Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,025
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6,025 results for “Science of science”
Dynamic Entrepreneur Functions in Web of Science
<p>A dataset of all papers with dynamic entrepreneur functions in Web of Science. The following keywords are searched and extracted from WOS:</p> <ul> <li>entrepreneur and arbitrage</li> <li>entrepreneur and composition</li> <li>entrepreneur and coordination</li> <li>entrepreneur and coordinator</li> <li>entrepreneur and image</li> <li>entrepreneur and innovation</li> <li>entrepreneur and innovator</li> <li>entrepreneur and reputation</li> <li>entrepreneur and reputator</li> <li>entrepreneur and risk</li> <li>entrepreneur and uncertainty</li> </ul> <p>The resulting tables are in two formats: </p> <ul> <li>allterms.csv holds all searchterms in a row, with the citation sums for 1980-2017 in separate columns. </li> <li>allterms_melted.csv holds all combination of searchterm and citations sum as rows (for pivot tables in Python/Excel)</li> </ul> <p>The following columns are available:</p> <ul> <li>Title</li> <li>Authors</li> <li>Corporate Authors</li> <li>Editors</li> <li>Book Editors</li> <li>Source Title</li> <li>Publication Date</li> <li>Publication Year</li> <li>Volume</li> <li>Issue</li> <li>Part Number</li> <li>Supplement</li> <li>Special Issue</li> <li>Beginning Page</li> <li>Ending Page</li> <li>Article Number</li> <li>DOI</li> <li>Conference Title</li> <li>Conference Date</li> <li>Total Citations</li> <li>Average per Year</li> <li>1980-2018 <strong>(allterms.csv only)</strong></li> <li>searchterm</li> <li>year_of_citations <strong>(allterms_melted.csv only)</strong></li> <li>citations_per_year <strong>(allterms_melted.csv only)</strong></li> </ul>
Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Publication Cost Data 2017
<p><br> Following the approach for the datasets in 2013 (<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.988754">http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.988754</a>), 2014 (<a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1378610.v14">https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1378610.v14</a>), 2015 (<a href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3180166">https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3180166</a>) and 2016 (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.810596">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.810596</a>), the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) is making the publication costs spent in 2017 (esp. for Open Access) publically available.</p> <p>The dataset includes payments for publications of authors funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) via following programmes:</p> <p>Peer-Reviewed Publications: <a href="https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/research-funding/fwf-programmes/peer-reviewed-publications/">https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/research-funding/fwf-programmes/peer-reviewed-publications/</a></p> <p>Stand-Alone Publications: <a href="https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/research-funding/fwf-programmes/stand-alone-publications/">https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/research-funding/fwf-programmes/stand-alone-publications/</a></p>
OAPEN-CH – The impact of open access on scientific monographs in Switzerland. A project conducted by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
<p>The Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) launched the OAPEN-CH pilot project in summer 2014. At that time, it had introduced new funding policies that only covered books that were published online and openly accessible after an embargo period of no more than 24 months. The pilot study set out to learn more about the changes to academic publishing and pave the way for future adaptations to funding policies.</p> <p>The findings of the shared learning process are now available. They are encouraging in that they produce a clear verdict for the scientific monograph: a digital edition that is freely available on the Internet increases the trackability, visibility and use of monographs. Open access does not have a negative impact on printed book sales. Facilitating and promoting open access will benefit the academic community and society at large as well as publishers and funders.</p> <p>The results of the OAPEN-CH pilot study have already been integrated into the new open access policy of the SNSF, which entered into force on 1 April 2018.</p>
Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Open Access Compliance Monitoring 2017
