Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 3 in Depth structuring of pelagic copepod biodiversity in waters adjacent to an Eastern Indian Ocean coral reef

Figure 3. Percentage composition of the zooplankton community at LA, contrasted with that in the five depth strata sampled at CH, NE and SW. The data are pooled over all Locations and Cruises. Note that there is an order of magnitude difference in abundance from the mixed layer (<100 m) to the 300–400 m stratum (Table 1).

Figure 2 in Depth structuring of pelagic copepod biodiversity in waters adjacent to an Eastern Indian Ocean coral reef

Figure 2. Representative vertical profiles of temperature, salinity, density and chlorophyll fluorescence at SW on each of the four cruises.

Figure 5 in Depth structuring of pelagic copepod biodiversity in waters adjacent to an Eastern Indian Ocean coral reef

Figure 5. Redundancy analysis displaying relationships between zooplankton samples, locations and depths.

Figure 1 in Depth structuring of pelagic copepod biodiversity in waters adjacent to an Eastern Indian Ocean coral reef

Figure 1. Scott Reef, eastern Indian Ocean, with the location of the four stations sampled: LA, CH, NE and SW.

F in Habitat utilization by juvenile hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata, Linnaeus, 1766) around a shallow water coral reef

F. 6. Schematic showing the movement of hawksbill turtles between foraging and resting sites: (1) foraging on reef flat; (2) ascending to the surface once foraging has ended; (3) descending down reef face; (4) resting site (typically sandy bottomed); (5) ascending to surface following period of rest and return to foraging site.

F in Habitat utilization by juvenile hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata, Linnaeus, 1766) around a shallow water coral reef

F. 7. Comparison of foraging depth (active and stationary combined) with the depth of the resting site (post-foraging) (open circle). Line of equivalence (i.e. foraging depth= resting depth). Data represent occasions when the turtle was observed to swim repeatedly between foraging and resting sites (N=11) and not when observed at either site independently. Superimposed are mean dive depth data (±1 SD) for juvenile hawksbills taken from table 3 in van Dam and Diez (1996) (closed circle).

F in Habitat utilization by juvenile hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata, Linnaeus, 1766) around a shallow water coral reef

F. 5. Mean depth (±1 SD) for different behaviours at the six study sites combined. SF, stationary foraging; AF, active foraging; R, resting; AR, assisted resting.

F in Habitat utilization by juvenile hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata, Linnaeus, 1766) around a shallow water coral reef

F. 3. Comparison of actual and estimated sizes of the four mock-up carapaces (±1 SD). Data shown represent a combination of all observers (N=6). Line of equivalence (i.e. actual size=estimated size) is shown.

Figure 7 in Taxonomy of family Plakinidae (Porifera: Homoscleromorpha) from eastern Pacific coral reefs, through morphology and cox1 and cob mtDNA data

Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy images of spicules and skeletal structure of Plakinastrella clippertonensis van Soest et al., 2011. A, diods. B, triods. C, simple calthrops. D, tangential view of the ectosome. E, transversal view of the choanosome.

Figure 5 in Taxonomy of family Plakinidae (Porifera: Homoscleromorpha) from eastern Pacific coral reefs, through morphology and cox1 and cob mtDNA data

Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy images of spicules and skeletal structure of Plakortis clarionensis sp. nov. A, diods. B, triods. C, tangential view of the ectosome. D, transversal view of the choanosome.

Figure 4 in Taxonomy of family Plakinidae (Porifera: Homoscleromorpha) from eastern Pacific coral reefs, through morphology and cox1 and cob mtDNA data

Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy images of spicules and skeletal structure of Plakina paradilopha sp. nov. A, diods. B, triods. C, dilophose calthrops. D, transversal view of the choanosome.

Figure 3 in Taxonomy of family Plakinidae (Porifera: Homoscleromorpha) from eastern Pacific coral reefs, through morphology and cox1 and cob mtDNA data

Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy images of spicules and skeletal structure of Plakina muricyae sp. nov. A, diods. B, triods. C, calthrops. D, monolophose calthrops. E, transversal view of the choanosome.

Figure 6 in Taxonomy of family Plakinidae (Porifera: Homoscleromorpha) from eastern Pacific coral reefs, through morphology and cox1 and cob mtDNA data

Figure 6. Scanning electron microscopy images of spicules and skeletal structure of Plakortis albicans Cruz-Barraza & Carballo, 2005. A, diods and triods. B, tangential view of ectosomal alveolar skeleton. C, transversal view of the choanosome.

Figure 2 in Taxonomy of family Plakinidae (Porifera: Homoscleromorpha) from eastern Pacific coral reefs, through morphology and cox1 and cob mtDNA data

Figure 2. External morphologies of plakinid species from the eastern Pacific. A, B, Plakina muricyae sp. nov. C, i, Plakina paradilopha sp. nov.; ii, Plakina muricyae sp. nov. D, Plakortis clarionensis sp. nov. E, Plakortis albicans Cruz-Barraza & Carballo, 2005. F, Plakinastrella clippertonensis van Soest et al., 2011.

Figure 8 in Taxonomy of family Plakinidae (Porifera: Homoscleromorpha) from eastern Pacific coral reefs, through morphology and cox1 and cob mtDNA data

Figure 8. Phylogenetic reconstruction of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1; A) and cytochrome b (cob; B) mitochondrial markers. The topologies were obtained by Bayesian inference analysis with MrBayes. The number at each node represents the Bayesian posterior probability (%).

