Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,118
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,118 results for “subterranean biology”
Figure 2 from: Martin-Solano S, Toulkeridis T, Addison A, Pozo-Rivera WE (2016) Predation of Desmodus rotundus Geoffroy, 1810 (Phyllostomidae, Chiroptera) by Epicrates cenchria (Linnaeus, 1758) (Boidae, Reptilia) in an Ecuadorian Cave. Subterranean Biology 19: 41-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.19.8731
Figure 2 - A Rainbow Boa (Epicrates cenchria) maintains the prey in the mouth with the interest to make sure it is dead, elongated thumb with three typical bearings evidences the species of the Common Vampire Bat (Desmodus rotundus) B Epicrates cenchria releases the dead prey C Epicrates cenchria turns around Desmodus rotundus having the first attempt to swallow prey D Evidence of sex-age category of the prey, being a female adult; 2e: Starting the second constriction F After the second constriction Epicrates cenchria swallows almost entirely Desmodus rotundus G, H Prey is almost completely eaten except for the wings, but the three typical bearings can be seen on the thumb of Desmodus rotundus.
Figure 1 from: Martin-Solano S, Toulkeridis T, Addison A, Pozo-Rivera WE (2016) Predation of Desmodus rotundus Geoffroy, 1810 (Phyllostomidae, Chiroptera) by Epicrates cenchria (Linnaeus, 1758) (Boidae, Reptilia) in an Ecuadorian Cave. Subterranean Biology 19: 41-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.19.8731
Figure 1 - Location of Napo Province and Tena as well as Castillo cave. Map of Castillo Cave in which circles represent sites where boas have been observed in the floor and crosses where boas have been observed close to the roof of the cave. The easternmost site is the one described in the text.
Figure 6 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 6 - Spatial variations in relative abundance of main invertebrates groups along the gradient of subterranean environmental conditions. (X-axis: 0 — the cave entrance area, negative values — epigean zone, positive values — cave zone). A Cave Abrskila B Cave Golova Otapa.
Figure 1 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 1 - Map of the study regions of Abkhazia. Caves: 1 New Athos 2 Simona Kananita 3 Nizhnyaya Shakuranskaya 4 Srednyaya Shakuranskaya 5 Tsebel'dinskaya 6 Abrskila 7 Golova Otapa 8 Well Uapatyh 9 Well 85 m.
Figure 3 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 3 - Map of Cave Golova Otapa. Sampling stations marked by red points (accordingly Grigorjan 1973).
Figure 2 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 2 - Map of Cave Abrskila. Sampling stations marked by red points (accordingly Benze et al. 1965).
Figure 5 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 5 - Spatial variations in abundance and species richness of the fauna along the gradient of subterranean environmental conditions. (X-axis: 0 — the cave entrance area, negative values — epigean zone, positive values — cave zone). A Cave Abrskila B Cave Golova Otapa.
Figure 4 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 4 - Map of Cave New Athos. Sampling stations marked by red points (accordingly Abhastur 2009).
Figure 7 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 7 - Two-dimensional ordination with superimposed clusters of the stygobiotic faunas from different caves, based on Kulszinski similarity index. River valleys are shown by different colors. Caves: 1 New Athos 2 Simona Kananita 3 Nizhnyaya Shakuranskaya 4 Srednyaya Shakuranskaya 5 Tsebel'dinskaya 6 Abrskila 7 Golova Otapa 8 Well Uapatyh 9 Well 85 m.
Figure 2 from: Oliveira MPA, Bernardi LFO, Zeppelini D, Ferreira RL (2016) First report of cave springtail (Collembola, Paronellidae) parasitized by mite (Parasitengona, Microtrombidiidae). Subterranean Biology 17: 133-139. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.8451
Figure 2 - A Trogolaphysa sp. n. (Collembola: Paronellidae) parasitized by larvae of an unidentified Microtrombidiidae (Trombidiformes) species B Dorsal view of the mite on the springtail's head.
Figure 1 from: Oliveira MPA, Bernardi LFO, Zeppelini D, Ferreira RL (2016) First report of cave springtail (Collembola, Paronellidae) parasitized by mite (Parasitengona, Microtrombidiidae). Subterranean Biology 17: 133-139. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.8451
Figure 1 - A Location of the Clarabóias Cave (black point) in the Brazilian ferruginous area denominated Iron Quadrangle (red area) B General aspect of the cave interior.
Figure 3 from: Pellegrini TG, Sales LP, Aguiar P, Ferreira RL (2016) Linking spatial scale dependence of land-use descriptors and invertebrate cave community composition. Subterranean Biology 18: 17-38. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8335
Figure 3 - Detailed figure of Gruta Helictites showing different land uses within the 50, 100 and 250 m buffers.
