Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,025
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6,025 results for “Science of science”
Research Workflows and Open Science - Data Set
<p>Data set accompanying the report "Research Workflows and Open Science", a systematic study of open science research workflows.</p> <p>The data set summarises the open science characteristics exhibited by the analysed workflows. The first two columns ‘<strong>workflow ID</strong>’ and ‘<strong>URL</strong>’ are dedicated to the ID we used to identify each workflow and to the publications related to the workflows respectively.</p> <p>The remaining columns are dedicated to the characteristics exhibited by the analysed workflows and are named The remaining columns are dedicated to the characteristics exhibited by the analysed workflows and are named following the different categories identified:</p> <ul> <li> <p>'<strong>used/open science infrastructure/virtual</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow relies on a virtual open infrastructure (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>used/open science infrastructure/physical</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow relies on a physical open infrastructure (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>used/open scientific knowledge/open source software</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow relies on open source software (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>used/open scientific knowledge/open hardware</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow relies on open hardware (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>used/open scientific knowledge/open research data</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow (re)uses open research data (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>used/open scientific knowledge/open educational resources</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow (re)uses open educational resources (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>produced/open scientific knowledge/(open access) scientific publication</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow envisages the release of a scientific publication (e.g. papers, reports, data management plans, preprints, study designs) under an open access licence (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>produced/open scientific knowledge/open source software</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow envisages the release of software (e.g. code, analysis scripts) under an open access licence (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>produced/open scientific knowledge/open research data</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow envisages the release of open research data (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>produced/open scientific knowledge/open educational resources</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow envisages the release of open educational resources (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>transparency/transparency type</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>degree of transparency of a workflow, defined in terms of which research products are openly shared and when in order to document the research processes (‘built-in’ if transparent, ‘enabled’ if capable of being transparent, ‘opaque’ otherwise)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>transparency/sharing type</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>workflow categories based on when the research products are shared (‘end’ for sharing at the end of the workflow, mixed for sharing part of the research products during the workflow and the rest at the end of it, ‘iterative’ for sharing iteratively during or at the end of the related workflow phase, and ‘user-dependent’, where it is ultimately up to the researcher to decide when to share the research products since the workflow offers different paths to follow while imposing no sharing constraint.)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>collaboration/collaboration implementation</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow implements collaborative practices (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>collaboration/open engagement of societal actors/crowdfunding</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow envisages crowdfunding (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>collaboration/open engagement of societal actors/crowdsourcing</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow envisages crowdsourcing (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>collaboration/open engagement of societal actors/scientific volunteering</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow envisages scientific volunteering (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>collaboration/open engagement of societal actors/citizen and participatory science</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow envisages citizen and participatory science (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>collaboration/open dialogue with other knowledge systems/indigenous peoples</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow envisages the establishment of a dialogue with indigenous peoples (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>collaboration/open dialogue with other knowledge systems/marginalised scholars</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow envisages the establishment of a dialogue with marginalised scholars (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>collaboration/open dialogue with other knowledge systems/local communities</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow envisages the establishment of a dialogue with local communities (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>assessment</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow implements assessment processes for the evaluation of the research products created (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>'<strong>automation</strong>'</p> <ul> <li> <p>If a workflow includes automated processes (yes/no)</p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul>
