Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 12 in Four new species and five new distribution records of the jumping spider genus Stenaelurillus Simon, 1886 (Salticidae: Aelurillines) from India

Fig. 12. Stenaelurillus solapur Kuni, Tripathi & Kadam sp. nov. A–D. Holotype, ♂ (NRC-AA-6957). A. Male habitus, dorsal view. B. Male habitus, lateral view. C. Carapace, frontal view. D. Leg I, prolateral view. E–H. Paratype, ♀ (NRC-AA-6959). E. Female habitus, dorsal view. F. Carapace, frontal view. G. Leg I, prolateral view. H. Habitus, lateral view. Scale bars: A–B, E, H = 1 mm; C–D, F–G = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 9 in Four new species and five new distribution records of the jumping spider genus Stenaelurillus Simon, 1886 (Salticidae: Aelurillines) from India

Fig. 9. Stenaelurillus judithbleisterae Kadam, Tripathi & Kuni sp. nov., genitalia. A–G. Holotype, ♂ (NRC-AA-6955). A. Male palp, ventral view. B. Male palp, retrolateral view. C. Male palp, palpal segments, retrolateral view. D. Embolic division, ventral view. E. Embolic division, retrolateral view. F. Embolic division, prolateral view. G. RTA, ventral view indicate serration. H–I. Paratype, ♀ (NRC-AA-6956). H. Epigyne, ventral view. I. Vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars: A–F = 0.2 mm; G–I = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 10 in Four new species and five new distribution records of the jumping spider genus Stenaelurillus Simon, 1886 (Salticidae: Aelurillines) from India

Fig. 10. Stenaelurillus judithbleisterae Kadam, Tripathi & Kuni sp. nov., genitalia. A–B. Holotype, ♂ (NRC-AA-6955). A. Male palp, ventral view; the arrow indicates the serration of RTA. B. Male palp, retrolateral view. C–E. Paratype, ♀ (NRC-AA-6956). C. Epigyne, ventral view. D. Vulva, dorsal view. E. Vulva, dorsal view of insemination ducts on left side. Scale bars: A–D = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 8 in Four new species and five new distribution records of the jumping spider genus Stenaelurillus Simon, 1886 (Salticidae: Aelurillines) from India

Fig. 8. Stenaelurillus judithbleisterae Kadam, Tripathi & Kuni sp. nov. A–E. Holotype, ♂ (NRC-AA-6955). A. Male habitus, dorsal view. B. Male habitus, lateral view. C. Carapace, frontal view. D. Carapace, dorsal view. E. Leg I, prolateral view. F–H. Paratype, ♀ (NRC-AA-6956). F. Female habitus, dorsal view. G. Carapace, frontal view. H. Carapace, lateral view. Scale bars: A–B, F, H = 1 mm; C–E, G = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 7 in Four new species and five new distribution records of the jumping spider genus Stenaelurillus Simon, 1886 (Salticidae: Aelurillines) from India

Fig. 7. Stenaelurillus judithbleisterae Kadam, Tripathi & Kuni sp. nov., habitus, live photographs. A–D. Holotype, ♂ (NRC-AA-6955). E–G. Paratype, ♀ (NRC-AA-6956). Photographs by Gautam Kadam (A–D) and Rishikesh Tripathi (E–G).

Fig. 6 in Four new species and five new distribution records of the jumping spider genus Stenaelurillus Simon, 1886 (Salticidae: Aelurillines) from India

Fig. 6. Stenaelurillus naldurg Kuni, Kadam & Tripathi sp. nov. A–B. Holotype, ♂ (NRC-AA-6952). A. Male palp, ventral view. B. Male palp, retrolateral view. C–E. Paratype, ♀ (NRC-AA-6954), genitalia. C. Epigyne, ventral view. D. Vulva, dorsal view. E. Vulva, dorsal view of insemination ducts on left side. Scale bars: A–B = 0.2 mm; C–D = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Four new species and five new distribution records of the jumping spider genus Stenaelurillus Simon, 1886 (Salticidae: Aelurillines) from India

Fig. 5. Stenaelurillus naldurg Kuni, Kadam & Tripathi sp. nov., genitalia. A–H. Holotype, ♂ (NRC-AA-6952). A. Male palp, ventral view. B. Male palp, retrolateral view. C. Male palp, palpal segments, retrolateral view. D–F. Embolic division. D. Ventral view. E. Retrolateral view. F. Prolateral view. G. Embolus, dorsal view. H. Palpal femur, prolateral view. I–J. Paratype, ♀ (NRC-AA-6954). I. Epigyne, ventral view. J. Vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars: A–B = 0.2 mm; C = 0.5 mm; D–J = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 2 in Four new species and five new distribution records of the jumping spider genus Stenaelurillus Simon, 1886 (Salticidae: Aelurillines) from India

Fig. 2. Stenaelurillus feral Tripathi, Kuni & Kadam sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NRC-AA-6951), genitalia. A. Ventral view. B. Retrolateral view. C. Embolic division, apical view. D. RTA, ventral view indicate serration. E. Embolic division, ventral view. F. Embolic division, retrolateral view. G. Embolic division, prolateral view. Scale bars: A–G = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 3 in Four new species and five new distribution records of the jumping spider genus Stenaelurillus Simon, 1886 (Salticidae: Aelurillines) from India

Fig. 3. Stenaelurillus naldurg Kuni, Kadam & Tripathi sp. nov., habitus, live photographs. A–B, D. Holotype, ♂ (NRC-AA-6952). C, E–F. Paratype, ♀ (NRC-AA-6954). Photographs by Rishikesh Tripathi.

