Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,104
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,104 results for “morphological variations”
FIGURE 8 in A new species of Brasineura Silva-Neto & García Aldrete (Psocodea, 'Psocoptera', Ptiloneuridae), with comments on morphological variation in B. troglophilica and a revised generic diagnosis
FIGURE 8. Fore wing of paratype male of B. serranortensis sp.n. Scales in mm.
Figure 5 from: Rossa R, Goczał J, Pawliczek B, Ohbayashi N (2017) Morphological variation in Leptura annularis Fabr. 1801 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) among European and Asiatic populations. ZooKeys 724: 31-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.724.20667
Figure 5 UPGMA similarity tree of hind wing shape of six Leptura annularis complex populations based on the Mahalanobis distance.
Figure 6 from: Rossa R, Goczał J, Pawliczek B, Ohbayashi N (2017) Morphological variation in Leptura annularis Fabr. 1801 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) among European and Asiatic populations. ZooKeys 724: 31-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.724.20667
Figure 6 Differences in average hind wing shape between continental Leptura annularis complex morphotype (full line) and morphotype from Sakhalin Is. and Japan (dotted line). Differences were exaggerated four times to make them more visible. The position of the lines is a result of interpolation, which is less accurate at greater distances from the landmarks. The presented differences are difficult to discern without measurements.
Figure 4 from: Rossa R, Goczał J, Pawliczek B, Ohbayashi N (2017) Morphological variation in Leptura annularis Fabr. 1801 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) among European and Asiatic populations. ZooKeys 724: 31-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.724.20667
Figure 4 Variation of hind wing shape among European and Asiatic populations of Leptura annularis complex: view in three-dimensional (A) and two-dimensional (B) morphospace.
Figure 1 from: Rossa R, Goczał J, Pawliczek B, Ohbayashi N (2017) Morphological variation in Leptura annularis Fabr. 1801 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) among European and Asiatic populations. ZooKeys 724: 31-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.724.20667
Figure 1 Sampling localities for morphological survey of Leptura annularis complex in Europe and Asia.
FIGURE 10 in Morphological variation during post-embryonic development in the centipede Lithobius melanops: traditional and geometric morphometrics approaches
FIGURE 10 Shape variation of (A) The forcipular apparatus; (B) The cephalic capsule; and (C) The ultimate leg among epimorphic groups was performed by Canonical Variate Analyses (CVA) [circle: black – agenitalis, white – maturus; rectangles: black – praematurus male, white – praematurus female (in the case of the forcipular aparatus) and praematurus (both sexes in the case of the cephalic capsule and the ultimate leg)]. Thin plate spline deformation grids and vector positions illustrate the shape variation pattern among analyzed groups.
Fig. 1 in Relationships between morphology, diet and spatial distribution: testing the effects of intra and interspecific morphological variations on the patterns of resource use in two Neotropical Cichlids
Fig. 1. Dispersion of the scores of the first two PCA axes, calculated with the variance matrix of 22 ecomorphological indices. a) Scores classified by the type of environment; b) Scores classified by food resources, where: Emp = empty, Cru = crustacean, Aqu = aquatic insect, Fis = fish, Mol = mollusk, Hig = higher plant, Det = detritus. Dashed line: Crenicichla britskii; dotted line: Satanoperca pappaterra. ARA = Aspect ratio of the anal fin; ARC = Aspect ratio of the caudal fin; ARPt = Aspect ratio of the pectoral fin; ARPv = Aspect ratio of the pelvic fin; PI = Protrusion index; RAA = Relative area of the anal fin; RAD = Relative area of the dorsal fin; RAE = Relative area of the eye; RAPt = Relative area of the pectoral fin; RAPv = Relative area of the pelvic fin; RHM = Relative height of the mouth; RHPd = Relative width of the caudal peduncle; RWPd = Relative width of the caudal peduncle.
Fig. 4 in Variation In Cone And Seed Morphology Traits Among The Mitochondrial Dna Haplotypes Of Scots Pine (Pinus Sylvestris L.)
Fig. 4. Dependence of seed number per cone on cone width for the type A and type B mitotypes of Scots pine. Individual cone values are shown.
FIGURE 8 in On the morphological variation and taxonomy of the Geoffroy's cat Leopardus geoffroyi (d'Orbigny & Gervais, 1844) (Carnivora, Felidae)
FIGURE 8: Distribution of the factorial scores in the first and second principal components of the craniometrical variables (in decimal logarithm) of L. geoffroyi male, female and unknown sex specimens combined.
Figure 6 in Redescription of the ocellus-bearing cuskeel Neobythites kenyaensis (Ophidiidae), with new Southeast African records and remarks on intraspecific morphological and colour variation
Figure 6. – Number of dorsal-fin rays in central ocellus spot plotted against latitude and depth in Neobythites kenyaensis. Numbers near symbols indicate multiple numbers of specimens referred to; with reference lines for each symbol.
