Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
256
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
256 results for “Forest Ecology”
Figure 25 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 25. Regression of Humidity on C. (C.) udumalpetense population in second row.
Figure 19 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 19. Regression of pH on C. (C.) udumalpetense population in first row.
Figure 18 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 18. Monthly fluctuations of total population and N(%) in Rows I, II and III.
Figure 30 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 30. Regression of N (%) on C. (C.) udumalpetense population in third row.
Figure 3 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 3. Showing the layout of the Sampling sites) Each sample unit (NWSE) represents 1m2).
Figure 24 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 24. Regression of temperature on C. (C.) udumalpetense population in second row.
Figure 1 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 1. Showing forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu.
Figure 17 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 17. Showing the monthly fluctuations of total population and pH in Rows I, II and III.
Figure 2 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 2. Showing location of the study area (forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu).
Figure 23 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 23. Regression of pH on C. (C.) udumalpetense population in second row.
Figure 26 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 26. Regression of N (%) on C. (C.) udumalpetense population in second row.
Figure 29 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 29. Regression of humidity on C. (C.) udumalpetense population in third row.
Figure 6 in A first ecological description of the lichen-clad larva of Eublemmistis chlorozonea Hampson, 1902 (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) from a southern Afrotemperate forest
Figure 6 – Pupa and remaining cocoon post-emergence of adult moth that was reared in captivity.
Figure 7 in A first ecological description of the lichen-clad larva of Eublemmistis chlorozonea Hampson, 1902 (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) from a southern Afrotemperate forest
Figure 7 – Adult male in typical resting posture (left) and a set specimen (right).
Data & codes for "Changes in abundance and distribution of European forest bird populations depend on biome, ecological specialisation and traits"
<h1>1. Selection of European forest bird species and classification of their biome preferences</h1> <p>We selected all species that are related to forest and woodland based on two data sources: Storchová & Hořák (2018) and Tobias et al. (2022), resulting in 107 bird species studied (Data S1). We defined forest bird species as those using environments ranging from closed-canopy forests to more open-canopy woodlands (A. Lehikoinen & Virkkala, 2018; Storchová & Hořák, 2018; Tobias et al., 2022). We determined their biome specialisation using breeding distribution centroids and the overall breeding distribution of each of the species, using the global map of terrestrial ecoregions from Olson et al. (2001) and range data from European Breeding Bird Atlas 1 and 2 (Hagemeijer & Blair, 1997; Keller et al., 2020). We categorised species as Mediterranean, temperate, or boreal based on their predominant biogeographic region. We considered species commonly occurring over several biomes as “generalists”. For instance, we reclassified the two typically boreal species Glaucidium passerinum Linnaeus and Strix uralensis Pallas as “generalists” due to significant range expansions into central and southern Europe in recent decades, therefore no longer restricted to the boreal region. For the complete list of species, biome specialisation, traits, and specialisation indices, refer to Data S1.</p> <h1>2. Changes in abundance and distribution of European forest bird species</h1> <p>We assessed long-term changes in European forest bird populations through two approaches: (i) changes in estimated total European-level species abundance over a 40-year timeframe; and (ii) changes in species spatial distribution over a 30-year timeframe (Fig. 1).