Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
203
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
203 results for “Divergence times”
FIGURE 5 in Biogeography and divergence time estimation of the relict Cape dragonfly genus Syncordulia: global significance and implications for conservation
FIGURE 5. Present distributions of Syncordulia species in South Africa. Uppermost box shows the distributions of all Syncordulia species, lower boxes show individual species distributions: S. gracilis (top and top left); S. legator (top right); S. serendipator (bottom left); S. venator (bottom right).
FIGURE 3. R8S in Biogeography and divergence time estimation of the relict Cape dragonfly genus Syncordulia: global significance and implications for conservation
FIGURE 3. R8S analysis on a 26-taxon tree; Geological maps adapted from figures on rst.gsfc.nasa.gov.
FIGURE 4 in Biogeography and divergence time estimation of the relict Cape dragonfly genus Syncordulia: global significance and implications for conservation
FIGURE 4. Ancestral distributions; DIVA analysis optimized with 2 regions; larger letters indicate the scenarios discussed in the text
FIGURE 1. Strict consensus tree from a in Biogeography and divergence time estimation of the relict Cape dragonfly genus Syncordulia: global significance and implications for conservation
FIGURE 1. Strict consensus tree from a PAUP parsimony heuristic search; 10,000 addition sequence replicates; bootstrap support shown above branches
FIGURE 2. Consensus tree from a in Biogeography and divergence time estimation of the relict Cape dragonfly genus Syncordulia: global significance and implications for conservation
FIGURE 2. Consensus tree from a PHASE analysis; 10 million generations. Posterior probabilities shown above branches
Figure 4 in Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of Hormaphidinae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) indicate Late Cretaceous tribal diversification
Figure 4. Simplified phylogenetic tree with information on host associations of sampled in-group genera. The phylogenetic pattern of host associations and dating might imply a coincidence between tribal diversifications within Hormaphidinae and the appearance of their primary hosts.
Figure 2 in Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of Hormaphidinae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) indicate Late Cretaceous tribal diversification
Figure 2. Phylogeny of Hormaphidinae based on combined data of nuclear EF-1a and mitochondrial COI sequences. The tree obtained from Bayesian analysis is shown. Bootstrap values (> 50) from maximum-parsimony/maximum-likelihood analyses are shown above the branches, and the Bayesian posterior probabilities (> 0.90) are shown below the branches.
Figure 1 in Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of Hormaphidinae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) indicate Late Cretaceous tribal diversification
Figure 1. Phylogeny of Hormaphidinae based on nuclear EF-1a sequences. The tree obtained from Bayesian analysis is shown. Numbers above the branches are bootstrap values (> 50) from maximum-parsimony/maximum-likelihood analyses, and the Bayesian posterior probabilities (> 0.90) are shown below the branches. Species including more than one sample are represented by species names with voucher numbers.
Figure 8 in Reassessing the phylogeny and divergence times of sloths (Mammalia: Pilosa: Folivora), exploring alternative morphological partitioning and dating models
Figure 8. Divergence ages (median and 95% HPD) for all dating models, shown for the main groups of Folivora of the present classification. Time scale in million years ago.
Figure 5 in Reassessing the phylogeny and divergence times of sloths (Mammalia: Pilosa: Folivora), exploring alternative morphological partitioning and dating models
Figure 5. Estimated rate multipliers for anatomical partitions in each model. Partition colours as in Figure 1.
Figure 2 in Reassessing the phylogeny and divergence times of sloths (Mammalia: Pilosa: Folivora), exploring alternative morphological partitioning and dating models
Figure 2. Diversity through time for sloth genera sampled and its association with geological epochs. Time scale in million years ago.
Figure 1 in Reassessing the phylogeny and divergence times of sloths (Mammalia: Pilosa: Folivora), exploring alternative morphological partitioning and dating models
Figure 1. Anatomical partitions and partitioning schemes. Coloured anatomical regions in the skeleton of Paramylodon harlani (modified from Stock, 1925) correspond to the maximally partitioned data subsets, as used in model A7, whereas their combinations into composite partitions used in schemes A1 to A6 are indicated by other colours in the table. UN, unpartitioned model.
Figure 4 in Reassessing the phylogeny and divergence times of sloths (Mammalia: Pilosa: Folivora), exploring alternative morphological partitioning and dating models
Figure 4. Selected trees, with node supports (Poisson boostrap and posterior probabilities), depicting the overall variation in topologies obtained. A, parsimony IW100. B, parsimony IW5. C, Bayesian UN_p. D, Bayesian IW100_e. All topologies and branch lengths for Bayesian trees are available in the Supporting Information (File S9).
Figure 3. A in Reassessing the phylogeny and divergence times of sloths (Mammalia: Pilosa: Folivora), exploring alternative morphological partitioning and dating models
Figure 3. A, marginal likelihoods of Bayesian models. B, normalized Robinson–Foulds (nRF) distances among topologies (with IW100_e used as reference). C, distribution of node supports, with posterior probabilities for Bayesian inferences and bootstrap values for maximum parsimony.
Figure 7 in Reassessing the phylogeny and divergence times of sloths (Mammalia: Pilosa: Folivora), exploring alternative morphological partitioning and dating models
Figure 7. Stratigraphic fit of maximum parsimony and Bayesian topologies evaluated with two metrics, considering fossil age intervals as known ranges or as stratigraphic uncertainty. A, stratigraphic consistency index (SCI). B, gap excess ratio (GER).
Figure 10 in Reassessing the phylogeny and divergence times of sloths (Mammalia: Pilosa: Folivora), exploring alternative morphological partitioning and dating models
Figure 10. Relative rates (median and 95% HPD) of speciation, extinction and fossilization obtained with a skyline fossilized birth-death process for seven consecutive time bins.
Figure 17 in The fifth family of the true crickets (Insecta: Orthoptera: Ensifera: Grylloidea), Oecanthidae defin. nov.: phylogenetic relationships and divergence times
Figure 17. Angustitrella sp., male: A, dorsal habitus; B, right FW. C, Paroecanhtus aztecus, male genitalia, dorsal view. Scales: 1 mm. Abbreviations: see Material and methods.
Figure 11. A in The fifth family of the true crickets (Insecta: Orthoptera: Ensifera: Grylloidea), Oecanthidae defin. nov.: phylogenetic relationships and divergence times
Figure 11. A, Cearacesa sp., frontal head; B, A. (Aphonomorphus) aff. montanus, maxillary palpus. Scale: 1mm.
Figure 10. A in The fifth family of the true crickets (Insecta: Orthoptera: Ensifera: Grylloidea), Oecanthidae defin. nov.: phylogenetic relationships and divergence times
Figure 10. A, Fryerius sp., male, dorsal habitus; B, Munda aff. asyrinx, male, dorsal habitus; C, Truljalia hibinonis, male, pronotum and FW, dorsal view; D, Madasumma melanotum, male genitalia, lateral view. Scales: 1mm. Abbreviations: see Material and methods.
Figure 7 in The fifth family of the true crickets (Insecta: Orthoptera: Ensifera: Grylloidea), Oecanthidae defin. nov.: phylogenetic relationships and divergence times
Figure 7. Neoxabea breƲipes. A, hind tibia and tarsi; B, hind tibia distal margin and tarsi, inner view; C, hind tibia distal margin and tarsi, outer view. Scales: 1mm. Abbreviations: see Material and methods.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.