Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

87

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

87 results for “Hypofractionated radiation therapy”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
ClinicalTrials.gov20/100

Treatment of High-grade Gliomas Using Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy -a Phase I Clinical Trial

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03082846. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
geo16/100

scRNA-seq data from patients undergoing neoadjuvant BO-112 and hypofractionated radiation therapy in soft tissue carcoma

GEO Series GSE313859. Homo sapiens. 12 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.

openGEO-OpenJan 2026View details →
geo16/100

Spatial transcriptomic data from longitudinal tumor samples from one patient undergoing neoadjuvant BO-112 and hypofractionated radiation therapy in soft tissue carcoma

GEO Series GSE313858. Homo sapiens. 4 samples. Type: Other.

openGEO-OpenJan 2026View details →
zenodo16/100

Dataset related to article "Hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy (CRT) for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. A propensity score matched analysis"

<p>This record contains raw data related to article &quot;Hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy (CRT) for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. A propensity score matched analysis&quot;</p> <p>The current treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma consists of surgery followed by conventional radiotherapy (CRT) with concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) has been investigated and it resulted feasible and safe. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether HFRT can be comparable to CRT.</p> <p>MATERIALS AND METHODS:</p> <p>The analysis included newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated with CRT 60 Gy/30 fractions or HFRT 60 Gy/15 fractions. A propensity score matching analysis (PSM) was performed using a logistic regression that considered age, KPS, extent of surgery, MGMT and IDH status.</p> <p>RESULTS:</p> <p>A total of 267 patients were included; before PSM 169 were in CRT-group and 98 in HRFT-group. After 1:1 matching, 82 patients resulted in each group. The median OS time was 17.9 months for the CRT-group and 16.7 months for the HFRT-group; the 1, 2, 3-year OS rates were 75.6%, 32.7%, and 15.5% for the CRT-group, and 75.6%, 33.3%, and 18.9% for the HFRT-group (p value = 0.8). No statistically significant differences were recorded between the two radiation therapy treatments performed.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS:</p> <p>A short course of radiation therapy would seem comparable to CRT in terms of outcome and less burdensome for these poor prognosis patients.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

restrictedSep 2019View details →
zenodo16/100

Dataset related to article "Phase II study of hypofractionated radiation therapy in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with poor prognosis"

<p>This record contains raw data related to article &quot;Phase II study of hypofractionated radiation therapy in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with poor prognosis&quot;</p> <p>OBJECTIVE::</p> <p>To evaluate hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) given at therapeutic effective doses in a phase II study. Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) rate, overall survival (OS), and incidence of toxicity.</p> <p>METHODS::</p> <p>Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, age ⩾70 years, Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score ⩽60, were enrolled. The total dose of HFRT was 52.5 Gy/15 fractions, corresponded to a biological effective dose to the tumor of 70.88 Gy.</p> <p>RESULTS::</p> <p>Thirty patients were treated, with a median age of 75 years. Concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy (TMZ-CHT) was administered in 7 (23.3%) and 11 (40.7%) patients received only adjuvant TMZ-CHT. The median, 6-month PFS, and 12-month PFS were 5.0 months, 43.3%, and 20%, respectively. The median, 6-month OS, and 12-month OS were 8 months, 90%, and 30%, respectively. At the last observation time, 26 patients (86.7%) were dead and 4 (13.3%) were alive. No increase in steroid drugs was required during radiotherapy treatment and a reduction was possible in 12 (40%). Patients with KPS=60, RPA V, MGMT methylated status, neurological status stable or improved after surgery and who underwent HFRT with concurrent and adjuvant CHT, had the better outcome.</p> <p>CONCLUSION::</p> <p>HFRT has proven to be feasible and effective, with limited morbidity, for selected elderly and frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The primary objective of this study was not reached in the whole cohort but only in selected patients, who need more aggressive treatment.</p>

restrictedSep 2019View details →
zenodo12/100

Dataset related to article "Linac-based stereotactic body radiation therapy vs moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer: propensity-score based comparison of outcome and toxicity."

