Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 18 in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 18. Cyphophthalmus kratochvili sp. nov. (holotype except B – paratype). A, male dorsum; B, female dorsum; C, dorsum granulation (fifth to ninth tergite); D, detail of granulation (convex tubercles) at the border of eighth to ninth tergite; E, terminal posterior part of the male dorsum with pores of anal glands; F, dorsum, frontal view.

Figure 29 in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 29. Cyphophthalmus corfuanus (Kratochvíl) (male 1.70 mm from Corfu). A, spermatopositor (dorsal view); B, ventral prosomal complex; C, basitarsus and telotarsus of leg I; D, basitarsus and telotarsus of leg IV; E, tibia and tarsus of pedipalp; F, chelicera; G, adenostyle. Scale bars: A, G = 100 Mm; B–F = 400 Mm.

Figure 12 in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 12. Cyphophthalmus minutus (Kratochvíl) (neotype except B, F – topotype). A, male dorsum; B, female dorsum; C, dorsum granulation (fifth to ninth tergite); D, detail of granulation (convex tubercles) at the border of eighth to ninth tergite; E, terminal posterior part of the male dorsum with pores of anal glands; F, dorsum, frontal view.

Figure 11 in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 11. Cyphophthalmus minutus (Kratochvíl) (neotype except C – topotype). A, spermatopositor, dorsal view; B, male ventral prosomal complex; C, female ventral prosomal complex; D, basitarsus and telotarsus of leg I; E, basitarsus and telotarsus of leg IV; F, tibia and tarsus of pedipalp; G, chelicera; H, adenostyle. Scale bars: A, H = 100 Mm; B–G = 400 Mm.

Figure 14 in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 14. Cyphophthalmus gordani sp. nov. (holotype except B, F – female paratype). A, male dorsum; B, female dorsum; C, dorsum granulation (fifth to ninth tergite); D, detail of granulation (convex tubercles) at the border of eighth to ninth tergite; E, terminal posterior part of the male dorsum with pores of anal glands; F, dorsum, frontal view.

Figure 35. A in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 35. A, geographical distribution of the three phylogenetic lines of the genus Cyphophthalmus (signs often cover more than one locality); B, distribution of presented species in south-eastern part of the Balkan Peninsula.

Figure 34 in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 34. Cyphophthalmus hlavaci sp. nov. (paratypes from Bast). A, male dorsum; B, female dorsum; C, dorsum granulation (fifth to ninth tergite); D, detail of granulation (convex tubercles) at the border of eighth to ninth tergite; E, terminal posterior part of the male dorsum with pores of anal glands; F, dorsum, frontal view.

Figure 6 in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 6. Detail of integument ornamentation of the third opisthosomal segment, dorsal. A, Cyphophthalmus corfuanus (Kratochvíl); B, Cyphophthalmus zetae sp. nov.; C, Cyphophthalmus martensi sp. nov.; D, Cyphophthalmus beschkovi (Mitov); E, Cyphophthalmus sp. (Cave, Mt. Biokovo, Dalmatia); F, Cyphophthalmus noctiphilus (Kratochvíl).

Figure 5 in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 5. Distal portion of ovipositor (left terminal lobe excluded), ventral view. A, Cyphophthalmus minutus (Kratochvíl) topotype; B, Cyphophthalmus gordani sp. nov.; C, Cyphophthalmus neretvanus sp. nov.; D, Cyphophthalmus trebinjanus sp. nov.; E, Cyphophthalmus ognjenovici sp. nov.; F, Cyphophthalmus rumijae sp. nov.; G, Cyphophthalmus martensi sp. nov. Circles represent insertion of ventral setae; x represent insertion of dorsal setae. Scale bar = 100 Mm.

Figure 4 in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 4. Distal portion of ovipositor (left terminal lobe excluded), ventral view. A, Cyphophthalmus gjorgjevici (Hadži), (Rašće, Macedonia); B, Cyphophthalmus paragamiani sp. nov.; C, Cyphophthalmus thracicus sp. nov.; D, Cyphophthalmus cf. thracicus (Evros, Greece); E, Cyphophthalmus corfuanus (Kratochvíl) (Corfu); F, Cyphophthalmus zetae sp. nov.; G, Cyphophthalmus hlavaci sp. nov. Circles represent insertion of ventral setae; x represent insertion of dorsal setae. Scale bar = 100 Mm.

