Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,315
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,315 results for “dinosaur”
FIG. 6 in Reassessment Of A Historical Collection Of Sauropod Dinosaurs From The Northern Morrison Formation Of Wyoming, With Implications For Sauropod Biogeography
FIG. 6. Range of midcaudal centrum elongation in Morrison Formation sauropods. Ratio represents centrum length (cL) to posterior centrum height (pcH). Dots are ratios of single vertebrae, bars represent the range of means from individual specimens, and stars are the mean of the specimen means across the entire taxon. The dotted line in Apatosaurinae indet. indicates that the highest value (1.8) comes from a specimen represented by a single vertebra in this dataset (LACM 52844), whereas several other, more complete specimens all have values that range between 1.2 and 1.3 (represented by the continuous bar). The open rectangles represent ratios in specimens from RFPR (CM 312 and CM 36034 may be from a single individual, see text). Note the generally higher mean values of diplodocines (Supersaurus, Galeamopus, Diplodocus, Barosaurus) compared with apatosaurines (Apatosaurus, Brontosaurus, and indeterminate specimens) with the exception of LACM 52844. The RFPR specimens are colored as the taxon to which they are referred in the text, with the exception of CM 312 and CM 36034, which are referred to Neosauropoda indet.
FIG. 11 in Reassessment Of A Historical Collection Of Sauropod Dinosaurs From The Northern Morrison Formation Of Wyoming, With Implications For Sauropod Biogeography
FIG. 11. Range of humeral robusticity indices (RI) in Morrison Formation sauropods. Ratio represents the mean of proximal, distal, and minimum shaft mediolateral widths (prW, diW, minW, respectively), divided by proximodistal length (pdL). Dots are ratios of single humeri and stars are the mean across the entire taxon. The open rectangles represent ratios in specimens from RFPR. Note that Galeamopus humeri have a more similar RI to apatosaurines (Apatosaurus, Brontosaurus, and indeterminate specimens) than to the other diplodocines Diplodocus and Barosaurus. The RFPR specimens CM 28849 and CM 36026 are referred to Diplodocidae indet., and CM 21775 and CM 36019 to Camarasauridae indet.
Figure 8 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 8. Rostrum of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in left oblique rostrodorsolateral view. AMNH 5405. Scale bar 70 mm. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 16 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 16. Scanning electron micrograph of tooth of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902). TMP 87.36.99. Scale bar, 10 mm.
Figure 5 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 5. Schematic illustrations of the basicranium of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in right lateral view. (A) Basicranial components of the occipital/basicranial region. (B) Basicranial foramina. Not to scale. Abbreviations in italics (i.e. the frontal and parietal elements) are not considered components of the occipital/basicranial region. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 1 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 1. Phylogeny of the Ankylosauria, providing the genealogical context for the taxa discussed in the text (after Vickaryous et al., 2001b). Explanation of nodes: node (1) Ankylosauria; node (2) Nodosauridae; node (3) Ankylosauridae; node (4) Ankylosaurinae. All suprageneric taxonomic nomenclature follows the definitions of Sereno (1998).
Figure 12 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 12. Post-palatal area of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) cranium in ventral view, original and interpretive illustration. TMP 97.132.1. Scale bar, 100 mm. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 15 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 15. Mandible of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902). Predentary in oblique rostroventral (A) and ventral (B) views. Right mandible in medial (C) and lateral (D; mirror imaged) views. AMNH 5405. Scale bar, 100 mm (E) Right coronoid bone (indicated by arrow) articulating with the dentary, surangular and splenial in medial view. AMNH 5403. Scale bar, 25 mm. Compare with Fig. 6.
Figure 17 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 17. Cranium of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in left lateral (A) and ventral (B) views. NMC 8530, holotype of Anodontosaurus lambei, herein considered synonymous with Euoplocephalus tutus. Scale bar, 100 mm. Abbreviations in italics and parentheses reflect the original interpretation by Sternberg (1929). All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 14 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 14. Basicranium of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in right lateral view, original and interpretive illustration. FPDM-V-35. Scale bar, 50 mm. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 10 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 10. Cranium of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in left lateral view (A) indicating the relative position of the transverse computer tomographic sections (B–F) through the rostrum. Only the left half of each transverse computer tomographic image is depicted. (A) AMNH 5405. (B–F) TMP 97.132.1. Scale bar, 100 mm. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1. (G) Schematic illustration of a nasal cavity proper undulating through the rostrum based on a reconstruction of the computer tomographic images. Not to scale.
Figure 6 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 6. Schematic illustrations of the mandibular region of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902). (A) Predentary, ventral view. (B) Medial view, right mandible. (C) Lateral view, right mandible. Teeth and alveoli omitted. Not to scale. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 3 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 3. Cranium of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in oblique rostrodorsolateral view demonstrating the unique pattern of cranial ornamentation. AMNH 5405. Scale bar, 100 mm. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1. Modified from Vickaryous et al. (2001a).
Figure 9 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 9. Palate of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in ventral view, original and interpretive illustration. TMP 97.132.1. Scale bar, 100 mm. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 7 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 7. Cranium of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in dorsal (A), ventral (B), right lateral (C) and occipital (D) views. TMP 91.127.1. Scale bar, 100 mm.
Figure 2 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 2. Cranium of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views, with the rostrum directed towards the top of the page. NMC 0210, holotype. Scale bar, 100 mm. Abbreviations in italics and parentheses reflect the original interpretation by Lambe (1902). All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 12 in Cranial anatomy of Shunosaurus, a basal sauropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of China
Figure 12. Diagrammatic view of the jaw occlusion of Shunosaurus during feeding. A, comparison of dental margin of Shunosaurus with a pair of garden shears. In Shunosaurus, the occlusal level of the upper jaw is convex downward, whereas that of the lower jaw is concave upward. B, wear facets between the upper and lower tooth rows. Upper and lower tooth rows interdigitate and shear past each other so that each lower tooth fits between two upper teeth along their lingual surfaces. C, one bite cycle procedure for shearing stems and branches.
Figure 3 in Cranial anatomy of Shunosaurus, a basal sauropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of China
Figure 3. Columnar section of Middle Jurassic to Upper Jurassic strata in Sichuan Basin, China (modified from Dong, 1992).
Figure 2. A in Cranial anatomy of Shunosaurus, a basal sauropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of China
Figure 2. A, Sketch map showing the fossil localities of Early and Middle Jurassic dinosaurs in China. B, Generalized geological map of Zigong area, Sichuan Province, China, showing the location of the Dashanpu quarry where several skeletons of Shunosaurus were discovered (simplified from Dong, 1992).
Figure 4 in Cranial anatomy of Shunosaurus, a basal sauropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of China
Figure 4. Skull of Shunosaurus lii (ZG65430). A−C, braincase in lateral, dorsal and ventral views. D & E, left maxilla and jugal in lateral and medial views. F &G, left dentary in lateral and medial views. H & I, right dentary in lateral and medial views. J, right maxilla in lateral view. K, right premaxilla in medial view. L, right pterygoid in lateral view. M, right quadrate and quadratojugal in medial view.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.