Products and Models for "Early Release Science of the Exoplanet WASP-39b with JWST NIRSpec PRISM"
<p>Associated publication: <a href="https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Farticles%2Fs41586-022-05677-y%2520&data=05%7C01%7Czafar%40jhu.edu%7C70cefcf501224b8d305708daed9f9533%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C638083566905963125%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=gyY0O%2FyMHX0paZC60ZCiQAif%2F0O8K2QKAuuF9%2FjtRpA%3D&reserved=0">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05677-y</a></p> <p> </p> <p>OVERVIEW: Transmission spectroscopy of exoplanets has revealed signatures of water vapor, aerosols, and alkali metals in a few dozen exoplanet atmospheres. However, these previous inferences with the Hubble and Spitzer Space Telescopes were hindered by the observations’ relatively narrow wavelength range and spectral resolving power, which precluded the unambiguous identification of other chemical species—in particular the primary carbon-bearing molecules. Here we report a broad-wavelength 0.5–5.5 µm atmospheric transmission spectrum of WASP-39 b, a 1200 K, roughly Saturn-mass, Jupiter-radius exoplanet, measured with JWST NIRSpec’s PRISM mode as part of the JWST Transiting Exoplanet Community Early Release Science Team program. We robustly detect multiple chemical species at high significance, including Na (19σ), H<sub>2</sub>O (33σ), CO<sub>2</sub> (28σ), and CO (7σ). The non-detection of CH<sub>4</sub>, combined with a strong CO<sub>2</sub> feature, favours atmospheric models with a super-solar atmospheric metallicity. An unanticipated absorption feature at 4 µm is best explained by SO<sub>2</sub> (2.7σ), which could be a tracer of atmospheric photochemistry. These observations demonstrate JWST’s sensitivity to a rich diversity of exoplanet compositions and chemical processes.</p>
Dataset of "Electronically ordered ultrathin Cr2O3 on Pt(111) in presence of a multidomain graphene intralayer", Applied Surface Science 613 (2023) 155918
<p>Dataset of "Electronically ordered ultrathin Cr2O3 on Pt(111) in presence of a multidomain graphene intralayer", Applied Surface Science 613 (2023) 155918</p>
Data from: Hazard and catch composition of ghost fishing gear revealed by a citizen science clean-up initiative
<p><span>Ghost fishing, the continued catch of fishes and invertebrates by lost fishing gear, represents an animal welfare issue as well as a waste of both potential food and ecosystem resources. Fishing gear is lost by both commercial and recreational fishers, and management authorities often lack an overview of gear loss and subsequently potential impact on coastal populations. </span><span>To investigate the hazard and catch composition of lost fishing gear along the Norwegian coast</span><span>, recreational divers in collaboration with scientists conducted systematic reporting of retrieved lost fishing gear. </span><span>Through this citizen science project,</span><span> a total of 12,101 gear items were retrieved and reported, including traps, gillnets and fyke nets. Combining both data on the catch ratio of the gear and its relative quantity, we identified the five most hazardous gear types to be parlor traps, gillnets, fyke nets, wrasse traps and square collapsible traps. The parlour trap was the most hazardous trap, due to high catchability and quantity. The correct classification of gear type could not be confirmed in 2.8 – 6.1 % of the pictures taken by divers, depending on reporting format, and divers reported the wrong gear type in 1.4 % of the reports. Brown crab (<em>Cancer</em> <em>pagurus</em>) was the species most often found in retrieved gear. Furthermore, the vulnerable species European lobster (<em>Homarus</em> <em>gammarus</em>) and Atlantic cod (<em>Gadus</em> <em>morhua</em>) were also common. These results can inform future clean up-initiatives and management responses to ghost fishing, including preventive measures against gear loss and gear restrictions and customization. </span></p>
Sustaining Cities, Naturally Webinar: Education Session - Bioblitz - Citizen science
<p>Poorly planned urbanisation can lead to societal challenges as social deprivation, climate change, deteriorating health and increasing pressure on urban nature. Urban ecosystem restoration can contribute to lessen these challenges, e.g. through implementing nature-based solutions (NBS). </p> <p>This pitch was made as part of the online webinar ‘Sustaining cities, Naturally: Urban ecosystem restoration in Europe, China and Latin America’, which took place as an official side-event of the European Week of Regions and Cities 2022 on 13th and 14th October 2023. The webinar was jointly organised by the projects: INTERLACE, CONEXUS, Regreen and CLEARING HOUSE. </p> <p>The webinar illustrated how Horizon 2020 projects support international cooperation in knowledge creation and knowledge exchange between local authorities and researchers to promote urban ecosystem restoration in Europe, China and Latin America and brought together cities, regions and local authorities, city network representatives, policy makers, researchers, civil society and experts on nature-based solutions and urban ecosystem restoration from Europe, China and Latin America. </p>
Artigos na Web of Science sobre "políticas públicas" and "ensino superior" no período de 2000 a 2022
