Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in The last erythrosuchid-a revision of Chalishevia cothurnata from the late Middle Triassic of European Russia

Fig. 1. Location of the Bukobay and Koltaevo localities (asterisks) in Orenburg Province and the Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia (A, B). Photograph of the Bukobay VII locality (C). Arrow indicates the point at which the holotype specimen of Chalishevia cothurnata was collected. Photograph by AGS.

Fig. 6 in A large hyaenodont from the Lutetian of Switzerland expands the body mass range of the European mammalian predators during the Eocene

Fig. 6. Bivariate plots representing the Relative Premolar Size (RPS) versus the Relative Blade Length (RBL) for some selected hyaenodonts from the Eocene of Europe.

Fig. 5 in A large hyaenodont from the Lutetian of Switzerland expands the body mass range of the European mammalian predators during the Eocene

Fig. 5. Results of the phylogenetic analysis of Hyaenodonta character-taxon matrix. Results are visualized as an "all compat" (majority rule plus compatible groups) consensus tree. Major named clades recovered or discussed in this analysis and recovered in other analyses are illustrated.

Fig. 7 in A large hyaenodont from the Lutetian of Switzerland expands the body mass range of the European mammalian predators during the Eocene

Fig. 7. Values of the body mass (in ln) of oxyaenids, mesonychids, and hyaenodonts (Hyaenodontoidea, "Sinopinae", "Arfiinae", Hyainailourinae, and Hyaenodontinae) from MP7 to MP19 with particular attention on the new species from Egerkingen γ (Hyaenodontinae + "Arfiinae"). Values from Table 1 (Cartierodon egerkingensis gen. et sp. nov.) and Solé et al. (2015). Egerkingen γ is here represented to be close to the MP13 reference-level. Abbreviations: ELMA, European Land Mammal Ages; ETM-2, Eocene Thermal Maximum 2; MECO, Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum; MDE, Mammal Dispersal Event; MP, Mammal Palaeogene; PETM, Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum.

Fig. 4 in A large hyaenodont from the Lutetian of Switzerland expands the body mass range of the European mammalian predators during the Eocene

Fig. 4. Comparison of the ratio width/length estimated for the lower premolars of Paenoxyaenoides liguritor from late Eocene of France, Quercy Phosphorites (based on Lange-Badré 1979: table 10), Prodissopsalis eocaenicus from Eocene of Switzerland, Geiseltal-Obere Mittelkohle (MP12) and Geiseltal-Untere Mittelkohle (MP13) (based on Lange-Badré and Haubold 1990: table 3); Cartierodon egerkingensis gen. et sp. nov. from Eocene of Switzerland, Egerkingen γ (MP13?); and Cartierodon cf. egerkingensis from Eocene of France, Lissieu (MP14) (based on Lange-Badré 1972: table 1).

Fig. 3 in A large hyaenodont from the Lutetian of Switzerland expands the body mass range of the European mammalian predators during the Eocene

Fig. 3. Comparison of the length of the lower premolars and molars of Cartierodon egerkingensis gen. et sp. nov. from the Eocene of Switzerland, Egerkingen γ (MP13?); Prodissopsalis eocaenicus from the Eocene of Switzerland, Geiseltal-Obere Mittelkohle (MP12) and Geiseltal-Untere Mittelkohle (MP13) (based on Lange-Badré and Haubold 1990: table 3); and Paenoxyaenoides liguritor from the late Eocene of France, Quercy Phosphorites (based on Lange-Badré 1979: table 10).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2012View details →

Fig. 3 in Boine SnakeBavarioboafrom the Oligocene/Miocene of Eastern Turkey with Comments on Connections Between European and Asiatic Snake Faunas

Fig. 3. Two vertebrae of boine snake Bavarioboa sp. from the Mendikdere Formation, Kurucan, Turkey, Oligocene/Miocene. A. AUNHL IZ100401a, anterior trunk vertebra in right lateral view. B. AUNHL IZ100401b, middle trunk vertebra, in right lateral (B1), ventral (B2), anterior (B3), posterior (B4), and dorsal (B5) views.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2012View details →

Fig. 1 in Boine SnakeBavarioboafrom the Oligocene/Miocene of Eastern Turkey with Comments on Connections Between European and Asiatic Snake Faunas

Fig. 1. Map of the Eastern Anatolia subbasins, and the location of snake fossil site (modified from Şenel et al. 1984; Bozkurt 2001; Sancay et al. 2006).

