Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
96
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
96 results for “ANN”
Drinking Fountain St Anne's Soho
Drinking fountain in St Anne's Churchyard on Wardour Street, London. Date: 1890 Photos taken in December 2018 with a Sony a6000 and processed in Agisoft Photoscan. It had been raining. http://www.mdfcta.co.uk/details-f/f118.html Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
The application performance of the ANN model in the ECS shelf
<p>In order to retrieve pH on the ECS shelf, the monthly T, S, DO, N, P and Si from the Changjiang Biology Finite-Volume Coastal Ocean Model (FVCOM) Data were applied to the ANN model as the input variables. Monthly pH for the period 2000-2016 was obtained at the spatial resolution of the Changjiang Biology FVCOM output: 1-10 165 km in the horizontal, 10 depth levels in the vertical, and 12 months. We compared retrieved pH with the corresponding observations at some sites repeated sampling for 3 to 4 years in order to evaluate the application performance of the ANN model. These sites were A1-5 (123.0140°E, 32.2145°N), A1-6 (123.2750°E, 32.2679°N), A6-7 (122.9880°E, 30.7050°N), A6-9 (123.4990°E, 30.5723°N), A7-5 (123.4990°E, 30.2523°N), and A8-5 (123.4930°E, 29.9940°N). Additionally, we further compared retrieved pH using the Changjiang Biology FVCOM Data with retrieved pH using measured T, S and DO, and in situ measured pH values.</p>
Chapelle Sainte-Anne
Chapelle du XIXème situé à 1750m d'altitude dans le vallon du Parpaillon sur la commune de La Condamine Châtelard (04) avec sa petite fontaine qui coule quasi toute l'année. Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Statue of Anne Frank
# **Statue of Anne Frank** Statue of Anne Frank in Light Horse Park, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
ANNE Sensor Monitoring in Cystic Fibrosis
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05941832. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ANNE Vital Sign System Remote Sleep Assessment
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05669495. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Effect of ANNE One-Wellue Device Array Use on Staff Bedside Vital Sign Measurement Activity
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06995742. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ANN for Paris curve under mode I fatigue delamination
<p>This publication provides the data set for quasi-static delamination (pre-cracking) and under Mode I fatigue delamination, including raw data, crack length images and post-processed data, and the scripts for data processing and ANN modelling. For each data we provide the CHADA to document the material characterisation.</p> <p>The research was funded by the European Union under GA No. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794424005162?via%3Dihub#gp015">101091409</a> (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794424005162?via%3Dihub#gp015">D-STANDART</a>). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.</p> <p> </p>
Épave du Queen Anne's Revenge - Bouteille 2
Bouteille à alcool découverte dans l'épave du Queen Anne's Revenge, au large de Beaufort en Caroline du Nord. Sa forme est appelée "glass onion bottle" et est caractéristique du début du XVIIIème siècle. **Modélisation inspirée** par une photo du site officiel : [Glass Onion Bottle](https://www.qaronline.org/conservation/artifacts/sustenance/glass-onion-bottle) Liquor glass onion bottle found in the Queen Anne's Revenge shipwreck, Beaufort, N.C. This bottle is characteristic of the start of the 18th century. **Modelisation inspired** by a photo of the official website : [Glass Onion Bottle](https://www.qaronline.org/conservation/artifacts/sustenance/glass-onion-bottle) https://www.qaronline.org/ Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Ngee Ann City Stone Lion
Ngee Ann City Stone Lion Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Data set from the article Settembrini AM, Mazzaccaro D, Modafferi A, Righini P, Malacrida G, Nano G. Carotid artery stenting in the elderly. Are there differences between open and closed cell stents? Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:106-110. PMID: 31182697.
<p>data set from the article Settembrini AM, Mazzaccaro D, Modafferi A, Righini P, Malacrida G, Nano G. Carotid artery stenting in the elderly. Are there differences between open and closed cell stents? Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:106-110. PMID: 31182697.</p> <p>This is the abstract</p> <p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We reviewed our experience of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients older than 75 years treated with open or closed cell stents. The aim of our paper is to evaluate if there are differences between the two groups in term of clinical outcomes, neurological impairment and survival.</p> <p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>CAS consecutively performed from March 2000 and December 2016 in elderly patients were rectrospectively collected. We classified them into two groups: closed cells (group A) and open cells stent (group B). Perioperative and long term events were observed (death, major cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events, in-stent restenosis).</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 429 CAS, 259 (60.37%) male with median age of 79 years (range 77-82). Group A collects 247 (57.98%) patients, 142 (33.3%) in group B. The other 40 patients were treated with hybrid stents or just ballooning. In perioperative period we had not death but 2 patients (0.8%) in group A had a transient ischemic attack (TIA) due to immediate stent thrombosis, 2 patients (1 per group) had an ipsilateral major stroke and 8 patients had a TIA (3 in group A and 5 in group B). Median follow up was 686 days (IQR 267-1299 days). Freedom from complications at 12, 36 and 60 months was 99.4 ± 0.5%, 97 ± 1.5% and 90.08 ± 4.3% respectively. Survival at 12, 36 and 60 months was 77.4 ± 7.5%, 51.6 ± 8.9% and 16.1± 6.6% respectively.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data show CAS as a safe procedure also for people older than 75 years in terms of perioperative and long term complications and cerebral events without any significant difference between the different type of stent. Further studies are requested to better clarify its role in symptomatic patients.</p>
Data set from the article Mazzaccaro D, Muzzarelli L, Modafferi A, Nano G. Sizes of endografts for endovascular aortic repair: do few fit most? Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:287-291. PMID: 31657351.
