Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,556
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
2,556 results for “assemblages”
Fig. 1 in The contribution of the Middle Triassic fossil assemblage of Monte San Giorgio to insect evolution.
Fig. 1 | Location of the Monte San Giorgio (Italy-Switzerland) UNESCO World Heritage and stratigraphic section of the Middle Triassic sediments. A Simplified map of the Monte San Giorgio showing the Middle Triassic carbonate succession and the location of Val Mara (indicated by a star) where VM 12 site occurs. B Stratigraphic section of the Middle Triassic sediments in Monte San Giorgio, the position of VM 12 strata where the insect fossils were collected is indicated by the black arrow.
Fig. 2 in The contribution of the Middle Triassic fossil assemblage of Monte San Giorgio to insect evolution.
Fig. 2 | Representatives of ametabolous and hemimetabolous insects. G Hemiptera, MCSN 8677. H Incerta sedis, MCSN 8689, possibly Hemiptera of the A Dasyleptus triassicus (†Monura), MCSN 8688. B Dasyleptus triassicus (†Monura), superfamily Protopsyllidioidea. I Psocodea, MCSN 8690. Scale bars: A, C, 1 mm; MCSN 8687. C Odonatan naiad, MCSN 8666. D Blattodean, MCSN 8667. B, E, I, 500 µm; D, 5 mm; F–H, 200 µm. E Enlargement of the external ootheca of MCSN 8667. F Thysanoptera, MCSN 8668.
Fig. 4 in The contribution of the Middle Triassic fossil assemblage of Monte San Giorgio to insect evolution.
Fig. 4 | Representatives of holometabolous insects (Antliophora). A Mecoptera, MCSN 8699. Diptera: MCSN 8694, adult (B); MCSN 8695, adult male (C); MCSN 8698, pupa (D). Scale bars: A-B, 500 µm; C, D, 1 mm.
Fig. 8 in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 8. Right maxilla of Majungatholus atopus Sues and Taquet, 1979 (FMNH PR 2100) in medial view showing alveoli and associated tooth basal cross−section.
Fig. 3. A in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 3. A. Tooth parameters considered in this study. FABL, fore−aft basal length, excluding denticles; TCH, tooth crown height; AC, anterior carina; PC, posterior carina; NDPMa, number of denticles per millimetre on the anterior carina, determined at mid−crown; NDPMp, number of denticles per millimetre on the posterior carina, determined at mid−crown. B. Detailed representation of denticles and blood grooves as described in the text (modified after Currie et al. 1990).
Fig. 2. A in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 2. A. Stratigraphic section of the Late Cretaceous succession exposed near the village of Berivotra (based on Papini and Benvenuti 1998 and Rogers et al. 2000). B. Stratigraphic succession of Coniacian–Danian sedimentary units in the central Mahajanga Basin (based on Papini and Benvenuti 1998 and Razafindrazaka et al. 1999).
Fig. 10 in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 10. Bivariate plots of tooth parameters. A. Tooth Crown Height versus Basal Width. B. Tooth Crown Height versus Basal Width. Teeth pertaining to Morphotype 1 falls closer to dromaeosaurids than to Majungatholus atopus teeth. Morphotype 2 falls close to Masiakasaurus knopfleri teeth.
Fig. 9 in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 9. Right dentary of Majungatholus atopus Sues and Taquet, 1979 (FMNH PR 2100) in lingual view showing alveoli and associated tooth basal cross−section.
Fig. 11 in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 11. Dendrogram drawn from the results of the cluster analysis. Statistical level of confidence for a node decreases toward the right (i.e., similarities between taxa increase toward the left). The results of the cluster analysis reveal that Morphotype 1 is very similar to Dromaeosaurus albertensis and Deinonychus antirrhopus while Masiakasaurus knopfleri (including Morphotype 2) is more similar to Saurornitholestes langstoni, Velociraptor mongoliensis, and Richardoestesia gilmorei. Morphotypes 1 and 2 are clearly different from Majungatholus atopus.
Fig. 1. A in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 1. A. Map of Madagascar showing the position of the Mahajanga Basin. B. Geologic map of the Mahajanga Basin with location of Berivotra study area.
Fig. 6 in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 6. Theropod teeth from Berivotra, Mahajanga Basin, northern Madagascar; Anembalemba Member, Maevarano Formation (Campanian?– Maastrichtian). A. Morphotype 3 (MSMN V3342) in labial (A1) and lingual (A2) views; A3, basal cross section; A4, mesial denticles. B. Morphotype 4 (MSMN V5518) in labial (B1) and lingual (B2) views; B3, basal cross section. C. Morphotype 5 (MSMN V5368) in labial (C1) and lingual (C2) views; C3, basal cross section.