<p>O arquivo corresponde a um conjunto de dados parcial da pesquisa "A precarização do trabalho docente asseverada na pandemia da Covid-19: políticas públicas para minorar o esgotamento profissional", financiada pelo CNPq. Mais especificamente, disponibiliza-se os dados referentes a produção veiculada pela Web of Science sobre "políticas públicas" and "ensino superior" no período de 2000 a 2022. </p> <p>O arquivo é composto por informações autorais, títulos dos artigos, revistas em que foram publicados, idioma, países e instituições de vínculo dos autores, dentre outras.</p>
Data from: How science communications can help build societal perceptions of invasive alien species and their impacts on the environment
<p>In this study, we investigated the reported beneficial aspects of the invasive alien plant species (IAPS) and argued that, over time and space, the detrimental impacts of the IAS might endanger sustainable livelihoods. The data set contains the following files:</p> <p>Data_S1.xlsx: The file contains details of 154 literature reports. From each paper, we extracted IAPS names (both as reported and standardized), taxonomic information (family and taxon rank), year, country, the scale of observation, and reported beneficial impacts. The beneficial impacts were further categorized into 13 use categories at TDWG (Taxonomic Databases Working Group) Level-1 states (in binary format - 1 indicates the IAPS use and 0 indicates not in use for the individual category).</p> <p>The Metadata_S1.pdf file contains detailed information on preparing literature records for data extraction, the data extraction process, and data organization. </p>
A critical analysis of plant science literature reveals ongoing inequities
<p><span></span></p> <p>These data are associated with the study entitled "<em>A critical analysis of plant science literature reveals ongoing inequities</em>" by Rose A. Marks, Erik J. Amézquita, Sarah Percival, Alejandra Rougon-Cardoso, Claudia Chibici-Revneanu, Shandry M. Tebele, Jill M. Farrant, Daniel H. Chitwood, and Robert VanBuren published in PNAS, 2023. The data deposited here include 296,447 plant science papers published between 2000 to 2021 that were sourced from a representative set of 127 plant science journals based in 26 different nations across 5 continents, covering 21 different subspecialties. Both society and for-profit journals are included, with open access, hybrid, and subscription publishing models. </p>
Alternative metrics and social impact of research about Social Sciences in Cuba
<p>The evaluation of social impact of research is a subject demanded by the scientific and social community. The present research is developed with the objective of describing the social impact of the results of scientific research in the field of Social Sciences in Cuba. 5 dimensions of analysis and 16 alternative indicators were used, through the use of altmetric tools and data sources. The sample collection for the study was carried out through the Scopus database and the altmetric data provider PlumX Metrics. For the analysis, statistical techniques of trend and correlation between indicators, data visualization and scientific information were used. The results show that the indicators with the greatest presence were citations in Scopus and CrossRef, Views count, Full Text Views, Abstract Views, Readers in Mendeley captures and the social network metrics Facebook and Twitter. The research results with the greatest social impact are related to climate change and environmental policy, scientific production about COVID-19, higher education, sustainable development, gender studies, legislation, and tourism.</p>
Agape Open Science MOOC
<p>Under Agape we aim to disseminate open science between PhD students and early career researchers across Ireland and later internationally. We want to create an open science practising community where we can learn, exchange our opinions and experiences, and together change the future. In the way that science is undertaken, made freely available, and communicated in a FAIR and transparent way.</p> <p> </p>
Nipah virus: Analysis of the scientific production in Open Access on the Web of Science, 2000 - 2020
<p>Data used in the analysis of the scientific production of Nipah in open access in the period 2000 to 2020</p>
Dataset for proceedings paper: How international is co-authorship outside of Web of Science? The case of social sciences and humanities in Flanders, Belgium
<p>This is an anonymized dataset containing data on international collaboration in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in Flanders, Belgium. It is based on all peer-reviewed publications in <a href="https://www.ecoom.be/en/data-collections/vabb-shw">VABB-SHW</a>, regardless of their indexation in WoS or other databases.</p> <p>The dataset accompanies the conference paper 'How international is co-authorship outside of Web of Science? The case of social sciences and humanities in Flanders, Belgium,' which was submitted to <a href="https://cns-iu.github.io/workshops/2023-07-02_issi/index.html">ISSI 2023</a>.</p>
Products and Models for "Early Release Science of the Exoplanet WASP-39b with JWST NIRISS"
<p>Associated Publication: <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05674-1">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05674-1</a></p> <p> </p> <p>Transmission spectroscopy provides insight into the atmospheric properties and consequently the formation history, physics, and chemistry of transiting exoplanets. However, obtaining precise inferences of atmospheric properties from transmission spectra requires simultaneously measuring the strength and shape of multiple spectral absorption features from a wide range of chemical species. This has been challenging given the precision and wavelength coverage of previous observatories. Here, we present the transmission spectrum of the Saturn-mass exoplanet WASP-39b obtained using the SOSS mode of the NIRISS instrument on the JWST. This spectrum spans 0.6−2.8μm in wavelength and reveals multiple water absorption bands, the potassium resonance doublet, as well as signatures of clouds. The precision and broad wavelength coverage of NIRISS-SOSS allows us to break model degeneracies between cloud properties and the atmospheric composition of WASP-39b, favoring a heavy element enhancement ("metallicity") of ∼10−30× the solar value, a sub-solar carbon-to-oxygen (C/O) ratio, and a solar-to-super-solar potassium-to-oxygen (K/O) ratio. The observations are best explained by wavelength-dependent, non-gray clouds with inhomogeneous coverage of the planet's terminator.</p>