<p>Data set from the article Mazzaccaro D, Muzzarelli L, Modafferi A, Nano G. Sizes of endografts for endovascular aortic repair: do few fit most? Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:287-291. PMID: 31657351.</p> <p> </p> <p>This is the abstract</p> <p><strong>Aim: </strong> The endoprostheses for the endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), are currently available in many sizes in reference to the aortic diameters of the proximal neck, but often not all of them are really used. Aim of our work was to review in our experience the most frequent proximal aortic diameters of main bodies that were used, among all those available for EVAR, with respect to the native proximal aortic neck.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong> All the sizes of main bodies of the different endografts used for EVAR from 2000 to 2016 were retrospectively counted. For each endograft, we calculated the number of times each size of main bodies' proximal diameter was used. The mean diameter of the proximal aortic neck was also calculated for each group of main bodies.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong> From 2000 to 2016, 607 patients underwent EVAR for infrarenal AAA. Overall, mean diameter of the proximal aortic neck was 23.4 ± 0.5 mm (median 23.1 mm, IQR 22.2-23.7 mm). The most frequently used main bodies had a 28 mm, 26 mm and 25 mm proximal diameter (161/607, 26.5%; 147/607, 24.2%; 122/607, 20.1% respectively), for a mean proximal neck diameter of 23.2 ± 0.5 mm, 22.2 ± 0.4 mm and 22.1 ± 0.2 respectively. The least frequently used main bodies had a 21 mm and a 36 mm proximal diameter (3/607 times each, 0.5%), for a mean proximal neck diameter of 18.1 ± 0.2 mm and 32.4 ± 0.8 mm respectively.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> In our experience, the most frequently used main bodies had a 25, 26 and 28 mm proximal diameters.</p>
Data set from Nano G, Muzzarelli L, Malacrida G, Righini PC, Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Mazzaccaro D. Endovascular repair of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions. Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:191-200. PMID: 31354152.
<p>Data set from Nano G, Muzzarelli L, Malacrida G, Righini PC, Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Mazzaccaro D. Endovascular repair of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions. Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:191-200. PMID: 31354152.</p> <p> </p> <p>This is the abstract:</p> <p><strong>Background: </strong> We report our "real-world" experience of endovascular repair of thoracic/thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions in patients treated from May 2002 to May 2017.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong> Data of all consecutive treated patients were retrospectively collected in a database and analyzed. Patients were divided into 4 groups: atherosclerotic thoracic/thoraco-abdominal aneurysms (TAA/TAAA) and floating thrombus (group A); acute complicated type B dissection (TBD), penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU) and intra-mural hematomas (IMH) in group B; chronic TBD evolving in TAA (group C); traumatic injuries (group D). Mortality, reinterventions and occurrence of neurological complications, both at 30 days and in the long term, were analyzed as primary outcomes for each group.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong> Ninety-four patients were treated complessively, most for a TAA (55.3%). Thirty-days deaths and neurological complications were observed in group A only (5 cases each, 5.3%). A reintervention was necessary in 6 patients (6.4%) of group A. At 5 years, in group A survival was 62.8%±6.3% and freedom from neurological complication was 88.3%±4.2%. Neither deaths nor neurological complications were recorded in the other groups. No late aortic ruptures were recorded. Freedom from reintervention in group A was 54.7%±7.6% at 5 years and a reintervention was needed in all patients of group D. Overall, the main cause for reintervention was a type I endoleak.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> The endovascular repair of thoracic/thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions had acceptable mortality and neurological complication rates, both at 30 days and in the long term. Reinterventions in the long term occurred more frequently after TAA/TAAA and traumatic injuries, and were mainly required for a type I endoleak.</p> <p> </p>
Data set and 3d model from Emendi M, Sturla F, Ghosh RP, Bianchi M, Piatti F, Pluchinotta FR, Giese D, Lombardi M, Redaelli A, Bluestein D. Patient-Specific Bicuspid Aortic Valve Biomechanics: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Integrated Fluid-Structure Interaction Approach. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Aug 17. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02571-4. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32804291.
