Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 5 in Molecular identifications and descriptions of the tadpoles of Rhacophorus kio Ohler & Delorme, 2006 and Rhacophorus rhodopus Liu & Hu, 1960 (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae)

FIG. 5. — Drawings and scanning electron micrographs of the tadpole of Rhacophorus rhodopus Liu & Hu, 1960, MNHN 2010.1125, stage 36: A, dorsal view; B, lateral view; C, oral disc; D, some keratodonts of the row A2 of the tadpole MNHN 2010.1106, stage 36. Scale bars: A, B, 10 mm; C, 1 mm; D, 10 µm.

FIG. 4 in Molecular identifications and descriptions of the tadpoles of Rhacophorus kio Ohler & Delorme, 2006 and Rhacophorus rhodopus Liu & Hu, 1960 (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae)

FIG. 4. — Rhacophorus kio Ohler & Delorme, 2006 (MNHN 2010.1143, stage 34): A, buccal floor; B, buccal roof. Scale bars: 1 mm.

FIG. 3. — A, B in Molecular identifications and descriptions of the tadpoles of Rhacophorus kio Ohler & Delorme, 2006 and Rhacophorus rhodopus Liu & Hu, 1960 (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae)

FIG. 3. — A, B, photographs of dorsal (A) and lateral (B) views of Rhacophorus kio Ohler & Delorme, 2006 (MNHN 2010.1072, stage 36, BL 20.3 mm, voucher DNA) with life coloration; C, D, photographs of dorsal (C) and lateral (D) views of Rhacophorus rhodopus Liu & Hu, 1960 (MNHN 2010.1131, stage 36, TL 44.4 mm) with colours in preservative.

FIG. 1 in Molecular identifications and descriptions of the tadpoles of Rhacophorus kio Ohler & Delorme, 2006 and Rhacophorus rhodopus Liu & Hu, 1960 (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae)

FIG. 1. — Known distributions of Rhacophorus kio Ohler & Delorme, 2006 and Rhacophorus rhodopus Liu & Hu, 1960. Symbols:, type locality of R. kio;, type locality of R. rhodopus; ■, and hatched areas: localities and areas where R. kio has been found; ●, and grey squared areas: localities and areas where R. rhodopus has been found;, localities where both species have been encountered. Note that both species are present in the type locality of each species. Data from Sarkar & Sanyal 1985; Yang 1991; Nguyen & Ho 1996; Fei 1999; Fei et al. 2009; Inger et al. 1999; Ohler et al. 2000, 2002; Tordoff et al. 2000; Ziegler 2002; Chan-ard 2003; Stuart 2005; Inthara et al. 2005; Wilkinson et al. 2005; Ohler & Delorme 2006; Bordoloi et al. 2007; Nguyen et al. 2008; Nguyen et al. 2009; Grosjean et al. 2015.

FIG. 2 in Molecular identifications and descriptions of the tadpoles of Rhacophorus kio Ohler & Delorme, 2006 and Rhacophorus rhodopus Liu & Hu, 1960 (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae)

FIG. 2. — Drawings and scanning electron micrographs of the tadpole of Rhacophorus kio Ohler & Delorme, 2006, MNHN 2010.1072, stage 36: A, dorsal view; B, lateral view; C, oral disc; D, some keratodonts of the row A3 of the tadpole MNHN 2010.1142, stage 40. Scale bars: A, B, 10 mm; C, 1 mm; D, 10 µm.

Figure 2 in Reproductive ecology and behaviour of a species of Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylinae) with endotrophic tadpoles: Systematic implications

Figure 2. The tadpole of Adenomera sp. Above: lateral view of the left side (scale bar: 4.0 mm). Below: detail of the oral apparatus (scale bar: 0.5 mm). Specimen from Uberlândia (MG, Brazil).

Figure 1 in Reproductive ecology and behaviour of a species of Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylinae) with endotrophic tadpoles: Systematic implications

Figure 1. Rainfall in the municipality of Uberlândia. Lines represent median values over the last 21 years; columns represent values accumulated over the pitfall sampling period (seasons 1999/2000 and 2000/2001). Data from meteorological station of the Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (Campus Santa Mônica).

Figure 4 in Reproductive ecology and behaviour of a species of Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylinae) with endotrophic tadpoles: Systematic implications

Figure 4. Oscillogram (first row), audiospectrogram (second and fourth rows) and power spectrum (third row) of the advertisement call of Adenomera sp. The first three rows are representations of single notes, the fourth represents a sequence of three notes. Recording files: first column, Adenomspmg2AAGd (17 December 2003, 17:00 h, air 24°C, unvouchered recording); second column, AdenomspmgAAGd (10 December 2003, 20:10 h, air 26°C, unvouchered recording); fourth row, AdenomspmgAAG21 (5 October 1999, 19:40 h, air 21°C, voucher AAG-UFU 2633).

Figure 3 in Reproductive ecology and behaviour of a species of Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylinae) with endotrophic tadpoles: Systematic implications

Figure 3. Monthly variation in abundance of adults (males and females) and juveniles of Adenomera sp. in pitfall traps in two localities at the municipality of Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Above: Caça e Pesca sample (N572 adults, 32 juveniles). Below: Panga sample (N513 adults and 13 juveniles). Sampling period from October 1999 to October 2001. The monthly samples are not independent, since the trapped specimens were removed from the environment.

Figure 5 in Reproductive ecology and behaviour of a species of Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylinae) with endotrophic tadpoles: Systematic implications

Figure 5. Territorial call of Adenomera sp. Above left: audiospectrogram of a sequence of three calls. Above right: oscillogram of single note. Below left: audiospectrogram of single note. Below right: power spectrum of single note. Record file AdenomspmgbAAG27, 14 November 2002, 20:30 h, air 23.0°C (unvouchered).

Figure 3 in Tadpole deposition behaviour in male stream frogs Mannophryne trinitatis (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Figure 3. Histogram showing the number of tadpoles in different weight classes collected from pond B at Mount Saint Benedict. Newly deposited tadpoles are nearly all in the first size class (,0.045 g; see depositions in Table I).

Figure 1 in Tadpole deposition behaviour in male stream frogs Mannophryne trinitatis (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Figure 1. Map of the Mount Saint Benedict site used for the deposition experiment. The numbers correspond to the tubs positioned at the site (see Table I for tub distances from the stream and altitude measurements).

Figure 2 in Tadpole deposition behaviour in male stream frogs Mannophryne trinitatis (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Figure 2. Histogram showing the number of tadpole depositions in each size class at Mount Saint Benedict (with collection of tadpoles every other day, N522).

Figure 11 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis

Figure 11. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis viridis (ZSM 574/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.

Figure 10 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis

Figure 10. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis tasymena (ZSM 527/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.

Figure 7 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis

Figure 7. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis sibilans (ZSM 557/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.

Figure 3 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis

Figure 3. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis madagascariensis (ZSM 519/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.

Figure 4 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis

Figure 4. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis albilabris (ZSM 588/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.

Figure 5 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis

Figure 5. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis pyrrhus (ZSM 580/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.

Figure 6 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis

Figure 6. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis marojezensis (ZSM 523/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view, note that the hindlimb has been removed from the specimen for better visibility of structures; (c) oral disc.