Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2001View details →

Fig. 19 in Phylogeny of Eulithis Hübner and Related Genera (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), with an Implication of Wing Pattern Evolution

Fig. 19. Character reconstruction over the preferred cladogram of Eulithis and related genera. Presence of yellow marking on the tornus of forewing (character 9). White branches: absent; black branches: present. Genera abbreviations: Tel., Telenomeuta; Ant., Antepirrhoe; Cid., Cidaria; Ecl., Ecliptopera; Lam., Lampropteryx; Eve., Evecliptopera; Eut., Eustroma; Cal., Callabraxas; Cer., Ceratodalia; Lob., Lobogonodes; Eul. Eulithis; Gan., Gandaritis.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2024View details →

◂Fig. 6 A molecular phylogeny of 56 systematically representative Peridiniaceae, including 42 accessions assignable to P. cinctum from various geographic regions. Maximum likelihood tree (– ln = 21,884.93), as inferred from a rRNA nucleotide alignment (1137 parsimony-informative sites) and with strain number information. Numbers on branches are ML bootstrap (above) and Bayesian support values (below) for the clusters (asterisks indicate maximal support values, values under 50 and 0.90, respectively, are not shown). Clades are indicated (CZE Czech Republic, E East, GER Germany, HET Heterocapsaceae, N North, PPE Protoperidiniaceae, POL Poland, rbn ribotype n, S South, SWE Sweden, UKR Ukraine, W West) in Bumps on the back: An unusual morphology in phylogenetically distinct Peridinium aff. cinctum (= Peridinium tuberosum; Peridiniales, Dinophyceae)

◂Fig. 6 A molecular phylogeny of 56 systematically representative Peridiniaceae, including 42 accessions assignable to P. cinctum from various geographic regions. Maximum likelihood tree (– ln = 21,884.93), as inferred from a rRNA nucleotide alignment (1137 parsimony-informative sites) and with strain number information. Numbers on branches are ML bootstrap (above) and Bayesian support values (below) for the clusters (asterisks indicate maximal support values, values under 50 and 0.90, respectively, are not shown). Clades are indicated (CZE Czech Republic, E East, GER Germany, HET Heterocapsaceae, N North, PPE Protoperidiniaceae, POL Poland, rbn ribotype n, S South, SWE Sweden, UKR Ukraine, W West)

Fig. 41 in Molecular phylogeny of Acerentomidae (Protura), with description of Acerentuloides bernardi sp. nov. from North America

Fig. 41. Molecular phylogeny of Acerentomidae inferred from concatenated COI, 18S rRNA, 28S rDNA D1–D2, and 28S rDNA D3–D6 sequences with maximum likelihood (ML). ML bootstrap values shown above the branches.

Figs. 11–15 in Molecular phylogeny of Acerentomidae (Protura), with description of Acerentuloides bernardi sp. nov. from North America

Figs. 11–15. Acerentuloides bernardi sp. nov. 11. Pronotum and mesonotum, right side; 12. lateral part of metanotum; 13. anterior part of prosternum; 14. anterolateral part of mesosternum; 15. anterolateral part of metasternum. Arrows indicate pores (al = tergal anterolateral, sl = tergal sublateral). Scale bars: 20 µm.

Figs. 1–10 in Molecular phylogeny of Acerentomidae (Protura), with description of Acerentuloides bernardi sp. nov. from North America

Figs. 1–10. Acerentuloides bernardi sp. nov. 1. Head, right side; 2. pseudoculus with seta l3; 3. cephalic seta sd5; 4. maxillary palpus; 5. labial palpus; 6. maxillary gland; 7. comb; 8. female squama genitalis; 9. foretarsus, exterior view; 10. foretarsus, interior view. Arrows indicate pores (cp = clypeal pore, fr = frontal pore). Scale bars: 20 µm.

Figs. 24–34 in Molecular phylogeny of Acerentomidae (Protura), with description of Acerentuloides bernardi sp. nov. from North America

Figs. 24–34. Acerentuloides bernardi sp. nov. scanning electron microscopy photographs. 24. Habitus; 25. labial palp (apical tuf with 4 setae broken; s = labial sensillum); 26. foretarsus, interior view: sensilla t1, t3 and a'; 27. modified seta P2a on mesonotum; 28. modified seta A2 on prosternum; 29. modified seta M2 on prosternum; 30. modified seta A5 on tergite I and P1a on sternite I; 31. abdominal leg on segment III (sa = subapical, am = apical medial, al = apical lateral setae; apical lateral seta is broken); 32. hind margin of sternite VI; 33. hind margin of sternite VII; 34. sternites VIII–XII. Scale bars = 300 µm (Fig. 24), 4 µm (Figs. 25 and 27–29), 10 µm (Fig. 31), and 20 µm (Figs. 26, 30, and 32–34).

Figs. 35–40 in Molecular phylogeny of Acerentomidae (Protura), with description of Acerentuloides bernardi sp. nov. from North America

Figs. 35–40. Acerentulus confinis (Berlese, 1908), American specimen scanning electron microscopy photographs. 35. Habitus; 36. pseudoculus and cephalic setae sd4 and l3; 37. foretarsus, exterior view: sensilla t1, t3 and a'; 38. labial palpi with apical tuf of setae and basal sensillum (s); 39. sternite VIII; 40. modified seta P4 on metanotum. Scale bars = 300 µm (Fig. 35), 20 µm (Figs. 36 and 38), and 40 µm (Figs. 37, 39, and 40).