<p>Data set and 3d model from Emendi M, Sturla F, Ghosh RP, Bianchi M, Piatti F, Pluchinotta FR, Giese D, Lombardi M, Redaelli A, Bluestein D. Patient-Specific Bicuspid Aortic Valve Biomechanics: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Integrated Fluid-Structure Interaction Approach. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Aug 17. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02571-4. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32804291.</p> <p> </p> <p>This is the abstract:</p> <p>Congenital bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) consists of two fused cusps and represents a major risk factor for calcific valvular stenosis. Herein, a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) BAV model was developed from patient-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compared against in vivo 4-dimensional flow MRI (4D Flow). FSI simulation compared well with 4D Flow, confirming direction and magnitude of the flow jet impinging onto the aortic wall as well as location and extension of secondary flows and vortices developing at systole: the systolic flow jet originating from an elliptical 1.6 cm<sup>2</sup> orifice reached a peak velocity of 252.2 cm/s, 0.6% lower than 4D Flow, progressively impinging on the ascending aorta convexity. The FSI model predicted a peak flow rate of 22.4 L/min, 6.7% higher than 4D Flow, and provided BAV leaflets mechanical and flow-induced shear stresses, not directly attainable from MRI. At systole, the ventricular side of the non-fused leaflet revealed the highest wall shear stress (WSS) average magnitude, up to 14.6 Pa along the free margin, with WSS progressively decreasing towards the belly. During diastole, the aortic side of the fused leaflet exhibited the highest diastolic maximum principal stress, up to 322 kPa within the attachment region. Systematic comparison with ground-truth non-invasive MRI can improve the computational model ability to reproduce native BAV hemodynamics and biomechanical response more realistically, and shed light on their role in BAV patients' risk for developing complications; this approach may further contribute to the validation of advanced FSI simulations designed to assess BAV biomechanics.</p> <p> </p>
Data set from Varrica A, Caldaroni F, Saitto G, Satriano A, Lo Rito M, Chiarello C, Ranucci M, Frigiola A, Giamberti A. Outcomes and Quality of Life After Ross Reintervention: Would You Make the Same Choice Again? Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jul;110(1):214-220. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Nov 23. PMID: 31770502.
<p>Data set from Varrica A, Caldaroni F, Saitto G, Satriano A, Lo Rito M, Chiarello C, Ranucci M, Frigiola A, Giamberti A. Outcomes and Quality of Life After Ross Reintervention: Would You Make the Same Choice Again? Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jul;110(1):214-220. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Nov 23. PMID: 31770502</p> <p> </p> <p>This is the abstract:</p> <p><strong>Background: </strong>The Ross procedure was introduced as a long-term if not definitive solution for aortic pathology. However, the rate of reoperation is not negligible.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center prospective study assessed the general outcome of Ross reoperation and patients' perceived quality of life compared with 2 control groups (Ross non-reoperation and mechanical aortic valve replacement). Patient's preference regarding the choice between mechanical aortic valve and Ross procedure was investigated in a subgroup that could theoretically have been directed to either of the 2 procedures.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2005 and 2017, 64 consecutive patients underwent reoperation after Ross. Median age was 31 years. Median freedom from reoperation after the Ross procedure was 136 months. An autograft reoperation was required in 49, and 25 had homograft failure. No in-hospital death was recorded. Mean follow-up was 77 months (range, 6-164 months). Quality of life was assessed with the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire. The Ross reoperation group showed a lower score involving psychological concerns compared with the other groups. In the reoperated-on patients group, 52 had adequate aortic annulus dimensions to receive a prosthetic valve instead of a Ross procedure. When asked whether they would make the same choice, only 31% confirmed the preference.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reoperations after Ross procedure have low mortality and morbidity. Long-term follow-up showed a high quality of life, even after reoperations. However, owing to psychological concerns after the redo operation, when choosing a Ross procedure, it is our duty to thoroughly explain to patients that a high level of disillusion is predictable in case of reoperations.</p>
dataset ANN
<p>287 data points</p> <p><strong>meaning of each excel sheet:</strong></p> <p>IN - input variable values for each data point (each data point is one row) </p> <p>TARGET - target variable values for each data point (each data point is one row) </p> <p>VARS - presents the units used for each input (independent) and output/target (dependent) variables</p> <p>TARGET vs OUTPUT - presents the 287 expected (experimental) values and the ones obtained by the proposed ANN</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Check reference below</strong> (to be added when the paper is published)</p> <p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329282738_14_Neural_Networks_-_Shear_Capacity_-_One-Way_RC_Slabs">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329282738_14_Neural_Networks_-_Shear_Capacity_-_One-Way_RC_Slabs</a></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.