Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
921
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
921 results for “Centipede”
Figure 3 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)
Figure 3. Canonical variates ordination of gonopod shape data for genera as assessed by landmark data and relative warps analysis. Only the first two canonical variate axes are shown. Together these account for 91.41% of the observed between-group shape variation. However, because only three relative warp axes accounted for 95% of the observed shape variation, only three canonical variate axes could be specified. Cross-tabulation analysis of these results (Table 1) indicated that over 80% of the sample can be assigned to the correct genus.
Figure 7 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 7. Microscopic images of a female specimen of Stenotaenia sturanyi (Attems, 1903) from Xiropotamos near Drama (Greece: Macedonia) (58-mm long, with 111 leg-bearing segments; 10-IV-1993, Beron lg, collection Natn. Mus. Nat. Hist., Bulgarian Acad. Sci., Sofia): (a) head, ventral; (b) clypeus and maxillary complex, ventral; (c) sternum of leg-bearing segment X; (d) forcipular segment, ventral.
Figure 6 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 6. Microscopic images of a female specimen of Stenotaenia sorrentina (Attems, 1903) from Palmarola Island (Italy: Tyrrhenian Sea) (23-mm long, with 61 leg-bearing segments; 3-IV-1966 Consiglio lg, collection A. Minelli): (a) head, ventral; (b) clypeus and maxillary complex, ventral; (c) sternum of leg-bearing segment X; (d) forcipular segment, ventral.
Figure 4 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 4. Microscopic images of a female specimen of Stenotaenia frenum (Meinert, 1870) from Baie de Tamanart (Algeria) (28-mm long, with 81 leg-bearing segments; 7-XI-1984, collection A. Minelli): (a) head, ventral; (b) clypeus and maxillary complex, ventral; (c) sternum of leg-bearing segment X; (d) forcipular segment, ventral. Abbreviations: ch, chitin line; cl, clypeus; co, condyle of forcipular coxosternum; cx, forcipular coxosternum; fb, forcipular basal article; fi, forcipular intermediate articles; ft, forcipular tarsungulum; la, labrum; pc, forcipular pleurocoxal margins; t1, telopodite of first maxillae; t2, telopodite of second maxillae.
Figure 2 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 2. Geographical distribution of Stenotaenia species. The previously published and new records have been plotted upon a grid of 30′ latitude ¥ 30′ longitude. The type localities of all nominal taxa are indicated by circles (full circles for valid species, empty circles for synonyms), with the following abbreviations: ab, abbreviatus; ac, acuneli; al, albanensis; an, antecribellatus; as, asiaeminoris; bo, bosporanus; br, brevicornis; c, caldarium; cr, cribelliger; fi, fimbriatus; ff, forficularius; fv, foveolatus; fr, frenum; gi, giljarovi; gr, graecus; li, linearis; na, naxius; or, ormanyensis; pl, palaestinus; po, polyporus; pp, palpiger; rh, rhodopensis; ro, romanus; sl, silvestrii; sm, simplex; so, sorrentinus; st, sturanyi.
Figure 3 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 3. Geographical distribution of Stenotaenia frenum, Stenotaenia romana, and Stenotaenia sturanyi. Both previously published and new records have been plotted upon a grid of 30′ latitude ¥ 30′ longitude.
Figure 1 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 1. Main differential characters between Stenotaenia and related genera to which species of Stenotaenia have been assigned, to date. Drawings represent the type species of each genus (see Table 1): A, forcipular segment, ventral; B, sternum at about one third of the length of the trunk, ventral; C, last leg-bearing segment and terminal segments in the female, ventral. Abbreviations: ch, chitin line; co, condyle of forcipular coxosternum; cs, 'carpophagus' socket; cx, forcipular coxosternum; fb, forcipular basal article; fi, forcipular intermediate articles; ft, forcipular tarsungulum; go, gonopods; lc, claw of last leg; ls, sternum of last leg-bearing segment; op, openings of coxal glands; pc, forcipular pleurocoxal margin; po, sternal pore area.