Fig. 4. Morphotype 1, specimen MSNM V5373 in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 4. Morphotype 1, specimen MSNM V5373. Berivotra, Mahajanga Basin, northern Madagascar; Anembalemba Member, Maevarano Formation (Campanian?–Maastrichtian). A. Mesial denticles from the posterior carina. B. Labial view. C. Lingual view. D. Basal cross−section.
Fig. 5. Morphotype 2, specimen MSMN V5378 in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 5. Morphotype 2, specimen MSMN V5378. Berivotra, Mahajanga Basin, northern Madagascar; Anembalemba Member, Maevarano Formation (Campanian?–Maastrichtian). A. Mesial denticles from the posterior carina. B. Labial view. C. Lingual view. D. Basal cross section.
Fig. 7 in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 7. Premaxilla of Majungatholus atopus Sues and Taquet, 1979 (FMNH PR 2100) in ventral view showing alveoli and associated tooth basal cross−section.
Table 1 in First Cretaceous teleostean otolith assemblage (Arkadelphia Formation, upper Maastrichtian) from Arkansas, USA, early Gadiformes, and the Western Interior Seaway
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Taxa from the Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality, Arkansas, USA) with number of specimens, percentage of total, and occurrences in the Cretaceous and Paleocene of North America. Letters in third and fourth columns refer to the following references: <b>A</b> =Stringer et al. (2020); <b>B</b> = Schwarzhans and Stringer (2020a); <b>C</b> = Schwarzhans et al. (2018b); <b>D</b> = Hoganson et al. (2019); <b>E</b> =Stringer et al. (2018); <b>F</b> = Schwarzhans (1985); <b>G</b> = Frizzell (1965a). References are not inclusive but provide evidence of the range of the species in North America. <b>Order=FORMES, Family=idae</b></p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Taxa</b></th><th><b>No. of specimens</b></th><th><b>% of total</b></th><th><b>Known N. Am Cretaceous</b></th><th><b>Known N. Am Paleocene</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>ELOPIFORMES Elopidae</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Elops</i> sp.</th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>C</td><td>F</td></tr><tr><th><b>ALBULIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Albulidae</b></th></tr><tr><th>Albuliformes indeterminate</th><td>4</td><td>0.19</td><td>E</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><i>Elopothrissus</i> sp.</th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>A</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>ORDER INDETERMINATE Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Genartina</i> sp.</th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>B</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>Osmeroididae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Osmeroides</i> sp.</th><td>3</td><td>0.14</td><td>A</td><td>G</td></tr><tr><th><b>ANGUILLIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Anguillidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Anguilla</i>? <i>chickasawae</i></th><td>6</td><td>0.28</td><td>A</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>Ophichthidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Echiophis</i> aff. <i>E. semisphaeroides</i></th><td>11</td><td>0.52</td><td>B</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>Family Indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Muraenanguilla</i>? sp.</th><td>2</td><td>0.09</td><td>A</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>OSTEOGLOSSIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Kokenichthys navis</i></th><td>2</td><td>0.09</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>CLUPEIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th>Clupeiform? indeterminate</th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th><b>SILURIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Ariidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Arius</i>? <i>subtilis</i></th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>A</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Vorhisia vulpes</i></th><td>1,537</td><td>72.88</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>AULOPIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Ichthyotringidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Apateodus crenellatus</i>?</th><td>3</td><td>0.14</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>GADIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Merlucciidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Palaeogadus</i>? <i>belli</i> sp. nov.