Figure 7 in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 7. Cyphophthalmus paragamiani sp. nov. (holotype). A, spermatopositor (dorsal view); B, ventral prosomal complex; C, basitarsus and telotarsus of leg I; D, basitarsus and telotarsus of leg IV; E, tibia and tarsus of pedipalp; F, chelicera; G, adenostyle. Scale bars: A, G = 100 Mm; B–F = 400 Mm.

Figure 3. Male anal regions. A–B in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 3. Male anal regions. A–B, Cyphophthalmus corfuanus (Kratochvíl); C, Cyphophthalmus serbicus (Hadži); D, Cyphophthalmus ere Karaman; E, Cyphophthalmus ognjenovici sp. nov.; F, Cyphophthalmus duricorius Joseph.

Figure 1. A, C in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 1. A, C, Siro exilis Hoffman, 1963 (West Virginia, Summers County). A, spermatopositor, dorsal view; C, ventral prosomal complex. B, D, Cyphophthalmus teyrovskyi (Kratochvíl, 1938). B, spermatopositor, dorsal view; D, ventral prosomal complex. Not to scale.

Figure 2. A–B, spiracles. A in The taxonomical status and diversity of Balkan sironids (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) with descriptions of twelve new species

Figure 2. A–B, spiracles. A, Siro exilis Hoffman (West Virginia, Summers County), light micoscopy microphotograph; B, Cyphophthalmus hlavaci sp. nov., scanning electron micrograph. C–D, outlet ducts and pores of anal glands. C, S. exilis Hoffman (West Virginia, Summers County); D, Cyphophthalmus serbicus (Hadži). E–F, spermatopositor movable fingers (digiti mobiles). E, Cyphophthalmus cf. zetae sp. nov. (Manastir Morača, Montenegro); F, Cyphophthalmus gordani sp. nov. Not to scale.

Figure 10 in Species diversity and endemism in the Daphnia of Argentina: a genetic investigation

Figure 10. UPGMA tree based on allozyme variation at seven loci in Daphnia spinulata populations from Argentina and D. exilis populations from North America. Data for most of the D. exilis populations are from Hebert & Finston (1993), but trimmed to the same seven loci surveyed in the Argentine populations. Codes for their populations are in capital letters and indicate the state where each was collected. Codes in small letters represent new D. exilis data and are found in Appendix 2, while the D. spinulata codes are in Appendix 1. The scale bar represents Nei's genetic distance.

Figure 6 in Species diversity and endemism in the Daphnia of Argentina: a genetic investigation

Figure 6. Collection sites for Argentine populations belonging to the subgenus Ctenodaphnia. Photographs are included for a single individual of each species. Species assignments are based on genetic analyses (see text and subsequent figures). Animals are not shown to scale, and not all sites are shown (see Appendix 1 for the complete collection list).

Figure 7 in Species diversity and endemism in the Daphnia of Argentina: a genetic investigation

Figure 7. NJ tree based on COI sequence variation among all unique haplotypes of Argentine populations belonging to the subgenus Ctenodaphnia. Two members of the subgenus Daphnia (D. obtusa and D. pulex) were included to root the tree. Bootstrap values are presented for major clusters, and K2P distances are indicated by the scale bar. The collection site of each individual is indicated by its population code (see Appendix 1). Individuals morphologically identified as D. notacantha are indicated by an asterisk. This tree is not intended to represent a phylogenetic hypothesis for the subgenus.

Figure 9 in Species diversity and endemism in the Daphnia of Argentina: a genetic investigation

Figure 9. NJ tree based on COI sequence variation among a sample of Daphnia spinulata populations from Argentina and D. exilis populations from North America. The scale bar represents K2P distance. The codes for Argentine populations are provided in Appendix 1, while D. exilis codes are found in Appendix 2.

Figure 8 in Species diversity and endemism in the Daphnia of Argentina: a genetic investigation

Figure 8. NJ tree based on COI sequences for two populations of North American and one population of South American Daphnia similis. Populations of Argentine D. spinulata and North American D. exilis are included for comparison. South American sequences are indicated in bold. The scale bar represents K2P distance.

Figure 5 in Species diversity and endemism in the Daphnia of Argentina: a genetic investigation

Figure 5. NJ tree based on COI sequence variation among Argentine populations identified as D. laevis and D. gessneri. The identifications, based on head morphology, are indicated in this tree, followed by the collection site numbers. Sequences from the North American members of the D. laevis complex (D. dubia, D. laevis, and D. magniceps) were included for comparison. D. mendotae, a Hyalodaphnia species belonging to a different species complex (Colbourne & Hebert, 1996), was used to root the tree. The scale bar represents K2P distance.