Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 17 from: Tibpromma S, Hyde K, Bhat J, Mortimer P, Xu J, Promputtha I, Doilom M, Yang J, Tang A, Karunarathna S (2018) Identification of endophytic fungi from leaves of Pandanaceae based on their morphotypes and DNA sequence data from southern Thailand. MycoKeys 33: 25-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.33.23670

Figure 17 Mycoleptodiscus endophyticus (MFLU 18-0001, holotype). a Colony on MEA media b, c Mycelia masses d–f Vegetative hyphae in culture. Scale bars: 10 μm (b–d), 5 μm (e, f).

Figure 10 from: Tibpromma S, Hyde K, Bhat J, Mortimer P, Xu J, Promputtha I, Doilom M, Yang J, Tang A, Karunarathna S (2018) Identification of endophytic fungi from leaves of Pandanaceae based on their morphotypes and DNA sequence data from southern Thailand. MycoKeys 33: 25-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.33.23670

Figure 10 Massarina pandanicola (MFLU 18-0004, holotype). a Colony on MEA media b Mycelium masses c–g Conidia and conidiogenous cells h Conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (b), 2 μm (c–g), 5 μm (h).

Figure 2 from: Tibpromma S, Hyde K, Bhat J, Mortimer P, Xu J, Promputtha I, Doilom M, Yang J, Tang A, Karunarathna S (2018) Identification of endophytic fungi from leaves of Pandanaceae based on their morphotypes and DNA sequence data from southern Thailand. MycoKeys 33: 25-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.33.23670

Figure 2 All cultures from this study are grown on PDA at room temperature after 7 days (original codes are written at the bottom of each picture).

Figure 13 from: Tibpromma S, Hyde K, Bhat J, Mortimer P, Xu J, Promputtha I, Doilom M, Yang J, Tang A, Karunarathna S (2018) Identification of endophytic fungi from leaves of Pandanaceae based on their morphotypes and DNA sequence data from southern Thailand. MycoKeys 33: 25-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.33.23670

Figure 13 Diaporthe pandanicola (MFLU 18-0006, holotype). a–c Mycelia masses. Scale bars: 5 µm (a–c).

Figure 15 from: Tibpromma S, Hyde K, Bhat J, Mortimer P, Xu J, Promputtha I, Doilom M, Yang J, Tang A, Karunarathna S (2018) Identification of endophytic fungi from leaves of Pandanaceae based on their morphotypes and DNA sequence data from southern Thailand. MycoKeys 33: 25-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.33.23670

Figure 15 Colletotrichum pandanicola (MFLU 18-0003, holotype). a Colony on PDA media b Conidia and conidiogenous cells c–g Conidia on PDA culture. Scale bars: 5 μm (b), 2 μm (c–g).

Figure 6 from: Ji X-H, Vlasák J, Tian X-M, Dai Y-C (2018) Three new species of Fomitiporella (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) based on the evidence from morphology and DNA sequence data. MycoKeys 30: 73-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.30.23109

Figure 6 Microscopic structures of Fomitiporella mangrovei. a Basidiospores b Basidioles c Basidia d Hyphae from trama.

Figure 4 from: Ji X-H, Vlasák J, Tian X-M, Dai Y-C (2018) Three new species of Fomitiporella (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) based on the evidence from morphology and DNA sequence data. MycoKeys 30: 73-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.30.23109

Figure 4 Microscopic structures of Fomitiporella austroasiana. a Basidiospores b Basidioles c Basidia d Cystidioles e Rhomboid crystals f Hyphae from trama.

Figure 2 from: Ji X-H, Vlasák J, Tian X-M, Dai Y-C (2018) Three new species of Fomitiporella (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) based on the evidence from morphology and DNA sequence data. MycoKeys 30: 73-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.30.23109

Figure 2 Phylogeny of Fomitiporella inferred from the ITS dataset. The topology is that of the MP analysis, and statistical values (ML/MP/BI) are indicated for each node that simultaneously received BS from ML and MP not below 50 %, and BPP from BI not below 0.9. Phellinus laevigatus and P. populicola are used to root the tree. Branch lengths reflect the number of steps as indicated by the scale.

Figure 1 from: Ji X-H, Vlasák J, Tian X-M, Dai Y-C (2018) Three new species of Fomitiporella (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) based on the evidence from morphology and DNA sequence data. MycoKeys 30: 73-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.30.23109

Figure 1 Phylogeny of Fomitiporella inferred from the 28S dataset. The topology is that of the MP analysis, and statistical values (ML/MP/BI) are indicated for each node that simultaneously received BS from ML and MP not below 50 %, and BPP from BI not below 0.9. Phellinus laevigatus and P. populicola are used to root the tree. Branch lengths reflect the number of steps as indicated by the scale.

Figure 14 from: Tibpromma S, Hyde K, Bhat J, Mortimer P, Xu J, Promputtha I, Doilom M, Yang J, Tang A, Karunarathna S (2018) Identification of endophytic fungi from leaves of Pandanaceae based on their morphotypes and DNA sequence data from southern Thailand. MycoKeys 33: 25-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.33.23670

Figure 14 Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on combined ITS, Actin, β-tubulin, GADPH and CHS-1 sequenced data. Maximum likelihood (left) and Bayesian inference (right) bootstrap values are given above/below the nodes. The newly generated sequences are in red text. The tree is rooted with Colletotrichum truncatum.