</th><td>148</td><td>7.02</td><td>No</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><i>Palaeogadus</i> cf. <i>P. weltoni</i></th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>B</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>GADIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th>Gadiformes indeterminate</th><td>11</td><td>0.52</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th><b>HOLOCENTRIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Tippaha mythica</i></th><td>8</td><td>0.38</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>BERYCIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Eutawichthys maastrichtiensis</i></th><td>21</td><td>1.00</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><i>Eutawichthys zideki</i></th><td>287</td><td>13.61</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><i>Eutawichthys</i> cf. <i>E. stringeri</i></th><td>48</td><td>2.28</td><td>C</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>OPHIDIIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Ophidiidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Ampheristus</i> cf. <i>A. americanus</i></th><td>6</td><td>0.28</td><td>B</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>Bythitidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Protobythites brzobohatyi</i></th><td>4</td><td>0.19</td><td>B</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>ORDER UNKNOWN</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Family unknown</b></th></tr><tr><th>Lapillus type 1</th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>Family unknown</b></th></tr><tr><th>Unknown sagitta</th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><th><b>Total</b></th><td>2,109</td><td>~100</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 3 in First Cretaceous teleostean otolith assemblage (Arkadelphia Formation, upper Maastrichtian) from Arkansas, USA, early Gadiformes, and the Western Interior Seaway
<p><b>Table 3.</b> Percentage similarity measurements for the otolith assemblages from the Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality, Arkansas, USA), Fox Hills Formation (NDGS 5597, North Dakota, USA), Kemp Clay (South Sulphur River locality, Texas, USA), Ripley Formation (Blue Springs locality, Mississippi, USA, and Severn Formation (five sites, Maryland, USA). Data for calculations were obtained from this study (Table 1) for the Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality), from Hoganson et al. (2019) for the Fox Hills Formation (NDGS 5597 locality), from Schwarzhans and Stringer (2020a) for the Kemp Clay (South Sulphur River locality), from Stringer et al. (2020, table 2) for the Ripley Formation (Blue Springs locality; bulk samples only), and from Stringer and Schwarzhans (2021; table 3) for the Severn Formation (four sites).</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Localities compared</b></th><th><b>Percent</b> <b>similarity</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality, Arkansas) and Fox Hills Formation (NDGS 5597, North Dakota)</th><td>30.32%</td></tr><tr><th>Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality, Arkansas) and Kemp Clay (South Sulphur River locality Texas)</th><td>35.73 %</td></tr><tr><th>Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality, Arkansas) and Ripley Formation (Blue Springs locality, Mississippi)</th><td>5.46%</td></tr><tr><th>Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality, Arkansas) and Severn Formation (four sites in Maryland)</th><td>57.68%</td></tr><tr><th>Kemp Clay (South Sulphur River locality, Texas) and Ripley Formation (Blue Springs locality, Mississippi)</th><td>3.33%</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 2 in A late Eocene wood assemblage from the Crooked River Basin, Oregon, USA
<p><b>Table 2.</b> Comparison of fossil <i>Fagus</i> woods from Dietz Hill with <i>Fagus dodgei</i> from Post Hammer (UF 279, late Eocene, Wheeler and Manchester 2021) and <i>Fagus manosii</i> (mid-Miocene, Wheeler and Dillhoff 2009). <b>VTD</b> =vessel tangential diameter in µm, mean (SD); <b>V/mm2</b> =number of vessels per square mm; <b>Lrg Ray</b> =large ray, number of cells wide; <b>Cmp</b> =compound ray; <b>Lrg Ray Ht.</b> =large ray height in µm, mean (SD, when known), range.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Sample</th><th>VTD</th><th>V /mm2</th><th>Lrg Ray</th><th><b>Lrg Ray Ht.</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>UF 278-84869</th><td>59 (8)</td><td>39–53</td><td>6–9, Cmp</td><td>2214 (580), 1269–3102</td></tr><tr><th>UF 278-84903</th><td>49 (13)</td><td>67–82</td><td>7–12, Cmp</td><td>2566 (734), 1974–3948</td></tr><tr><th>UF 278-84873</th><td>44 (6)</td><td>86–103</td><td>to 22, Cmp common</td><td>1875 (500), 1356–2825</td></tr><tr><th>UF 278-84888</th><td>62 (12)</td><td>61–75</td><td>8–11, Cmp common</td><td>2358 (311), 1904–2744</td></tr><tr><th>UF 278-84896</th><td>53 (8)</td><td>87–117</td><td>to 20+, Cmp common</td><td>1967 (815), 705–3666</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fagus dodgei</i></th><td>55 (11)</td><td>39–79</td><td>18–20, Cmp</td><td>1560, 740–2690</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fagus manosii</i></th><td>52 (11)</td><td>110–130</td><td>to 16, Cmp absent</td><td>1700 (max)</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in A late Eocene wood assemblage from the Crooked River Basin, Oregon, USA