</p> <p>We utilized the estimated trends in European-level population size (i.e., the total number of individuals) for each common native European bird species from 1980 to 2017, as reported by Burns et al. (2021). Three species out of the 107 studied forest species were missing in the original manuscript and we used data generated with the same method from 1980 to 2018 from the European assessment, Article 12 (https://nature-art12.eionet.europa.eu/article12/). These abundance trends were calculated by Burns et al. (2021) using multi-sourced annual times series. For each species, they gathered population estimates and trends from each European country as well as European Union (EU)-level population trends. They analysed these data with a Bayesian hierarchical model to reconstruct EU-level smoothed species population time series. The model outputs include an average annual rate of abundance change and an associated 95% credible interval (Burns et al., 2021). Therefore, we did not directly use the average annual rate of abundance change, as this would have led us to consider species with low uncertainty as similar to those with high uncertainty. To account for the uncertainty, we categorised species as (i) declining, i.e., annual rates below one, (ii) increasing, i.e., annual rates above one and (iii) stable, i.e., annual rate whose 95% CI overlap one, i.e., no significant change. To better acknowledge the magnitude of the abundance change, significant changes with rates below 0.98 were labelled as “strongly declining” (i.e., 6.5% of the 107 species), while those above 1.02 were labelled as “strongly increasing” (i.e., 11% of the 107 species). To evaluate the sensitivity of the decision to categorised abundance change data, we also analysed abundance trend as continuous variable (see Supporting Information Fig. S8).</p> <p>To determine changes in species distributions, we used a comparison of species distributions between two periods (i.e., 1985-1988 and 2013-2017) using the European Breeding Bird Atlas 1 and 2 (EBBA 1 & 2; Hagemeijer & Blair, 1997; Howard et al., 2023; Keller et al., 2020). Howard et al. (2023) provided calculations of observed colonisation and extinction areas at a 50 x 50 km resolution across Europe. We measured changes in range as the difference between colonisations and extinctions of each species, with negative values indicating contracting ranges and positive values indicating expanding ranges. Additionally, we calculated the shift in the centre of gravity of the distribution range between the two periods, as a distance (km) along the south-north gradient for each species (Howard et al., 2023).</p> <h1>3. Trait and specialisation data for European forest bird species</h1> <p>We extracted data for six functional traits from several sources (Table 1). (i) The species temperature index (STI)represents the long-term average temperature within the species’ breeding range (A. Lehikoinen et al., 2021). (ii) Diet data during the breeding season were obtained from Storchová & Hořák (2018), classifying species into binary variables as vertebrate carnivorous, invertebrate carnivorous, and herbivores (combining the leaf and seed eaters). Storchová & Hořák (2018) classified species into a diet category when the corresponding food resource represented at least 10% of the species diet throughout the breeding season. Therefore, one species can be in several categories (i.e., omnivores). (iii) We obtained nesting site data from Pearman et al. (2014), classifying species into binary variables as ground nesters, tree hole nesters, or elevated nesters (> 1 m in a tree or shrub). We also included data on (iv) species dependence on old-growth forests (Data S1; mostly from Fraixedas et al. (2015) and Mönkkönen et al. (2014), if present on both references, we classified them as “1” and if only in one reference as “0.5”), (v) migration distance (Howard et al., 2023), and (vi) body mass (Tobias et al., 2022).</p> <p>Finally, we extracted and developed seven species specialisation indices. (i) We used an overall specialisation index based on multiple traits (i.e., temperature, diet, foraging behaviour and substrate, habitat, and nesting site), and (ii) a nesting specialisation index, both obtained from Morelli et al. (2019). Both indices represent species specialization based on the dispersion of trait preferences for each species: e.g., nesting specialism equal 0 for species that nest in all habitat type and equal 1 for species that nest in only one habitat type). They are both calculated using the Gini index of inequality, which measures overall dispersion across, e.g., all traits for the overall specialization, based on data from Pearman et al. (2014) and Storchová & Hořák (2018). For additional information, see Morelli et al. (2019). We also used (iii) the diet specialisation index, (iv) the species distribution range during the breeding season (hereafter “breeding range area”) and (v) the climatic niche breadth from Reif et al. (2016). The diet specialisation index was calculated as the coefficient of variation for diet preferences for each species, where high values denotes specialized species (Reif et al., 2016). The breeding range area was evaluated as the number of 50-km squares in the distribution maps in Europe occupied by each species during the reproduction period, and is based on EBBA 1 (Hagemeijer & Blair, 1997). The climatic niche breadth was calculated as the difference between the 5% hottest and the 5% coldest mean temperature between April and June in which each species occurs, using EBBA 1 (Hagemeijer & Blair, 1997; Reif et al., 2016).