Figure 2 from: Pellegrini TG, Sales LP, Aguiar P, Ferreira RL (2016) Linking spatial scale dependence of land-use descriptors and invertebrate cave community composition. Subterranean Biology 18: 17-38. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8335
Figure 2 - Study area location, sampling design used in sampled caves at "Parque Estadual do Sumidouro", and the Buffers of 50m, 100m, and 250m for analyzing the effect of spatial scale on the explanatory power of environmental variables in the cave invertebrate communities.
Figure 1 from: Pellegrini TG, Sales LP, Aguiar P, Ferreira RL (2016) Linking spatial scale dependence of land-use descriptors and invertebrate cave community composition. Subterranean Biology 18: 17-38. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8335
Figure 1 - Spatial characterization of landscape at "Parque Estadual do Sumidouro". Different colors represent distinct vegetation cover or land-use types. The numbers indicate the sampled caves, indicated by name. Legend: 1 Gruta Ninho de Pérolas 2 Gruta Macaco das Cavernas 3 Lapa da Várzea 4 Gruta do Grilão 5 Gruta Helictites 6 Lapa das Pacas 7 Gruta do Sumidouro 8 Gruta Lagoa Seca 9 Gruta do Feneme 10 Gruta do Lixo.
Figure 2 from: Rasoloariniaina JR, Ganzhorn JU, Riemann JC, Raminosoa N (2016) Water quality and biotic interaction of two cavefish species: Typhleotris madagascariensis Petit, 1933 and Typhleotris mararybe Sparks & Chakrabarty, 2012, in the Mahafaly Plateau groundwater system, Madagascar. Subterranean Biology 18: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8321
Figure 2 - Significant relationships between the abundance of Typhleotris madagascariensis and Typhleotris mararybe and water characteristics.
Figure 4 from: Souza Silva M, Ferreira RL (2016) The first two hotspots of subterranean biodiversity in South America. Subterranean Biology 19: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.19.8207
Figure 4 - Species accumulation curves for the two Brazilian hotspots. The time-scale do not present regular intervals. Such curves were performed considering both data from literature and the new records here presented.
Figure 1 from: Souza Silva M, Ferreira RL (2016) The first two hotspots of subterranean biodiversity in South America. Subterranean Biology 19: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.19.8207
Figure 1 - Areias cave system (F, G) in the Atlantic Rain Forest (C) and Toca do Gonçalo Cave (A, D, E) in Caatinga (B). Photos F and G by Daniel Menin.
Figure 3 from: Souza Silva M, Ferreira RL (2016) The first two hotspots of subterranean biodiversity in South America. Subterranean Biology 19: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.19.8207
Figure 3 - Some of the stygobiotic and troglobitic species in Toca do Gonçalo. Rhandiopsis sp. n. (A), Spelaeogamarus trajanoae (B), Phalangopsidae sp. n. (C), Coarazuphium caatinga (D), Lygromma sp. n. (E), Scleropactidae sp. n. (F), Newportia spelaea (G), Clivinina sp. n. (H), Pongycarcinia xyphidiorus (I), Allokoenenia sp. n. (J), Rotadiscus sp. n. (K), Cthoniidae sp. n. (L), Geophilomorpha sp. n. (M), Nicoletiidae sp. n. (N).
Figure 2 from: Souza Silva M, Ferreira RL (2016) The first two hotspots of subterranean biodiversity in South America. Subterranean Biology 19: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.19.8207
Figure 2 - Some of the stygobiotic and troglobitic species in Areias cave system, São Paulo, Brazil. Pimelodella kronei (A), Pachylospeleus strinatii (B), Pseudochthonius strinatii (C), Ideoroncus cavicola (D), Pselaphidae sp. n. (E), Spelaeobochica muchmorei (F), Hahniidae sp. n. (G) Cryptodesmus spn (H), Schizogenius ocelatus (I), Cryptops iporangensis (J), Potamolithus troglobius (K), Crypturodesmus spn (L), Leodesmus yporangae (M), Hyallela epikarstica (N), Aegla cavernicola (O), Peridontodesmella sp. (P).
Figure 1 from: Esmaeili-Rineh S, Akmali V, FathipourF, Heidari N, Rastegar-Pouyani N (2016) New distribution records of cave-dwelling gekkonid lizards (Sauria, Gekkonidae and Phyllodactylidae) in the Zagros Mountains of Iran. Subterranean Biology 18: 39-47. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8185
Figure 1 - Location of the visited caves in the Zagros Mountains. (Numbers show caves: 1 Asmari 2 Bendirh 3 Dalaki 4 Darhamreh 5 Gavbar 6 Ghadah 7 Ban 8 Khesht 9 Kulkani 10 Manian 11 Pelazh 12 Sangeshkan 13 Tadovan 14 Taigeh 15 Zarinabad).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.