Figure 28. Diploastrea Matthai, 1914 in Taxonomic classification of the reef coral families Merulinidae, Montastraeidae, and Diploastraeidae (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia)

Figure 28. Diploastrea Matthai, 1914, has discrete corallites that bud extracalicularly, septa in ≥ four cycles (≥ 48 septa), and large (≥ 1/4 of calice width) spongy columellae. Septal teeth elliptical−parallel at base; weak (rounded) granules scattered on septal face. Walls formed by synapticulotheca and partial septotheca; thickening deposits in concentric rings with extensive stereome. A–F, Diploastrea heliopora (Lamarck, 1816), the only living species of Diploastrea; macromorphology, Orbicella minikoiensis Gardiner, 1904, syntype of Diploastrea NHMUK 1927.5.4.153, Minicoy, Lakshadweep, India (A; photo by N. Santodomingo); micromorphology (scanning electron microscopy; B, E) and microstructure (transverse thin section; C), hypotype USNM 93732, Madang, Papua New Guinea; macromorphology, holotype MNHN IK-2010-551, unknown locality (D); microstructure, hypotype USNM 48046, Redang Island, eastern coast of Peninsula Malaysia (F).

Figure 27 in Taxonomic classification of the reef coral families Merulinidae, Montastraeidae, and Diploastraeidae (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia)

Figure 27. Montastraea de Blainville, 1830, has discrete corallites that bud extracalicularly, septa in ≥ four cycles (≥ 48 septa) spaced> 11 septa per 5 mm, regular free septa, and large (≥ 1/4 of calice width) spongy columellae. Septal teeth elliptical−perpendicular at base. Walls formed by partial septotheca and weak abortive septa, with strong costa centre clusters. A, Astrea guettardi Defrance, 1826, type species of Montastraea; macromorphology, hypotype MNHN R05933, Miocene, Turin, Italy. B–F, Montastraea cavernosa (Linnaeus, 1767), the only living species of Montastraea; macromorphology (D) and micromorphology (scanning electron microscopy; B, E), hypotype SUI 122829 (FA1109), Carrie Bow Cay, Belize; microstructure (transverse thin section), hypotype SUI 48763 (FA1110), Discovery Bay, Jamaica (C), and hypotype SUI 122828 (FA1093), Bocas del Toro, Panama (F).

Figure 25 in Taxonomic classification of the reef coral families Merulinidae, Montastraeidae, and Diploastraeidae (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia)

Figure 25. Scapophyllia Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848a, has uniserial corallites, fused walls, small (<4 mm) and lowrelief (<3 mm) calices, compact columellae, well-developed paliform (uniaxial) lobes, and sparse endotheca. Septal teeth are low (<0.3 mm) and narrowly spaced (<0.3 mm). Walls formed by strong abortive septa and partial septotheca. A–F, Scapophyllia cylindrica Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849a, the type and only living species of Scapophyllia; macromorphology, holotype MNHN IK-2010-715, unknown locality (A, D); micromorphology (scanning electron microscopy; B, E) and microstructure (transverse thin section; C, F), hypotype USNM 89934, Enewetak Atoll, Marshall Islands.

Figure 23. Physophyllia Duncan, 1884 in Taxonomic classification of the reef coral families Merulinidae, Montastraeidae, and Diploastraeidae (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia)

Figure 23. Physophyllia Duncan, 1884, has organically united and polymorphic corallites, extensive coenosteum (≥ corallite diameter), septa spaced <six septa per 5 mm, spongy columellae, and abundant (vesicular) endotheca. A, B, Physophyllia ayleni Wells, 1935, the type and only living species of Physophyllia; macromorphology, holotype NHMUK 1862.7.16.46, Japan (A; photo by H. Taylor), and paratype NHMUK 1893.9.1.188, Macclesfield Bank, South China Sea (B).

Figure 18. Orbicella Dana, 1846 in Taxonomic classification of the reef coral families Merulinidae, Montastraeidae, and Diploastraeidae (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia)

Figure 18. Orbicella Dana, 1846, has discrete corallites that bud extracalicularly, small (<4 mm) and low-relief (<3 mm) calices, regular free septa, equally thick costosepta, and large (≥ 1/4 of calice width) compact columellae. Septal teeth are low (<0.3 mm) and narrowly spaced (<0.3 mm), with multiaxial tips. Walls formed by dominant septotheca and partial paratheca. A–C, Orbicella annularis (Ellis & Solander, 1786), type species of Orbicella; macromorphology, holotype GLAHM 104008, Antilles (A; photo by K. G. Johnson); micromorphology (scanning electron microscopy), hypotype SUI 95207, San Blas, Panama (B); microstructure (transverse thin section; C), hypotype SUI 122825 (FA1108), Anguilla. D–F, Orbicella faveolata (Ellis & Solander, 1786); macromorphology, holotype GLAHM 104009, probably Late Pleistocene, Antilles (D; photo by K. G. Johnson); micromorphology, hypotype SUI 95213, San Blas, Panama (E); microstructure, hypotype SUI 95215, San Blas, Panama (F). G–I, Orbicella franksi (Gregory, 1895); macromorphology, holotype NHMUK R2514, Pleistocene, Barbados (G; photo by H. Taylor); micromorphology, hypotype SUI 133923 (H); microstructure, hypotype SUI 133883 (I).