<p>OBJECTIVE:</p> <p>Prostate cancer represents the second most common malignancy in the world and majority of patients have diagnosis of localized disease. The aim of the present study was to compare two cohorts of patients treated with moderate hypofractionation (MHRT) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).</p> <p>METHODS:</p> <p>We included patients treated between 2010 and 2015. Inclusion criteria were: adenocarcinoma of the prostate; class risks low or intermediate; WHO performance status 0-2. We evaluated rectal, gastrointestinal toxicity and genitourinary. Measures of outcome were biochemical disease-free survival and overall survival. Propensity score was used to approximate the balance in covariates.</p> <p>RESULTS:</p> <p>209 patients were included, treated with MHRT (<em>n</em> = 109) or SBRT (<em>n</em> = 100). Median follow-up time was 37.4 months. Rates of biochemical disease-free survival at 1- and 3&thinsp;years were 100 and 95%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (<em>p</em> = 0.868). Rates of overall survival at 1- and 3&thinsp;years were 100 and 97.1%, respectively with no differences between the two groups (<em>p</em> = 0.312). After propensity scoring matching, no differences were observed in terms of acute and late rectal and gastrointestinal toxicity. While mild genitourinary side-effects were more common in SBRT group (45.5% <em>vs</em> 19.5 %), Grade 2 and 3 toxicity was increased after MHRT (11.7% <em>vs</em> 2.6 %; <em>p</em> = 0.029).</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS:</p> <p>Moderate hypofractionation and SBRT are two effective and safe options for the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. The analysis showed no difference in terms of disease&#39;s control and survival but increased moderate and severe toxicity after MHRT.</p> <p>ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:</p> <p>Moderate hypofractionation and SBRT are comparable in terms of efficacy while moderate and severe toxicity is more common in the first one.</p>

restrictedMar 2020View details →
zenodo12/100

Dataset related to article "Can thoracic nodes oligometastases be safely treated with image guided hypofractionated radiation therapy?"

<p>OBJECTIVE:</p> <p>To evaluate safety and efficacy of image guided-hypofractionated radiation therapy (IG-HRT) in patients with thoracic nodes oligometastases.</p> <p>METHODS:</p> <p>The present study is a multicenter analysis. Oligometastatic patients, affected by a maximum of five active lesions in three or less different organs, treated with IG-HRT to thoracic nodes metastases between 2012 and 2017 were included in the analysis. Primary end point was local control (LC), secondary end points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, acute and late toxicity. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify possible prognostic factors for the survival end points.</p> <p>RESULTS:</p> <p>76 patients were included in the analysis. Different RT dose and fractionation schedules were prescribed according to site, number, size of the lymph node(s) and to respect dose constraints for relevant organs at risk. Median biologically effective dose delivered was 75&thinsp;Gy (interquartile range: 59-86&thinsp;Gy). Treatment was optimal; one G1 acute toxicity and seven&thinsp;G1 late toxicities of any grade were recorded. Median follow-up time was 23.16 months. 16 patients (21.05%) had a local progression, while 52 patients progressed in distant sites (68.42 %).Median local relapse free survival was not reached, LC at 6, 12 and 24 months was 96.05% [confidence interval (CI) 88.26<em>-</em>98.71%], 86.68% (CI 75.86<em>-</em>92.87) and 68.21% (CI 51.89<em>-</em>80.00%), respectively. Median OS was 28.3 months (interquartile range 16.1<em>-</em>47.2). Median progression-freesurvival was 9.2 months (interquartile range 4.1<em>-</em>17.93).At multivariate analysis, RT dose, colorectal histology, systemic therapies were correlated with LC. Performance status and the presence of metastatic sites other than the thoracic nodes were correlated with OS. Local response was a predictor of OS.</p> <p>CONCLUSION:</p> <p>IG-HRT for thoracic nodes was safe and feasible. Higher RT doses were correlated to better LC and should be taken in consideration at least in patients with isolated nodal metastases and colorectal histology.</p> <p>ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:</p> <p>Radiotherapy is safe and effective treatment for thoracic nodes metastases, higher radiotherapy doses are correlated to better LC. Oligometastatic patients can receive IG-HRT also for thoracic nodes metastases.</p>

restrictedMar 2020View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record