Figure 2 in Redescription of the ocellus-bearing cuskeel Neobythites kenyaensis (Ophidiidae), with new Southeast African records and remarks on intraspecific morphological and colour variation
Figure 2. – Photographs of fresh specimens of Neobythites kenyaensis. A: SAIAB 98891, 121 mm SL, northern Mozambique (F. Uiblein); B: SAIAB 98891, 101 mm SL, northern Mozambique (F. Uiblein); C: SAIAB 82154, 136 mm SL, southern Mozambique (P.C. Heemstra); D: SAIAB 95778, 148 mm SL, off Durban, South Africa (D. Hayes). The horizontal size bars indicate 20 mm length.
Fig. 1 in Morphological and genetic variation in Mexican wild populations of Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)
Fig. 1. Neighbor-joining tree showing the genetic distance between Tamarixia radiata haplotypes. The tree was inferred according to the Tamura-3-parameter model. Next to each branch appear the bootstrap values as percentage of 1,000 replications. Next to each sequence are between brackets the gene bank accession numbers; the asterisks (*) indicate the report where the sequences were obtained, i.e., *Barr et al. 2009, **De León & Sétamou (2010), and ***González-Hernández et al. (2010).
Figure 4 in Mesobuthus nigrocinctus (Ehrenberg, 1828) (Scorpiones: Buthidae) in Turkey: Distribution and Morphological Variation
Figure 4: Mesobuthus nigrocinctus, female, Nemrut Mts. (1550 m asl), Kâhta, Adiyaman Province. Photos by Ahmet Karataş.
◂Fig. 3 Historically described phenotypical variations and yet undiscovered deviations in the plate pattern of P. volzii. b–c, f, i, l–m Light microscopy, a, d–e, g–h, k scanning electron microscopy. a–f Newly identified deviations a–b plate 4′′ pentagonal in strains a GeoM*793; b GeoM*788; c plate 2a split (strain GeoK*024); d plates 2′′ and 3′′ fused (strain GeoM*866); e plates 1′′′ and 1′′′′ fused (strain GeoM*788); f plates 1a and 3′ fused (strain GeoM*788). g–m Historic infraspecific taxa; g P. guestrowiense forma lineatum (strain GeoM*866); h P. guestrowiense forma compressum (strain GeoM*866); i P. guestrowiense subvar. originale (strain GeoK*024); k P. volzii var. cinctiforme (strain GeoM*793); l P. volzii var. simplex (strain GeoM*789); m P. volzii forma complexum (strain GeoM*793). Abbreviations: n′: apical plate, n′′: precingular plate, n′′′: postcingular plate, n′′′′: antapical plate, na: anterior intercalary plate, nC: cingular plate, split or fused plates are indicated by asterisks. Scale bar= 10 µm. U A= 15 kV in Morphological and molecular variability of Peridinium volzii Lemmerm. (Peridiniaceae, Dinophyceae) and its relevance for infraspecific taxonomy
◂Fig. 3 Historically described phenotypical variations and yet undiscovered deviations in the plate pattern of P. volzii. b–c, f, i, l–m Light microscopy, a, d–e, g–h, k scanning electron microscopy. a–f Newly identified deviations a–b plate 4′′ pentagonal in strains a GeoM*793; b GeoM*788; c plate 2a split (strain GeoK*024); d plates 2′′ and 3′′ fused (strain GeoM*866); e plates 1′′′ and 1′′′′ fused (strain GeoM*788); f plates 1a and 3′ fused (strain GeoM*788). g–m Historic infraspecific taxa; g P. guestrowiense forma lineatum (strain GeoM*866); h P. guestrowiense forma compressum (strain GeoM*866); i P. guestrowiense subvar. originale (strain GeoK*024); k P. volzii var. cinctiforme (strain GeoM*793); l P. volzii var. simplex (strain GeoM*789); m P. volzii forma complexum (strain GeoM*793). Abbreviations: n′: apical plate, n′′: precingular plate, n′′′: postcingular plate, n′′′′: antapical plate, na: anterior intercalary plate, nC: cingular plate, split or fused plates are indicated by asterisks. Scale bar= 10 µm. U A= 15 kV
Figure 6 from: Wurdack KJ, Zartman CE (2019) Insights on the systematics and morphology of Humiriaceae (Malpighiales): androecial and extrafloral nectary variation, two new combinations, and a new Sacoglottis from Guyana. PhytoKeys 124: 87-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.124.34679
Figure 6 Macromorphology of Sacoglottisperryi. A Dried fruit with central seed embedded in woody endocarp, longitudinal split along carpel wall (dissected by Cuatrecasas) B dried fruit with 2 central seeds and endocarp lacunae, transverse section C fresh fruit with fleshy yellow-green exocarp and liquid in endocarp lacunae, transverse section D young inflorescence with bracts intact (b) or fallen leaving bract scars (bs) E mature bud with marginal sepal gland (small red dot in center) F partly open flower with intact anthers G post-anthetic flower H freshly cut trunk I type in life just before pressing. Sources: AGillespie 2810BTripp 2984C, E–IRedden 7264DHoffman 1600 (all US).