Fig. 7 in The European Early Cretaceous cryptodiran turtle Chitracephalus dumonii and the diversity of a poorly known lineage of turtles

Fig. 7. Disarticulated carapace of cryptodiran turtle Chitracephalus dumonii Dollo, 1885, ICIPLR−1, from the Barremian–Aptian of Torremuña (La Rioja, Spain). A–E. Fragments of costal plates. F–L. Peripheral plates and fragments of these plates. All elements are represented in dorsal view (A1–L1), explanatory drawings in that view (A2–L2), and ventral view (A3–L3)

Fig. 6 in The European Early Cretaceous cryptodiran turtle Chitracephalus dumonii and the diversity of a poorly known lineage of turtles

Fig. 6. Specimen of cryptodiran turtle Chitracephalus dumonii Dollo, 1885, MDS−JTS.V.1–40, from the Hauterivian–Barremian of Tenadas del Jabalí (Burgos, Spain). A. MDS−JTS.V.2, plastron in ventral view, photograph (A1), explanatory drawing (A2). B. MDS−JTS.V.4–5, pelvis in ventral (B1) and left lateral (B2) views. C. MDS−JTS.V.3, right scapula and coracoid, in anterolateral view. D. MDS−JTS.V.6–7, left scapula and coracoid, in anterolateral view. E. MDS−JTS.V.26, right humerus in distal (E1), proximal (E2), dorsal (E3), medial (E4), and lateral (E5) views. F. MDS−JTS.V.27, left humerus in distal (F1), proximal (F2), and lateral (F3) views. G. MDS−JTS.V.25, right femur in distal (G1), proximal (G2), dorsal (G3), medial (G4), and lateral (G5) views. H. MDS−JTS.V.30, right tibia in medial (H1) and lateral (H2) views. I. MDS−JTS.V.10, sacral or anteriormost caudal vertebra in dorsal (I1) and ventral (I2) views. J. MDS−JTS.V.37, caudal vertebra in proximal (J1), dorsal (J2), distal (J3), and ventral (J4) views. K. MDS−JTS.V.39, caudal vertebra in proximal (K1), dorsal (K2), distal (K3), and ventral (K4) views.

Fig. 4 in The European Early Cretaceous cryptodiran turtle Chitracephalus dumonii and the diversity of a poorly known lineage of turtles

Fig. 4. Holotype of cryptodiran turtle Chitracephalus dumonii Dollo, 1885 from the Barremian–Aptian of Bernissart (Hainaut, Belgium). A, B. IRSNB R11. Plastron and appendicular skeleton in ventral view (A), detail of the left hindlimb (B). C–E. IRSNB R12. Second to fifth cervical vertebrae, in dorsal (C), left lateral (D), and ventral (E) views. Photographs (A1, B1, C1, D1, E1) and explanatory drawings (A2, B2, C2, D2, E2).

Fig. 3 in The European Early Cretaceous cryptodiran turtle Chitracephalus dumonii and the diversity of a poorly known lineage of turtles

Fig. 3. Holotype of cryptodiran turtle Chitracephalus dumonii Dollo, 1885, from the Barremian–Aptian of Bernissart (Hainaut, Belgium). A, B. IRSNB R11. Carapace and appendicular skeleton in dorsal view (A), detail of the left forelimb (B). C, D. IRSNB R12. Skull in dorsal (C) and ventral (D) views. Photographs (A1, B1, C1, D1) and explanatory drawings (A2, B2, C2, D2).

Fig. 5 in The European Early Cretaceous cryptodiran turtle Chitracephalus dumonii and the diversity of a poorly known lineage of turtles

Fig. 5. Specimen of cryptodiran turtle Chitracephalus dumonii Dollo, 1885, MDS−JTS.V.1–40, from the Hauterivian–Barremian of Tenadas del Jabalí (Burgos, Spain). A, B. MDS−JTS.V.1. Carapace in dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views. C, E. MDS−JTS.V.34. Skull in dorsal (C), ventral (D), and rigth lateral (E) views. Photographs (A1, B1, C1, D, E) and explanatory drawings (A2, B2, C2).

