Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2021View details →

Fig. 6 in A new riparian Andean Potamites (Reptilia, Squamata, Gymnophtalmidae) from El Sira Mountains, central Peru, with comments on P. ecpleopus Cope 1875, and on the taxonomy and biogeography of Potamites

Fig. 6. Panoramic view of the primary forest on the mountains of the type locality of Potamites hydroimperator sp. nov. in El Sira Communal Reserve.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2021View details →

Fig. 5 in A new riparian Andean Potamites (Reptilia, Squamata, Gymnophtalmidae) from El Sira Mountains, central Peru, with comments on P. ecpleopus Cope 1875, and on the taxonomy and biogeography of Potamites

Fig. 5. Coloration in life of males of all species of Potamites Doan & Castoe, 2005 ocurrying in Peru. A–B. P. hydroimperator sp. nov. (CORBIDI 14468). C–D. P. ecpleopus Cope, 1875 (CORBIDI 9516). E–F. P. erythrocularis Chávez & Catenazzi, 2014 (MUSM 30260). G–H. P.juruazensis Avila-Pires & Vitt, 2001 (CORBIDI 15504). I–J. P. montanicola Chávez & Vasquez, 2012 (CORBIDI 10596). K–L. P. strangulatus Cope, 1868 (CORBIDI 11415). M–N. P. trachodus Uzzell, 1966 (CORBIDI 15515). Photographs by Germán Chávez (A–B, G–J, M–N) and Alessandro Catenazzi (C–F, K–L).

Figures 15–22 in Parajulid milliped studies XII: Initial assessment of Ptyoiulus Cook 1895 and neotype designations for Julus impressus Say 1821 and J. montanus Cope 1869 (Diplopoda: Julida)

Figures 15–22. Gonopodal variation in P. montanus. 15) Distal extremity of right anterior gonopod of male from Montgomery Co., Virginia, caudal view. 16) The same of male from Tishomingo Co., Mississippi. 17) The same of male from DeKalb Co., Georgia. 18) The same of male from Craighead Co., Arkansas. 19) The same of male from Clay Co., Arkansas. 20) Right posterior gonopod of male from Mason Co., Tennessee, lateral view. 21) The same of male from Tishomingo Co., Mississippi. 22) The same of male from Montgomery Co., Virginia. Abbreviations as in Fig. 5–6.

Figures 7–13 in Parajulid milliped studies XII: Initial assessment of Ptyoiulus Cook 1895 and neotype designations for Julus impressus Say 1821 and J. montanus Cope 1869 (Diplopoda: Julida)

Figures 7–13. Gonopodal variation in P. impressus. 7) Distal extremity of right anterior gonopod of neotype, caudal view. 8) The same of male from Rabun Co., Georgia. 9) The same of male from Liberty Co., Florida. 10) The same of male from Leon Co., Florida. 11) The same of male from Greene Co., Arkansas. 12) Right posterior gonopod of male from Rabun Co., Georgia, lateral view. 13) The same of male from Greene Co., Arkansas. Abbreviations as in Fig. 5–6.

Figure 14 in Parajulid milliped studies XII: Initial assessment of Ptyoiulus Cook 1895 and neotype designations for Julus impressus Say 1821 and J. montanus Cope 1869 (Diplopoda: Julida)

Figure 14. Distributions of species of Ptyoiulus. Black dots, P. impressus. Open black circle in southeastern Pennsylvania, denoted by the black arrow, is the neotype locality. Red dots, P. montanus. Open red circle in central North Carolina, denoted by the red arrow, is the neotype locality. Blue dots, geographically significant samples lacking adult males and presently unidentifiable to species.

Figures 5–6. Ptyoiulus spp. anterior gonopods, caudal views. 5 in Parajulid milliped studies XII: Initial assessment of Ptyoiulus Cook 1895 and neotype designations for Julus impressus Say 1821 and J. montanus Cope 1869 (Diplopoda: Julida)

Figures 5–6. Ptyoiulus spp. anterior gonopods, caudal views. 5) P. impressus. 6) P. montanus. at, anterior gonopod telopodite; ca, calyx; cp, coxal process stem.

Figure 4 in Parajulid milliped studies XII: Initial assessment of Ptyoiulus Cook 1895 and neotype designations for Julus impressus Say 1821 and J. montanus Cope 1869 (Diplopoda: Julida)

Figure 4. Distributions of Ptyoiulus/Ptyoiulinae plotted against the maximal extent of the Western Interior Seaway during the Cretaceous Period, Mesozoic Era. All land areas shown are in the eastern land mass, Appalachia, which was separated from western Laramidia by the vertical, latitudinal arm of the Seaway (not shown), which segregated Ptyoiulus from bollmaniulinines in Laramidia but is irrelevant to Ptyoiulus itself. The Seaway spread eastward south of Appalachia and when it receded, P. impressus spread southward into the formerly inundated area. 1, large, contiguous main range area. 2, small, disjunct northernmost population extending from Montreal, Québec, to northern Vermont. 3, disjunct population along the southwestern coast of Lake Michigan. 4, disjunct area in northeastern/eastcentral Arkansas. 5, point locality in northeastern Louisiana vouchered by females. The transect denoted by the red lines near the center of the distribution is the band occupied by both P. montanus and P. impressus; the latter occurs alone to the north and south.

