Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
875
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
875 results for “Infestation”
Figure 1 in Performance of Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) rearing on fruits of two guava varieties under forced infestation
Figure 1. Infestation parameters of Anastrepha fraterculus in guavas "Tailandesa" (red pulp) and "Kumagai" (white pulp). Bars with different letters indicate significant differences by Student´s t-test (P <0.05).
Figure 4 in Performance of Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) rearing on fruits of two guava varieties under forced infestation
Figure 4. Plots of the principal component analysis of physical and physicochemical profile data for two guavas. PC1/PC2 scores () and loadings plot () accounted for 100.00% of the total variation. Samples: Red pulp ("Tailandesa" guava), White pulp ("Kumagai" guava). Trait abbreviations: pupae per fruit [PPF], pupal weight [PW], pupae per kg [PPK], pupal viability [PV], luminosity peel [LPE], a* peel [APE], b* peel [BPE], angle Hue peel [HPE], chromaticity peel [CPE], luminosity pulp [LPU], a* pulp [APU], b* pulp [BPU], angle Hue pulp [HPU], chromaticity pulp [CPU], peel firmness [PEF], pulp firmness [PUF], pH [PH], titratable acidity [TA], soluble solids [SS], ratio [RAT].
Figure 3 in Performance of Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) rearing on fruits of two guava varieties under forced infestation
Figure 3. Pupae of Anastrepha fraterculus per fruit or kg as function of pupal viability and, pupal weight versus guava weight of "Tailandesa" (red pulp) and "Kumagai" (white pulp) varieties (n=42).
Figure 2 in Performance of Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) rearing on fruits of two guava varieties under forced infestation
Figure 2. Pupal infestation pattern of Anastrepha fraterculus in guavas "Tailandesa" (red pulp) and "Kumagai" (white pulp) (n=42).
Figure 2 in Trichodinid fauna of freshwater fishes with infestation indices in the Lower Kızılırmak Delta in Turkey and a checklist of trichodinids (Ciliophora: Trichodinidae) in Turkish waters
Figure 2. Trichodinid parasites identified on Lower Kızılırmak Delta fishes: A) T. lepsii, B) T. puytoraci, C) T. domerguei, D) T. heterodentata, E) Paratrichodina corlissi, F) T. domerguei, G) T. modesta, H) Tripartiella macrosoma, I) T. acuta, J) T. lucioperca, K) T. tenuidens, L) Trichodina sp1, M) T. cobitis, N) Trichodina sp2, O) Trichodina sp3.
Figure 1 in Invertebrate infestation in green turtle (Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus, 1758)) and loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758)) nests on Alata Beach, Mersin, Turkey
Figure 1. The important sea turtle nesting beaches in Turkey and a general view of Alata beach showing the back structure.
Fig. 3 in Morphological traits, allometric relationship and competition of two seed-feeding species of beetles in infested pods
Fig. 3. Negative allometry depicted by the slopes and their confidence intervals for the pronotum and elytron allometry (pronotum length and elytron length in relation to body weight) between infestation categories for both bruchine species. G1, low infestation (0–0.30% of attacked seeds); G2, medium infestation (0.31–0.60% of attacked seeds); G3, high infestation (0.61–0.90% of attacked seeds).
Fig. 1 in Morphological traits, allometric relationship and competition of two seed-feeding species of beetles in infested pods
Fig. 1. Variations in body weight, pronotum and elytron length between Merobruchus terani and Stator maculatopygus and for males and females. The analyses used a linear mixed model with a log-normal distribution and Tukey's pairwise comparison. MF, M. terani females; MM, M. terani males; SF, S.maculatopygus females; SM, S. maculatopygus males.
Figure S1 in Do Castanea sativa wild provenances influence Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) infestations?
Figure S1. Results of climatic data analysis of the interval June–July (left panel a) and December–February (right panel b) in 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016. Temperature and relative humidity indicate mean value (dot) and standard error (bars). Rain is the sum of total rainfall in the interval, without confidence interval. The left vertical axis is divided in two sections, the average temperature at bottom, and the relative humidity at the top, respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences between years at p <0.05. Differences between years in temperature and relative humidity were tested with ANOVA and posthoc Tukey HSD test (p <0.05). Difference in rainfall between years were tested with x!-test (p <0.05).
Figure 3 in Do Castanea sativa wild provenances influence Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) infestations?
Figure 3. Infestation by D. kuriphilus on six C. sativa provenances grown in common garden field trial, during the years 2015 (top plots) and 2016 (bottom plots). Panels a) and c) number of gallsper shoot/branch; b) and d) number of cells per gall. Bars represent mean and standard error. Within each plot, different letters indicate significant difference between provenances after Bonferroni posthoc test at p <0.05.
Figure 1 in Do Castanea sativa wild provenances influence Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) infestations?
Figure 1. South Europe map localising the experimental site in Castel Giorgio (Italy) (black dot) where the investigation was conducted. Black stars and codes identify the provenance areas of the chestnuts that were considered in this study.
Figure 4 in Infestation and effect of parasitic isopod Epipenaeon ingens ingens Nobili, 1906 on commercial shrimp species in the eastern Mediterranean: a case study of the population of brown shrimp Penaeus aztecus Ives, 1891
Figure 4. Data of E. ingens ingens. Expected (pink logistic line) percentage of a female with male, expected (red logistic line) and observed percentage (red circular) of Ov-F, and size structure of female parasite (thick line), female accompanied with male (broken line) and Ov-F (thin line), size at first accompaniment (FAS ) and size at first maturity (FMS ).
Figure 2 in Infestation and effect of parasitic isopod Epipenaeon ingens ingens Nobili, 1906 on commercial shrimp species in the eastern Mediterranean: a case study of the population of brown shrimp Penaeus aztecus Ives, 1891
Figure 2. Percentage of infected and uninfected shrimps by carapace length (CL) and by sex of P. aztecus sampled in Antalya Bay (red circular: an observed percentage of the infection, thick line: correlation line).
Figure 6 in Infestation and effect of parasitic isopod Epipenaeon ingens ingens Nobili, 1906 on commercial shrimp species in the eastern Mediterranean: a case study of the population of brown shrimp Penaeus aztecus Ives, 1891
Figure 6. Box and Whisker plot representation of the negative effect of E. ingens ingens on the gonadal development of the female host shrimp P. aztecus.
Fig. 9 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 9. Number and sex ratio of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in bitter gourd plot treated with Thai bait.
Fig. 8 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 8. Number and sex ratio of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in bitter gourd plot treated with Pinnacle bait.
Fig. 5 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 5. Species and number of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in angled luffa plots treated with Pinnacle bait.
Fig. 4 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 4. Percentage of infested fruits of bitter gourd in plots treated with Pinnacle, Thai baits and untreated. (Only Bactrocera cucurbitae and B. tau were found.)
Fig. 1 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 1. Funnel trap for dead fruit flies collecting in plots treated with baits (1=waxed cardboard funnel; 2=plastic basket; 3=plastic glass, 4=formalin (5%), 5=string and 6=post).
Fig. 6 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand
Fig. 6. Species and number of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in bitter guard plots treated with Pinnacle and the Thai baits (Both sexes were collected).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.