The way forward with inclusive Open Science
<p>Presentation slides used during AAAS 2023 panel discussion session title: <a href="https://aaas.confex.com/aaas/2023/meetingapp.cgi/Session/30038">Foster Inclusion in Scientific Communities through Shared Data </a></p> <p>Synopsis:</p> <p>Over the past few years the scientific community has learned s=valuable lessons: It is stronger together; it must uplift one another in order to achieve scientific progress; and the best solutions are found when working together. But these lessons will be unable to spread very far unless all address the hesitancy in transitioning towards sharing data and results and the lack of applied experience with tools which make open collaboration easier. Transform to Open Science (TOPS) is a new National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Science Mission Directorate mission designed to spark a cultural shift to collaborative, inclusive science. Open science increases access to knowledge and expands opportunities for new voices to participate. Sharing the data, code, and knowledge associated with the scientific process lowers barriers to entry for historically-underrepresented communities, enables findings to be more easily reproduced, and generates new knowledge at scale. Success depends on everyone working to change the frameworks from which all operate. This session panel shows how open science is transformative and empowering for those who have traditionally been marginalized in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). The session highlights students and researchers of diverse backgrounds to share their open science experiences, including their foray into open science, barriers to practicing open science, and successes obtained through an open science framework.</p> <p>-----</p> <p>Abstract: <a href="https://aaas.confex.com/aaas/2023/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/31052">The way forward with inclusive Open Science</a></p> <p>Open science is an ethos behind communities that are intrinsically motivated to contribute to the greater good of humanity. Working openly is a way of building bridges with the larger scientific community creating more inclusive pathways for those looking to expand beyond their bounds. This in itself serves as a lifeline to many in marginalized communities, offering abundant opportunities for growth and development. Open science is not just for those who can, but also for those who can’t. </p>
Data supplement to "Overview of the Demonstration and Science Experiments (DSX) mission"
<p>Additional data supporting "Overview of the Demonstration and Science Experiments (DSX) mission", manuscript accepted to Journal of Geophysical Research.</p>
14 - Divergent versus Convergent Thinking in Science
<p>Session #14 of the REINFORCE Critical & Scientific Thinking course, entitled, 'Divergent versus Convergent Thinking in Science', is given by Stefano Gattei, Professor of Science in Society, at the University of Trento, Italy.</p> <p>During the session, Prof. Gattei explores the ideas of convergent and divergent thinking, and scientific revolutions and normal research, in the works of Thomas Kuhn.</p>
08 - Science as Falsification
<p>Session #8 of the REINFORCE Critical & Scientific Thinking course, entitled, 'Science as Falsification', is given by Stefano Gattei, Professor of Science in Society, at the University of Trento, Italy.</p> <p>During the session, Prof. Gattei covers Popper's criticisms of Logical Positivism and examines how the theories of Einstein, Marx and Adler provided rich grounds for their elaboration.</p>
06 - How to provide science with solid foundations...at the origins of critical thinking (Part 2)
<p>Session #6 of the REINFORCE Critical & Scientific Thinking course, entitled, 'How to provide science with solid foundations...at the origins of critical thinking (Part 1)', is given by Stefano Gattei, Professor of Science in Society, at the University of Trento, Italy.</p> <p>During the session, Prof. Gattei covers Wittgenstein, Logical Positivism and the life of the Vienna Circle.</p>
04 - What is this thing called science?
<p> </p> <p>Session #4 of the REINFORCE Critical & Scientific Thinking course, entitled, 'What is this thing called science?', is given by Stefano Gattei, Professor of Science in Society, at the University of Trento, Italy.</p> <p>In this session, Prof. Gattei, places the so-called Second Scientific Revolution in a historical context, exploring the key figures involved and building the foundations for the sessions to come.</p>
16 - Normal Science versus Extraordinary Science
<p>Session #16 of the REINFORCE Critical & Scientific Thinking course, entitled, 'Normal Science versus Extraordinary Science', is given by Stefano Gattei, Professor of Science in Society, at the University of Trento, Italy.</p> <p>During the session, Prof. Gattei continues to explore the works of Popper and Kuhn and their application to different aspects of science, focussing particularly on the ideas of Puzzles and Anomalies and the ways in which crises in science bring about scientific revolutions and, thus, new Paradigms.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.