Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 5 in On Potamocypris compressa (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from temporary rock pools in Utah, USA, with notes on the taxonomic harmonisation of North American and European ostracod faunas

FIGURE 5. Distribution of living P. smaragdina (circles), based on the NODE, NANODe and Delorme databases, and P. c o m - pressa (numbered squares): 1, type locality and other Ohio localities of Furtos (1933), 2, Little San Poil Lake, Washington (Dobbin, 1941), 3, Hidden Canyon, Utah (this paper).

FIGURE 4 in On Potamocypris compressa (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from temporary rock pools in Utah, USA, with notes on the taxonomic harmonisation of North American and European ostracod faunas

FIGURE 4. Potamocypris compressa; valves and soft parts drawn in transmitted light. A: Female RV, ext. lat. (OC.3158); B: female LV, ext. lat. (OC.3158); C: male LV, ext. lat. (OC.3161); D, right male hemipenis (OC.3164); E, left male hemipenis (OC.3164); F: Zenker's Organ (OC.3161). Scale bars: 100 μm

FIGURE 3 in On Potamocypris compressa (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from temporary rock pools in Utah, USA, with notes on the taxonomic harmonisation of North American and European ostracod faunas

FIGURE 3. Potamocypris compressa; soft parts drawn in transmitted light. A: female L5 (OC.3162); B, right male L5 endopodite (clasper) (OC.3157); C: left male L5 endopodite (clasper) (OC.3157); D: female L6 (OC.3158); E: female L7 (OC.3162); F: female posterior of body (OC.3162), including furca, genital hooks and uncoiled spiral ducts; G: female genital hook (OC.3163); H: furca (caudal rami) (OC.3163).

FIGURE 1 in On Potamocypris compressa (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from temporary rock pools in Utah, USA, with notes on the taxonomic harmonisation of North American and European ostracod faunas

FIGURE 1. Potamocypris compressa; scanning electron micrographs of valves and carapaces. A: female carapace (OC.3154), 610 µm long, left lateral view; B: A-1 juvenile carapace (OC.3155), 515 µm long, left lateral view; C: A-2 juvenile carapace (oc. 3156), 420 µm long, left lateral view; D: female carapace (OC.3159), ventral view; E: detail of antero-ventral region of (D) showing valve overlap; F: detail of postero-ventral region of (D), showing valve overlap; G: female carapace (OC.3160), dorsal view; H: female left valve (OC.3163), 620 µm long, internal lateral view; I: female right valve (OC.3163), 610 µm long, internal lateral view; J: male left valve (OC.3164), 550 µm long, internal lateral view; K: male right valve (OC.3164), 550 µm long, internal lateral view. Scale bars: 100 mm (A–D, G–K), and 50 mm (E, F).

FIGURE 2 in On Potamocypris compressa (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from temporary rock pools in Utah, USA, with notes on the taxonomic harmonisation of North American and European ostracod faunas

FIGURE 2. Potamocypris compressa; soft parts drawn in transmitted light. A: female A1 (OC.3158); B: female A2 (OC.3158); C: detail of B; D, E: female Md palps (OC.3165); F: male Mx palp and endites (OC.3161) (enditic setae omitted).

FIGURES 14–17 in Genus Leptoiulus Verhoeff, 1894 new to the fauna of the Asian part of Russia, with description of a new species from the Altai and its comparison with the European Leptoiulus trilineatus (C. L. Koch, 1847) (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

FIGURES 14–17. Leptoiulus trilineatus (C.L. Koch, 1847), male. 14, gonopods (mesal view); 15, gonopod promere (caudal view); 16, gonopod mesomere (front view); 17, gonopod opisthomere (nearly caudal view, slightly laterally); s, interior parabasal spine.

FIGURES 12–13 in Genus Leptoiulus Verhoeff, 1894 new to the fauna of the Asian part of Russia, with description of a new species from the Altai and its comparison with the European Leptoiulus trilineatus (C. L. Koch, 1847) (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

FIGURES 12–13. Leptoiulus tigirek sp. nov., male paratype. 12, gonopods (mesal view); 13, gonopods (lateral view). Scale in mm.

FIGURE 1 in Genus Leptoiulus Verhoeff, 1894 new to the fauna of the Asian part of Russia, with description of a new species from the Altai and its comparison with the European Leptoiulus trilineatus (C. L. Koch, 1847) (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

FIGURE 1. Leptoiulus tigirek sp. nov., male paratype. Habitus in lateral view. Photographed not to scale.

FIGURES 10–11 in Genus Leptoiulus Verhoeff, 1894 new to the fauna of the Asian part of Russia, with description of a new species from the Altai and its comparison with the European Leptoiulus trilineatus (C. L. Koch, 1847) (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

FIGURES 10–11. Leptoiulus tigirek sp. nov., female paratype. 10, vulva (caudal view); 11, vulva (lateral view).