Fig. 2. Majority rule tree from the 73 in The European Early Cretaceous cryptodiran turtle Chitracephalus dumonii and the diversity of a poorly known lineage of turtles

Fig. 2. Majority rule tree from the 73 most parsimonious trees produced by the cladistic analysis of Chitracephalus dumonii using the modified data set of Joyce (2007) proposed in Pérez−García et al. (2012). Retention index (RI) = 0.872 and consistency index (CI) = 0.567. Values refer to percentages under 100% obtained in the majority rule analysis; those with values below 50% are collapsed. Letters refer to the nodes mentioned in the text.

Fig. 1 in The European Early Cretaceous cryptodiran turtle Chitracephalus dumonii and the diversity of a poorly known lineage of turtles

Fig. 1. Geographical location of the areas where Chitracephalus dumonii has been identified: The type locality, Bernissart (Hainaut, Belgium), and the Spanish localities of Tenadas del Jabalí (Burgos) and Torremuña (La Rioja).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2006View details →

Fig. 2 in Dental and tarsal morphology of the European Paleocene/Eocene "condylarth" mammal Microhyus

Fig. 2. Belgicasorex ramboeri, Lower Oligocene, Hoogbutsel, Belgium, IRSNB−M−1903 (holotype). Right maxillary with P4–M2, in labial (A), occlusal (B), and lingual (C) views.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2006View details →

Fig. 3 in Dental and tarsal morphology of the European Paleocene/Eocene "condylarth" mammal Microhyus

Fig. 3. Belgicasorex ramboeri, Lower Oligocene, Hoogbutsel, Belgium, IRSNB−M−1904, right M3 in occlusal view.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Рис. 3–6. Coprophilus, строение эΔеагуса. 3, 5 – C. (Zonyptilus) pseudopiceus Gildenkov, 2015; 4, 6 – C. (Zonyptilus) schubertii (Motschulsky, 1860); 3–4 – вентраΛьно; 5–6 – ΛатераΛьно. Масштабная Λинейка 0.25 мм. Figs 3–6. Coprophilus, structure of aedeagus. 3, 5 – C. (Zonyptilus) pseudopiceus Gildenkov, 2015; 4, 6 – C. (Zonyptilus) schubertii (Motschulsky, 1860); 3–4 – ventral view; 5–6 – lateral view. Scale bars: 0.25 mm. in New data on distribution of Coprophilus Latreille, 1829 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Oxytelinae) in the south of European part of Russia, in the Caucasus and Turkey

Рис. 3–6. Coprophilus, строение эΔеагуса. 3, 5 – C. (Zonyptilus) pseudopiceus Gildenkov, 2015; 4, 6 – C. (Zonyptilus) schubertii (Motschulsky, 1860); 3–4 – вентраΛьно; 5–6 – ΛатераΛьно. Масштабная Λинейка 0.25 мм. Figs 3–6. Coprophilus, structure of aedeagus. 3, 5 – C. (Zonyptilus) pseudopiceus Gildenkov, 2015; 4, 6 – C. (Zonyptilus) schubertii (Motschulsky, 1860); 3–4 – ventral view; 5–6 – lateral view. Scale bars: 0.25 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Рис. 1–2. ВиΔы роΔа Coprophilus Latreille, 1829. 1 – C. (Zonyptilus) pseudopiceus Gildenkov, 2015, самец, гоΛотип; 2 – C. (Zonyptilus) schubertii (Motschulsky, 1860), самец (Россия, ВоΛгограΔская обΛасть). Figs 1–2. Species of the genus Coprophilus Latreille, 1829. 1 – C. (Zonyptilus) pseudopiceus Gildenkov, 2015, male, holotype; 2 – C. (Zonyptilus) schubertii (Motschulsky, 1860), male (Russia, Volgograd Region). in New data on distribution of Coprophilus Latreille, 1829 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Oxytelinae) in the south of European part of Russia, in the Caucasus and Turkey

Рис. 1–2. ВиΔы роΔа Coprophilus Latreille, 1829. 1 – C. (Zonyptilus) pseudopiceus Gildenkov, 2015, самец, гоΛотип; 2 – C. (Zonyptilus) schubertii (Motschulsky, 1860), самец (Россия, ВоΛгограΔская обΛасть). Figs 1–2. Species of the genus Coprophilus Latreille, 1829. 1 – C. (Zonyptilus) pseudopiceus Gildenkov, 2015, male, holotype; 2 – C. (Zonyptilus) schubertii (Motschulsky, 1860), male (Russia, Volgograd Region).