<p><strong>I. Executive summary</strong></p> <p>The Austrian Science Fund (FWF), which is Austria's main funding organisation for basic research, encourages and helps all project leaders and project staff members to make their peer-reviewed research results freely available on the Internet. Since 1 January 2016, open access has been mandatory for all peer-reviewed publications listed in final reports on FWF-funded projects. Any exceptions must be clearly indicated and justified. For projects that started after 1 January 2015, open access has been compulsory for all peer-reviewed publications.</p> <p>All principal investigators in FWF-funded projects are obliged to submit a final report within three months of completing their projects. In 2017 all in all 608 final reports were submitted to the FWF, 42 out of them couldn't report publications by now.</p> <p>The publications and other data mentioned in those reports are archived and analysed by the FWF. This report examines the state of compliance with open access requirements on the basis of final project reports submitted in the year 2017.</p> <p>Main findings:</p> <ul> <li>A total of 8.398 publications were listed in the final project reports submitted in 2017.</li> <li>Of those publications, 6.439 were conclusively identified as peer-reviewed.</li> <li>Regarding compliance with the FWF's Open Access Policy, the report shows that 90% of the peer-reviewed publications that arose from submitted final reports of FWF projects in 2017 are openly accessible (2015: 83%, 2016: 92%).</li> <li>The most frequently chosen option is hybrid open access (41%). Since last year's report, the use of green open access has declined by 5% green open access and by 2 % gold open access. Other open access has increased by 4%, and hybrid open access by 1%.</li> <li>The majority of peer-reviewed publications submitted are journal articles, 91% of which are openly accessible.</li> <li>The lowest rate of compliance with the FWF's Open Access Policy can be found in editions, contributions to edited volumes and monographs (66%) an increase by 8% since last year's report.</li> <li>Although open access is not compulsory, 51% of non peer-reviewed publications are freely available through the internet.</li> <li>The absolute number of publications listed in final reports in 2017 includes 715 publications that are mentioned several times in different projects; however, those repetitions do not ultimately affect the relative share of open access publications (90%).</li> <li>56% of all peer-reviewed publications without open access originate from the "Special Research Programmes" (SFB). Since these reserach networks have a long duration, the open access policy of the FWF often does not yet apply to them.</li> </ul> <p><strong>II. Bias</strong></p> <p>All publications were entered in the FWF’s database manually and with the utmost care when the final project reports were received. Nevertheless, it is not possible to rule out minor errors entirely. Moreover, some systematic problems need to be solved in the future; the FWF is currently preparing to implement a research information system in which FWF-funded researchers will be able to enter and update their research data on an ongoing basis.</p> <ul> <li>Due to the amount of data involved, it was not possible to check the current open access status of all publications twice. The last check was performed in January 2018.</li> <li>In some cases, the embargo period may have expired after submission, and publications labelled "Other open access" in the FWF’s database may now be accessible through green open access.</li> </ul> <p>Whenever the status "peer-reviewed" could not be clearly identified according to FWF guidelines, the publications were classified as non peer-reviewed.</p>
Open Access in the Global South: Perspectives from the Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network
<p>As with science in general, the discussion around open access has generally been driven by the institutions and perspectives of western or global North countries. However, approaches to open access are far more diverse and there are alternative approaches that have not gained visibility, especially in historically marginalized communities. This presentation will present some key lessons of the OCSDNet http://ocsdnet.org. The OCSDNet is a research network that engaged in participatory research and consultation with scientists, development practitioners, community members and activists from 26 countries in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia to understand the values at the core of open science in development. What we learned is that there is not one right way to do open science, and “openness” requires constant negotiation and reflection, and the process will always differ by context due to historical and socio-political factors. The set of seven values and principles at the core of the OCSDNet manifesto will be discussed for a more inclusive open science in development. More important, we will discuss the implications of these values in relation to the aspirations and features of COAR’s Next Generation Repository.</p>
Top 500 Topics Prominence in Science Brazil and USP 2013-2018