FIGURES 6–9 in Genus Leptoiulus Verhoeff, 1894 new to the fauna of the Asian part of Russia, with description of a new species from the Altai and its comparison with the European Leptoiulus trilineatus (C. L. Koch, 1847) (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

FIGURES 6–9. Leptoiulus tigirek sp. nov., male paratype. 6, gonopod promere (caudal view); 7, gonopod opisthomere and mesomere (front view); 8, gonopod opisthomere and mesomere (mesal view); 9, gonopod opisthomere (nearly caudal view); ph, phylacum; v, velum; s, interior parabasal spine.

FIGURES 2–5 in Genus Leptoiulus Verhoeff, 1894 new to the fauna of the Asian part of Russia, with description of a new species from the Altai and its comparison with the European Leptoiulus trilineatus (C. L. Koch, 1847) (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

FIGURES 2–5. Leptoiulus tigirek sp. nov., male paratype. 2, gnathochilarium; 3, leg pair 1(front view); 4, penes and coxae 2; 5, gonopods (mesal view).

FIGURES 31–39. Podolinella ruseki comb. nov. 31 in Redescription of two European species of Acerentomidae (Protura) belonging to the Italian fauna

FIGURES 31–39. Podolinella ruseki comb. nov. 31) Tergites V–VII. 32) Tergites VIII–XII. 33) Prosternum. 34) Metasternum. 35) Sternites V–VII. 36) Sternites VIII–XII. 37) Comb on abdominal tergite VIII. 38) Male squama genitalis. 39) Female squama genitalis. Arrows indicate pores.

FIGURES 1–9. Acerentulus apuliacus. 1 in Redescription of two European species of Acerentomidae (Protura) belonging to the Italian fauna

FIGURES 1–9. Acerentulus apuliacus. 1) Head. 2) Dorsal side of the anterior part of the head. 3) Scheme of the dorsal side of the head. 4) Pseudoculus (left and right side). 5) Canal of maxillary gland. 6) Maxillary palpus. 7) Labial palpus. 8) Foretarsus, exterior view. 9) Foretarsus, interior view. Arrows indicate pores. Figs. 1, 2, 4, 9 from the original drawings by Rusek & Stumpp (1988).

FIGURES 14–22. Acerentulus apuliacus. 14 in Redescription of two European species of Acerentomidae (Protura) belonging to the Italian fauna

FIGURES 14–22. Acerentulus apuliacus. 14) Prosternum. 15) Metasternum. 16) Sternite VI. 17) Sternite VII. 18) Sternites VIII–XII. 19) Detail of pleural pectines VI. 20) Male squama genitalis. 21) Female squama genitalis. 22) Detail of female acrostylus. Arrows indicate pores. Figs. 16‒22: from the original drawings by Rusek & Stumpp (1988).

FIGURES 10–13. Acerentulus apuliacus. 10 in Redescription of two European species of Acerentomidae (Protura) belonging to the Italian fauna

FIGURES 10–13. Acerentulus apuliacus. 10) Thoracic tergites. 11) Tergites VI–VII. 12) Tergites VIII–XII. 28) Comb on abdominal tergite VIII. Figs. 11‒13 from the original drawings by Rusek & Stumpp (1988).

Figure 4 in Overlooked cryptic diversity in Muschampia (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) adds two species to the European butterfly fauna

Figure 4. Comparison of spatial distributions of diversity for ITS2, COI and morphology of the male genitalia. A, C, E, the specimens have been projected in the red–green–blue colour space, and the resulting colours were plotted in pie charts grouping specimens from the same 2° × 2° latitude–longitude squares (maps on the left). B, D, F, representations of principal coordinates analyses based on dissimilarity matrices for genetic markers and of partial least squares discriminant analysis for male genitalia (circles, Muschampia alta; squares, Muschampia proto; triangles, Muschampia proteides).

Figure 3 in Overlooked cryptic diversity in Muschampia (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) adds two species to the European butterfly fauna

Figure 3. Geometric morphometrics of male genitalia. A, the location of fixed landmarks (filled circles) and sliding semilandmarks (open circles) on the cucullus (red) and gnathos (green). B, the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) results, showing specimens of the three species as dots of different colours and the relative warp (RW) scores as dotted lines (Cuc, cucullus; Gn, gnathos). C, thin plate splines representing deformations corresponding to the average values shown by the three species in the relative warps selected by PLSDA as those most involved in the discrimination of the groups.

Figure 2. A in Overlooked cryptic diversity in Muschampia (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) adds two species to the European butterfly fauna

Figure 2. A, phylogenetic tree based on ITS2 data obtained through Bayesian inference. Posterior probabilities> 0.7 are indicated. Scale units are presented in substitutions per site. For each sample, boxes are filled if the genitalia were measured and/or the COI gene was sequenced. B, COI gene tree obtained through Bayesian inference, with the main groups collapsed. The x-axis indicates time (in millions of years), and the blue bars show the 95% highest posterior density range for the posterior distribution of node ages.

Figure 1 in Overlooked cryptic diversity in Muschampia (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) adds two species to the European butterfly fauna

Figure 1. Sampling sites (symbols) and the approximate range (shading) of the species recognized in this study (green squares, Muschampia proto; blue circles, Muschampia alta; red triangles Muschampia proteides). Photograph: M. proto from Jaén (southern Iberia) by V.D.