Figure 5 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 5. Microscopic images of a female specimen of Stenotaenia romana (Silvestri, 1895) from Isola del Cantone near Genova (Italy: Liguria) (12-mm long, with 47 leg-bearing segments; 5-XI-1978 Gardini lg, collection A. Minelli): (a) head, ventral; (b) clypeus and maxillary complex, ventral; (c) sternum of leg-bearing segment X; (d) forcipular segment, ventral.
Fig. 6 in Brooding behaviour of the centipede Otostigmus spinosus Porat, 1876 (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha: Scolopendridae) and its morphological variability in Thailand
Fig. 6. Variability in taxonomic characters in Otostigmus spinosus Porat, 1876 (examination materials: CUMZ 00224, Wat Tham Wararam, Phanom district, Surat Thani; CUMZ 00229, Tham Wang Thong, Phatthalung; CUMZ 00231, Surin Islands, Phang-nga). A, Ventral view of cephalic plate and antenna; B, Dorsal view of cephalic plate and antenna; C, Coxosternite; D–F, Variation in coxosternal teeth; G, Surface of TT5–7; H, Variability of depressions on surface of sternites 5–7; I, Leg 20 with projection on distal end of tarsus 1; J, Leg 21 with projection on tarsus 1; K, Ultimate leg-bearing segment, ventral view, with arrangement of ventral spines on prefemur of ultimate legs; L, Tergite of ultimate leg-bearing segment with arrangement of dorsal and corner spines on prefemur of ultimate legs; M, Pore field on coxopleuron (left).
Fig. 5. Otostigmus spinosus Porat, 1876 in Brooding behaviour of the centipede Otostigmus spinosus Porat, 1876 (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha: Scolopendridae) and its morphological variability in Thailand
Fig. 5. Otostigmus spinosus Porat, 1876. Light photographs of specimens from southern Thailand (Fig. A–E; specimens from Surin Islands, Phang-nga province: CUMZ 00231; Fig. I–N; specimens from Wat Tham Wararam, Surat Thani province: CUMZ 00224). A, Cephalic plate and T1 with first pair of locomotory legs; B, Forcipular segment; C, Antenna with cephalic plate and TT1–5; D, Tergites 9–10; E, Sternites 9–10; F–H. Spiracles on segments 3, 5 and 8, respectively; I, Tergite and sternite of ultimate-leg bearing segment; J, Pore field on left and right coxopleura; K, Dorsal view of ultimate leg prefemur; L, Ventral view of ultimate leg prefemur; M–N, Leg 20 left and right with spine on distal part of prefemora.
Figs 1–6 in Studies on centipede communities (Chilopoda) from three habitats in Toledo Province, Spain
Figs 1–6. Monthly densities of Chilopoda captured. 1. Through edaphic probes in riverside plot. Mean density standard error for the whole sampling period. 2. Through edaphic probes in rural plot. Mean density standard error of the whole sampling period. 3. Through edaphic probes in green oak forest plot. Mean density standard error of the whole sampling period. 4. Through direct capture in riverside plot. Mean density standard error of the whole sampling period. 5. Through direct capture in rural plot. Mean density standard error of the whole sampling period. 6. Through direct capture in green oak forest plot. Mean density standard error of the whole sampling period.
Fig. 1 in Species distribution and assemblages of centipedes (Chilopoda) in open xeric sites of Saxony-Anhalt (Germany)
Fig. 1. Locations of study sites. Abbr.: xeric meadows (XM) – FW, Fscha, KK 1, AA, AT, Bi 1, CH 2, EP, SH, BH, Ha 5; mesoxeric meadows (SMM) – Bi 2, Zy, Ha 1, ha 2, ha 3, MTha, ZHei, SBe, SoTr 2, Rü 1, Rü 2, Rü 3, Kö 3, UF 2, UF 3, UF 4, NG, NBG, SBG, TT 1, TT 2; grasslands contaminated by heavy metal (HMG) – Eck 1, Eck 2, Wi, Wo; draw shrub heaths (DSH) – FK 2, FK 3, KB, CH 1, Ha 6, Kö 1, Kö 2, UF 1; advanced succession sites (ASS) – SoGZ 1, SoGO 3, SoGU 4, SoVW 5, Ha 4.