Figures 1–3 in Parajulid milliped studies XII: Initial assessment of Ptyoiulus Cook 1895 and neotype designations for Julus impressus Say 1821 and J. montanus Cope 1869 (Diplopoda: Julida)

Figures 1–3. Pilosity and epiproct variation on caudalmost rings of Ptyoiulus impressus. 1) Specimen from Morgan Co., Ohio. 2) Specimen from Allen Co., Kentucky. 3) Specimen from Leon Co., Florida. e, epiproct; h, hypoproct; lp, left paraproct.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →

Figure 1 in Breeding biology of Phyllomedusa azurea Cope, 1862 and P. sauvagii Boulenger, 1882 (Anura) from the Cerrado, Central Brazil

Figure 1. Number of individuals present in monthly samples from October 2000 to September 2001 and total rainfall per month at the study site. Black bars, number of Phyllomedusa sauvagii; dotted white bars, number of P. azurea; black circles, total rainfall during the study; black triangles, rainfall recorded during 4 days by month of study.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2010View details →

Figure 2 in Breeding biology of Phyllomedusa azurea Cope, 1862 and P. sauvagii Boulenger, 1882 (Anura) from the Cerrado, Central Brazil

Figure 2. Females of Phyllomedusa azurea (A) and P. sauvagii (B, C) collected at the study site from October 2000 to September 2001. Correlations between: (A) SVL versus NME (NME56.411SVL2173.22); (B) SVL versus OM (OM50.403SVL221.79); (C) BM versus OM (OM50.3043BM25.41).

Fig. 4 in On the Identities of Colostethus inguinalis (Cope, 1868) and C. panamensis (Dunn, 1933), with Comments on C. latinasus (Cope, 1863) (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Fig. 4. Ontogenetic variation in male ventral coloration of Colostethus inguinalis. Left to right: LACM 42522 (subadult, left vocal slit open, 21.0 mm SVL), LACM 42437 (adult, 23.0 mm SVL), LACM 42402 (adult, 23.4 mm SVL), LACM 42334 (adult, 27.4 mm SVL).

Fig. 5 in On the Identities of Colostethus inguinalis (Cope, 1868) and C. panamensis (Dunn, 1933), with Comments on C. latinasus (Cope, 1863) (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Fig. 5. Map of Panama and northern Colombia showing localities for specimens examined of Colostethus inguinalis (circles), C. latinasus (pentagons), and C. panamensis (squares). The checkered circle indicates the approximate locality of the holotype of C. inguinalis, which was reported only as ''the river Truando, New Granada'' (Cope, 1868: 138).

Fig. 8 in On the Identities of Colostethus inguinalis (Cope, 1868) and C. panamensis (Dunn, 1933), with Comments on C. latinasus (Cope, 1863) (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Fig. 8. Ventral and dorsal views of Colostethus latinasus. A: Adult female (KU 115910, 31.8 mm SVL). B: Adult male (KU 94811, 30.1 mm SVL).

Fig. 3 in On the Identities of Colostethus inguinalis (Cope, 1868) and C. panamensis (Dunn, 1933), with Comments on C. latinasus (Cope, 1863) (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Fig. 3. Lateral views of Colostethus inguinalis (A: LACM 42417, adult female, 27.5 mm SVL) and C. panamensis (B: AMNH 87297, adult female, 24.9 mm SVL). Note the pale postocular stripe crossing the anteroventral twothirds of the welldefined tympanum of C. inguinalis versus the solid dark brown color of the inconspicuous tympanum of C. panamensis.

Fig. 7 in On the Identities of Colostethus inguinalis (Cope, 1868) and C. panamensis (Dunn, 1933), with Comments on C. latinasus (Cope, 1863) (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Fig. 7. Ventral and dorsal views of Colostethus panamensis from Parque Nacional Natural Los Katios, Colombia. A: Adult female (IAvH 3348, 28.2 mm SVL). B: Adult male (IAvH 3347, 24.3 mm SVL).

Fig. 6 in On the Identities of Colostethus inguinalis (Cope, 1868) and C. panamensis (Dunn, 1933), with Comments on C. latinasus (Cope, 1863) (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Fig. 6. Ventral and dorsal views of Colostethus panamensis from El Valle de Antón, Panama. A: Adult female (AMNH 124217, 26.5 mm SVL). B: Adult male (AMNH 124216, 23.1 mm SVL).

Fig. 1 in On the Identities of Colostethus inguinalis (Cope, 1868) and C. panamensis (Dunn, 1933), with Comments on C. latinasus (Cope, 1863) (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Fig. 1. Dorsal and ventral views of type specimens of three species currently placed in Colostethus. A: Prostherapis inguinalis (holotype, adult female, 27.6 mm SVL, type species of Prostherapis), USNM 4349. B: Hyloxalus panamensis (holotype, adult male, 24.5 mm SVL), MCZ 19209. C: Phyllobates latinasus (neotype, adult female, 30.3 mm SVL, type species of Colostethus), USNM 50198.

Fig. 2 in On the Identities of Colostethus inguinalis (Cope, 1868) and C. panamensis (Dunn, 1933), with Comments on C. latinasus (Cope, 1863) (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Fig. 2. Ventral and dorsal views of adult female (A: LACM 42409, 28.2 mm SVL, one of the darkest females observed) and adult male (B: LACM 42329, 26.9 mm SVL) specimens of Colostethus inguinalis.

opencc-zeroDec 2004View details →

FIG. 14 in Ostéologie de Pentanogmius evolutus (Cope, 1877) n. comb. (Teleostei, Tselfatiiformes) du Crétacé supérieur marin des États-Unis. Remarques sur la systématique du genre Pentanogmius Taverne, 2000

FIG. 14. — Pentanogmius evolutus (Cope, 1877) n. comb., squelette caudal NHM P. 9646. Même légende qu'à la Figure 13 et HEMEP, hémépine; NEUREP, neurépine. Échelle: 1 cm.