<p><b>Table 1</b>. Comparison of fossil Magnoliaceae woods in chronological order. <b>K</b> =Cretaceous, (<b>C</b>)=Campanian, (<b>M</b>)=Maastrichtian, <b>Eo</b> =Eocene, <b>Olig</b> =Oligocene; <b>Mio</b> =Miocene, <b>e</b> =early, <b>m</b> =middle, <b>up</b> =upper; <b>IVP</b> =intervessel pitting, <b>S</b> =scalariform, <b>O</b> =opposite; <b>Bars/PP</b> =number of bars per scalariform perforation plate; <b>Si</b> =simple perforation plates present; <b>HT</b> =helical thickenings in vessel elements; <b>O/M</b> = oil/mucilage cells; <b>Y</b> =present; <b>N</b> =absent; <b>*</b> =small axis, <b>()</b> =not as common. <b>References</b>. <b>1</b> =Cevallos-Ferriz and Stockey (1990); <b>2</b> = Huang et al. (2020; <b>3</b> = Huard (1967); <b>4</b> = Iamandei et al. (2011); <b>5</b> = Iamandei et al. (2020); <b>6</b> = Page (1970); <b>7</b> = Prakash et al. (1971); <b>8</b> = Sakala et al. (2010); <b>9</b> = Srivastava and Suzuki (2001); <b>10</b> = Suzuki (1976); <b>11</b> = Takahashi and Suzuki (2003); <b>12</b> = van der Burgh (1973); <b>13</b> = Wheeler et al. (1977); <b>14</b> = Wheeler and Manchester (2002).</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Species</th><th>Age</th><th>IVP</th><th>Bars/PP</th><th>Si</th><th>HT</th><th>OM</th><th><b>Reference</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Magnoliaceoxylon hokkaidoense</i></th><td>K (C-M)</td><td>S, O</td><td>12–47</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnoliaceoxylon panochensis</i></th><td>K (C)</td><td>S, O</td><td>up to 10</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnoliaceoxylon wetmorei</i></th><td>e m Eo</td><td>S, (O)</td><td>8–26</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>Y</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><th><i>Liriodendroxylon mutltiporosum</i></th><td>m Eo</td><td>O</td><td>2–10</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>(Y)</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><th><i>Liriodendroxylon princetonensis *</i></th><td>m Eo</td><td>S, O</td><td>8–18</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnolia pageae</i></th><td>m Eo</td><td>O</td><td>5–20</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>Y</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnoliaceoxylon angulata</i></th><td>m Eo</td><td>S, O</td><td>15–18</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnoliaceoxylon cutleri</i></th><td>m Eo</td><td>S, (O)</td><td>8–20</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>Y</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnoliaceoxylon longiradiata</i></th><td>m Eo</td><td>S, (O)</td><td>6–20</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>(Y)</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnolia hansnooteboomii</i> sp. nov.</th><td>l Eo</td><td>S</td><td>8–16</td><td>N</td><td>Y</td><td>N</td><td>This paper</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnoliaceoxylon palaeogenica</i></th><td>e Olig</td><td>S</td><td>4–15</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><th><i>Michelia oleifera</i></th><td>Olig</td><td>S, O</td><td>7–15</td><td>N</td><td>Y</td><td>Y</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><th><i>Liriodendroxylon tulipiferum</i></th><td>Olig</td><td>O</td><td>~10</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>7, 8</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnolia nanningensis</i></th><td>up Olig</td><td>S, O</td><td>2–11</td><td>N</td><td>Y</td><td>Y</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnolioxylon</i> c <i>f. transilvanicum</i></th><td>m Mio</td><td>S, O</td><td>short</td><td>Y</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnolioxylon kräuselli</i></th><td>m Mio</td><td>(S), O</td><td>10–12</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnolia intermedia</i></th><td>Mio</td><td>S</td><td>15–20</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>Y</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><th><i>Magnolioxylon parenchymatosum</i></th><td>Mio</td><td>S</td><td>3–12</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>N</td><td>12</td></tr></tbody></table>
Figure 20 in A late Eocene wood assemblage from the Crooked River Basin, Oregon, USA
Figure 20. Malpighiaceae?. UF 278-84892. A‒C. Distinct growth ring boundaries, wood diffuse-porous, vessels predominantly in radial multiples, TS. D. Simple perforation plates (PP), ray cells predominantly procumbent. RLS. E. Scalariform perforation plate with 5 bars, RLS. F. Perforation plate with partial bars, RLS. G. Crowded alternate intervessel pitting. RLS. H. Vessel-ray parenchyma pits. RLS? I. Tyloses in vessels, ray cells predominantly procumbent. RLS. J, K. Rays uniseriate and partially biseriate, axial parenchyma strands. TLS. L. Short vessel element, simple perforation plate (PP), rays partially biseriate. TLS. Scale bars=500 µm in A; 200 µm in B; 100 µm in C, I, J; 50 µm in D, K, L; 20 µm in E‒H.
Figure 18 in A late Eocene wood assemblage from the Crooked River Basin, Oregon, USA
Figure 18. Sapindales. Fagaroxylon sp., UF 278-84907. A, B. Diffuse-porous wood; vessels solitary and in radial multiples, thin-walled fibers, growth ring boundary marked by radially narrow fibers, and axial parenchyma, TS. C. Crowded alternate intervessel pitting, TLS. D. Vessel-ray parenchyma pits (VRP) similar to intervessel pits, procumbent ray cells, RLS. E. Multiseriate rays; crystalliferous strand (C); crowded alternate intervessel pitting, vessel element end walls (E), helical thickenings (HT) in narrow vessel elements, TLS. F. Ray composed of procumbent cells; narrow vessel element with simple perforation plate (PP) and helical thickenings (HT), RLS. G. Rays 1‒4-seriate, crystalliferous strands adjacent to rays (C), TLS. H. Marginal axial parenchyma (AP); simple perforation plate (PP), RLS. I. Crystals in fibers, RLS. Scale bars=500 µm in A; 100 µm in B, G, 50 µm in E, F, H, I; 20 µm in C, D.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.