Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 3 in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts

Fig. 3. The state of Rhabdias hylae larvae in cane toads as a function of days-post treatment. The graph shows larval numbers as the percentage of total larvae that were seen at each time period.

Fig. 5 in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts

Fig. 5. Average inflammation severity surrounding Rhabdias hylae larvae and foci (probable larvae being broken down by the host's immune system) within infected cane toads at different numbers of days post-infection. Graph shows average values ±1 S.E.M.

Fig. 8 in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts

Fig. 8. Changes through time (days post-infection) on the relative numbers of anurans that were infected with lungworms, and that contained adult versus juvenile stages of the parasites involved. Data are shown for two lungworm species (Rhabdias hylae from native frogs, and Rhabdias pseudosphaerocephala from invasive cane toads) and for two types of host: the native frog, Cyclorana australis, and the cane toad, Rhinella marina. The panels show data for (a) C. australis infected with R. pseudosphaerocephala, (b) C. australis infected with R. hylae, (c) cane toads infected with R. pseudosphaerocephala and (d) cane toads infected with R. hylae.

Fig. 8 in Haemoprotozoa: Making biological sense of molecular phylogenies

Fig. 8. Phenotypic characters mapped against broad molecular phylogenies of haemosporidian parasites. Molecular phylogenetic relationships are indicated on the left as a consensus (macro-evolutionary) tree derived from multiple studies cited within the text.

Fig. 7 in Haemoprotozoa: Making biological sense of molecular phylogenies

Fig. 7. Phenotypic characters mapped against broad molecular phylogenies of haemogregarine parasites. Molecular phylogenetic relationships are indicated on the left as a consensus (macro-evolutionary) tree derived from multiple studies cited within the text.

Fig. 6 in Haemoprotozoa: Making biological sense of molecular phylogenies

Fig. 6. Phenotypic characters mapped against broad molecular phylogenies of haemococcidian parasites (blood-borne genera shown in red). Molecular phylogenetic relationships are indicated on the left as a consensus (macro-evolutionary) tree derived from multiple studies cited within the text. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 5 in Haemoprotozoa: Making biological sense of molecular phylogenies

Fig. 5. Developmental cycles and hosts for apicomplexan blood parasites (DH = definitive host; IH = intermediate host; PH = paratenic host; bm = blood meal; bmi = injected during blood meal; ve = vector eaten).

Fig. 3 in Haemoprotozoa: Making biological sense of molecular phylogenies

Fig. 3. Developmental stages formed by kinetoplastid flagellates (blood-borne genera shown in red). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 2 in Haemoprotozoa: Making biological sense of molecular phylogenies

Fig. 2. Geological time periods with milestones in the development of life on Earth, together with historical extent of fossil records for particular assemblages.

Fig. 10 in Haemoprotozoa: Making biological sense of molecular phylogenies

Fig. 10. Probable evolutionary origins of haemoprotozoan parasites (solid lines = strong inferential support; dotted lines = presumptive).

Fig. 9 in Haemoprotozoa: Making biological sense of molecular phylogenies

Fig. 9. Phenotypic characters mapped against broad molecular phylogenies of piroplasm blood parasites. Molecular phylogenetic relationships are indicated on the left as a consensus (macro-evolutionary) tree derived from multiple studies cited within the text.

Fig. 4 in Haemoprotozoa: Making biological sense of molecular phylogenies

Fig. 4. Phenotypic characters mapped against broad molecular phylogenies of trypanosomatid haemoflagellates. Molecular phylogenetic relationships are indicated on the left as a consensus (macro-evolutionary) tree derived from multiple studies cited within the text.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Data of Figs. 6 and 8 in Legendre (2024, Jigsaw puzzle of the interwoven biologically-driven ocean carbon pumps. Progress in Oceanography)

Figure 6. Depth variations of carbon-pump components considering only gravitational POC export (i.e., Forg calculated using eqs. 10 and 18 and eq 1 of Martin et al., 1987, with b = 0.86): carbon fluxes at different depths z, and cumulative carbon fluxes from zexp to z. Figure 8. Cumulative carbon-pump fluxes from Fig. 6 are added together showing that [Forg(z) + ∑FseqDIC + ∑FupDIC]  = [Forg(z) + ∑FwcDIC] = Fexp. The different curves are added together (a) from left to right, and (b) from the centre to the left and the right.

Fig. 2 in The impact of meteorological parameters on the biological productivity of mycorrhizal mushrooms in Eastern Siberia

Fig. 2. The variation of total amount of month precipitations *** in August and biological productivity**** of mushrooms in different years. *** variation of total amount of month precipitations, **** biological productivity

Fig. 1 in The impact of meteorological parameters on the biological productivity of mycorrhizal mushrooms in Eastern Siberia

Fig. 1. The variation of average month temperature * of soil at a depth of 40 cm below the natural cover in August and biological productivity** of mushrooms in different years. * variation of average month temperature, ** biological productivity, *** 1 centner = 100 kilograms (a centner is a metric unit of mass equal to one hundred kilograms).

Fig. 4. Insects visiting Caesalpinia decapetala. A. Metasyrphus corollae. B. Xylocopa appendiculata circumvolans. C. Celastrina argiolus. D. Bombus ardens ardens. E. Megachile japonica. F in Pollination biology of Caesalpinia decapetala (Leguminosae) in Korea

Fig. 4. Insects visiting Caesalpinia decapetala. A. Metasyrphus corollae. B. Xylocopa appendiculata circumvolans. C. Celastrina argiolus. D. Bombus ardens ardens. E. Megachile japonica. F. Anastrangalia sequensi.

Fig. 3 in Pollination biology of Caesalpinia decapetala (Leguminosae) in Korea

Fig. 3. The anther height and stigma height of C. decapetala during pre-anthesis (A1), anthesis (A2), and post-anthesis (A3).

Fig. 5 in Pollination biology of Caesalpinia decapetala (Leguminosae) in Korea

Fig. 5. Pollen grain attachment ventral view of Apidae. A. Megachile japonica. B. Bombus ardens ardens. C. Xylocopa appendiculata circumvolans.

Fig. 1. A in Pollination biology of Caesalpinia decapetala (Leguminosae) in Korea

Fig. 1. A. inflorescences of C. decapetala wrapped with nylon bags on May. B. leaves are folded down at night.