Fig. 1 in Four new species and five new distribution records of the jumping spider genus Stenaelurillus Simon, 1886 (Salticidae: Aelurillines) from India

Fig. 1. Stenaelurillus feral Tripathi, Kuni & Kadam sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NRC-AA-6951). A. Male habitus, dorsal view. B. Male habitus, lateral view. C. Carapace, frontal view. D. Carapace, dorsal view. E. Male palp, ventral view; the arrow indicates the serration of RTA. F. Male palp, retrolateral view. Scale bars: A–B = 0.5 mm; C–D = 0.2 mm; E–F = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 4 in Four new species and five new distribution records of the jumping spider genus Stenaelurillus Simon, 1886 (Salticidae: Aelurillines) from India

Fig. 4. Stenaelurillus naldurg Kuni, Kadam & Tripathi sp. nov. A–D. Holotype, ♂ (NRC-AA-6952). A. Male habitus, dorsal view. B. Male habitus, lateral view. C. Carapace, frontal view. D. Leg I, prolateral view. E–H. Paratype, ♀ (NRC-AA-6954). E. Female habitus, dorsal view. F. Carapace, frontal view. G. Leg I, prolateral view. H. Female habitus, lateral view. Scale bars: A–B, E, H = 1 mm; C–D, F–G = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 2 in Carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) distribution in a rural landscape based on habitat diversity and habitat characteristics

Fig. 2. Cluster analysis of the results (individual years separated) based on Euclidian distance as distance measure and agglomeration according to Ward. Numbers indicate the percentage of replicates where each node is still supported (Hammer 2012)

Fig. 3 in Carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) distribution in a rural landscape based on habitat diversity and habitat characteristics

Fig. 3. Ordination plot based on correspondence analysis (CA) of the results (individual years separated) for study sites (open circles) and species (open triangles)

Fig. 5 in Carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) distribution in a rural landscape based on habitat diversity and habitat characteristics

Fig. 5. Ordination plot based on correspondence analysis (CA) of the results (years for the study sites pooled) for study sites (open circles) and species (open triangles)

Fig. 1 in Carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) distribution in a rural landscape based on habitat diversity and habitat characteristics

Fig. 1. Scheme of the research object "Krzywda" (a) and location of the study sites (1-6) (b) (After Bùaszkiewicz & Schwerk (2013), modified).

Fig. 4 in Carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) distribution in a rural landscape based on habitat diversity and habitat characteristics

Fig. 4. Cluster analysis of the results (years for the study sites pooled) based on Euclidian distance as distance measure and agglomeration according to Ward. Numbers indicate the percentage of replicates where each node is still supported (Hammer 2012)

Figure 8 in Unraveling distributional patterns and life-history traits of a deep-water shrimp Plesionika edwardsii (Decapoda, Pandalidae) under unexploited virgin conditions: a benchmark for fisheries management

Figure 8. Hypothesized life cycle of Plesionika edwardsii in the Azorean region. After the incubation period of shrimp eggs, (1) larvae are released into the water column and (2) juveniles develop in shallow waters. Mature females and males are distributed up to 600 m with a sexual segregation by depth: (3) non-ovigerous females are mainly found up to 200 m, (4) ovigerous females between 200 and 300 m, and (5) males from 400 to 500 m deep. Females are bigger than males, and ovigerous females are bigger than nonovigerous females. A bigger-deeper trend is observed up to 400 m. (6) Long larval stages of P. edwardsii increases its potential for dispersal (Landeira et al., 2009), favoring connectivity and stock homogeneity between adjacent areas.

Figure 5 in Unraveling distributional patterns and life-history traits of a deep-water shrimp Plesionika edwardsii (Decapoda, Pandalidae) under unexploited virgin conditions: a benchmark for fisheries management

Figure 5. Sex ratio of Plesionika edwardsii by depth stratum in the Azorean region during the period 1999–2000.

Figure 2 in Cladocera (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) species of Bahia State, Brazil: a critical update on species descriptions, distributions, and new records

Figure 2. Number of cladoceran species from seven families in the state of Bahia, Brazil. The family Chydoridae was partitioned into Chydorinae and Aloninae sub-families.

Figure 1 in Cladocera (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) species of Bahia State, Brazil: a critical update on species descriptions, distributions, and new records

Figure 1. Map of the current distribution of cladocerans throughout the drainage basins and freshwater ecoregions in Bahia State, Brazil. Previous species records are shown as black circles. New records/localities added by this study are shown as white circles, see Tabs. 1, 2. Red and blue colors represent each hydrographic basin within the specific ecoregion where cladocerans were recorded.