Fig. 4 in Four-year development of a centipede (Chilopoda) community after a summer flood
Fig. 4. Comparison of mean endogeic density of centipedes (mean for vegetation season) in studied forests with densities from other floodplain forests. a: Floodplain forest in Litovelské Pomoraví PLA (Piz˘l & Tajovský 1998). b: Floodplain forest in Danube River basin (Gulic˘ka 1960). c: Floodproof floodplain forest near the confluence of Morava River and Dyje River (Tajovsky´ 1999). d: Floodplain forest in Litovelské Pomoraví PLA (Piz˘l & Tajovský 1998). e: Floodplain forest with regular short spring floods (Tajovsky´ 1999). f: Floodplain forest with long-term spring floods (Tajovský 1999). g: Floodplain forest shortly after summer flood (Piz˘l & Tajovský 1998). h: Floodplain forest shortly after summer flood (Piz˘l & Tajovský 1998).
Figs 1–7 in The scolopendromorph centipedes (Chilopoda) of Taiwan
Figs 1–7. Characteristics of Scolopendra species. 1–3. S. morsitans Linnaeus, 1758. 1. General body form and coloration. 2. End legs dorsally flattened and with swollen margins. 3. Prefemur of end legs with three rows of nine ventral spines. 4–5. S. multidens Newport, 1844. 4. Head region, showing large punctures. 6–7. S. subspinipes mutilans L. Koch, 1878. 6. Yellow-leg form. 7. Red-leg form.
Figs 8–15 in The scolopendromorph centipedes (Chilopoda) of Taiwan
Figs 8–15. Characteristics of Scolopendra, Rhysida and Otostigmus species: 8. S. subspinipes mutilans L. Koch, 1878: pair of small genital appendages. 9. S. subspinipes subspinipes Leach, 1815: general body coloration and form. 10–11. R. longipes longipes (Newport, 1845). 10. Spiracle with raised bumps. 11. Tergites 7–8 (marginate laterally). 12. R. nuda immarginata (Porat, 1876): coxalpleural process and end legs. 13. O. aculeatus Haase, 1887: end legs. 14. O. scaber Porat, 1876: tergites 17–19. 15. O. astenus (Kohlrausch, 1881): last sternite and end legs.
Figs 16–20 in The scolopendromorph centipedes (Chilopoda) of Taiwan
Figs 16–20. Characters of Cryptops and Scolopocryptops species. 16. C. japonicus Takakuwa, 1934: end leg. 17. S. capillipedatus (Takakuwa, 1938): end legs. 18. S. melanostomus melanostomus Newport, 1845: coxopleural process. 19. S. rubiginosus (L. Koch, 1878): coxopleural process. 20. S. curtus (Takakuwa, 1939): coxopleural process.
Map 6 in The scolopendromorph centipedes (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha) of Tunisia: taxonomy, distribution and habitats
Map 6. Distribution of C. punicus in Tunisia.
Map 5 in The scolopendromorph centipedes (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha) of Tunisia: taxonomy, distribution and habitats
Map 5. Distribution of C. trisulcatus in Tunisia.
Map 4 in The scolopendromorph centipedes (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha) of Tunisia: taxonomy, distribution and habitats
Map 4. Distribution of O. spinicaudus in Tunisia. The Matmata record is marked with an arrow.
Map 3 in The scolopendromorph centipedes (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha) of Tunisia: taxonomy, distribution and habitats
Map 3. Distribution of C. gervaisianus in Tunisia.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.