Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,140
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,140 results for “TOPS”
FIGURE 4. Top 15 in Diversity And Distribution Of Nigerian Legumes (Fabaceae)
FIGURE 4. Top 15 genera with highest number of taxa (> 10 taxa).
Fig. 5 in Head in the clouds: a new dwarf frog species of the Physalaemus signifer clade (Leptodactylidae, Leiuperinae) from the top of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
Fig. 5. Spectrogram (above) and oscillogram (below) of advertisement calls. A–C. Three populations of Physalaemus maculiventris (Lutz, 1925). A. Paranapiacaba (FNJV 31815). B. São Paulo (FNJV 31988). C. Salesópolis (FNJV 33756). – D. P. araxa sp. nov. from Ibitirama (FNJV 34633).
Figure 7 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 7 - Focus stacking in Zerene Stacker. The small image in the upper corner provides a detailed close-up of 518 × 345 pix of the image at 100%. A Stack of 77 pictures, aligned and combined with PMax B Stack of 44 pictures, aligned and combined with PMax The individual pictures of both stacks are made with the Leica Z6 APO with DFC290 and Manfrotto led light system.
Figure 9 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 9 - A 3D model of a Dicranorrhina sp. beetle. The left pictures (A, C) represent the 3D model with its texture, while the right pictures (B, D) are from the model with the mesh only and show the level of detail of the 3D model made in Agisoft Photoscan.
Figure 8 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 8 - Focus stacking in Zerene Stacker. The small image in the upper corner provides a detailed close-up of 518 × 345 pix of the image at 100%. A Stack of 74 pictures, aligned and combined with PMax B Stack of 41 pictures, aligned and combined with PMax. The individual pictures of both stacks are made with the Canon-Cognisys set-up and double flash lights.
Figure 5 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 5 - The results of the different stacking methods in Zerene Stacker, each with a detail of a hairy leg and a part of the head with hairs. A, B details of the stack pictures by the PMax method C, D details of the stacked picture with the DMap method.
Figure 4 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 4 - The results of the different stacking methods in Helicon Focus: each stacking option is provided with a detail of a hairy leg and a part of the head with hairs. A, B result of Method A (average) C, D result of Method B (depth) E, F result of Method C (pyramid).
Figure 6 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 6 - Focus stacking in Zerene Stacker. The small image in the upper corner provides a detailed close-up of 518 × 345 pix of the image at 100%. A Stack of 70 pictures, aligned and combined with PMax B Stack of 41 pictures, aligned and combined with PMax. The individual pictures of both stacks are made with the Leica MZ16A with DFC500 camera and Leica KL 1500 LCD lights.
Figure 3 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 3 - The results of the different stacking methods in CombineZP: each stacking option is provided with a detail of a hairy leg and a part of the head with hairs. A, B details of the stack pictures by the Do Stack method C, D details of the stacked picture with the Do Soft Stack E, F details of the Do Weighted Stack method G, H details of the combined pictured with the Pyramid Weighted method I, J details of the stacked image with the Pyramid Do stack method K, L Details of the Stacked image with the Pyramoid Maximum Contrast method.
Figure 1 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 1 - The Canon-Cognisys set-up at the RBINS. The Canon 600D Camera, equipped with a Canon MP-E 65 mm 1:2.8 1–5× Macro Photo Lens, is mounted on the vertically positioned StackShot (Cognisys inc.). In the Ikea closet, at the bottom, you see the two Yongnuo YN560II speedlites positioned frontally and above is the plexiglas fig covered with paper to position the specimen.
Figure 2 from: Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P (2014) Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys 464: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.464.8615
Figure 2 - The results of the different stacking methods in Auto-Montage: each stacking option is provided with a single picture which is reduced in size by the Auto-Montage software itself and imprinted with watermarks. A represents the Blended Stacking option B picture composed by the Compound Weighted method C picture stacked by the Exponentially Weighted option D picture composed by the Fixed method and E picture stacked by the Weighted method.
Figure 4 from: Nilsson RH, Wurzbacher C, Bahram M, Coimbra VRM, Larsson E, Tedersoo L, Eriksson J, Duarte Ritter C, Svantesson S, Sánchez-García M, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K (2016) Top 50 most wanted fungi. MycoKeys 12: 29-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.12.7553
Figure 4 - Geographical distribution of the top 50 most wanted fungi at the phylum, class, and order level. Each fungal sequence was assigned to country of origin according to its INSDC entry (or underlying publication as applicable) and then summarized based on the continents: Africa (dark blue), Antarctica (green), Asia (grey), Australia (yellow), Europe (orange), North America (light blue), and South America (blue).
Figure 5 from: Nilsson RH, Wurzbacher C, Bahram M, Coimbra VRM, Larsson E, Tedersoo L, Eriksson J, Duarte Ritter C, Svantesson S, Sánchez-García M, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K (2016) Top 50 most wanted fungi. MycoKeys 12: 29-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.12.7553
Figure 5 - The most common substrates associated with the top 50 most wanted fungi at the phylum, class, and order level. Each fungal sequence was assigned to substrate according to its GenBank entry (or underlying publication as applicable). The major substrates included soil (light blue), living plants (blue), mycorrhiza (orange), dust (green), lichen (dark blue), dead wood (red), and other (grey). To improve readability, rare substrates (<3 occurrences) were merged into the 'other' category.