Figs. 16–23 in Molecular phylogeny of Acerentomidae (Protura), with description of Acerentuloides bernardi sp. nov. from North America

Figs. 16–23. Acerentuloides bernardi sp. nov. 16. Tergite I, right side; 17. tergite VI, right part; 18. tergite VII, right part; 19. tergite VIII; 20. sternite II; 21. abdominal leg of sternite II; 22. sternite VI; 23. sternites VII–IX. Arrows indicate pores (psm = tergal posterosubmedial, psl = tergal posterosublateral, spsm = sternal posterosubmedial, spm = sternal posteromedial). Scale bars: 20 µm.

Fig. 3 in Epidemiology and molecular phylogeny of Babesia sp. in Little Penguins Eudyptula minor in Australia

Fig. 3. Agarose gel electrophoresis of amplification products obtained through nested PCR tests targeting the 18S rRNA gene of Babesia (primers Bab5.1/BabB followed by RLBF/RLBR) or the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene of Haemoproteus/Plasmodium (primers HaemNFI/HaemNR3 followed by HaemF/HaemR2). The following samples are represented: (a) captive-born little penguin chick, negative blood smear; (b) adult wild little penguin, negative blood smear; (c) Babesia-infected adult wild little penguin, as confirmed through blood smear; (d) Haemoproteus-infected adult tropical screech owl, as confirmed through blood smear; (e) Plasmodium-inoculated chicken, raised in arthropod-free environment; (f) blood parasite-free chicken, raised in arthropodfree environment.

Fig. 1 in Epidemiology and molecular phylogeny of Babesia sp. in Little Penguins Eudyptula minor in Australia

Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of sampling locations, southeast Australia. Site details are given in Table 1. The geographic distribution of little penguins (black area) is shown in the top right map (adapted from Marchant and Higgins, 1990).

Fig. 4 in Epidemiology and molecular phylogeny of Babesia sp. in Little Penguins Eudyptula minor in Australia

Fig. 4. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the 18S rRNA gene of the studied Babesia lineages. Lineages identified in this study are emphasized in red, and other avianinfecting lineages are emphasized in blue. For each lineage, the following information is provided: morphospecies (Genbank ascension number) host species. For avianinfecting lineages, the geographic location is also provided. Branch lengths are drawn proportionally to evolutionary distance (scale bar is shown). For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.

Fig. 2 in Epidemiology and molecular phylogeny of Babesia sp. in Little Penguins Eudyptula minor in Australia

Fig. 2. Babesia sp. in the blood smear of a little penguin. Individual details: TAS- 124, male, adult, moulting, sampled at "Darlington Foreshore" (Maria Island, Tasmania) in 21/02/2013, Genbank ascension number KP144323, Giemsa stain.

Fig. 2 in Fig. 11. Left G1s in Tuerkayana latens, a New Species of Land Crab from French Polynesia, with a Discussion on the Phylogeny of the Genus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinidae)

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed with Maximum Likelihood (ML) based on the COI gene for selected sequences of A. amphitrite, focusing on Iranian populations (green circles). Amphibalanus reticulatus (JQ035518.1), A. variegatus (JQ035522.1) and Balanus glandula (KU204282.1) were used as outgroups. Numbers show the bootstrap values after 1000 pseudo-replicates. Clades I, II and III are corresponding to those in Chen et al. (2014).

Fig. 3 in Fig. 11. Left G1s in Tuerkayana latens, a New Species of Land Crab from French Polynesia, with a Discussion on the Phylogeny of the Genus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinidae)

Fig. 3. Maximum-parsimony mitochondrial DNA haplotype networks for material from the PG and the GO, and the retrieved sequences from the GenBank (only sequences of the clade I in Chen et al. (2014) phylogenetic tree are included).

Fig. 7. MAXENT reconstruction for clade I in Fig. 11. Left G1s in Tuerkayana latens, a New Species of Land Crab from French Polynesia, with a Discussion on the Phylogeny of the Genus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinidae)

Fig. 7. MAXENT reconstruction for clade I (A) and clade III (B) of Amphibalanus amphitrite in the world representing current distribution models.

Fig. 6 in Fig. 11. Left G1s in Tuerkayana latens, a New Species of Land Crab from French Polynesia, with a Discussion on the Phylogeny of the Genus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinidae)

Fig. 6. Bayesian skyline plots of effective population size through time in Amphibalanus amphitrite from two biogeographical areas (A: PG and B: GO), based on the 576 bp sequences of COI and a nucleotide substitution rate of 3.1%/MY. The bold black curve is the median of the parameter NeT, which is proportional to the effective population size; the blue lines delimit the 95% highest posterior density. For comparison, all x-axes have the same scale. The plots are truncated to the median estimate of each area's TMRCA.

Fig. 5 in Fig. 11. Left G1s in Tuerkayana latens, a New Species of Land Crab from French Polynesia, with a Discussion on the Phylogeny of the Genus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinidae)

Fig. 5. Frequency distribution of the number of pairwise nucleotide differences (mismatch) between COI haplotypes in the two populations of Amphibalanus amphitrite. The solid line shows the theoretical distribution under the model of demographic expansion.

Fig. 4 in Fig. 11. Left G1s in Tuerkayana latens, a New Species of Land Crab from French Polynesia, with a Discussion on the Phylogeny of the Genus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Gecarcinidae)

Fig. 4. Maximum-parsimony of mitochondrial DNA haplotype networks for the PG and the GO populations constructed in PapArt. Hatch marks represent mutations; numbers in the figure legend refer to sampling sites in table 1 and figure 1.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Fig. 14 in An Integrative Description of Two New Species (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) with Updated Genus Phylogeny.

Fig. 14. Mesobiotus peterseni (Maucci, 1991) from Greenaland – PCM images of the egg. (A–B) entire egg with egg processes midsections seen on the egg circumference; (C–E) egg surface. Scale bars in μm.