Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,761
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.8.0
Dataset results
3,761 results for “phylogenetic relationships”
Figure 4 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of a new eschrichtiid genus (Cetacea: Mysticeti) from the Early Pliocene of northern Italy
Figure 4. Eschrichtioides gastaldii gen. nov., comb. nov.: vertex. See Anatomical abbreviations for explanation of lettering. Scale bar = 5 cm.
Figure 11 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of a new eschrichtiid genus (Cetacea: Mysticeti) from the Early Pliocene of northern Italy
Figure 11. Fifty-% majority-rule strict consensus bootstrap tree; tree statistics: CI, 0.568; RI, 0.7582; HI, 0.5173; Rescaled CI, 0.3659. Numbers above branch are bootstrap support values; numbers in bold are values higher than 80%.
Figure 2 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of a new eschrichtiid genus (Cetacea: Mysticeti) from the Early Pliocene of northern Italy
Figure 2. Eschrichtioides gastaldii gen. nov., comb. nov.: skull. A, dorsal view. B, right lateral view. C, ventral view. D, posterior view. Scale bar = 20 cm.
Figure 6 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 6. Time calibration using the program BEAST. The error bar on each node represents the 95% confidence interval calculated by the program. The column on the right shows the time slice of Isthmian closure (3.5–2.5 Mya; Coates & Obando, 1996). Pli + Ple: Pliocene + Pleistocene.
Figure 4 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 4. Strict consensus of three most parsimonious trees produced from 3373 aligned characters (TL = 3337; CI = 0.43; RI = 0.59) using maximum parsimony. Of these, 2315 are constant characters and 798 are potentially parsimony-informative. Numbers above and below branches are bootstrap (> 50%) and Bremer values, respectively.
Figure 3. A, the single most parsimonious tree derived from 2129 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 3. A, the single most parsimonious tree derived from 2129 aligned characters of mitochondrial genes (12S, 16S, cyt-b) (CI = 0.40; TL = 31; RI = 0.58) using maximum parsimony. Of these, 1229 characters are constant and 708 characters are parsimony-informative. Numbers above branches are bootstrap values and below are Bremer values. B, strict consensus of 96 trees generated from 1244 aligned characters of nuclear genes (Rag1 and Cmos) (CI = 0.82; TL = 205; RI = 0.84) using maximum parsimony. Of these, 1086 characters are constant and 90 are parsimonyinformative. Numbers above branches are bootstrap values and below are Bremer values.
Figure 2 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 2. Previous hypotheses regarding the position of Rhinoclemmys among geoemydids (upper cladograms) and the relationships among the species of the genus (lower cladograms). †Fossil taxon.
Figure 51 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 51. Left side of Weberian apparatus of Rhytiodus lauzannei, INPA 21604, 260 mm SL; lateral view, gap between basioccipital and centrum 1 indicates a post-mortem disassociation of these elements, claustrum, scaphium and intercalarium and tripus dislodged in illustrated specimen, positions of these elements in illustration based on Rhytiodus microlepis, USNM 389694, 91 mm SL.
Figure 43 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 43. Anterior portion of left suspensorium, Petulanos plicatus, USNM 225396, 95.3 mm SL; medial view, drawing reversed to place anterior at left.
Figure 36 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 36. Left upper and lower jaws, Laemolyta taeniata, USNM 280708, 72.9 mm SL; jaws spread wider in drawing of dissected specimen than typical in life.
Figure 29 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 29. Dentition of right premaxilla in (A) Leporellus vittatus, INHS 56128; (B) Hypomasticus mormyrops, FMNH 112963, margin of symphyseal tooth slightly damaged; (C) Hypomasticus despaxi, MCZ 56552; (D) Leporinus jatuncochi; INHS 38940, posterior portion of premaxilla damaged and missing; (E) Rhytiodus argenteofuscus, INHS 66082; (F) Schizodon fasciatus, FMNH 111351; (G) Sartor elongatus (paratype), INPA 1168; (H) Gnathodolus bidens, ANSP 159389; lateral view, scale bar = 200 Mm, images rotated to standardize orientation of premaxilla, anterior to right of image in A–C, to bottom-right in D–F and to bottom in G and H.
Figure 32 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 32. Dentition of right dentary in (A) Leporinus cf. moralesi, UMMZ 216435; (B) Abramites hypselonotus, FMNH 106574; (C) Anostomoides laticeps, INHS53677, posterior (fourth) tooth dislodged from socket; (D) Rhytiodus argenteofuscus, INHS 66082; (E) Schizodon fasciatus, FMNH 11135; (F) Pseudanos trimaculatus, FMNH 102122; medial view, scale bar = 200 Mm, images rotated to standardize orientation of dentary, anterior to left in A, B, D and E, to bottom left in C and to bottom in F.
Figure 27 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 27. Schematic drawings showing variation in relative depth of neurocrania in (A) Leporinus cf. friderici, INPA 21605, 167.3 mm SL; (B) Schizodon fasciatus, INPA 21606, 283 mm SL; (C) Rhytiodus lauzannei, INPA 21604, 260 mm SL; lateral views, drawings scaled to same length for ease of comparison.
Figure 26 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 26. Anterior portion of neurocranium of Petulanos plicatus, USNM 225396, 95.3 mm SL; ventral view.
Figure 23 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 23. Anterior portion of neurocranium of Hypomasticus megalepis, INHS 49387, 68.4 mm SL; ventral view.
Figure 22 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 22. Anterior portion of neurocranium of Gnathodolus bidens, USNM 389623, 71 mm SL; ventral view.
Figure 34 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 34. Left upper and lower jaws and anterior palatine arch, Hypomasticus mormyrops, USNM 318140, 104 mm SL; lateral view, jaws spread wider in drawing of dissected specimen than typical in life.
Figure 21 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 21. Anterior portion of neurocranium of Synaptolaemus cingulatus, USNM 389693, 99 mm SL; dorsal view.
Figure 31 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 31. Dentition of right dentary in (A) Leporellus vittatus, INHS 56128; (B) Hypomasticus despaxi, MCZ 56552; (C) Leporinus jatuncochi, INHS 38940; (D) Leporinus cf. fasciatus, FMNH 103450; (E) Laemolyta taeniata, INHS 61513; (F) Petulanos intermedius, INPA 15184; (G) Synaptolaemus cingulatus, FMNH 103455; (H) Sartor elongatus, INPA 1168; (I) Gnathodolus bidens, ANSP 159389; lateral view, scale bar = 200 Mm, images rotated to standardize orientation of dentary, anterior to top of image in A and B, to right in C and D, to bottom right in E–G, and to bottom in H and I.
Figure 20 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 20. Anterior portion of neurocranium of Schizodon fasciatus, INPA 21606, 283 mm SL; dorsal view.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.