation practices in software projects.</p>
Dataset - SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW OF CHINA-BRAZIL RELATIONS (1993-2023): EXPLORING NEW RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
<p>The dataset contains five files. The first one, "rawDatabase.xlsx," pertains to the Systematic Literature Review after applying exclusion criteria, comprising 208 records. The remaining files ("class_x_export.txt") contain data generated by the Hierarchical Descendent Classification technique using Iramuteq software.</p>
Trade-offs Between Performance Efficiency and Costs While Using Function as a Service for Machine Learning Tasks: A Systematic Literature Review
<p>This repository contains all artifacts that were used for the systematic literature review (SLR) related to a the cost and performance trade-offs when Function as a Service (FaaS) for machine learning (ML) tasks.</p> <p>We selected and analyzed 65 papers and publications that were optained via Scopus. The study took place in 2024 from January to August 2024.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.