<p>Levantamento realizado na Plataforma <a href="http://www.scival.com/">SciVal</a> (Elsevier) entre os dias 29 de junho e 02 de julho de 2018, com dados da base Scopus atualizados até 08 de junho de 2018 revela os principais tópicos proeminentes na ciência que estão despertando o interesse de pesquisadores, instituições de pesquisa e órgãos de financiamento. São os Tópicos Proeminentes em Ciência (em inglês <em>Prominent Topics in Science</em>). </p> <p>DUDZIAK, E.A.<strong> Interesse mundial e a produção científica do Brasil e da USP: </strong>proeminência de tópicos na ciência - um estudo usando o SciVal. São Paulo: SIBiUSP, 2018. Disponível em:< > Acesso em: 02 Jul. 2018. </p> <p>A survey carried out on the SciVal Platform (Elsevier) between June 29 and July 2, 2018, with Scopus base data updated until June 8, 2018 reveals the main prominent topics in science that are arousing the interest of researchers, institutions research and funding bodies. These are Prominent Topics in Science.</p> <p>DUDZIAK, E.A. <strong>Global interest and academic production in Brazil and USP</strong>: topic prominence in science - a study using SciVal. Sao Paulo: SIBiUSP, 2018. Disponível em: <http://www.sibi.usp.br/?p=24517> Acesso em: 02 July 2018. </p>
Austrian Science Fund (FWF) funding statistics 2009-2017
<p>Compilation of funding statistics from FWF's annual reports as longitudinal data from 2009-2017.</p>
Experteninterview mit Steffi Grimm für die Bachelorarbeit "Open Science an der HAW Hamburg - Empfehlungen zur Open-Access-Beratung"
<p>Da sich die HAW Hamburg am hochschulübergreifenden Programm Hamburg Open Science beteiligt, ging die Autorin im Rahmen ihrer Bachelorarbeit <em>Open Science an der HAW Hamburg - Empfehlungen zur Open-Access-Beratung</em> der Frage nach, ob die Hochschule eine Publikations- bzw. Open-Access-Beratung einführen sollte. Hierfür wurden Best-Practice-Beispiele aus anderen Hochschulen analysiert und vier ausführliche Experteninterviews mit verschiedenen FachvertreterInnen geführt.</p> <p>Im Rahmen der Experteninterviews wurde Steffi Grimm (zum Zeitpunkt der Erhebung) aus dem Team Universitätsverlag/Hochschulschriften/Open Access der Universitätsbibliothek der Technischen Universität Berlin interviewt. Das Experteninterview fand am 19.12.2017 am Telefon statt. Die Länge des Interviews betrug 77 Minuten. Das folgende Transkript wurde auf die relevanten Informationen gekürzt und zur besseren Lesbarkeit stilistisch bearbeitet.</p> <p>Die Veröffentlichung der kompletten Bachelorarbeit soll noch erfolgen.</p>
Experteninterview mit Michaela Voigt im Rahmen von Hamburg Open Science
<p>Da sich die HAW Hamburg am hochschulübergreifenden Programm Hamburg Open Science beteiligt, wurde im Rahmen von Hamburg Open Science zur Entwicklung eines Konzeptes für eine Open-Access-freundliche Publikationskultur Michaela Voigt aus dem Team Universitätsverlag/Hochschulschriften/Open Access der Universitätsbibliothek der Technischen Universität Berlin interviewt. Das Experteninterview fand am 01.08.2018 an der UB der TU Berlin statt. Die Länge des Interviews betrug 49 Minuten. Das folgende Transkript wurde auf die relevanten Informationen gekürzt und zur besseren Lesbarkeit stilistisch bearbeitet.</p>
[DATA_SCIENCE] Interviews: The Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank (SAIL)
<p>This is a set of interview transcripts executed by Niccolò Tempini between September 2015 and October 2016, as part of the ERC project "The Epistemology of Data-Intensive Science", and in the context of a case study of SAIL. Please read the "Notes on transcript editing" document for further information.</p> <p>Two papers that specifically make use of these interviews have been published as of 2018:</p> <ul> <li>Tempini, N., Leonelli, S., 2018. Concealment and discovery: The role of information security in biomedical data re-use. Soc Stud Sci 48, 663–690. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718804875">https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718804875</a></li> <li>Tempini, N., 2016. Science Through the “Golden Security Triangle”: Information Security and Data Journeys in Data-intensive Biomedicine, in: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2016). <a href="https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2016/ISHealthcare/Presentations/20/">https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2016/ISHealthcare/Presentations/20/</a></li> </ul> <p>The transcripts document SAIL researchers' experience of infrastructure development and data curation and re-use practices. Researchers have consented to have these transcripts made available as Open Data. Other interviewees did not give consent, so those transcripts are held securely by the research team in Exeter.<br> You also find the information sheet provided to interviewees, which gives you the context for this project. Further information and related publications can be found at www.datastudies.eu.</p>
Leveraging Commercial Cubesat Constellations for Auroral Science: A Case Study
<p>Planet satellite magnetometer data to accompany the paper "Leveraging Commercial Cubesat Constellations for Auroral Science: A Case Study"</p>
Data sharing in the life sciences : a study of researchers at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences
<p>Survey data collected in 2012 as basis for master thesis in library and information sciences titled "Data sharing in the life sciences : a study of researchers at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences" </p>
Illustrative Darwin core archive to output data from a citizen science platform to a collection management system
<p>Illustrative DwC archive to send data back to a collection management system from a citizen sciences platform. This illustrative archive displays the specimens used for the trans-institutional and trans-platform pilot project held in the frame of ICEDIG.</p> <p>Further description of its content in the milestone28 document, worpackage 5.2 of the ICEDIG project.</p>
Experteninterview mit Jürgen Christof im Rahmen von Hamburg Open Science
<p>Da sich die HAW Hamburg am hochschulübergreifenden Programm Hamburg Open Science beteiligt, wurde im Rahmen von Hamburg Open Science zur Entwicklung eines Konzeptes für eine Open-Access-freundliche Publikationskultur Jürgen Christof, Direktor der Universitätsbibliothek der Technischen Universität Berlin, interviewt. Das Experteninterview fand am 01.08.2018 an der Universitätsbibliothek der Technischen Universität Berlin statt. Die Länge des Interviews betrug 78 Minuten. Das folgende Transkript wurde auf die relevanten Informationen gekürzt und zur besseren Lesbarkeit stilistisch bearbeitet.</p>
Austrian Science Fund (FWF) funding statistics 2009-2018
<p>Compilation of funding statistics from FWF's annual reports as longitudinal data from 2009-2018</p>
Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: implications for science, sport and wearable tech
<p>An interactive user interface and the raw data from the manuscript titled: "Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: implications for science, sport and wearable tech". </p>
Media education to Open Science | Education des médias à Open Science
<p><strong>Open Science - an opportunity for science journalism -> Poster in English <em>It's Time</em></strong></p> <p>Well-known Swiss media such as RTS, Le Temps or NZZ have sometimes relayed dubious scientific articles. This brings the idea of training journalists at Open Science to acquire new tools and avoid the spread of<em> 'flawed or fake science'</em>. The Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) has been providing media training to researchers for years. In turn, journalists and institutional communicators could be trained in Open Science to improve - the selection of scientific content to relay - and the accuracy of the reports. A proposal was formulated in the form of posters at the <a href="http://memento.epfl.ch/event/swissuniversities-open-science-action-plan-kick-of/">swissuniversities Open Science Action Plan: Kick-Off Forum of 17 October 2019</a>. Swissuniversities and the SNSF can unite and begin to make a commitment to raise the awareness of journalists and institutional communicators at Open Science.</p> <p><strong>Open Science - une opportunité pour le journalisme scientifique -> Poster en français <em>Il est Temps</em></strong></p> <p>Des médias réputés tels que la RTS, Le Temps ou la NZZ ont parfois relayé des articles scientifiques douteux. Ce qui amène l’idée d’une formation des journalistes à Open Science pour aquérir de nouveaux outils et éviter la propagation de '<em>flawed ou fake science'. </em>Le Fond National Suisse (FNS) offre des formations aux médias aux chercheurs depuis des années. A leur tour, les journalistes et communicants institutionnels pourraient être formés à Open Science pour améliorer - la sélection de contenus scientifiques à relayer - et la précision des comptes rendus. Une proposition a été formulée sous forme de posters à l’occasion de <a href="http://memento.epfl.ch/event/swissuniversities-open-science-action-plan-kick-of/">swissuniversities Open Science Action Plan: Kick-Off Forum du 17 octobre 2019</a>. Swissuniversities et le FNS peuvent s'unir et commencer à s’engager à sensibiliser les journalistes et communiquants institutionnels à Open Science.</p>
Data for "Corruption Risk in Contracting Markets: A Network Science Perspective"
<p>EU public procurement data, scored for corruption risk. Includes deduped issuers and winners. Includes data dictionary. For more information contact: johanneswachs@gmail.com</p>
Data set used in "Diving into science and conservation recreational divers can monitor reef assemblages"
<p>This data set was used in the manuscript "Diving into science and conservation: recreational divers can monitor reef assemblages", accepted for publication in Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation. It is composed by reef species (fishes and turtles) counts in different size classes performed by recreational and experience scientific divers following a sampling protocol. Additionally there is information about recreational divers diving experience, underwater waste register and the scores for their evaluation about conducting scientific data collection.</p>
Enhancing the health and wellbeing benefits of biodiversity citizen science
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.