Figure 5 from: Wurdack KJ, Zartman CE (2019) Insights on the systematics and morphology of Humiriaceae (Malpighiales): androecial and extrafloral nectary variation, two new combinations, and a new Sacoglottis from Guyana. PhytoKeys 124: 87-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.124.34679
Figure 5 Micromorphology of Sacoglottisperryi. A Marginal glandular seta B basilaminar gland, adaxial C laminar gland near margin, abaxial D sepal tip, inner side with terminal gland E paired glandular stipules and petiole scar F pollen inside sporangium G stigma with ephemeral lobes intact and showing secretion H stigma lobes shredded showing thin walls I gynoecium with diagnostic hirsute ovary J glandular disc with erose margin. Sources: A–CGillespie 2810D–JTripp 2984 (all US).
Figure 4 from: Wurdack KJ, Zartman CE (2019) Insights on the systematics and morphology of Humiriaceae (Malpighiales): androecial and extrafloral nectary variation, two new combinations, and a new Sacoglottis from Guyana. PhytoKeys 124: 87-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.124.34679
Figure 4 Extrafloral nectary and leaf margin diversity of Humiriaceae. AVantaneadepleta laminar glands, abaxial BDuckesialiesneri basilaminar glands, adaxial CSchistostemonoblongifolius basilaminar glands, adaxial DHumiriastrumottohuberi laminar glands, abaxial EDuckesiaverrucosa robust seta at margin FSacoglottisguianensis basilaminar glands, adaxial GHumiriafruticosa shoot tip with marginal glands exposed on expanding new leaf HHumiriafruticosa marginal gland IHylocarpaheterocarpa laminar gland, abaxial JHumiriabalsamiferavar.minarum dense row of marginal glands, abaxial KDuckesiaverrucosa laminar gland, abaxial LSchistostemonretusus darkened scar from deciduous seta MSchistostemonretusus intact seta at margin. g = gland, s = seta scar. Sources: AMori & Kallunki 4889BLiesner 22589CMaas et al. 6804DMaguire 34912E, KDucke 2108FJansen-Jacobs et al. 1898G, HSteyermark 103255IDucke [JBRJ-30137] JMexia 5815LRedden 3372MCuatrecasas 7203 (all US).
Figure 2 from: Wurdack KJ, Zartman CE (2019) Insights on the systematics and morphology of Humiriaceae (Malpighiales): androecial and extrafloral nectary variation, two new combinations, and a new Sacoglottis from Guyana. PhytoKeys 124: 87-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.124.34679
Figure 2 Stamen structure of Humiriaceae. ASacoglottisperryi stamen cluster of 2 types, ventral BSacoglottisperryi stamen cluster of 2 types, dorsal CSacoglottisperryi short-stamen anther with open stomium and pollen DSacoglottisguianensis androecium with interstaminal staminodes (st), dorsal ESchistostemonmacrophyllus stamen cluster of 3 types, ventral FSchistostemonmacrophyllus stamen cluster of 3 types, dorsal GSchistostemonoblongifolius trifurcate filament tip, dorsal. Sources: A–CTripp 2984DCarvalho et al. 4396E, FMaas et al. 6577GMaas et al. 6804 (all US).
Figure 1 from: Wurdack KJ, Zartman CE (2019) Insights on the systematics and morphology of Humiriaceae (Malpighiales): androecial and extrafloral nectary variation, two new combinations, and a new Sacoglottis from Guyana. PhytoKeys 124: 87-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.124.34679
Figure 1 Stamen structure of Humiriaceae. ADuckesiaverrucosa tetrasporangiate anther, dorsal BDuckesiaverrucosa tetrasporangiate anther, lateral CDuckesialiesneri tetrasporangiate anther, lateral DEndopleurauchi disporangiate anther, lateral EEndopleurauchi tetrasporangiate anther, lateral FDuckesiaverrucosa sterile anther, lateral GHumiriastrumcuspidatum disporangiate anther, lateral HHumiriastrumcuspidatum androecium, dorsal IEndopleurauchi tetrasporangiate anther, lateral JHumiriastrumdentatum disporangiate anther, lateral KHumiriastrumdentatum disporangiate anther, ventral LHumiriastrumdiguense disporangiate anther, lateral MHumiriabalsamiferavar.imbaimadaiensis stamen cluster with 2 of 3 types, dorsal. f = filament attachment location. Sources: A, B, FDucke 2108CHenderson 933D, E, IAssunção 605G, HCid et al. 4264J, KHatschbach 56145LQuizhpe et al. 612MWurdack 4814 (all US.)
Figure 7 from: Wurdack KJ, Zartman CE (2019) Insights on the systematics and morphology of Humiriaceae (Malpighiales): androecial and extrafloral nectary variation, two new combinations, and a new Sacoglottis from Guyana. PhytoKeys 124: 87-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.124.34679
Figure 7 Illustration of Sacoglottisperryi. A Habit B bud C bud with petals removed D open flower, axial E open flower, lateral F gynoecium G stamen cluster of 2 types, ventral H floral diagram I post-anthetic flower J young fruit K, L fruit M fruit with 2 central seeds and endocarp lacunae, transverse section. Source: A–M from specimens and life photos of Redden 7264 (US).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.