</p> <p>Additionally, (vi) we calculated a broadleaf forest specialisation index based on binary forest habitat preferences (Storchová & Hořák, 2018), assigning values of one for species found only in broadleaf forests; zero for those in coniferous forests, and 0.5 for those found in both. Lastly, (vii) we created a forest specialisation index based on the species habitat preferences (Storchová & Hořák, 2018). The forest specialisation index was calculated as the mean of species affinity across habitats. We used increasing habitat weights along a gradient of tree dominance: open habitats as 1, shrubland as 1.5, woodland as 2 (i.e., species associated with habitats structured by trees in lower density than in forest), forest generalist (found in both coniferous and broadleaf dense forests) as 3, and forest specialist (found only either in coniferous or broadleaf dense forests) as 4. For instance, the index value for species occurring either in shrubland, woodland or both broadleaf and coniferous forests is 2.167.</p> <h1>4. Data analysis</h1> <p>Data analyses were conducted with R software version 4.4.1. (R Core Team, 2024). Given the non-independence of species due to their genetic relatedness, we accounted for interspecific phylogenetic distance in all models. We constructed the phylogenetic tree for the 107 European forest bird species using ‘rotl’ and ‘ape’ R-packages (Michonneau et al., 2022; Paradis et al., 2023). We used rotl as an interface with the "Open Tree of Life", employing tol_induced_subtree R-function to generate the phylogenetic tree and compute.brlen R-function to set branch lengths using Grafen’s computation. We generated separate phylogenetic trees for boreal (17), temperate (15), Mediterranean (16) and “generalist” (59) species to perform biome-specific analysis (see Supplementary Information, Figs. S1 & S2).</p> <p>To investigate the effects of functional traits and specialisation indices on abundance, range changes, and distribution shift, we used two regression methods. All methods were based on the relationships between a measure of change and a functional trait or specialisation index. Our sample unit is an individual forest bird species (i.e., one value for each species, either abundance or range change, or distribution shift). Abundance change was a categorical variable (i.e., strong decline – decline – stable – increase – strong increase), while range change (i.e., difference between colonisation and extinction) and distribution shift (i.e., south-north shift) were continuous variables. Therefore, to study abundance changes, we used proportional-odds linear mixed effects model using (Phylo)clmm R-function from the ‘ordinal’ R-package (Christensen, 2022). Interspecific phylogenetic relatedness was included as a random effect, reflecting the correlation between species based on phylogenetic distances (see also Hagge et al. (2021) and Seibold et al. (2015)). For distribution changes, we employed phylogenetic generalised least squares regression (PGLS) using the gls R-function from the ‘nlme’ R-package (Pinheiro et al., 2023). The phylogenetic correlation structure was integrated into PGLS using Pagel’s lambda parameter (λ; Pagel (1999)) a widely used measured of phylogenetic signal strength (see, e.g., Hagge et al., 2021; Triviño et al., 2013).</p> <p>Furthermore, we included latitude, a key driver of bird communities at broad scales (Luoto et al., 2007), as a fixed covariable (centroid latitude of the species’ breeding distribution) in all global models (i.e., species from all biomes together), except for the STI model due to strong correlation. For biome-specific analysis, we included latitude only in boreal species models for range change and distribution shift, as it significantly improved model fit (ΔAIC < -2). We did not add latitude for models specific to temperate, Mediterranean, and generalist species since it did not improve model fits (ΔAIC > -2). Additionally, we included breeding range area in range change and distribution shift models, assuming that species with larger ranges would exhibit larger shifts. We scaled predictors to a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1 to facilitate effect size comparisons. We adjusted p-values using the Holm method (for n=3) to account for multiple testing of traits and specialisation indices on three response variables.</p>
Data from: Species Delimitation of Endemic Atlantic Forest Inga subnuda (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade) Subspecies Based on Morphological, Ecological and Palaeoecological Data
