Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

1,118

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

1,118 results for “subterranean biology”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo28/100

Figure 13 from: Katz AD, Taylor SJ, Soto-Adames FN, Addison A, Hoese GB, Sutton MR, Toulkeridis T (2016) New records and new species of springtails (Collembola: Entomobryidae, Paronellidae) from lava tubes of the Galápagos Islands (Ecuador). Subterranean Biology 17: 77-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7660

Figure 13 - Pseudosinella intermixta syntypes. A syntype specimen chosen for slide mount (INHS Acc. 567,409) B hind claw complex C detail of preservation condition of syntypes in ethanol D original labels in vial.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Katz AD, Taylor SJ, Soto-Adames FN, Addison A, Hoese GB, Sutton MR, Toulkeridis T (2016) New records and new species of springtails (Collembola: Entomobryidae, Paronellidae) from lava tubes of the Galápagos Islands (Ecuador). Subterranean Biology 17: 77-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7660

Figure 2 - A Drip pool in dark zone of Cueva Chato 2 (Santa Cruz Island, Galápagos Islands, Ecuador), where Pseudosinella vulcana sp. n. was collected from surface film. Photo by SJT, 15 March 2014 B Entrance of Cueva Cañón (Santa Cruz Island, Galápagos Islands, Ecuador), where Lepidocyrtus nigrosetosus was collected. Photo by SJT, 10 March 2014.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 10 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 10 - Scatterplots showing the relationship between stygofauna taxon richness per sample and different physico-chemical variables; In Figure 10 the scatterplots presented are based on available data in the Queensland Subterranean Aquatic Fauna database where: depth to groundwater is available for 113 samples in meters below ground level (mbgl); electrical conductivity is available for 137 samples in microSiemens per centimetre (μS/cm); pH is available for 130 samples; and temperature is available for 77 samples in degrees Celsius (°C).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 5 - Biogeography of described families in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 5 the total number of subregions a described family has been recorded inhabiting is indicated by numerical figures located to the right of the bars and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the y-axis.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 4 - Stygofauna discovery rates by lithology in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 4 the discovery rate of stygofauna is indicated by numerical figures located above the columns, the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the x-axis, and the average stygofauna discovery rate (28%) is plotted as a grey, dashed line.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 8 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 8 - Distribution of described families across different lithologies in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 8 the total number of lithologies is indicated by numerical figures located to the right of the bars and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the y-axis.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 7 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 7 - Diversity of described families across different lithologies in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 7 the total number of described families is indicated by numerical figures located above the columns and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the x-axis.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 6 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 6 - Diversity of described families in different IBRA subregions in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 6 the total number of described families is indicated by numerical figures located to the right of the bars and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the y-axis.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 9 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 9 - Comparison of systemic composition of described families from Australia and the World Average; In Figure 9 the systemic composition of described stygofauna families is compared between the Pilbara region (Western Australia, Australia) derived from Eberhard et al. (2005), Queensland (Australia), and the World Average derived from Eberhard et al. (2005).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 3 - Distribution of stygofauna sampling effort by lithology in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 3 the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located above the columns and the percentage of samples is indicated by numerical figures along the x-axis.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 2 - Outline map of Queensland, Australia highlighting the location of stygofauna sampling sites and other localities; In Figure 2 an outline map shows the location of all 582 stygofauna sampling sites and other key localities mentioned in the text (e.g. Bowen Basin, Murray–Darling Basin, Proserpine–Sarina Lowlands IBRA region).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 6 from: Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterranean Biology 17: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7298

Figure 6 - Human population density (2010 U.S. Census from the U.S. Census Bureau) by county with ranges for the eight Bactrurus species. For Bactrurus brachycaudus, Bactrurus hubrichti, and Bactrurus mucronatus, the range boundary has been interpreted as in Fig. 5.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterranean Biology 17: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7298

Figure 1 - Distribution of species of the genus Bactrurus (Amphipoda, Crangonyctidae) in relation to karst. Karst areas are based on Weary and Doctor (2014). Letters A–F (red arrows) are localities discussed in the body of the text.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterranean Biology 17: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7298

Figure 5 - Species ranges for the genus Bactrurus (Amphipoda, Crangonyctidae) in relation to pre-Pleistocene rivers of the mid-western United States. Shaded areas with thin dashed lines represent species ranges. For Bactrurus brachycaudus, Bactrurus hubrichti and Bactrurus mucronatus, the range boundary has been interpreted in light of these rivers. Heavy dashed line is maximum extent of Pleistocene glaciation.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterranean Biology 17: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7298

Figure 4 - Groundwater amphipod relationships modified after the maximum clade credibility diagram of Corrigan et al. (2014) with 95% highest posterior density intervals shown as gray bars, and with additional details of geological timeline following Cohen et al. (2013).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterranean Biology 17: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7298

Figure 3 - Land use within the ranges of the eight species of the genus Bactrurus. Based on the National Land Cover Database (Homer et al. 2015), collapsed into six categories (see Methods).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterranean Biology 17: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7298

Figure 2 - Distribution of species of the genus Bactrurus (Amphipoda, Crangonyctidae), overlain on a map of the maximum extent of Pleistocene glacial episodes derived from Fullerton et al. (2003). Letters A–F (red arrows) are localities discussed in the body of the text.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: de Ázara LN, Bernardi LFO, Ferreira RL (2016) The first survey on harvestmen in Brazilian artificial cavities, with notes on distribution and natural history. Subterranean Biology 17: 31-53. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.6762

Figure 2 - Artificial cavities in: A, B, C Alagoa D and E Padre Paraíso F Caraí G Mariana H São José da Safira I Caeté J Mariana.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: de Ázara LN, Bernardi LFO, Ferreira RL (2016) The first survey on harvestmen in Brazilian artificial cavities, with notes on distribution and natural history. Subterranean Biology 17: 31-53. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.6762

Figure 1 - Map of the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, showing the biomes and municipalities in which the artificial cavities are situated: a Alagoa b Ataléia c Caeté d Caraí e Mariana f Mateus Leme g Medina h Nova Lima i Novo Oriente de Minas j Ouro Preto k Padre Paraíso l São José da Safira m Vazante.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: de Ázara LN, Bernardi LFO, Ferreira RL (2016) The first survey on harvestmen in Brazilian artificial cavities, with notes on distribution and natural history. Subterranean Biology 17: 31-53. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.6762

Figure 5 - Mitogoniella mucuri inside the Túnel do Garrafão (Alagoa) A Female guarding eggs on the wall of the mine B Female guarding immatures on the wall of the mine.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record