Figure 3 from: Nilsson RH, Wurzbacher C, Bahram M, Coimbra VRM, Larsson E, Tedersoo L, Eriksson J, Duarte Ritter C, Svantesson S, Sánchez-García M, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K (2016) Top 50 most wanted fungi. MycoKeys 12: 29-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.12.7553
Figure 3 - Web-based third-party taxonomic annotation of the sequences in a species hypothesis is demonstrated. Third-party annotation requires non-anonymous registration, and such annotations are subject to peer review. Annotations are tagged with the name of the annotator as well as the date. Multiple annotations for individual entries are supported.
Figure 1 from: Nilsson RH, Wurzbacher C, Bahram M, Coimbra VRM, Larsson E, Tedersoo L, Eriksson J, Duarte Ritter C, Svantesson S, Sánchez-García M, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K (2016) Top 50 most wanted fungi. MycoKeys 12: 29-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.12.7553
Figure 1 - A web-based screenshot of the upper part of the top 50 list of compound clusters where all sequences are unidentified at the phylum level. The clusters are ordered by the number of contributing studies in this screenshot.
Figure 2 from: Nilsson RH, Wurzbacher C, Bahram M, Coimbra VRM, Larsson E, Tedersoo L, Eriksson J, Duarte Ritter C, Svantesson S, Sánchez-García M, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K (2016) Top 50 most wanted fungi. MycoKeys 12: 29-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.12.7553
Figure 2 - A compound cluster displayed in the web browser of the user. The INSDC accession numbers and their taxonomic annotation are shown in columns 1 and 2. The DNA source and the country of collection are shown in columns 3 and 4. Column 5 shows the inclusiveness of the species hypotheses at the 97% similarity level (rightmost filled column), the 97.5% similarity level (second-to-rightmost filled column), and so on up to 100% similarity. The aligned sequence data are shown in column 6.
Source Dynamics - Top 5 - Financial Literacy
<p>Repository of image and support table, part of PhD Thesis in Management.</p>
Geomagnetic Induced Currents (GICs) estimations for Portugal mainland - Top 8 geomagnetic storms of solar cycle 24
<p>Geomagnetic Induced Currents, or GICs, are electric currents induced in conductive infrastructures (such as power lines and pipelines) due to changes in the Earth's magnetic field. GICs can cause power outages, damage transformers and other electrical equipment, and interfere with the operation of pipelines.</p> <p>We present here the GIC estimation for all the high voltage lines (150, 220 and 400 kV) over mainland Portugal for the eight most intense geomagnetic storms during solar cycle 24. The induced electric field is calculated from geomagnetic series obtained at Coimbra or San Fernando magnetic observatories, according to the Nearest Neighbour method and from 31 magnetotelluric soundings (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7147543).</p> <p>The GIC peak and standard deviation values for each substation are listed in the dataset. The criteria used for the definition of the geomagnetic storm duration in order to compute standard deviation values are based on the Ebre Observatory tables (https://www.obsebre.es/en/rapid) and the Hutchinson et al. (2011) criteria for the storm beginning and end, respectively.</p>
Fig. ¹. 7KRWWHD EHXQJRQJWDQRHK MustaqimNJ ANJ Living plantNJ BNJ Leaf, adaxial sideNJ CNJ Leaf, abaxial sideNJ DNJ InflorescencesNJ ENJ Flower, lateral viewNJ FNJ Flower, top viewNJ GNJ Perianth, outer surfaceNJ HNJ Perianth, inner surfaceNJ INJ StamensNJ JNJ Style and stigmaNJ KNJ Immature capsuleNJ Scale bars: B-C, F = 1 cm, D-E = 1 cm, G = 5 mm, H-J = 1 mm, K = 5 mmNJ Photographed by Wendy ANJ Mustaqim in Thottea beungongtanoeh (Aristolochiaceae), a new species Irom Aceh, northern Sumatra
Fig. ¹. 7KRWWHD EHXQJRQJWDQRHK MustaqimNJ ANJ Living plantNJ BNJ Leaf, adaxial sideNJ CNJ Leaf, abaxial sideNJ DNJ InflorescencesNJ ENJ Flower, lateral viewNJ FNJ Flower, top viewNJ GNJ Perianth, outer surfaceNJ HNJ Perianth, inner surfaceNJ INJ StamensNJ JNJ Style and stigmaNJ KNJ Immature capsuleNJ Scale bars: B-C, F = 1 cm, D-E = 1 cm, G = 5 mm, H-J = 1 mm, K = 5 mmNJ Photographed by Wendy ANJ Mustaqim
Supplementary material 4 from: Petrosyan V, Osipov F, Feniova I, Dergunova N, Warshavsky A, Khlyap L, Dzialowski A (2023) The TOP-100 most dangerous invasive alien species in Northern Eurasia: invasion trends and species distribution modelling. NeoBiota 82: 23-56. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.82.96282
Geographic partitioning of the SOR
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.