Figure 11 from: Tibpromma S, Hyde K, Bhat J, Mortimer P, Xu J, Promputtha I, Doilom M, Yang J, Tang A, Karunarathna S (2018) Identification of endophytic fungi from leaves of Pandanaceae based on their morphotypes and DNA sequence data from southern Thailand. MycoKeys 33: 25-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.33.23670

Figure 11 Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on ITS, TEF1, LSU and RPB2 sequence data. Maximum likelihood bootstrap values are given above/below the nodes. The newly generated sequences are in red bold. The tree is rooted with Pleospora herbarum.

Figure 12 from: Tibpromma S, Hyde K, Bhat J, Mortimer P, Xu J, Promputtha I, Doilom M, Yang J, Tang A, Karunarathna S (2018) Identification of endophytic fungi from leaves of Pandanaceae based on their morphotypes and DNA sequence data from southern Thailand. MycoKeys 33: 25-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.33.23670

Figure 12 Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on ITS, TEF1 and β-tubulin sequenced data. Maximum likelihood (left) and Bayesian inference (right) bootstrap values are given above/below the nodes. The newly generated sequences are in red bold. The tree is rooted with Diaporthe ambigua.

Figure 8 from: Ji X-H, Vlasák J, Tian X-M, Dai Y-C (2018) Three new species of Fomitiporella (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) based on the evidence from morphology and DNA sequence data. MycoKeys 30: 73-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.30.23109

Figure 8 Microscopic structures of Fomitiporella vietnamensis. a Basidiospores b Basidioles c Basidia d Cystidioles e Hyphae from trama f Hyphae from subiculum.

Figure 18 from: Tibpromma S, Hyde K, Bhat J, Mortimer P, Xu J, Promputtha I, Doilom M, Yang J, Tang A, Karunarathna S (2018) Identification of endophytic fungi from leaves of Pandanaceae based on their morphotypes and DNA sequence data from southern Thailand. MycoKeys 33: 25-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.33.23670

Figure 18 Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the combination of ITS, β-tubulin and TEF1 sequenced data. Maximum parsimony bootstrap is given above/below the nodes. The newly generated sequences are in red bold. The tree is rooted with Seiridium camelliae.

Figure 19 from: Tibpromma S, Hyde K, Bhat J, Mortimer P, Xu J, Promputtha I, Doilom M, Yang J, Tang A, Karunarathna S (2018) Identification of endophytic fungi from leaves of Pandanaceae based on their morphotypes and DNA sequence data from southern Thailand. MycoKeys 33: 25-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.33.23670

Figure 19 Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on combined LSU and SSU sequence data. Maximum parsimony bootstrap is given above/below the nodes. The newly generated sequences are in red text. The tree is rooted with Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Fig. 8 in Pollen characters and DNA sequence data converge on a monophyletic genus Iresine (Amaranthaceae, Caryophyllales) and help to elucidate its species diversity

Fig. 8. Evolution of pollen morphology using the maximum clade credibility tree of the plastid analysis with a reduced sampling. Pie charts depict the ancestral states reconstructed for pollen form (character 1), aperture number (character 2), aperture diameter (character 3), shape and diameter of mesoporia (characters 4, 5), and pollen size (character 6). For character and state definitions see Appendix 2.

Fig. 10 in Pollen characters and DNA sequence data converge on a monophyletic genus Iresine (Amaranthaceae, Caryophyllales) and help to elucidate its species diversity

Fig. 10. Evolution of pollen morphology, continued from Fig. 9. Pie charts depict the ancestral states reconstructed for the ektexinous bodies on the aperture membrane including their number (character 13), density (character 14) and shape (character 15). Character 16 defines the reproductive system. Consistently hermaphroditic flowers (state 0) are ancestral and widespread in Amaranthaceae, while the Iresinoids are mostly dioecious (state 1) or sometimes gynodioecious (bisexual and pistillate flowers appear on the same plant; state 2).

Fig. 3 in Pollen characters and DNA sequence data converge on a monophyletic genus Iresine (Amaranthaceae, Caryophyllales) and help to elucidate its species diversity

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of Iresine and related Gomphrenoideae based on the analysis of nrITS sequence data and depicting the 50% majority-rule tree of the Bayesian analysis. Subclades A (with further subclades A1, A2 and A3) and B are largely congruent in composition to the plastid tree depicted in Fig. 2. Posterior probabilities are shown above branches, bootstrap values from parsimony (left, bold) and maximum likelihood analysis (right, italics) below branches. The annota- tion bars for the species concepts are placed for identical groups of individuals as in the plastid tree.

Fig. 9 in Pollen characters and DNA sequence data converge on a monophyletic genus Iresine (Amaranthaceae, Caryophyllales) and help to elucidate its species diversity

Fig. 9. Evolution of pollen morphology, continued from Fig. 8. Pie charts depict the ancestral states reconstructed for tectum characters including tectum completeness (character 7), diameter and frequency of tectum perforations (characters 8, 9), and placement, height and frequency of microspines (characters 10, 11, 12).

Fig. 2 in Pollen characters and DNA sequence data converge on a monophyletic genus Iresine (Amaranthaceae, Caryophyllales) and help to elucidate its species diversity

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic relation- ships of Iresine and related Gomphrenoideae based on a combined analysis of matK-trnK, rpl16 and trnLF sequence data depicting the 50% majority-rule tree of the Bayesian analysis. Posterior probabilities are shown above branches, bootstrap values from parsimony (left, bold) and maximum likelihood analysis (right, italics) below branches.