<p><i>Inga subnuda</i> Salzm. ex Benth. are one of 31 endemic species in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Intermixed leaf and floral traits have made morphological distinctiveness difficult, and its current taxonomic treatment considers <i>I. subnuda</i> as one species with two subspecies. We aim to explore different lines of evidence to disentangle and clarify species boundaries in these two subspecies. Morphological variation and bioclimatic data of the two subspecies of the complex were assessed by using multivariate morphometric analyses and ecological niche modeling. Morphological quantitative characters allowed the recognition of different groups. The climatic space was similar but not identical, and the recent climatic cycles that could have shaped the current distribution are discussed. The results of our integrative study suggest regard both subspecies as two different species. Moreover, we propose a change in status of <i>I. subnuda subsp. luschnathiana</i> to the rank of species. The new up-ranked taxon is described and illustrated.</p>
Ecological data on evergreen forest types of central plains Cambodia
<p>Four different lowland evergreen forest types, each with a unique species composition and ecological characteristics is described from the central plains, Cambodia. Through six botanical expeditions, we collected data on the forest types using 50x10 = 500 sqm strip sample plots (n=119); i) riverine forest dominated by Dipterocarpus costatus (Dipterocarpaceae): ii) tall dipterocarp forest dominated by Anisoptera costata (Dipterocarpaceae); iii) swamp forest dominated by Macaranga triloba (Euphorbiaceae); and iv) "Sralao" forest with a monodominance of Lagerstroemia cochinchinensis (Lythraceae). This dataset includes i) a matrix showing the occurrence of different species within the 119 sample plots, ii) a summary of forest structure and diversity index values for the 119 individual sample plots, iii) a summary for individual species within forest types of mean, standard error and coefficient of variation of the mean for diameter, density, basal area and frequency, as well as relative density, dominance and frequency and importance value index (IVI), iv) a summary of forest structure variables for diameter classes and forest types. The dataset was analyzed and used to characterize and compare the four evergreen forest types in the publication: Theilade et al. 2022. Evergreen forest types of the central plains in Cambodia: floristic composition and ecological characteristics; published in Nordic Journal of Botany. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.03494" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.03494</a></p>
Ecological and geographical marginality in rear edge populations of Palaearctic forest birds (data)
<p>The centre–periphery hypothesis predicts that habitat suitability will decrease at the edge of a species' range, a pattern often questioned by empirical data. Here we explore if habitat suitability decreases southwards and shapes the abundance distribution of rear edge populations of forest birds within the restricted geographical setting of the south-western Palaearctic. We also test if birds endemic to the area fit more poorly to the latitudinal decrease of habitat suitability due to the putative effect of adaptations to regional conditions. Location: North-western Africa (Morocco) Time period: Present day Major taxa studied: Passerines (11 species) Methods: Bird occurrences were used to model species distribution and line transects were used to estimate bird abundance. Occurrence probabilities provided by species distribution models were used to display the spatial patterning of habitat suitability. Habitat suitability was employed to predict abundance after controlling for the effect of the distance to some regional source areas of forest birds (tree covered large areas). The species were classified as North African endemic according to an updated review of their taxonomic status. Results: Habitat suitability decreased southwards, supporting the predicted relationship between ecological and geographical marginality in most species. Abundance was positively correlated to habitat suitability and negatively correlated to distance to source areas. The taxonomic status of birds did not affect the patterns. Main conclusions: The southward decrease of habitat suitability predicted by the centre–periphery hypothesis shapes the distribution of rear edge populations of forest birds within the south-western Palaearctic. As most of these populations are endemic, the results suggest that they track the gradients in isolation within the geographical setting of north-western Africa. These results support the vulnerability of these isolated, peripheral populations of forest birds to large-scale environmental changes in a region under the effect of increasing drought and temperature.</p>
Figure 28 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 28. Regression of Temperature on C. (C.) udumalpetense population in third row.
Figure 21 in Population ecology of Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense (Insecta: Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in a deciduous forest floor of the Trimurti Dam, Tamil Nadu, India
Figure 21. Regression of humidity on C. (C.) udumalpetense population in first row.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.